Wikidata:Property proposal/Wine color
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wine color
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science
Not done
| Description | Wine's color |
|---|---|
| Represents | wine color (Q8024923) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | wine (Q282) |
| Allowed values | rosé (Q12979), red wine (Q1827), white wine (Q10210) |
| Example 1 | Q55589962 -> red wine (Q1827) |
| Example 2 | Château de l'Éclair (Q55590045) -> white wine (Q10210) |
| Example 3 | Q55590048 -> rosé (Q12979) |
Motivation
(Add your motivation for this property here.) 2A01:E35:2E5C:3AD0:2DA3:F420:A0D3:DE38 20:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC) I wan't create a wine ontology in wikidata with all characteristics.
Discussion
Comment I'm french so I guess that I will have to support this proposal. ^_^' -- Thibdx (talk) 11:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)- Comment I would have thought instance of (P31) or color (P462) would suffice here? In any case, the proposal needs a lot of work - the examples should be showing actual wikidata items, etc. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Thibdx, ArthurPSmith: I have changed the template parameters to grasp the proposer's intention. By the way, the superclasses of Beaujolais wine (Q616) are not only wine (Q282) but also wine-producing region (Q2140699) and viticulture (Q253140)? We must correct the upper ontology of wine. --Okkn (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: You are right, color (P462) will make the job. One point could be that there is 3 main colors of wine : red, white and rosé. Then there is subcolors. It only make sense to have a dedicated paramater if we want to force a strcutured database with a selector, avoiding exotic subcolors. Maybe having color (P462) for eventual subcolors. I changed my vote. -- Thibdx (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Oppose I see no reason why the existing properties don't work. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 11:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)- Oppose color seems good for this Nepalicoi (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC)