๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐๐ฒ๐น๐๐จ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ? โ ๏ธ Vessels running on conventional fuels will have a greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity higher than the 2025 limit of 89.3 gCO2e/MJ, resulting in a compliance deficit and significant financial exposure to FuelEU penalties. Luckily, there are different strategies to decrease a vessel's GHG intensity and become #FuelEU compliant. The different options summarized: โฝ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ The most efficient way to decrease GHG intensity is shifting to lower intensity fuels. Blending biofuel with conventional fuel is seen as a logical route to compliance as it often doesn't require major vessel modifications. Using alternative fuels - like e-methanol or e-ammonia - does often requires retrofitting, but is even more beneficial under FuelEU regulation. In addition to having a very low GHG intensity, the energy provided by these fuels can be counted double in the GHG intensity calculations. This incentive is known as the '๐บ๐๐น๐๐ถ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ' ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ก๐ผ๐ป-๐๐ถ๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ข๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐ป and only applies from 2025 to 2033. ๐จ ๐๐ป๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐น๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป Ships with wind-asissted propulsion, for example by rotor sails, kites, hard or rigid sails, soft sails, suction wings or turbines, benefit from the reward factor for wind. Based on the available effective power and the propulsion power of the ship, a reward factor can be calculated which translates into a 1-5% discount on the vessel's annual GHG intensity. ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ ๐ข๐ป๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐น๐ From 2030, connecting to Onshore Power Supply (OPS) will be mandatory for container and passenger vessels. Already from 2025, all vessels will benefit from connecting to OPS, since the regulation assumes electricity delivered to the ship per OPS to have zero emissions. โ๏ธ ๐จ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐๐บ๐ FuelEU provides three so-called flexibility mechanisms. Banking and borrowing allow shifting compliance deficits or surpluses for the same vessel between years. Pooling allows balancing deficits and surpluses between vessels in the same reporting year. This way, a non-compliant vessel can achieve compliance by borrowing a compliance surplus from the next reporting year or by joining a pool with one or more overcompliant vessels. ๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐ Last but not least, compliance can be achieved by not undertaking any mitigating actions and pay the FuelEU penalty of about โฌ0,058 per MJ of non-compliant energy used. Want to learn more about #FuelEUMaritime? Make sure to follow zero44 to stay up to date with the latest developments.
zero44โs Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Sustainable processes also require risk management to minimize occurence of accidents. Green hydrogen is the key to reduce Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions and descarbonize the global economy. However, like any other chemicals, it has its own associated risks. This article makes an overview about diferent tools to ensure safety in green hydrogen production. #greenhydrogen #processsafety
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Carbon Markets Unveiled: A Comparative Analysis of Compliance and Voluntary Strategies! by Climate Compliance Carbon Markets, driven by regulatory mandates, compel large industrial entities to meet emission reduction targets through mechanisms like cap-and-trade systems or carbon taxes. Participants, often in high-emission sectors, acquire allowances to cover excess emissions or engage in emissions trading In contrast, Voluntary Carbon Markets operate on a voluntary basis, attracting diverse participants like businesses and individuals who voluntarily offset their emissions to demonstrate environmental responsibility. These markets, governed by recognized standards, generate carbon credits through emission reduction projects, with credits purchased by voluntary buyers. While compliance markets focus on strict regulatory adherence and are regionally or nationally based, voluntary markets offer a global reach, allowing participants to support projects worldwide Both markets play vital roles in mitigating climate change, with compliance markets ensuring regulatory compliance and voluntary markets fostering a proactive commitment to sustainability and corporate social responsibility #carbonmarketsย #compliancecarbonmarketย #voluntarycarbonmarketย #carboncreditsย #emissionsreductionย #netzeroย #carbontradingย #carbonoffsettingย #carbontaxย #climatechangeย #climateactionย #mitigationย #climatemitigationย #decarbonizationย #capandtradeย #greenhydrogenย #energyย #energiaย #energieย #hydrogeneuropeย #energyaustraliaย #industrialclustersย #energytransitionย #europeancommissionย #energialimpiaย #esigย #hidrogenoverdeย #cleanenergyย #industriaย #UNIDOย #decarbonizationย #emissionsreductionย #descarbonizacionย #valuechainย #hydrogenstrategyย #suezcanalย #sczoneย #electrolysisย #electrolyzerย #greenhydrogenย #electrolyserย #pemย #soecย #evย #electrificationย #electricvehiclesย #fcevย #bevย #soeย #aemย #cathodeย #anodeย #h2ย #oxygenย #greenelectricityย #waterย #energyย #renewableenergyย #renewablehydrogenย #greenhydrogenย #idrogenoverdeย #hydrogรจnevertย #hydrogenenergyย #hydrogenstrategyย #hidrogenioverdeย #hidrogenoverdeย #hidrรณgenoย #hidrogenioย #wasserstoffย #wasserstoffย #onshorewindย #solarenergyย #hydroenergyย #ifcย #afcย #H2Medย #irenaย #decarbonizeย #renewableenergyย #canaldesuezย #sokhnaย #emethanolย #hydrogรจnevertย #hydrogรจneย #windenergieย #hydrogenenergyย #hydrogenfuelย #hidrogenoverdeย #hidrรณgenoย #hidrogenioverdeย #idrogenoverdeย #idrogenoย #hidrojenย #windpowerย #windenergyย #hydrogenfuelcellย #gizย #hydrogeneuropeย #northafricaย #ifcย #ieaย #ebrdย #eibย #europeย #waterstofย #greenfuelย #greenammoniaย #ebrdย #greenmethanolย #irenaย #safย #greenfertilisersย #greenfuelย #greenmethanolย #egyptย #lngbunkeringย #unย #greensteelย #greenfertย #greenbunkeringย #bunkeringย #ccusย #ccsย #carboncreditsย #carbonfootprintย #carbonneutralityย #carbononeutralย #maritimeindustryย #VesselEmissionsย #shippingindustryย #indianmarketย #maritimetransportย #emethanolย #decarbonisationย #aviationย #trasportiย #transportationย #bluehydrogenย #lngindustryย #naturalgasย Osama Fawzy Georgy HENEIN, MBA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Whatโs the most efficient way for the UK to achieve net zero? We at Fuels Industry UK strongly believe the UK should take a โtechnology neutralโ approach - allowing different low carbon technologies to compete and achieve decarbonisation in the most effective way. But from 2035, only new cars and vans with no tailpipe emissions such as battery or fuel cell electric vehicles can be sold under current UK Government policy. Yet according to the European Environment Agency, biodiesel hybrids powered by biomass fuel are the least carbon dioxide emitting cars across their entire lifecycle. In addition, the manufacture of Sustainable Aviation Fuel creates renewable gasoline and diesel. But a ban on new internal combustion engine cars in 2035 risks there being no market for these fuels. Net Zero policy needs to focus on the outcome not the journey.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
According to DNV's latest report "Maritime Forecast to 2050", the shipping industry will struggle to secure the 17 million tonnes of carbon-neutral fuels needed annually by 2030 to meet environmental goals. The report explored how the maritime sector will compete with aviation and road transport, adding that fuel producers will need to boost production at an unprecedented pace to meet the demands of strict regulations such as the IMO's GHG strategy and EU ETS. It also expanded on how different factors affect supply issues, including price uncertainty and fuel compatibility with current infrastructure. At XFuel, we're working to provide fuels which are scalable, affordable and replicable worldwide, accelerating the energy transition from the most rural areas to urban ones. Read more via Maritime Reporter and Engineering News: https://lnkd.in/devVA7Y6 #AlternativeFuels #Decarbonisation #Environment #Shipping #Regulations
Shipping Will Need a Third of Worldโs Carbon Neutral Fuel by 2030
marinelink.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
*Are Carbon Capture and Storage projects bankable?* New 30-page report from Deloitte on the bankability of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects is a good read for those interested in the commercial and legal/regulatory side of #ccs. *Context* ย - IEA & IPCC both recognise CCS as critical to achieving Net Zero by 2050 - 15% of emissions reductions needed via CCS = $1.5trn investment requirement - EU introducing regulations to grow storage capacity by 100x by 2030 *Business case* - Carbon capture can be up to 50% or total CCS costs for an emitter: the rest is transport, storage, interest costs and lost emitter revenue - Whilst some solutions becoming economically viable, most need grants and subsidies. VCM and green product premiums (e.g. green steel) are an additional revenue source, but those markets need further development/scaling - In some jurisdictions, the price that transport and storage operators can charge is regulated, limiting returns *Investability* - Whilst govt. incentives can help with initial projects, private capital is needed. Expect medium to high single digital RoI for a mid-size transport and storage project. First projects have been funded by oil and gas companies, with govt. support - Bankability: to be bankable, a project needs to be economically attractive for emitters & address cross-chain risks, including leakage of stored emissions. Not all risks benefit from government protection in UK. In EU and US, transport and storage providers bear *all* risk - Geography: in their view, only the UK has implemented a holistic and bankable (albeit unproven) CCS business model, by taking an integrated cluster approach to infrastructure and implementing a regulated asset base approach (which may nonetheless limit returns). US project pipeline has significant uncertainty - Limited empirical data on performance few operational projects = uncertainty on technical risks decreased expected RoI *Catalysing investment in UK and EU* - Whilst UK, Dutch and Danish emitters can receive subsidies to cover gap between CO2e capture costs and EU ETS price, similar CfD-like subsidies tailored to CCS should be introduced across the EU to support the emitter business case - To make CCS investible, a guarantee-type of risks protection should be established to support in case of low-probability high-impact events (USโ 45Q fails in this regard) - Cross-border CO2 transport and storage (i.e., London Protocol) should be enabled to enable emitters to access ideal storage locations, promote competition among developers and mitigate storage underutilisation risks: requires adaptation of legal agreements *Scaling* - Policy needs: provide dedicated financial support for emitters; sprite t again low-probability, high-impact events; and ratify European cross-border CO2 shipping framework - Needs commercial offering of CCS-as-a-service. Could be a large market, depending on availability/cost of alternatives for emittersย
Carbon Capture and Storage | Deloitte Netherlands
www2.deloitte.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Big News in Sustainable Aviation โ As part of the Inflation Reduction Act, the Biden-Harris Administration has released guidance on the Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Credit, accelerating the shift to low-carbon fuels in aviation. This effort, involving key agencies like the Treasury, IRS, EPA, DOT, USDA, and DOE, is not just about cutting emissions but driving innovation and creating jobs in one of the most challenging sectors to decarbonize. Key Points: ยทย ย Producers of SAF are eligible for a tax credit of $1.25 to $1.75 per gallon. ยทย ย Numerous fuels will qualify for the credit, including valid biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuels, cellulosic biofuel, or cellulosic diesel that have been approved by EPA under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). ยทย ย An updated DOE's GREET model for measuring lifecycle emissions from SAFs is set for release in early 2024. Read the full press release:ย https://lnkd.in/g5RDgQ_g Be sure to follow NXTClean Fuels as we work to decarbonize the transportation industry. #NXTCleanFuelsย #SAFย #SustainableAviationFuelย #RenewableFuelsย #NEXTRenewablesย ย
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Pinion Biofuels advisor, Donna Funk, shares a holistic look at #SAF and #GREET opportunity factors: https://okt.to/dFAB87. Want to stay informed as this legislation evolves? Sign up to receive important updates around the legislation ahead that could impact your business and bottom line: https://okt.to/6Lz0uU.
GREET Model & SAF
https://www.pinionglobal.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What low-carbon fuels could be used for aviation and shipping in Scotland? Our latest report reviews the evidence and policy surrounding these fuels in transport. It concludes: - Low-carbon fuels in Scotland will be essential in decarbonising the aviation and maritime sectors. - In the short term, the reliance is likely to be on established biofuel-based technology to meet the demand. The key issue is maintaining a sustainable feedstock as demand increases both domestically from the heat/power sector and from the global economy. - Green hydrogen and such derivatives are known as renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs), which generally offer greater carbon savings compared to biofuels and the third category of LCFs, recycled carbon fuels (RCFs). Longer term, the demand would ideally be met by RFNBO-based technology, as this does not generally have the same constraints surrounding feedstock availability as biofuels or RCFs. However, research and investment into the required technology and infrastructure will be essential in realising this potential. For a complete list of findings and further details, please visit our project page: https://lnkd.in/eCtVEQiQ #aviation #shipping #LowCarbonFuels Andrew Ure | Conall Martin | Michael Campbell | Kadam Lokesh | Colin McNaught | Fiona Twisse | Nicola Dunn
Low-carbon transport fuels โ an evidence review
climatexchange.org.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in