I realize that one intervening party has already filed testimony (due tomorrow) for the upcoming #Vogtle #nuclear prudency hearing. But I'm still re-reviewing prior filings already in the Administrative Record.
My latest update (last week) was from the 2017 testimony of Peter Bradford.
https://lnkd.in/gRCunB8i
Here's another nugget from Mr. Bradford's 2017 testimony:
"Q. HAS GEORGIA POWER PROVEN THAT COMPLETING VOGTLE IS LIKELY TO BE THE LEAST EXPENSIVE WAY TO MEET ITS CUSTOMERS’ FUTURE NEED FOR ELECTRICITY?"
"A. No. Indeed, given the importance of this proceeding, it would be hard to overstate the inadequacy of the analysis of alternatives to completing Vogtle performed by Georgia Power Company. The Company’s approach would return Georgia to the era when power systems were built around fixed concepts of “baseload”, “intermediate load” and “peak load” without any recognition of the great extent to which load following generation, computer control, grid enhancement (often expending the potential for power purchase agreements), load management, flexible resources, energy efficiency and energy storage had revised this paradigm."