In a letter to readers today, Wall Street Journal Editor in Chief Emma Tucker wrote about the upcoming sham trial of our colleague, WSJ reporter Evan Gershkovich, and the critical role of media organizations in reporting responsibly on the proceedings and the baseless allegations Evan faces. “To even call it a trial, however, is unfair to Evan and a continuation of this travesty of justice that already has gone on for far too long.” Read the full letter here: #IStandWithEvan #JournalismIsNotACrime https://lnkd.in/dBRsvSsY
Dow Jones’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
In case you missed it- I have thoughts #copyrightlaw #artlaw
Paul Bain's latest IP Brief Blog, "Warhol and Prince: Good Artists Borrow, Great Artists…Litigate," covers the US Supreme Court decision about fair use in art and the licensing of images. To read the full article, click here: https://bit.ly/3pPqmLf #Iplaw
Warhol and Prince: Good Artists Borrow, Great Artists…Litigate
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Publisher, Investigative Visual Journalist, Public Records Expert, Local - Community News- Advocate for Cameras in Court
Back in the day the San Jose Mercury would report on who was arrested and who was found guilty in court. We thought we understood the story and the assignment. This morning we published an article about the win of a local San Jose social media journalist in an anti-Slapp lawsuit. We reported on this when San Jose City Councilman Peter Ortiz first filed the restraining order against East Side San Jose Times. What surprised me doing this story ? 1. How shamelessly unethical the San Jose Mercury News has become in their local reporting. They broke the story of a temporary restraining order being granted for Ortiz. But they didn’t get comment from the journalist or his attorney when they did. Nor did they follow up to report Ortiz lost and was found to have violated the First Amendment rights of a journalist. 2. That Jidge Geffon denied our media requests and closed the courtroom to the remote public , but called the case a matter of public interest. 3. That all of the San Jose City Councilmembers , City Attorney and the mayor have remained mum while these elected officials claim they are fearful of speech as they use city resources to claim they are fearful of their personal safety while they crest a public safety threat every day. 4. That the McManis Faulkner law firm keeps representing clients like Peter Ortiz. Abusive , entitled and overfunded to misuse the courts. The firm once stood for the First Amendment. Now they just try to weaponize it for profit. Here is the link to the arficle in the a Davis Vanguard https://lnkd.in/g-zfF7BX If you happen to see the video trailer on Twitter (X) , Instagram or YouTube , please let me know where you found it. Helps for our local open source investigative reporting. Or the Sheriff training we apparently need to be doing about # and @ and how they relate to family court and restraining orders involving minors counsel. #JessicaHuey #AndrewCook #NicoleFord #MorrisBisted #ContanceCarpenter #BJFadem #HeatherAllan #EvaMartelle #AurthurLin
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In this intriguing segment, the speaker discusses potential reforms to current intellectual property structures. Addressing the needs of not only top earners but also a broad set of creators, he advocates for a more balanced revenue distribution model that could double creators' income.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The settlement of the dispute between Hugh Grant and the publisher of the Sun newspaper has been a hot topic in mainstream media over the past 48 hours. The coverage and outcome raises some interesting questions from a legal standpoint, particularly around Part 36 offers. In this overview, I outline what a Part 36 offer is, the possible cost consequences flowing from such an offer, and why parties use Part 36 offers in litigation. #HughGrant #litigation #Part36 #Part36offers #settlement
Following the dispute between Hugh Grant and the publisher of the Sun newspaper being settled outside of the courtroom, the actor’s social media posts have brought Part 36 offers into the spotlight. Rhys Thompson breaks down what Part 36 offers are and why parties use them https://lnkd.in/ec43Y-Qz
Hugh Grant: Bringing Part 36 Offers Into The Spotlight
geldards.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
it seems we will not be able to remotely watch or listen to a donald j. trump criminal trial. one justification for this no video or audio rule is that the media circus in the courtroom would risk making a trial unfair. but why would the media be disrupting the courtroom just because of livecasting? couldn't the media just watch in another room if necessary? wouldn't it be the court, not the media, doing the livecasting? the court could order the media out if necessary, especially if there is any disruption in the courtroom. and one would think ordering the media to leave is even easier to justify if they could just watch elsewhere. does the analysis change if the trial is recorded but not simultaneously streamed for the public to watch or listen? the public record of this trial is so very important. it seems criminal (excuse that one) to forego recording that could be used to show the trial was fair, and for obvious historical reasons. will also make some epic tiktoks. https://lnkd.in/evHwjMSe
Trump Is Going on Trial, But You Won’t Be Able to Watch
nymag.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Crowell & Moring’s Eric Enson comments on the remarks from Paula Blizzard about increased criminal antitrust enforcement. Read more in the Daily Journal:
California Antitrust Division Chief Threatens Criminal Enforcement — Daily Journal
dailyjournal.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Crowell & Moring’s Eric Enson comments on the remarks from Paula Blizzard about increased criminal antitrust enforcement. Read more in the Daily Journal:
California Antitrust Division Chief Threatens Criminal Enforcement — Daily Journal
dailyjournal.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Crowell & Moring’s Eric Enson comments on the remarks from Paula Blizzard about increased criminal antitrust enforcement. Read more in the Daily Journal:
California Antitrust Division Chief Threatens Criminal Enforcement — Daily Journal
dailyjournal.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Crowell & Moring’s Eric Enson comments on the remarks from Paula Blizzard about increased criminal antitrust enforcement. Read more in the Daily Journal:
California Antitrust Division Chief Threatens Criminal Enforcement — Daily Journal
dailyjournal.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
Data Tech = Efficient Risk Management
1mo#RuleByLaw