Did the UK buck the election trend of electing "anti-climate" politicians?
Looks like it. Will be curious what my UK colleagues think.
But 16 years since their first law mandating a reduction in GHG emissions, and 5 years since they made the most ambitious sustainability commitments at the time in Glasgow, it doesn't seem like the UK populous is fatigued and pushing back against the climate agenda. I think they argue around the edges (which is healthy) but not on the direction (which is the definition of unproductive; taking one step forward and two steps back repeatedly over cycles).
Personally, the climate agenda is about promoting resource efficiency, limiting environmental damage, becoming more energy secure (and affordable), being more resilient against physical climate change risks, creating a vibrant clean economy (which boosts productivity), and protecting asset value (for most industries) and people from the worst effects of climate change. What's not to like, right? (Except the usual change management pains of course)
We'll see what voters in the rest of the EU, US and Canada choose but I'm not convinced that voters should have to choose between "conservative values", "fiscal responsibility", "economic growth", "fixing the system", "draining the swamp" LOL, "patriotism" AND "the green transition". I don't see these things as mutually exclusive, and I would like to see more leaders (Oh Canada) lead on this.
https://lnkd.in/gXvQEj53
Construction Planning and Delay Analysis
1mosounds rather green washing, when NET ZERO doesn't necessarily framed as NET Zero issues! In the last decade, I wonder if Carbon Trust has lost its core value, in their road to Zero GHG!