跳转到内容

User talk:Rethliopuks

页面内容不支持其他语言。
维基百科,自由的百科全书

既往讨论已于2024年12月03日存档至User talk:Rethliopuks/结构式讨论 存档 1

您好,Rethliopuks!欢迎加入维基百科!

感謝您對維基百科的興趣與貢獻,希望您會喜歡這裡。除了歡迎辭以外,也請您了解以下重要文章:

政策
政策
GNU
GNU

版權問題解答貢獻內容必须是您所著或獲得授權
并同意在CC-by-sa-3.0和GFDL條款下發布

手冊
手冊
問號
問號
有问题?請到互助客栈询问,或在我的对话页提出。别忘記:討論後要簽名,方式之一是留下4個波浪紋「 ~~~~ 」。
If you have any questions about the Chinese Wikipedia, please leave a message here. Thank you for visiting!

我是欢迎您的维基人:Jack Tao(留言) 2010年6月27日 (日) 06:49 (UTC)[回复]

About the page“希臘字母” in Chinese Wikipedia.

[编辑]

Please check these pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet (page "Greek alphabet" in English Wikipedia)
http://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ελληνικό_αλφάβητο (page "Greek alphabet" in Greek Wikipedia)
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet_grec (page"Greek alphabet" in French Wikipedia)
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ギリシア文字 (page"Greek alphabet" in Japanese Wikipedia)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griechisches_Alphabet (page "Greek alphabet" in German wikipedia)

Thanks. Rethliopuks (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 15:12 (UTC)[回复]

Foreign western, but not eastern wikis are bad - current 希腊字母 is based on verifiable external sources:

You are breaking wikilink consensus established by admin User:Symplectopedia, so please stop or you will be blocked by administrators if you continue. I revert on behalf of Chinese administrators. ريال (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 15:13 (UTC) ريال (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 15:13 (UTC)[回复]

For your first point: Yes, one or two of them may be wrong, so I checked several languages (such as Fr/Eng/Jpn/Deu), and for the safety, I checked GREEK Wiki (it is their "mother alphabets"). They all show things same or similar with what I said. So, I could believe that I am right.

But in fact, the main reason is...

For your second point: I've studied for Greek for a period of time, so I trust what I studied is correct. In fact, I am now suspecting that why you only trust Turkish Wikipedia, and why you believe western wiki (such as English and Greek) are bad?

In my opinion, the source of modern spelling should differ from truth. If you don't believe things from (all Greece people) and (foreigners who studied or are now studying Greek), you should believe things from English wiki and Greek wiki. If you don't trust Western wikis at all, you should believe what Japanese wiki at least - in this problem. In fact, all the person or wiki I've mentioned will gve you the same as, or just a little different from my opinion.

I don't know if I made it clear. Another thing, it seems that the man you mentioned is not a real admin yet.Rethliopuks (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 16:01 (UTC)[回复]

I don't believe Wikipedias, I only believe Unicode, because bunch of classicists already gave me quantum-blurred values of Greek letter phonetic values, while http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt gives me strict singular values of classical values of Greek letter phonetic values, derived from first letter of each Greek letter name placed in http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt ريال (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 16:10 (UTC)[回复]

Uh, interesting. IS "http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yunan_alfabesi" THE TURKISH VERSION? It shows the same things as I said! There is little difference between this wiki and Eng/Fra/Deu/Jpn/Greek wiki! Rethliopuks (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 16:11 (UTC)[回复]

It only served as modern spelling hint, like spelling of names in this template, while all sound values I derived from initial letters of Greek letter names in http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt primary source, like A as Alpha, etc... Note that http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt is only source that covers all archaic letters and their values at once, which are present in:

File:Greek Alphabet Unicode.png

at once. All other sources are only subsets of http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt . ريال (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 16:23 (UTC)[回复]

ريال (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 16:18 (UTC)[回复]

But these two files, neither of them shows the pronunciation and transliteration, aren't it? Both of them is just lists.Rethliopuks (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 16:32 (UTC)[回复]

I agree the existence of these Greek alphabets and their Unicode codes. I just think your "pronunciation (present)" and "transliteration" partly are wrong. Rethliopuks (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 16:41 (UTC)[回复]

Even if these lists do not provide pronunciation/transliteration directly, they provide it indirectly, as follows:

Alpha
Beta
Gamma
Delta
Epsilon
Digamma
Stigma
Zeta
Heta
Eta
Theta
Iota
Yot
Kappa
Lamda
Mu
Nu
Xi
Omicron
Pi
San
Koppa
Rho
Sigma
Tau
Upsilon
Phi
Chi
Psi
Omega
Sampi
Sho

where both pronunciation and transliteration is provided from primary bold initial letter and breathing (h) / hissing (s) secondary bold letter when applicable. Note that Xi hides K initial and s hissing inside X initial, but it is spelled as Xi in Unicode. Even Wau spelling is derived from Unicode "COPTIC CAPITAL LETTER OLD NUBIAN WAU" inside Greek Coptic range of blocks. The same principle was reapplied to Turkish-derived modern Greek letter names. As you see, all is now as simple as possible, without uncertainity overhead, that formerly was provided by existence of several alternative phonetic/graphemic values for the same letter. Simply, we now have 1:1 correspondence, backed by singular verifiable source like http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt . ريال (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 17:02 (UTC)[回复]

Well, if you want to explain them by their NAME, their names are now pronounced as:

alfa

vita

ɣamma

ðelta

epsilon

zita

ita

θita

iota

kappa

lamða

mi

ni

ksi

omikɾon

pi

ɾo

siɣma

tau

ipsilon

fi

xi

psi

omeɣa

"x" is “清軟齶擦音/清软颚擦音(Voiceless velar fricative)”,not "ks".

In Greek, when "x" "k" "ɣ" "g" is behind /i/ or /e/, they become "ç" "c" "ʝ" "ɟ".

also……“According to en:WP:VER>en:WP:VER#Wikipedia_and_sources_that_mirror_or_use_it one wiki cannot be used as source for another wiki at least in serious matters like phonetic value definitions, etc... - only direct basing of text on external sources is allowed. Rethliopuks (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 17:03 (UTC)[回复]

I of course wanted to explain all by classic names as they are in Unicode, to recover classic graphemic and phonemic values, because they are less redundant than modern versions, and because they are more unambiguous at all. ريال (留言) 2010年7月6日 (二) 19:09 (UTC)[回复]

维基百科:投票/開放IP創建條目權限 (第二次)已经开始

[编辑]

维基百科:投票/開放IP創建條目權限 (第二次)已经开始了。由于上次组织者的缺乏经验导致最后结果产生争议,现经过上次共识的三个月试行,相信各位用户已经对开放IP创文权有一定的认识,希望您可以再次前往参与。—Edouardlicn (留言) 2010年12月21日 (二) 05:02 (UTC)[回复]

邀請討論2011年香港春聚

[编辑]
邀請你的維基人是:拉叔(留言~) 2011年4月15日 (五) 06:43 (UTC)[回复]

邀請你的維基人是:拉叔(留言~) 2011年4月15日 (五) 06:43 (UTC)[回复]

邀請出席2011年香港春聚

[编辑]

拉叔(留言~) 2011年4月24日 (日) 05:25 (UTC)[回复]

送给您一枚星章!

[编辑]
原星章
good--鄧小平複制人黃魯宏(user:cn223)() 2013年1月29日 (二) 22:59 (UTC)[回复]

关于大明藩属朝鲜国纪年问题

[编辑]

您好,近来朝鲜条目被加上明朝年号一事未有共识,已在社群发起投票,请您拨冗前往维基百科:投票/朝鲜王朝相关条目是否该加上明朝年号参与投票讨论,感谢您。---- 行走京滬线  旅客留言  时刻表  2013年12月16日 (一) 17:36 (UTC)[回复]