The global rich must pay more to tackle the climate crisis, whether through taxes or charges on consumption, says Laurence Tubiana, our CEO and co-chair of the International Tax Task Force. There's a growing consensus on the need for some kind of global wealth tax. Meanwhile, poor countries are struggling to raise the estimated $1tn a year of external finance needed to help them cut emissions and cope with the impacts of the climate crisis. Another proposal is for a frequent flyer levy, targeted at business class and first class seats. Other possible sources of revenue include a carbon tax on international shipping, which could raise billions without disrupting global trade, according to research from the World Bank. Levies on fossil fuels could also play a role. Failing to address these inequalities could damage public acceptance of the measures needed to tackle the climate crisis. Read more in The Guardian ➡ https://lnkd.in/e58NYgg9 Learn more about the International Tax Task Force, an initiative spearheaded by the governments of Barbados, France and Kenya, and set up at COP28 to explore options for climate levies ➡ https://lnkd.in/dXkhJdJ7
Please consider signing this initiative. 1.000.000 signatures needed before 9 Oct 24 to take this initiative forward. Currently 221.071 signatures collected. https://eci.ec.europa.eu/038/public/#/screen/home/allcountries
Frequent flyer levy clearly hasn't been thought through. Technology is rapidly impacting need for business travel and where it does take place more and more companies enforce economy class. A better target would be levy on the budget airline / short haul weekend break sector, which is seeing the most growth
Taxes need to be activity neutral, so only a global carbon tax would make sense and not individual or regional taxes. If not biases are built up.
Great news -
Director of Engagement @ Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance
1moAMEN. “The United States should take responsibility for past emissions, something the Biden administration has been reluctant to do. It’s responsible for $2 trillion in climate damages but offered a measly $17.5 million for the Loss and Damage Fund at the climate talks, which amounts to what the federal government uses in less than three minutes of operating costs. It’s pennies, and it’s insulting, frankly. Meanwhile, the world is reeling from the climate change-caused loss and damage that the U.S. made possible with its historical emissions. With loss and damages headed toward $600 billion per year by 2030, the U.S. needs to take its polluted past seriously and clean up accordingly.” https://www.newsweek.com/stop-finger-pointing-democrats-youre-grip-big-oil-opinion-1859676