Property talk:P1891

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

signatory
person, country, or organization that has signed an official document (use P50 for author)
Representssignatory (Q28008347)
Data typeItem
Template parameter"signers" in en:Template:Infobox document
Domain
According to this template: document (Q49848) and its subclasses
According to statements in the property:
document (Q49848), contract (Q93288) or law (Q7748)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesitems with instance of human (Q5) (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleUnited States Declaration of Independence (Q127912)Benjamin Harrison V (Q387664)
Edward Rutledge (Q878666)
Benjamin Franklin (Q34969)
Treaty of Fredrikshamn (Q1130792)Nikolay Rumyantsev (Q546048)
David Alopaeus (Q1175557)
Curt von Stedingk (Q559295)
Anders Fredrik Skjöldebrand (Q3352340)
Sourceitem, external reference (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896))
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P1891 (Q29168738)
See alsoratified by (P6193), number of request signatories (P9740)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total55,605
Main statement31,06655.9% of uses
Qualifier24,27143.6% of uses
Reference2680.5% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): human (Q5): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1891#Conflicts with P31, search, SPARQL
Type “document (Q49848), contract (Q93288), law (Q7748): item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “document (Q49848), contract (Q93288), law (Q7748)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1891#Type Q49848, Q93288, Q7748, SPARQL
Value type “human (Q5), state (Q7275), organization (Q43229), person or organization (Q106559804): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31), subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value human (Q5), state (Q7275), organization (Q43229), person or organization (Q106559804) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1891#Value type Q5, Q7275, Q43229, Q106559804, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1891#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1891#Scope, SPARQL

Joint statement

[edit]

I just created joint statement (Q107013291) and added it to about 15 documents titled as instance of "joint statement". I listed signatories to some of these.

So far as I could tell, previously many of these statements were only labeled as documents.

Instead of instance of joint statement, they could be instance of document where genre (P136) is joint statement. Thoughts from anyone? In any case, anything titled "joint statement" is likely to have signatories. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]