All year, I’ve been talking with jobseekers who've been applying for hundreds of jobs in the private sector and getting no reply. PSA from today's The Wall Street Journal( and this I found genuinely shocking): Half of all government jobs attract just 5.5 applicants. The bottom 25% of government jobs get just 3 applications per role. Read more from our latest story on how gov't hiring has powered much of the new jobs growth this year: https://rb.gy/t0gcu
Private sector demand slowing with Government jobs increasing.... Sounds like Socialism.
From my experience, getting a government position is tedious especially when it comes to the application process. However, for those that are in entry-level positions in tech starting with a government position is ideal because of how slow they move. You are able to skill at your own pace vs. becoming overwhelmed with the ongoing changes and evolution in technology.
As a tax payer, I don't approve of this message. We should be cutting Government Jobs and departments, not growing them. Or are we putting more "liberal" studies majors in charge of things like Disaster Prepardness so they can have a cush job? Worked out great for Maui.
Government jobs don’t attract applicants because it’s not worth it in most cases. The application process itself is lengthy and on top of that the announcements usually include a litney of preferences. In most cases outside applications aren’t even reviewed.
Great news. Governments must eat their own food and step out of the box too. Its nice to talk about innovation but its objectives must be supported by the machinery of government, its business and operational model. Government must have a robut ''Attract & Retain'' Program anchored in flexibility, rich working climate and challenging rewarding work objectives. Its nice to ''Attract'' youth and talent. Its better to also '' Retain'' talent and experience by offering flexible and modern work models. Some people prefer working in the evening others during the day. Who cares when the work is done as long as quality content is consistently delivered? Some folks would like to work 6 to 8 months per year, and spend 6 or 4 months off travelling or doing something else. Why not retain experience folks like that to train the new youthful hires? Working Anywhere, Any Time is also part of the flexible work models. There is no questions some work must be done on site. Other jobs not so much. Choosing a job that must be done on site is a choice. Other jobs, employees who prefer to work on site....that is fine and must be accomodated. Other who prefer to work from home or from anywhere, part time, full time must be accomodated too. 😊
I'm one of the few people who found a job in the highest-paying setting for my occupation (occupational therapy), immediately out of graduate school. Surprisingly, I work for a local, family-owned healthcare company. However, the benefits are terrible. I recently started my own business (www.danforddigital.com) on top of this to try to help other local businesses be able to provide high-paying salaries for their employees as well!
I am not posting the following to start a political debate. It’s a thought from reading the latest news: the article’s timing about government hiring may be ironic. I am guessing government hiring will be frozen if a federal shutdown occurs. I hope a shutdown doesn’t happen so those currently working for the government can continue to work and get paid, government hiring as noted in the article moves forward, and the function of government continues.
Why would anyone apply for a job that should not exist and will likely get cut as soon the Dems leave office next year?
Co-Founder and Associate Director @ University of Pennsylvania | Anthropologist of Education and Human Development
1yI think the cumbersome hiring process for government jobs is a deterrent.