Avatar

counter, original, spare, strange

@gothhabiba / gothhabiba.tumblr.com

πŸ¦‡ Najia. 1995. she / he / they πŸ¦‡
Avatar

[ID: Every film on archive.org sorted by date published from earliest to latest. There are 66,923 results; the first page is all in black and white and covers the years from 1874 to 1895. End ID]

I've decided to watch every movie. my favourite so far is the 1895 one with the kid trying to catch the fish in the fish bowl. he's not even good at it

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
gothhabiba

I can't lie, I find it very odd that posts cautioning people against donating to individual* campaigns and promoting the idea of supporting mutual aid efforts and community kitchens in Gaza can rack up 10k notes--while a post promoting a community kitchen (that I can personally vouch for) struggles to get 1k notes, and has barely pulled in a couple hundred dollars over the past week.

I actively try to avoid using guilting tactics in fundraising, but this is weird to me. It's like people are using these posts as an excuse not to do things they already didn't want to do anyway, rather than actually taking their recommendations on board...

*In my experience, these campaigns often support large extended families their neighbours

MAQMAP is a community kitchen aiming to support families in the Mawasi Al-Qarara area.

Mohammed is planning to distribute food parcels, each containing one liter of vegetable oil, one kilo of sugar, one kilo of rice, one kilo of lentils, one kilo of pasta, and a can of sauce, to the 70 families in Mawasi Al-Qarara camp later this week.

Thank you so much for all of your help so far. Any money that you can spare would really help to keep this initiative going in the coming weeks.

The organisers have begun to purchase and hand out food parcels! For the next parcels, they plan to supplement the flour and other essentials with fruits and vegetables. Not only starvation but also malnourishment are killing people in Gaza.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
gothhabiba

Fundraiser with 0 donations that needs attention

This fundraiser belongs to Mohammed Abu Alwan's brother and so is vetted by association.

From the fundraiser page:

I am Salah Elwan. I live in Gaza. I am 32 years old. My family consists of 5 members, me and my wife Aseel, my children Ahmed and Sham, and the newborn that my wife gave birth to during the war, Nour El-Din. Before the war, I was working as an interior designer, and the living conditions for me and my family were wonderful, but since the beginning of the aggression against Gaza and the war of extermination that we are exposed to in Gaza, we have been living with death every second and fighting the most powerful terrorist army in the world. We have been dying of hunger, thirst and killing at the hands of the Israeli occupation for more than a year. This account was created to donate to help me and my family, provide living needs, and live in peace like the rest of the people in the world. Please do not ignore us, we desperately need your donations and support.

Salah’s middle child has a congenital a heart defect and needs medical care ‼️

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
gothhabiba

Tatreez commissions for Palestine

I am opening custom tatreez commissions to support Samar and Mohammed Abu Alwan, who are trying to feed an extended family of 15 (including children and elders) and help their neighbours in Gaza.

I'll design and create a piece for you for proof of donation of a minimum of $75 USD. 100% of what you pay goes to the family: nothing will be deducted for materials, labour, or shipping.

Please consider donating even if you can't or don't wish to purchase a commission. Every member of this family needs medical care, and yet they can seldom access it because they're being forced to decide between food and medicine.

Or use:

Venmo: gothhabiba Paypal: paypal.me/Najia Cashapp: $NajiaK

all with note "πŸ“" or "strawberry"

$169 / $1,000 to pay for January's rent

This family is in danger of being evicted. Samar is still in the hospital and needs a safe place to come back to!

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
txttletale

ironically "stripping the original creator of the ability to make a livelihood from their work" is something that only copyright law is capable of doing

worst case scenario when someone james somerton style unambiguously maliciously jacks your shit at least you still have your original shit, no amount of plagiarism or piracy can stop you from continuing to make and monetise your own art -- for that you need a publisher, studio, or record label that can threaten to sue you into oblivion if you violate their copyright on the thing you made!

Avatar
reblogged

The Search for Mrs. Bingley

By now many Austen fans are familiar with a letter the author wrote to her sister Cassandra, claiming to have discovered Mrs. Jane Bingley's exact likeness in an exhibition of portraits:

Monday, May 24, 1813 [...] Henry & I went to the exhibition in Spring Gardens. It is not thought a good collection, but I was very well pleasedβ€”particularly (pray tell Fanny) with a small portrait of Mrs. Bingley, excessively like her. I went in hopes of seeing one of her Sister, but there was no Mrs. Darcy;β€”perhaps however, I may find her in the Great Exhibition which we shall go to, if we have time;β€”I have no chance of her in the collection of Sir Joshua Reynolds’s Paintings which is now showing in Pall Mall, & which we are also to visit.β€”Mrs. Bingley’s is exactly herself, size, shaped face, features & sweetness; there never was a greater likeness. She is dressed in a white gown, with green ornaments, which convinces me of what I had always supposed, that green was a favourite colour with her.* I dare say Mrs. D. will be in Yellow. […] β€”Monday evenβ€”We have been both to the Exhibition & Sir J. Reynolds’,β€”and I am disappointed, for there was nothing like Mrs. D. at either.β€”I can only imagine that Mr. D. prizes any Picture of her too much to like it should be exposed to the public eye.β€”I can imagine he wd have that sort [of ommitted] feelingβ€”that mixture of Love, Pride & Delicacy. Setting aside this disappointment, I had great amusement among the Pictures; & the Driving about, the Carriage been open, [sic] was very pleasant (Le Faye, pp. 212-3).

Of course Austen scholars have searched for this portrait. The first resource to check is of course the catalogue of this exhibition, which was The Exhibition of the Society of Painters in Oil and Water Colours at The Great Room, Spring Gardens in London.

In 1986, Lance Bertelson used this catalogue to narrow down the possibilities, as he saw them, to 5:

  1. Huet-Villiers, "Portrait of Mrs. Crompton" (catalogue no. 3)
  2. Huet-Villiers, "Portrait of a Lady" (no. 27)
  3. C. J. Robertson, "Portrait of Lady Anderson" (no. 15)
  4. C. J. Robertson, "Portrait of Mrs. Clarke, of Weston [listed as such in the catalogue: but it should be 'Welton'] Place" (no. 116)
  5. C. J. Robertson, "Portrait of Lady Nelthorpe" (no. 246).

He writes, however, that his "inquiries to major public collections in Britain and the USA have failed to turn up any of the above paintings"; but they may still exist in private collections. He says we know the portrait of Lady Nelthorpe to have been in Mrs. C. B. Prowse's private collection as of 1929. It was described by Basil Long thusly:

It is on ivory, about 7 3/4 in. x 5 3/4 in., and is signed at the back C. J. Robertson, pinxit / Apr: 1813. It is a 3/4 length portrait of a lady seated on a rustic bench in a landscape, with her hat on her lap... The face is shaded with brown and gray.

Two years later, in 1988, Martha Rainbolt has more success: she writes that "[b]y searching through the art libraries in London and this country [the USA], I have found some of the portraits and information about some of the other ones" (very annoyingly, she does not say where). She lists out 11 possibilities for the painting of Jane Bennet Bingleyβ€”everything in the catalogue claiming to feature a "girl," "Miss," "Mrs.," or "Lady":

  1. "Girl in a Wood," Thomas Uwins (sometimes spelled Unwins)
  2. "Girl decorating her Hair with Hops," Thomas Uwins
  3. "Girl Reading a Ballad," Thomas Uwins
  4. "Portrait of a Lady in the Character of Hebe," Jean Francois Marie Huet-Villiers
  5. "Portrait of Lady Nelthorpe," Charles John Robertson
  6. "Portrait of Lady Anderson," Charles John Robertson
  7. "Portrait of Mrs. Crompton," Jean Huet-Villiers
  8. "Portrait of Miss Smirnove," James Stephanoff
  9. "Portrait of a Young Lady," James Hewlett
  10. "Portrait of Mrs. Clarke, of Weston [sic] Place," Charles John Robertson
  11. "Portrait of a Lady," Jean Huet-Villiers

According to Rainbolt, paintings 1 and 2 can be eliminated because they are of children. Painting 3 "is a work in the Italian style, rather grand and quite romanticized. This woman with her dark hair and sentimental look could not be the likeness of Jane Bingley" (I can't say I understand why Rainbolt thinks that Jane mustn't have dark hair). Painting 4 is of "a bare bosomed, very voluptuous lady sharing the canvas with an eagle who is hovering over her cup," and Rainbolt feels that this, too, can be eliminated.

Painting 5 is a possibility which Bertelson also mentioned. However, Rainbolt points out that it is a miniature, and Austen described the picture of Mrs. Bingley as a "small portrait"; and that Lady Nelthorpe would have been middle-aged at this time, and so not a good candidate for 23-year-old Mrs. Bingley. Of painting 6, Rainbolt says that the subject would also be too old (as she had been middle-aged as of the late 1780s).

This leaves paintings 7 through 11. Rainbolt was only able to locate information about one of them: #11, Jean Huet-Villiers' "Portrait of a Lady."

We don't still have this portrait. We don't know whether it still exists, and we don't have any photographs taken of it. What we do have is what is likely a copy of the portrait, in the form of a tinted engraving by William Blake:

The title of the engraving ("Mrs. Q," referring to Harriet Quentin, mistress of the Prince of Wales) is different from what the exhibition catalogue lists as the title of the Huet-Villiers portrait, but Rainbolt doesn't see this as problematic: the title had likely been changed in the exhibition to maintain the subject's anonymity, as was common practice at the time.

Rainbolt felt that the colour of the gown and ornament, and the "sweetness" of the face depicted, made it very likely that this was the portrait in questionβ€”though she notes that "It would be helpful if the portraits of Mrs. Crompton, Miss Smirnove, Hewlett's 'Young Lady,' and Mrs. Clarke would surface to be examined."

There was also a small problem, in the fact that Austen wrote green ornaments, while this gown only has one: but Rainbolt thinks that "This discrepancy might be explained by the circumstances: Jane Austen was writing an informal letter to her sister recalling the exhibition; she did not have the portrait in front of her when she wrote."

Deirdre Le Faye, writing in 1997, feels the question to still be an open one:

[...] [T]he three miniatures by Charles John Robertson in the same exhibition, of Lady Nelthorpe (No. 246) and her sisters-in-law Lady Anderson (No. 15), and Mrs. Clark of Welton [not Weston] Place (No. 116), cannot be completely ruled out as alternatives. (Footnote 4, pp. 416-7)

However, in the years since Le Faye wrote, and apparently without anyone noticing (?), that first miniature has appeared on auction site Christie's:

I think we can rule out this portrait as a possibility, due to the lack of any green ornamentation to the gown.

Bibliography

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
gothhabiba

There are rumours that the Rafah crossing is going to re-open soon. Ghadir and her brother Mohammed want to get out of Gaza so that they can start to earn money to help the rest of their family flee. They need to raise $5,000 as quickly as possible (which will bring us up to $11k on the campaign page).

This is a really attainable goal and it could make an enormous difference, not just for Ghadir and Mohammed, but for Remas, Toleen, and the entire family.

You can also give to venmo @gothhabiba, cashapp $NajiaK, or PayPal.me/Najia with note β€œπŸŠβ€ or β€œorange”

$0 / $5,000

$2,654 / $5,000

Halfway there!!!

Avatar

We're already a few days into the new month and Mohammed is going to need to pay his rent very soon! He's trying to keep his three young children fed and housed, all while taking care of his wife in the hospital, and supporting his community.

You can help via: Venmo: gothhabiba Paypal: paypal.me/Najia Cashapp: $NajiaK

all with note "πŸ“" or "strawberry"

Or via GFM:

$37 / $1,000

Avatar

It's a new year, a time when many people set goals. Whether that's personal goals, career goals, fitness goals, you name it! Regardless of how that looks for you, I hope it goes well.

While the rest of the world celebrates a new year, the people of Gaza remain at the mercy of iof violence and displacement, and if not that, the bitter chill of winter with no shelter to protect themselves or their children. Mahmoud ( @ma7moudgaza2 ) and his family are receiving only $10-$20 per day in donations. This is not enough to meet their daily needs for survival! Please read Mahmoud's story in his own words.

In the spirit of making positive strides, why not set a goal to help those in need? It doesn't have to be a grand gesture. Donating, reblogging, sharing with your friends, queueing their campaign, it all adds up and helps this family! Please put some good into this world and lend them your support.

Tagging for reach:

Avatar
reblogged

so it’s not very good, but uh, i was testing out some new markers…

‼️ READ FULL POST !!! ‼️

i’m going to ask you all to perform a simple thought exercise. what are you like as a person?

what do you like? do you like comics, or tv shows, or knitting? do you quilt, maybe? do you collect something? do you draw, do you play metal music, or do you build things?

what’s your family like? is it big? small? do you live with your family? are you close?

what’s your day like? do you work? if so, what do you do? if you don’t, do you study? do you have a specific class you like?

just like anyone, i am a person. i collect comic books, i paint my nails black because my stepmom hates it, i draw in my free time, and i like to cook even if i’m not very good at it.

and nothing ever hurt me more than the realization that people just like me endure nightmarish pain every single day, just for the crime of being born in the wrong land.

hello! i’m here on behalf of ahmed (@ilovelifetbh). the photo above is a drawing of his two children. ahmed is the brother-in-law of a dear friend of mine, and by that, ahmed is my friend as well.

none of us want to see our friends anything other than happy. but every day i hear news coming from gaza; famine, bombs, sickness, and death. i just want my friends to live! i want them to be happy! i want a world where a child’s biggest worry is that they aren’t allowed to eat sweets before dinner, not whether or not they or their family will survive a genocide!

i want to live in a world where people can be free! where people can dance, and live, and love one another without the threat of gunfire and violence!

and every day i become more and more hopeless about that world.

so i’m here to beg you to help. donate if you canβ€” if you can’t, reblog. please.

if you cannot help for the sake of aiding palestinians, help for the sake of making the world better all around.

Avatar
gothhabiba

Ahmed has gotten no donations for two weeks!

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
gothhabiba

[ID: reply reading "Finally someone that saw the same movie I did, all the "but it's racist, and misogynistic so it's the worse movie ever" comments are killing me"; someone replied and said "What parts are people claiming to be racist???"; the original commenter replied with "Honestly I have no idea, I just read an entire rant about how this version somehow managed to be even more racist than the original and the movie was" text cuts off. end ID]

so you don't even know what the argument is of this one person who felt that the movie was racist, but you still assume that you can dismiss that argument as obviously stupid, not worth listening to or considering, and necessarily proceeding from a complete lack of attention to the movie? despite the fact that, again, you did not even read, pay attention to, understand, or remember that argument? how arrogant can you get?

The ideas that these arrogant, incurious, & frankly racist people have, are roughlyβ€”

  1. It is always and automatically insufficiently enlightened, attentive, sensitive, nuanced, intellectual, sophisticated, and analytical, to call something "racist." It always and automatically points to a failure to engage with a text, a hyperactive willingness to be offended, a kind of racial hysteria or paranoia on the part of the critic (psychiatric terms used on purpose here).
  2. Hidden underneath this: people of colour are always and automatically less capable than white people of 'intellectual' work and analysis; the analyses of white people may be 'universal' and 'objective,' devoid of identity; but the analyses of people of colour are always tainted with their racialisation, unless perhaps they take particular pains to distance themselves from it.
  3. It is always and automatically sensitive, rigorous, and sophistated to insist that something is not racist, that it is ironic, that it is satirical, that racialised discourses are used on purpose to effect without being bought into, &c. &c. &c. (n.b. I'm obviously not saying that sometimes this isn't arguably true of a given text).
  4. 'Primary' texts, especially those by white authors, are worthy of close attention, nuance, sympathy, and significant efforts to understand and think with and through them. 'Secondary' texts, especially those by people of colour, especially those that criticise 'primary' texts by white authors, are not worthy of any such thing.

These people are uncomfortable that anyone cares about racism or is willing to talk about it and try to analyse it, and they just want those people to shut up. We deal with this again and again inside and outside the academy, it's always the same rodeo. The worst, least sensitive, most obvious misunderstanding of a text has more genuine integrity and interest than these people's arrogant dismissals.

Avatar

[ID: reply reading "Finally someone that saw the same movie I did, all the "but it's racist, and misogynistic so it's the worse movie ever" comments are killing me"; someone replied and said "What parts are people claiming to be racist???"; the original commenter replied with "Honestly I have no idea, I just read an entire rant about how this version somehow managed to be even more racist than the original and the movie was" text cuts off. end ID]

so you don't even know what the argument is of this one person who felt that the movie was racist, but you still assume that you can dismiss that argument as obviously stupid, not worth listening to or considering, and necessarily proceeding from a complete lack of attention to the movie? despite the fact that, again, you did not even read, pay attention to, understand, or remember that argument? how arrogant can you get?

Avatar
reblogged

People not comprehending Nosferatu correctly might kill me. Yes it's erotic and about pleasure but yes it's devastating and about child sexual abuse. It's a movie about victimhood, about being already dead, about longing for the great beyond, about never feeling safe from your abuser, about always expecting one more rape must be endured. It is about being an ugly victim, a neurotic victim. About your supposed allies tying you down for fear you will rip their world to ribbons. It is about facing the abuser, facing the pleasure the abuser brought. It is about men seeking to silence a plague in the quiet of the night when grooming and abuse can only be destroyed by pulling it into the light of morning.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
gothhabiba

Nosferatu (2024)

  • I'll tell you right now that I'm going to call everyone by their Dracula names because I'm sorry but I don't know the proper ones
  • The camera angle when the first Germany part of the movie opens! you're so in the streets, so in the crowds. idk if that's the cinematography or just that I haven't seen a film on such a large screen in a long time?
  • The scenes with Count Orlac in the castle and how civil he is in his speech (demanding to be addressed by his proper title; forbidding Jonathan to leave but saying "you will stay as I advise," not e.g. "as I command"), and how thin but impenetrable that veneer of civility is. For "civility" read here all of its implications of "civilisation"
  • The first scene of the ship being in perfect profile, sailing on a sunny sea with picturesque clouds in the background, just like a painting!! like an Age of Sail painting, and all the things about aesthetics, colonialism, depiction-as-claiming-of-ownership, that that implies.
  • And then the next time you see the ship, it's storming, the camera pans in from over the stern and forward, the ship is rocking, it's much more down in it, the sunny idealism of imperialist fortune-making brought down to its gritty reality
  • The East As Contagion (free square)
  • Major missed opportunity to make the ship more explicitly imperialism-flavoured
  • Female Sexuality As Dangerous And Inviting Contagion (free square)
  • Lucy and Arthur already being married and having children, specifically her being pregnant again, Lucy and Arthur as "heterofuture" (after @metamatar), reproductive futurity, him being a shipman, their money being conspicuous and being from shipping--
  • then Mina having one of her episodes just as they're about to kiss, in the water, dress pulled up, legs open to the water (to the Contagion From The East), convulsing--! Inappropriate female sexuality (inadequately contained, inadequately future-oriented, the West as future, heterosexuality as future, female sequestration in the home to raise children who are also appropriately heterosexual as futurity) and how inappropriate female sexuality interrupts the heterofuture that Lucy & Arthur's almost-kiss represents.
  • Lucy being very light in colouring and lit so as to emphasise that fact, obsessively dressed in white and placed in all-white rooms, versus Mina being dark in colouring (I mean of hair & eyes) and dress, reproductive futurity as whiteness
  • The Insane Asylum piquing itself as morally upright, scientific, humane, modern, future-oriented institution; the doctor's "don't lock him [Renfield] up, we don't do that here"--and then of course he stays locked up and restrained, and more so than he was before the doctor spoke to him (so gently and kindly and civilly)
  • Renfield caressing a bird Dracula had given him and saying "master likes the pretty ones," Mina as bird, birds in cages as metaphor for Victorian womanhood and sequestration within the home, Jonathan saying immediately when the men plan to go hunt Dracula down that Mina isn't going
  • Something about the drunk (?) man gently banging his head against a wall whom they have to pass to get to Van Helsing's, and this coming on the heels of the scene in the asylum
  • Mina becoming poorly specifically when Jonathan leaves, her saying that she's unwell because he's gone, Lucy saying "and Jonathan leaving caused your..." and Mina finishing "melancholy." When, like, obviously what's being elided here is the idea that Mina is unwell because she's sexually unfulfilled, the Victorian idea that once a woman has sex she has to continue to or she'll become physically and mentally unwell--a series of ideas you may be most familiar with under the heading of "hysteria."
  • Mina talking about her "epilepsies," insert everything about Victorian medical science versus popular culture and how ambivalently epilepsy was treated as effectively demonic and uncontrollable on the one hand, or subjected to modernising theories of disease (including and especially mental illness) on the other hand--
  • which, obviously, the "science versus popular superstition" is a significant part of what animates this. I think they brought this out very well & maybe even a little too explicitly
  • The fact that it is Germany's (England's) "modern" and "scientific" ideas that allowed this to happen, when Nosferatu had grown weak in Transylvania because of the superstitions of the local populace and especially the "g*psies"--I have to think about it more but there's a countercurrent in there somewhere--expressing anxiety not necessarily on behalf of, but about, "Western" modernity and heterofuturity
  • That Mina x Jonathan sex scene was so good even & especially because of the demonic possession / doing-it-to-prove-a-point thing. they're so endlessly devoted to one another and I love them so much
  • Needed an intermission. really really needed an intermission
  • Just the sexiest Dracula adaptation ever. horniest by far, by far. yes, even including that other one, which really wasn't sexy or horny at all imo.
  • Whoever was involved in making this movie is very, very familiar with Victorian anxieties and motivations and rhetoric and very, very psychosexually disturbed. perfection
  • My girlfriend complained that all the sex was missionary-style but I think that worked perfectly. For one thing, think of "missionary" and all the colonial implications there. The implications of heterosexual reproduction specifically within marriage that it carries. Also the implications of domination that come with being physically on top of someone, and the fact that the way Nosferatu feeds on Jonathan bears close resemblance to the way he feeds on & has sex with Mina--
  • then Nosferatu apparently telling Mina that Jonathan was "pathetic" and "weak" and "womanish"--!!!!!!! And the image of spread legs (recall Mina's scene in the water, also Lucy after her death) as surrender. If all the sex and quasi-sex scenes weren't so formulaically heterosexual in this particular way, these parallels wouldn't work as well.
  • And speaking of Jonathan, it's also interesting that his seduction-by-three-brides-of-Dracula thing is cut out to emphasise instead Mina's seduction by Dracula. We don't get any of that reference to his "indiscretion" (with Mina holding his hand sympathetically, forgiving, perfect angelic Victorian wife) that we get in 1992.
  • Stupid ending. there is never a good or poetic or touching reason to kill the woman at the ending of a movie. it's always stupid. like I get that she sacrificed herself to save everyone and took agency by reversing things so that inside, within the home, within the bed was where the war was fought, and outside, with the men was just a diversion and I get that this is an intentional subversion of the Angel-in-the-Home bird-in-a-cage situation. I still think it's stupid.
  • When Jonathan kisses Mina's hand as she's naked, covered in blood, legs spread, covered by the body of Nosferatu, and he pulls away, and he's so covered in tears and snot and saliva and all those liquids make so many stringy trails in the backlit space between her hand and his face as he pulls away. so so so good.
  • the sound design was incredible

it's now cracking me up that I described an attitude of "penetration = dominance = masculinity" & "being penetrated = submission / being dominated = femininity" as "psychosexually disturbed." but you know what? I stand by it. nothing is more grotesque and disturbing than "normal" sex and Nosferatu (2024) understands that

Avatar

[ID: 1980s video game on an old mac desktop computer. In neon green on a black background are pictured a pixellated astroid belt and text reading "It is the year 2025. All telemarketers and unsolicited bulk e-mailers have been exiled to Phobos". End ID]

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
gothhabiba

Fundraiser with 0 donations that needs attention

This fundraiser belongs to Mohammed Abu Alwan's brother and so is vetted by association.

From the fundraiser page:

I am Salah Elwan. I live in Gaza. I am 32 years old. My family consists of 5 members, me and my wife Aseel, my children Ahmed and Sham, and the newborn that my wife gave birth to during the war, Nour El-Din. Before the war, I was working as an interior designer, and the living conditions for me and my family were wonderful, but since the beginning of the aggression against Gaza and the war of extermination that we are exposed to in Gaza, we have been living with death every second and fighting the most powerful terrorist army in the world. We have been dying of hunger, thirst and killing at the hands of the Israeli occupation for more than a year. This account was created to donate to help me and my family, provide living needs, and live in peace like the rest of the people in the world. Please do not ignore us, we desperately need your donations and support.
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.