Which?’s Post

🔍 Legal Collaboration: Uncover the latest developments as Cassie collaborates with federal authorities on their cases involving Sean "Diddy" Combs! 📝 Delve into the intricacies of this collaboration and its potential implications on the ongoing legal matters. 📖 READ MORE - Link in Bio. 💼💬 Share the breaking news with your followers, engage in discussions about celebrity legal affairs, and stay informed on the unfolding story. Copy & Paste: 📲 https://lnkd.in/eWqasw7X ⚖️📰 Post Hashtags: #Cassie #LegalCollaboration #SeanCombs #CelebrityLegalAffairs #BreakingNews #FederalCases #FreeNewsUpdate

19.  Lawrence: Trump's stupidity, recklessness, & depravity costing him $551 million (youtube.com);I do believe that the US has impartial Constitution and laws, but the idea that if you are white man you can shoot somebody in a day light and get away with was a coup on a court of law and judges of law. If our former president truthfully and legally held accountable by courts, I am not too rogue to accuse my own government for fame or bad game, if I told hard truth then I am very hopeful that 18 years of crimes, robbery, conspiracies against rights, techno-tyranny, and others will face the court of law. 20.  I can never believe conspiracies against rights is legal in the USA, - United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)( United States v. Price :: 383 U.S. 787 (1966) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center) : Appellees are three Mississippi law enforcement officials and 15 private individuals who are alleged to have conspired to deprive three individuals of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The alleged conspiracy involved releasing the victims from jail at night; intercepting, assaulting and killing them, and disposing of their bodies. Its purpose was to "punish" the victims summarily. Two indictments were returned. One charged all appellees with a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it a misdemeanor willfully and under color of law to subject any person to the deprivation of any rights secured or protected by the Constitution. The indictment also charged all appellees with substantive violations of § 242. The District Court sustained the conspiracy count against a motion to dismiss, and sustained the substantive counts as to the three official defendants. It dismissed the substantive counts as to the 15 private defendants on the ground that, although the indictment alleged that they had acted "under color" of law, it did not allege that they were acting as officers of the State. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 60. The other indictment charged all appellees with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241, making it a felony to conspire to interfere with a citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The District Court dismissed this indictment as to all appellees on the ground that § 241 does not include rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 59.

19.  Lawrence: Trump's stupidity, recklessness, & depravity costing him $551 million (youtube.com);I do believe that the US has impartial Constitution and laws, but the idea that if you are white man you can shoot somebody in a day light and get away with was a coup on a court of law and judges of law. If our former president truthfully and legally held accountable by courts, I am not too rogue to accuse my own government for fame or bad game, if I told hard truth then I am very hopeful that 18 years of crimes, robbery, conspiracies against rights, techno-tyranny, and others will face the court of law. 20.  I can never believe conspiracies against rights is legal in the USA, - United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)( United States v. Price :: 383 U.S. 787 (1966) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center) : Appellees are three Mississippi law enforcement officials and 15 private individuals who are alleged to have conspired to deprive three individuals of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The alleged conspiracy involved releasing the victims from jail at night; intercepting, assaulting and killing them, and disposing of their bodies. Its purpose was to "punish" the victims summarily. Two indictments were returned. One charged all appellees with a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it a misdemeanor willfully and under color of law to subject any person to the deprivation of any rights secured or protected by the Constitution. The indictment also charged all appellees with substantive violations of § 242. The District Court sustained the conspiracy count against a motion to dismiss, and sustained the substantive counts as to the three official defendants. It dismissed the substantive counts as to the 15 private defendants on the ground that, although the indictment alleged that they had acted "under color" of law, it did not allege that they were acting as officers of the State. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 60. The other indictment charged all appellees with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241, making it a felony to conspire to interfere with a citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The District Court dismissed this indictment as to all appellees on the ground that § 241 does not include rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 59.

20.  I can never believe conspiracies against rights is legal in the USA, - United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)( United States v. Price :: 383 U.S. 787 (1966) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center) : Appellees are three Mississippi law enforcement officials and 15 private individuals who are alleged to have conspired to deprive three individuals of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The alleged conspiracy involved releasing the victims from jail at night; intercepting, assaulting and killing them, and disposing of their bodies. Its purpose was to "punish" the victims summarily. Two indictments were returned. One charged all appellees with a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it a misdemeanor willfully and under color of law to subject any person to the deprivation of any rights secured or protected by the Constitution. The indictment also charged all appellees with substantive violations of § 242. The District Court sustained the conspiracy count against a motion to dismiss, and sustained the substantive counts as to the three official defendants. It dismissed the substantive counts as to the 15 private defendants on the ground that, although the indictment alleged that they had acted "under color" of law, it did not allege that they were acting as officers of the State. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 60. The other indictment charged all appellees with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241, making it a felony to conspire to interfere with a citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The District Court dismissed this indictment as to all appellees on the ground that § 241 does not include rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 59.

20.  I can never believe conspiracies against rights is legal in the USA, - United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)( United States v. Price :: 383 U.S. 787 (1966) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center) : Appellees are three Mississippi law enforcement officials and 15 private individuals who are alleged to have conspired to deprive three individuals of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The alleged conspiracy involved releasing the victims from jail at night; intercepting, assaulting and killing them, and disposing of their bodies. Its purpose was to "punish" the victims summarily. Two indictments were returned. One charged all appellees with a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it a misdemeanor willfully and under color of law to subject any person to the deprivation of any rights secured or protected by the Constitution. The indictment also charged all appellees with substantive violations of § 242. The District Court sustained the conspiracy count against a motion to dismiss, and sustained the substantive counts as to the three official defendants. It dismissed the substantive counts as to the 15 private defendants on the ground that, although the indictment alleged that they had acted "under color" of law, it did not allege that they were acting as officers of the State. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 60. The other indictment charged all appellees with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241, making it a felony to conspire to interfere with a citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The District Court dismissed this indictment as to all appellees on the ground that § 241 does not include rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 59.

20.  I can never believe conspiracies against rights is legal in the USA, - United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)( United States v. Price :: 383 U.S. 787 (1966) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center) : Appellees are three Mississippi law enforcement officials and 15 private individuals who are alleged to have conspired to deprive three individuals of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The alleged conspiracy involved releasing the victims from jail at night; intercepting, assaulting and killing them, and disposing of their bodies. Its purpose was to "punish" the victims summarily. Two indictments were returned. One charged all appellees with a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it a misdemeanor willfully and under color of law to subject any person to the deprivation of any rights secured or protected by the Constitution. The indictment also charged all appellees with substantive violations of § 242. The District Court sustained the conspiracy count against a motion to dismiss, and sustained the substantive counts as to the three official defendants. It dismissed the substantive counts as to the 15 private defendants on the ground that, although the indictment alleged that they had acted "under color" of law, it did not allege that they were acting as officers of the State. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 60. The other indictment charged all appellees with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241, making it a felony to conspire to interfere with a citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The District Court dismissed this indictment as to all appellees on the ground that § 241 does not include rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 59.

20.  I can never believe conspiracies against rights is legal in the USA, - United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)( United States v. Price :: 383 U.S. 787 (1966) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center) : Appellees are three Mississippi law enforcement officials and 15 private individuals who are alleged to have conspired to deprive three individuals of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The alleged conspiracy involved releasing the victims from jail at night; intercepting, assaulting and killing them, and disposing of their bodies. Its purpose was to "punish" the victims summarily. Two indictments were returned. One charged all appellees with a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it a misdemeanor willfully and under color of law to subject any person to the deprivation of any rights secured or protected by the Constitution. The indictment also charged all appellees with substantive violations of § 242. The District Court sustained the conspiracy count against a motion to dismiss, and sustained the substantive counts as to the three official defendants. It dismissed the substantive counts as to the 15 private defendants on the ground that, although the indictment alleged that they had acted "under color" of law, it did not allege that they were acting as officers of the State. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 60. The other indictment charged all appellees with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241, making it a felony to conspire to interfere with a citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The District Court dismissed this indictment as to all appellees on the ground that § 241 does not include rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 59.

19.  Lawrence: Trump's stupidity, recklessness, & depravity costing him $551 million (youtube.com);I do believe that the US has impartial Constitution and laws, but the idea that if you are white man you can shoot somebody in a day light and get away with was a coup on a court of law and judges of law. If our former president truthfully and legally held accountable by courts, I am not too rogue to accuse my own government for fame or bad game, if I told hard truth then I am very hopeful that 18 years of crimes, robbery, conspiracies against rights, techno-tyranny, and others will face the court of law. 20.  I can never believe conspiracies against rights is legal in the USA, - United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)( United States v. Price :: 383 U.S. 787 (1966) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center) : Appellees are three Mississippi law enforcement officials and 15 private individuals who are alleged to have conspired to deprive three individuals of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The alleged conspiracy involved releasing the victims from jail at night; intercepting, assaulting and killing them, and disposing of their bodies. Its purpose was to "punish" the victims summarily. Two indictments were returned. One charged all appellees with a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it a misdemeanor willfully and under color of law to subject any person to the deprivation of any rights secured or protected by the Constitution. The indictment also charged all appellees with substantive violations of § 242. The District Court sustained the conspiracy count against a motion to dismiss, and sustained the substantive counts as to the three official defendants. It dismissed the substantive counts as to the 15 private defendants on the ground that, although the indictment alleged that they had acted "under color" of law, it did not allege that they were acting as officers of the State. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 60. The other indictment charged all appellees with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241, making it a felony to conspire to interfere with a citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The District Court dismissed this indictment as to all appellees on the ground that § 241 does not include rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This dismissal is here on direct appeal as No. 59.

Check out my latest article in the The Morning Advertiser where I discuss the benefits (and legalities) of having a piano in your pub. https://lnkd.in/eZJ4VA-t

An important reminder that contracts are a powerful tool in managing copyright interests. It’s not always just about ownership of the underlying rights, but frequently about how those rights are managed and who is entitled to receive the proceeds pursuant to negotiated terms! #artlaw #artlawlawyer #copyright #copyrightlaw #royalties #contracts #contractlaw https://lnkd.in/g_ZfgpcJ