National Security Agency’s Post

🔒 Cybersecurity Alert: The National Security Agency (NSA) reports that the People’s Republic of China is targeting government and business networks in the U.S. and Australia. To assist network defenders, they've released a set of case studies and guidance in collaboration with Australian partners and other agencies. Stay informed and learn how to counter future threats. Read more://lnkd.in/eRzMTKE6 #Cybersecurity #PRC #NetworkDefense #NSAhttps

Understanding PRC tradecraft in cybersecurity is crucial. It equips network defenders with insights into sophisticated cyber threats and strategies employed by state-sponsored actors, enhancing the ability to anticipate, detect, and mitigate potential cyberattacks effectively.

Awareness and diligent preparation for threat actors like APT-40 are crucial in safeguarding national security and protecting sensitive data from sophisticated cyber attacks. Understanding the tactics, techniques, and procedures of such advanced persistent threats allows organizations to anticipate and mitigate potential breaches effectively. Collaborative efforts between our security agencies and support companies foster a unified defense strategy, enabling the sharing of critical intelligence and best practices. This synergy enhances our ability to detect, respond to, and recover from cyber incidents, thereby fortifying our cyber resilience. Together, we can fight the good fight, ensuring the integrity and security of our digital infrastructure against ever-evolving threats.

To help network defenders protect their systems, NSA is releasing a set of case studies and guidance along with our Australian partners and other agencies. Read it now to understand PRC tradecraft and counter future targeting: https://lnkd.in/eRzMTKE6

Good use case for NDR EDR SIEM to provide the complete picture of activity on the network.

Great insights for those leading cybersecurity efforts.

I mean, the move is understandable from their own side. It's also nearly unacceptable for anyone planning to go there and invest. It also exposes anyone to the risk of abuses. Together with total control on communications, chats, socials, media etc. We see similar effects in pseudo-democracies as well targeting singles or groups for ideological or sheer personal interest motivations as well. It just won't work well for investments. ____________________________________________ When the WeChat account of China’s Ministry of State Security came to life late last month, it appeared to have two missions: pushing back at Western criticism of its national security efforts and enlisting the public in counter-intelligence. Accusing the United States of double standards and playing up the China threat to bridge the domestic political divide, the ministry took the rare move of twice accusing the CIA by name of trying to recruit Chinese informers. It also called on the Chinese public to be on the lookout for spies and report them. “12339. You are a hero. National security – everyone has a part to play,” an online poster from the ministry says, urging people to call its national hotline. https://lnkd.in/gpTYpdEK

The only Solution is a Political Solution and when will Israel negotiate a Political Solution?

🚨 Social Media and terrorist radicalization collide in Australia! 🚨 The recent ruling by an Australian court allowing social media to host a video depicting the horrific stabbing of Assyrian Orthodox Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in a Sydney church has ignited a fierce debate about free speech and the responsibility of online platforms. As a retired Intelligence Officer with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, I've witnessed firsthand how access to extremely violent content on social media can be exploited by terrorist groups to radicalize individuals, particularly young and impressionable minds. The morbid fascination with violence is a potent tool used to lure individuals into participating in similar acts of terror. See the following article: https://lnkd.in/efdBuY9q The decision to permit the dissemination of this graphic video raises serious concerns about the glorification of violence and its potential to incite further acts of terrorism. While the concept of free speech is fundamental to democratic societies, it must be balanced with the need to prevent the spread of harmful and dangerous content. Platforms like X, whose owner Elon Musk resisted calls to take down the video, argue that censorship infringes upon free speech rights. However, in cases involving explicit violence linked to terrorism, the stakes are undeniably high. The controversy surrounding this case underscores the urgent need for greater scrutiny and regulation of social media platforms. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's announcement of a parliamentary inquiry into the negative effects of social media is a step in the right direction. As we navigate these complex issues, it's imperative that we prioritize the safety and security of our communities while upholding the principles of free speech. Let's continue to engage in constructive dialogue and action to ensure that our online spaces remain safe and inclusive for all. #CounterTerrorism #OnlineSafety #FreeSpeech #SocialMediaRegulation #SecurityConcerns 🌐🔒🗣️

https://lnkd.in/eKbuXQdF America pumps roughly around 3 to 5 billion $ each year. UK keeps supporting them with arms and also holds key business interests with them. ... the outcome which they support.. TERRORISM.. explain to me if this is the correct way to deal with the general public.. https://lnkd.in/eKbuXQdF