We know that more and more U.S. nonprofits are engaging with demographic data about their staff and board—but what does quality demographic data look like? Here is a hint: it's not making your best guess. Kelly Brown, founder and CEO of Viewpoint Consulting, highlights the importance of collecting this information in an inclusive and respectful way and how valuable this data can be.
Candid’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
At The Presser Foundation, we've talked a lot about Candid's efforts related to demographic data collection and even hosted a Next Movement about it. We believe that collecting these data points will help make the sector more equitable in the long run. If you're an organization wanting to learn more and/or to understand the complexities of this work, consider attending this upcoming webinar. https://lnkd.in/dU7UJwZj
The nonprofit experience: Insights on demographic data collection | Training | Candid Learning
learning.candid.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Vice President for Research and Evaluation and Chief Science Officer at Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Data-driven decision making is crucial for equitable recovery and active conversations about data can help create more fruitful discussions and informed decisions. Data Chats allow communities to have deeper and more accurate conversations about the needs of residents and facilitate data-driven community action. In this article, Data You Can Use in Milwaukee shares how their Data Chats helped them effectively engage with residents, built capacity for residents to engage with local officials, and helped create long-term COVID-19 responses and solutions. Learn more about how Data Chats can help improve outcomes here: https://lnkd.in/gmpayZ5z #DataEquity
Data Chats as an Organizing and Capacity-Building Process
medium.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📣 New report: "Responsibly Using and Reusing Non-Traditional Data Sources for Service Provision to Children: A Path Towards Due Diligence" 🔆 When is it appropriate to use non-traditional data sources for service provision to children? 🔆 How to do so responsibly? Quite impossible questions, which we try to begin to answer here.
📊 New Report 🚀 "Responsibly Using and Reusing Non-Traditional Data Sources for Service Provision to Children: A Path Towards Due Diligence." 👉 explores the evolving re-use of non-traditional data in enhancing services for children and develops a due diligence method to asses risks involved when working with multiple partners. 🛡️ 📲 From social media interactions to mobile and geospatial data, the report focuses on how different types of non-traditional #data ✅ can be re-used to offer insights into children's needs ✅ and the risks and challenges that must be considered to prevent harm and loss of #trust. 🌍🔐 📋 To address the unique challenges at the intersection of data and #children the report provides: ✅ a structured consideration of key topics, including data relevance, #security, and #ethical issues ✅ a six-step due diligence process to ensure that data usage not only meets high ethical standards but also advances the #wellbeing and #rights of children. ➡️ Part of Responsible Data for Children, an initiative with UNICEF ✍️ Co-Authors: Sara Marcucci and Andrew Zahuranec 📕 Full Report: https://lnkd.in/ePiA_HxE 📝 Blog introducing the report: https://lnkd.in/eBs_WDyZ 💻 Responsible Data for Children initiative: https://rd4c.org/ #DataForGood #ChildWelfare #DueDiligence #EthicalDataUse #NonTraditionalData #ChildrensServices #Datagovernance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📊 New Report 🚀 "Responsibly Using and Reusing Non-Traditional Data Sources for Service Provision to Children: A Path Towards Due Diligence." 👉 explores the evolving re-use of non-traditional data in enhancing services for children and develops a due diligence method to asses risks involved when working with multiple partners. 🛡️ 📲 From social media interactions to mobile and geospatial data, the report focuses on how different types of non-traditional #data ✅ can be re-used to offer insights into children's needs ✅ and the risks and challenges that must be considered to prevent harm and loss of #trust. 🌍🔐 📋 To address the unique challenges at the intersection of data and #children the report provides: ✅ a structured consideration of key topics, including data relevance, #security, and #ethical issues ✅ a six-step due diligence process to ensure that data usage not only meets high ethical standards but also advances the #wellbeing and #rights of children. ➡️ Part of Responsible Data for Children, an initiative with UNICEF ✍️ Co-Authors: Sara Marcucci and Andrew Zahuranec 📕 Full Report: https://lnkd.in/ePiA_HxE 📝 Blog introducing the report: https://lnkd.in/eBs_WDyZ 💻 Responsible Data for Children initiative: https://rd4c.org/ #DataForGood #ChildWelfare #DueDiligence #EthicalDataUse #NonTraditionalData #ChildrensServices #Datagovernance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Data-driven decision making is crucial for equitable recovery and active conversations about data can help create more fruitful discussions and informed decisions. Data Chats allow communities to have deeper and more accurate conversations about the needs of residents and facilitate data-driven community action. In this article, Data You Can Use in Milwaukee shares how their Data Chats helped them effectively engage with residents, built capacity for residents to engage with local officials, and helped create long-term COVID-19 responses and solutions. Learn more about how Data Chats can help improve outcomes here: https://lnkd.in/gYRPjhej #DataEquity
Data Chats as an Organizing and Capacity-Building Process
medium.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In our latest blog post, Gregg Orton, Karthick Ramakrishnan and Akil Vohra coauthor an important piece that sheds light on a pivotal moment in federal policy on data collection relevant to communities of color — and why the federal government needs to take action right now to address this pressing issue. The last time the federal government revised its race and ethnicity standards across all federal data collections was in 1997 — nearly 30 years ago. It’s past time for updated guidelines, and to ensure timely and effective implementation informed by community expertise. Read the full blog post to understand the depth of these proposed changes and how they pave the way for a more inclusive and equitable society: https://lnkd.in/gc55drz4
Strengthening Federal Data Will Better Serve Communities of Color - Data Bits
https://aapidata.com/blog
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Survey data can provide meaningful insights to public sector agencies. It’s one of the most powerful tools to serve your community. Public sector agencies have multiple objectives. Gathering actionable feedback is essential to help you reach your goals." Should governments do their own national surveys (election style: all citizens called to do the survey) to know better their citizens concerns and with that, bridge the gap between politicians and citizens and, strategize better?
How The Public Sector Can Use Surveys To Better Inform Decision Making
cint.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
#MPNMember the Annie E. Casey Foundation recently launched Pro-DATA. This free resource supports data-driven decision-making and data transparency in youth justice at the local and state levels. Read more below and check out the tool for yourself. #JuvenileJustice #DataAnalystics #PhilanthropyInAction #MarylandPhilanthropy
President and CEO, The Annie E. Casey Foundation | Board Director | Strategist | Social Innovator | Thought Leader
MEET Pro-Data! Pro-DATA is a free resource created by the Annie E. Casey Foundation to support data-driven decision-making and data transparency in youth justice at the local and state levels. This online tool is open to all jurisdictions by request. We now have jurisdictions in 42 states uploading data which provides opportunities for comparison not previously available. Pro-DATA is an application for jurisdictions to gather and visualize their youth justice data on more than 100 measures, with the option to add unlimited additional measures to address local priorities. The application’s chart-making capability helps users identify opportunities for improvement and track what interventions work — and don’t work, and for which groups of youth. The dashboard lets users see patterns for all youth and then dive deeper into patterns by race and ethnicity, among other characteristics. This tool is a true game changer for system leaders, families and advocates. I am so very proud of our Juvenile Justice Strategy Group and our internal Business Technology teams who partnered to make this happen. We're not done. There are more features to come. But this is an amazing start to help the field better collect, analyze and share youth justice data. https://lnkd.in/e5GwZvim
Pro-DATA
aecf.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I have often referred to and used the excellent data, commentary and analysis that can be found at the Pew Research Center website. I saw this over the weekend and please note that the text and graphic are © Visual Capitalist, 2024. All Rights Reserved, used with permission. I have also often posted and commented on the enormous (and seemingly growing) divide and discourse in the United States today. Their data on net favorability rating confirms this without any question. The charts depict the net favorability ratings of 16 federal government agencies, based on the respondents’ party affiliation. To find this data, Pew Research Center surveyed more than 10,701 adults, between March 13-19, 2023. The partisan divide in America has also hit how positively Democrats and Republicans feel about key government agencies. The division is deepest for the CDC, the EPA and the Department of Education, where the difference in net favorability is as high as 70–100 percentage points. How was this data collected? Pew Research recruited respondents for their survey panel through a national, random sampling of residential addresses. The panel is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population. What is net favorability? For example: 80% of the Democrats rated the CDC “favorable” and 15% rated it “unfavorable.” The CDC’s net favorability with Democrats is 65%. Seems like the only thing we do all agree on in the United States today is that we disagree on just about everything including our governmental agencies.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
National CAPACD applauds today's announcement from the Biden Administration of revisions to Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 (SPD 15): Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. This monumental update, the first in over two decades, will provide a greater and more detailed understanding of America’s diverse population, which is a significant step towards a more inclusive and equitable society. Read our statement to learn more about the new revisions and what they mean for underserved communities: https://lnkd.in/eWnA8xU8
National CAPACD Affirms OMB’s Revisions to Federal Data Collection Standards - National CAPACD
nationalcapacd.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
54,205 followers
Instructional Designer
2moSuch important research and lessons learned. A key quote: "Asking directly allows people to self-identify or to choose not to."