International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC)’s Post

There are so many good things to say about cotton, we could do positive #TruthTuesdays all week long! But sometimes, a lie is so odious and unfair that we use the #Truth to set things right — and that’s the case with today’s topic: the Aral Sea in Central Asia. Here’s the background … Back in the 1960s, the Aral Sea — a 68,000 square km body of water between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan — was one of the largest inland seas in the world, teeming with fish, birds, and marine mammals. It was even a tourist hotspot for people looking for fun in the sun! But Soviet government officials decided to cultivate cotton and other crops around the Aral Sea, and that was a terrible, unfortunate decision. With rivers diverted to feed crops, the Aral Sea began to dry up, leaving behind a dusty wasteland. It is considered one of the greatest natural disasters in human history. This is probably the true origin of the “cotton is a thirsty crop” myth, which has been a thorn in cotton’s side for decades. But was it really cotton’s fault? The evidence is clear. Cotton is NOT the reason for the Aral Sea disaster. There are multiple reasons for this: 1) The Soviet Union drained up to 33 inches of water from the Aral Sea each year  2) Changes in population are important to understand the Aral Sea crisis. Between 1950 and 1988, the population of the Aral Sea basin grew dramatically, from 13.8 to 33.2 million people 3) The Soviet Union dug a total of 20,000 miles of canals, raised 45 dams, and laid out 80 reservoirs to service its cotton agro-business 4) Poor Soviet irrigation practices are the cause of the problem Soviet irrigation techniques at the time were horrifically inefficient, and their shoddily built canals lost between 25% and 75% of the diverted water to leaks and evaporation in the desert sands before it ever reached the crops. If cotton’s water requirements truly were to blame, this same type of ecological damage would have occurred over and over, everywhere cotton is grown. Furthermore, media outlets overlook the fact that cotton only accounted for 41% of the cultivated land around the Aral Sea. Rice, wheat and other grains accounted for 32% of the land, fruit crops 11%, vegetables 4%, and various other crops the remaining 12%. The devastation of the Aral Sea is not a story about cotton; it’s a story about human misjudgment and egregiously inefficient water management techniques. It’s time for the irresponsible media outlets to stop mistaking correlation for causation, no matter how attention-grabbing a cotton-focused headline might be. Here’s a video that lays it all out: https://lnkd.in/eFvZsT4Z #TruthAboutCotton #TruthTuesday

#TruthAboutCotton: The Aral Sea

https://www.youtube.com/

Abid Zaidi

Cotton professional (Gold medalist) | Cotton market analyst | Cotton classer and arbitrator

1mo

Insightful truth

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics