Pages that link to "Q46799122"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following pages link to Is spinal cord isolation a good model of muscle disuse? (Q46799122):
Displaying 16 items.
- Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face (Q33347554) (← links)
- Metallothionein deficiency leads to soleus muscle contractile dysfunction following acute spinal cord injury in mice (Q33579211) (← links)
- Distribution and localization of 5-HT(1A) receptors in the rat lumbar spinal cord after transection and deafferentation (Q33689687) (← links)
- Effects of baclofen on motor units paralysed by chronic cervical spinal cord injury (Q33803683) (← links)
- Persistence of motor unit and muscle fiber types in the presence of inactivity (Q33968597) (← links)
- Transcriptional regulation of the myosin heavy chain IIb gene in inactive rat soleus (Q34008202) (← links)
- Application of a Rat Hindlimb Model: A Prediction of Force Spaces Reachable Through Stimulation of Nerve Fascicles (Q34958960) (← links)
- Gene expression during inactivity-induced muscle atrophy: effects of brief bouts of a forceful contraction countermeasure (Q36956454) (← links)
- Activity-dependent plasticity of spinal locomotion: implications for sensory processing (Q37464716) (← links)
- Neuromuscular adaptations to respiratory muscle inactivity. (Q37863997) (← links)
- Novel multi-system functional gains via task specific training in spinal cord injured male rats. (Q37718864) (← links)
- Biomechanics and structural adaptations of the rat femur after hindlimb suspension and treadmill running (Q44118120) (← links)
- Electromechanical stimulation ameliorates inactivity-induced adaptations in the medial gastrocnemius of adult rats (Q46115273) (← links)
- Does elimination of afferent input modify the changes in rat motoneurone properties that occur following chronic spinal cord transection? (Q51727927) (← links)
- CrossTalk opposing view: The diaphragm muscle does not atrophy as a result of inactivity (Q86640034) (← links)
- Rebuttal from Gary C. Sieck and Carlos B. Mantilla (Q86640036) (← links)