New opportunity! Power and Renewables Underwriter - #London. To apply, please click the link below
Bruin’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Eversource-GIP at $4.26mn/MW V/S Dominion-Stonepeak at $2.3mn/MW: Enerdatics Analyses Top US Offshore Wind Deals Enerdatics has benchmarked Dominion Energy-Stonepeak’s transaction to the recent Eversource - GIP offshore wind deal and our analyses reveals several similarities and differences between the agreements: Similarities: -- Both deal structures enable the buyer to hedge against construction risk by setting a cap on their financial exposure. Until reaching this cap, the construction costs will be evenly split with the seller; thereafter, any excess will be borne by the seller. -- The transacted assets have 20-year utility PPAs. -- Assets are ready for construction and expected to be operational between 2026-2028. Differences: -- The Eversource portfolio is backed by a weighted average PPA tariff of $121.85/MWh, while Dominion’s CVOW project sells power at $93.1/MWh -- The Eversource portfolio has reached FID and secured funds through debt and green bonds for construction, Conversely, there has been no debt raise for CVOW yet, however, FID is anticipated shortly #EnerdaticsInsights #OffshoreWind #RenewableEnergy #WindPower #SustainableInvesting #CleanEnergy #EnergyTransition #WindEnergy #GreenBonds #UtilityPPA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Here is my three-minute guide on how to secure your first energy trading role💡📈 I’m keen to hear alternative advice from heads of trading and hiring managers🗣️ #trading #getintotrading #becomeatrader #energytrading #energytrader #energyindustry #energymarkets #powertrading #powertrader #powermarkets #natgas #naturalgas #gastrader #tradingcareers #tradingjobs #recruitment #energyrecruitment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One of our contracts over the last 18 months, helping to take a client's (8) projects in Virginia from clearing to activation has been a very satisfying contract. We acted as one of the owner's reps over the EPC on this multi-site portfolio handling; landowner issues, subcontractor issues, and racking... issues. Every aspect of that coaster, all in one project. We added to the team, relieving the workload, and improving the pace. We take on a lot of the work that requires a decade of experience in solar to do correctly, without the job hunt. Whether it is any phase of the large-scale portfolio process (origination through activation), or growing your Distributed Generation company from 10 to 50 employees. Give us a call and let us get creative moving you, your project, or your company to that next stage. #virginasolar #distributedgeneration #solar
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Director in Aker Solutions Entr| Floating Wind & Renewables | Bridging Technical and Commercial Solutions for our Clients
Is TRL (Technology Readiness Level) the right scale to assess bankability of #floatingwind? TRL is frequently discussed in relation to project bankability in the floating wind sector. While TRL provides good insight on the level of testing, is it comprehensive enough to cover all critical aspects that goes into bankability? Several dimensions beyond TRL can influence the bankability of offshore wind projects: 👉 Turbine manufacturer's perspective: How does turbine manufactures assess the specific technologies? 👉 Fabrication and installation approach: Are the strategies for fabrication and installation efficient and reliable? 👉 Experience from other industries: Does the designer or supplier have expertise from oil and gas or other industries that improve bankability? 👉 O&M approach: Are the maintenance requirements and operational risk fully understood? 👉 Contractual and Insurance coverage: Are the risks adequately covered through contracts and insurance? 👉 System Performance: How does the technology impact turbine and floater availability, as well as overall production? Given these complexities, should we consider developing a new scale or standard to better assess bankability for floating wind concepts? And are there other aspects beyond the ones stated above that should be considered? #offshorewind #renewableenergy #bankability #financing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Why is wind power popular?...Because it has lots of fans 𖣘 🤣 Here's a debrief on some of the roles I've got on my desk at the moment: 1. Remote working Energy Shift Trader (Electricity and Gas) 2. Intraday Shift Trader (Power and Gas) London 3. Intraday Shift Trader (Power and Gas) Dublin 4. Alpha Generation Energy Trader/Analyst Dublin Think you're ready to take on a new challenge with a platform that suits your needs and career aspirations? If yes, you know what to do 📩 #energytrading #energymarkets #gasmarkets #gastrading #shiftrading #intradaytrading #intraday #remotetrading #electricitymarkets #SEM #ISEM #alphageneration #londontraders #dublintraders #uktraders #imhiring
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I fully agree with this post from Magnus Christian Ebbesen. One of my standard recommendations to customers is not to focus on TRL only. The "speed", which includes awareness, plan and execution of floating technology providers/ developer to move up the TRL ladder is one aspect. The other is understanding the commercial, contractual and technical system behaviour of floating offshore wind with the target to achieve bankability and project finance. In end this turned fixed offshore wind in the success we see now...
Director in Aker Solutions Entr| Floating Wind & Renewables | Bridging Technical and Commercial Solutions for our Clients
Is TRL (Technology Readiness Level) the right scale to assess bankability of #floatingwind? TRL is frequently discussed in relation to project bankability in the floating wind sector. While TRL provides good insight on the level of testing, is it comprehensive enough to cover all critical aspects that goes into bankability? Several dimensions beyond TRL can influence the bankability of offshore wind projects: 👉 Turbine manufacturer's perspective: How does turbine manufactures assess the specific technologies? 👉 Fabrication and installation approach: Are the strategies for fabrication and installation efficient and reliable? 👉 Experience from other industries: Does the designer or supplier have expertise from oil and gas or other industries that improve bankability? 👉 O&M approach: Are the maintenance requirements and operational risk fully understood? 👉 Contractual and Insurance coverage: Are the risks adequately covered through contracts and insurance? 👉 System Performance: How does the technology impact turbine and floater availability, as well as overall production? Given these complexities, should we consider developing a new scale or standard to better assess bankability for floating wind concepts? And are there other aspects beyond the ones stated above that should be considered? #offshorewind #renewableenergy #bankability #financing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
A fascinating post by Magnus Christian Ebbesen regarding the TRL of floating wind. Not only does it bring into stark contrast the primary material of choice to date, but it further indicates the bias towards Sem-subs as the preferred foundation type. Beyond these obvious points, it raises the subject of how we properly measure the readiness and maturity of a concept, and is TRL a suitable metric on its own? As a final thought, is the graphic too skewed towards concepts with an O&G pedigree? With the numerous concepts under development, it is reasonable to consider that better floating solutions may exist at a lower TRL than those migrating from O&G. . . . . . #floatingwind #floatingwindsolutions #offshorewind #floatingwindinsurance #bankability #greensolutions #greenenergy #oneaon #aonunited
Director in Aker Solutions Entr| Floating Wind & Renewables | Bridging Technical and Commercial Solutions for our Clients
Is TRL (Technology Readiness Level) the right scale to assess bankability of #floatingwind? TRL is frequently discussed in relation to project bankability in the floating wind sector. While TRL provides good insight on the level of testing, is it comprehensive enough to cover all critical aspects that goes into bankability? Several dimensions beyond TRL can influence the bankability of offshore wind projects: 👉 Turbine manufacturer's perspective: How does turbine manufactures assess the specific technologies? 👉 Fabrication and installation approach: Are the strategies for fabrication and installation efficient and reliable? 👉 Experience from other industries: Does the designer or supplier have expertise from oil and gas or other industries that improve bankability? 👉 O&M approach: Are the maintenance requirements and operational risk fully understood? 👉 Contractual and Insurance coverage: Are the risks adequately covered through contracts and insurance? 👉 System Performance: How does the technology impact turbine and floater availability, as well as overall production? Given these complexities, should we consider developing a new scale or standard to better assess bankability for floating wind concepts? And are there other aspects beyond the ones stated above that should be considered? #offshorewind #renewableenergy #bankability #financing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Game around #PowerCurve Warranties: Over the period of last 10 years, How the Power Curve Guarantees changed from constant values such as 97%,98% etc to 100% - uncertainty? (Uncertainty range from 4% to 6% Plus if site calibration required and if not done then it will be additional 2%). Obliviously at the end of Power curve Test it become 96%, to 92% as per the present standard contract term in the market...... Better don't waste money on Power curve test in this case, just do not conduct the power curve test just because contract says. Waste of time and waste of Money. If you still wanted to follow this current method, then add the corresponding losses into your "Post Construction" Energy Assessment and link to Turbine Price accordingly as like the OEM linking the steal price into the Turbine cost. At least 4% to 6% energy shortage in the Operational project because of Power Curve. Adjust the same into Commercials at the end of Power curve test, Banks also should keep this as major contractual obligations to the project owners. #windturbine #warranty #contract #renewableenergy #ipp #bank #equity #renewablerevolution #powercurve #windfarm #bankable V2W Renewables Solutions V2W Software Solutions
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
CEO @ Beridi Maritime | Floating Offshore Wind | Civil Engineering | IESE PDG | Entrepreneurship & Innovation | Startup Investor
About TRL’s and its applicability to Floating Wind technologies. Spot on.
Director in Aker Solutions Entr| Floating Wind & Renewables | Bridging Technical and Commercial Solutions for our Clients
Is TRL (Technology Readiness Level) the right scale to assess bankability of #floatingwind? TRL is frequently discussed in relation to project bankability in the floating wind sector. While TRL provides good insight on the level of testing, is it comprehensive enough to cover all critical aspects that goes into bankability? Several dimensions beyond TRL can influence the bankability of offshore wind projects: 👉 Turbine manufacturer's perspective: How does turbine manufactures assess the specific technologies? 👉 Fabrication and installation approach: Are the strategies for fabrication and installation efficient and reliable? 👉 Experience from other industries: Does the designer or supplier have expertise from oil and gas or other industries that improve bankability? 👉 O&M approach: Are the maintenance requirements and operational risk fully understood? 👉 Contractual and Insurance coverage: Are the risks adequately covered through contracts and insurance? 👉 System Performance: How does the technology impact turbine and floater availability, as well as overall production? Given these complexities, should we consider developing a new scale or standard to better assess bankability for floating wind concepts? And are there other aspects beyond the ones stated above that should be considered? #offshorewind #renewableenergy #bankability #financing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨🚨FRAUD / SCAM ALERT 🚨 🚨 Must read for ALL solar colleagues & distributors. I recently, ALMOST, fell victim to an elaborate scam… Someone pretending to be Christophe Virondaud is attempting to “purchse” solar modules throughout the EU with lines of credit. The URL in the individual’s email ([email protected] )” links back to the main Technip website and they were able to produce ALL the required documentation to successfully be extended credit through Sinosure. P&L’s, tax returns, up to date balance sheets, articles of incorporation, etc etc. They were literally APPROVED for a $1,000,000 line of credit 🥴🥴🥴🥴 Thankfully, my spidey senses went off & even though the individual was approved, something about the last phone call I had with them rubbed me the wrong way… Upon further investigation, I was able to confirm they were not affiliated with Technip. I don’t want to see any colleagues fall for this, so please beware of this individual as they’re the best I’ve ever seen. #solar #solarenergy #solarpower #solarmodules #scam #scamalert #renewableenergy #renewables
To view or add a comment, sign in