#Job Alert! A law firm in New York City, NY, is seeking an experienced Insurance Coverage Attorney. The successful candidate will represent insurers in coverage matters and insurance coverage litigation, develop litigation strategies, conduct complex legal research, and provide comprehensive coverage advice. This role demands solid legal skills, excellent communication abilities, and a collaborative approach in a fast-paced legal environment. Duties: - Represent insurers in coverage matters and insurance coverage litigation. - Develop litigation strategies for insurance coverage disputes. - Perform critical roles in insurance coverage litigation and arbitration. - Conduct complex and rigorous legal research and analysis. - Draft memoranda, position letters, and legal correspondence. - Analyze insurance policies and provide coverage advice and recommendations to clients. - Supervise and participate in the mediation and settlement of underlying litigations worldwide. - Draft and review pleadings, memos, briefs, interrogatories, and other litigation documents. - Participate in depositions, document reviews, conferences, and all aspects of coverage litigations and arbitrations. - Work cooperatively with colleagues and other professionals. - Interact with clients and maintain strong client relationships. Requirements: - Admission to practice law in either New York or New Jersey. - 3 years of experience in commercial litigation or in-house experience with liability insurance policies. - 3-6 years of experience in a law firm or insurance company setting. - Strong legal research, writing, and verbal communication skills. - Excellent academic credentials and a solid work history. - Ability to work effectively in a collaborative team environment. Apply now or share this opportunity with your network, Click the link to learn more: https://lnkd.in/gGYSrrFp #BCGSearch #LegalJobs #AttorneyJobs # InsuranceCoverageAttorney #BCGJobs
BCG Attorney Search’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
I’ve spent my entire career working with the legal industry, primarily litigators from the AmLaw firms as well as in-house attorneys. Every year you see the same messaging in the industry: --> In-House counsel are finding more creative ways to manage outside counsel spend - budget keeps disappearing and more work is being done in-house --> Law firms are trying to find ways to get more competitive while also increase rates (and that’s been very apparent over the last 3-5 years with innovative technologies not only being used to help save the lawyers time, but built to support their in-house client community) In the last few years I’ve become intimately familiar with just how high those bills with outside counsel can be for litigated matters. Is it an impeccable work product completed by someone who has an expertise in this particular area and is well worth it? 10000% no argument there. However, there’s other steps you can take to ensure your law firm bills are more manageable and more predictable. The last several years of my life have been dedicated almost exclusively to managing legal spend, without sacrificing quality or level of service. I went from managing in-house spend on contract review to automate the obscene amount of NDAs/MSAs/POs/alltheacryonyms with AI to helping outside counsel manage spend on eDiscovery matters based on TB rather than user count or number of applications. I’m back for more with court reporting. In-house community, I’ve worked with you for years. You know panels of approved vendors aren’t exactly a new concept ..they’re being used by almost every insurance company in business today. You don’t have to be in insurance to dictate the services you want your law firm to use for you. I am here to help make your spending more predictable. Litigation happens. Sometimes it’s anticipated, often times it’s not…but it’s always expensive no matter how you slice it. Wouldn’t it be nice to have pre-negotiated rates agreed upon with a trusted vendor of your choosing before your next matter arises? What can Steno do for YOU?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Co-Founder & Executive Vice President of Sales at Magna Legal Services Co-Founder of JINLAW.ORG (Jewish American Insurance and Legal Professionals Association)
When the “you know what” hits the fan... your first call should be to Kopka Pinkus Dolin! KPD has over 100 talented attorneys and are trusted partners to the Top 10 insurance companies in the nation. Call up Gene Pinkus, Robert Kopka & Mark Dolin or click below to learn more! #LawFirm #DefenseAttorneys Magna Legal Services
Kopka Pinkus Dolin | Nationally Recognized Insurance Defense Law Firm
https://www.kopkalaw.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
There’s litigation finance and litigation insurance. Do you know the difference? In this blog post W. Tyler Perry breaks down the important but subtle differences, lays out best practices when working with a litigation funder and what else to keep in mind when considering litigation insurance. Check it out here: https://hubs.ly/Q02dzCYq0 #litigationfunding #legalfinance #litigation
How to Choose a Funder - Certum Group
https://certumgroup.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Right Off the Press 📰 is just one benefit provided to members of the Insurance Law Section of the State Bar of Texas. If you would like to receive these emails containing recent case law updates and job postings related to Texas Insurance Litigation, join the Section. You can also access the cases from Right Off the Press on the Section website at https://lnkd.in/g7AxshUA #texasinsurancelaw #law #insurance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
#hiring Partner, New York City, United States, fulltime #jobs #jobseekers #careers #NewYorkCityjobs #NewYorkjobs #Legal Apply: https://lnkd.in/ghNKVehU Rapidly growing law firm with great base pay and giving 35%-45% on businessThis Jobot Job is hosted by: Chris CavishAre you a fit? Easy Apply now by clicking the "Apply Now" button and sending us your resume.Salary: $250,000 - $750,000 per yearA bit about us:We are a prominent law firm with a rich history of providing comprehensive legal services to clients across a diverse range of industries. Established in 1969, we have consistently demonstrated our commitment to excellence, earning a reputation for our expertise in insurance recovery, corporate law, and litigation. With offices strategically located in major cities across the United States, including New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C., we have positioned ourselves as a trusted partner for clients seeking innovative and effective legal solutions. Our seasoned team of attorneys is known for their strategic thinking, legal acumen, and dedication to client success. Our practice areas encompass a wide spectrum, including insurance, real estate, environmental law, and bankruptcy, reflecting our versatility and ability to navigate complex legal landscapes. Through a client-focused approach and a track record of success, we continue to be a formidable force in the legal industry.Why join us? Base pay of $250,000 - $500,000 35%-45% on business that you bring in for the firm Medical, Dental, Vision 401k Firm is looking to grow by 40 attorneys within the next 2 yearsJob DetailsPosition Overview:As a Partner, you will play a key role in leading and expanding our business The ideal candidate will have a proven track record of successfully handling complex matters and possess a deep understanding of the legal landscape in this field. You should be bringing a book of business worth $800,000 - $1,000,000.Responsibilities:Client Advocacy: Serve as a trusted advisor to clients, providing strategic guidance and legal expertise in insurance recovery matters. Develop and maintain strong client relationships through effective communication and exceptional service.Leadership and Mentorship: Lead and mentor a team of attorneys, fostering a collaborative and supportive work environment. Share knowledge and insights to enhance the professional development of junior lawyers.Business Development: Drive business growth by identifying and pursuing new client opportunities. Develop and execute strategic initiatives to expand the firm's presence in the insurance recovery and litigation market.Legal Expertise: Stay abreast of industry trends, legal developments, and emerging issues in insurance law. Leverage your expertise to provide innovative solutions to clients and maintain a competitive edge in the marketplace.Litigation Management: Oversee and manage complex insurance litigation matters from inception
https://www.jobsrmine.com/us/new-york/new-york-city/partner/471226033
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you are an insurance company or a self-insured selecting a litigation defense firm, are you considering the following? 1. Trial Results: Does the firm actually try cases to conclusion and consistently obtain favorable outcomes? A firm that regularly tries and wins cases does more than achieve favorable outcomes in the specific cases tried. A firm with a reputation for getting winning trial results has a better chance of efficiently and fairly settling cases without incurring the expenses associated with extended discovery and trial; 2. Client Driven, Not Billable Driven: Will the firm work toward a quick resolution of a matter, even if that means significantly less billables and revenue to the firm for that one case? The goal is to efficiently resolve cases for just and fair sums. If that means the attorney's fees are nominal, so be it. Successful firms know that keeping a file open for one minute longer than necessary is a recipe for long-term failure. Bringing cases to efficient and fair resolutions is the key to a successful long-term relationship with clients. 3. Works Well with Others: Are you hiring professionals? Many lawyers fight just to fight. That attitude makes it impossible to efficiently handle matters. Searching for common ground is necessary to handle litigation in an efficient manner. That is impossible if you do not have a professional relationship with your adversary. 4. One Size Doesn't Fit All: Does the firm adapt to different cases and situations? No two cases are the same. There must be variations in strategy depending on the details and circumstances of each individual case. It is important for lawyers to recognize how different issues and facts will play out and to adapt case handling based upon that. 5. Value: Am I getting my money's worth? This one is obvious and doesn't involve just the hourly rate. Law firms should strive to control their total fee and expense spends on a per case basis.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Exciting news! Daniel Coker attorneys have once again secured their spots in the highly prestigious 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®, the ultimate guide to legal excellence since 1983! Best Lawyers' reputation as the most reliable source of legal referrals is undeniable, and with its presence in over 75 countries since 2006, it continues to command respect throughout the legal community. This year's 2024 edition involved an analysis of over 12.2 million votes to identify the top legal talent, as recognized by their peers. Congratulations to the distinguished lawyers of Daniel Coker for their well-deserved recognition in the esteemed 2024 Best Lawyers in America list. Their expertise spans diverse practice areas and regions, a testament to their unwavering commitment to legal excellence and unmatched skill in the field. Gulfport, MS Kristi Rogers Brown -Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jackson, MS George E. Abdo III - Commercial Litigation, Construction Law, Litigation – Construction, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Gary K. Jones - Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Thomas R. Julian - Insurance Law, Litigation – Insurance, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Roy A. Smith, Jr. - Insurance Law, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Jason Strong - Litigation – Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants M. James Weems - Litigation – Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Oxford, MS Wilton V. Byars III - Insurance Law, Litigation – Insurance, Municipal Law, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants J. Miles Forks- Municipal Law Timothy M. Peeples - Litigation - Labor and Employment, Litigation – Municipal, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants George E. Read- Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Kenneth A. Rutherford - Commercial Litigation, Corporate Law Shea S. Scott- Insurance Law, Litigation – Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Robert F. Stacy, Jr. - Litigation – Construction, Litigation – Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Join me and a dynamic panel today sponsored by the ABA Litigation Committee for an informative roundtable on Practical Strategies to Maximize Insurance Coverage for IP and Antitrust Disputes. Registration info below. McGuireWoods LLP #insurance #insurancecoverage #riskmanagement
Please join the ABA Litigation Section Corporate Counsel Committee for an informative roundtable discussion on Practical Strategies for Maximizing Insurance Coverage for IP and Antitrust Disputes. We have a dynamic panel (David A. Gauntlett, Mikaela Whitman, Lawrence Fine (he/him), Kimberly Cauthorn) who are highly experienced and will offer practical tips for both in-house and outside counsel. ABA Litigation Section Corporate Counsel Committee Tuesday, March 5, 2024 9:30-10:30 AM PT | 10:30-11:30 AM MT | 11:30 AM-12:30 PM CT | 12:30-1:30 PM ET Program Description: The panel will discuss use cases and provide practical advice on how in-house counsel can utilize their existing insurance policies to maximize coverage in an unanticipated way (for example, by using D&O insurance for potential coverage in antitrust actions) as well as better mitigate risk by obtaining insurance for specific litigation risks (for example, intellectual property insurance). The panel will also provide advice on how in-house counsel can work more effectively with their in-house risk managers and outside brokers particularly when balancing considerations such as providing insurers notice of a potential claim, giving up control over the defense of the litigation, and managing concerns that claims will increase premiums. You can find the event information here (https://lnkd.in/eVh3sATw) and the registration link for the roundtable here ((https://lnkd.in/e8-RcJ24).
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Defense lawyers can't fix stupid. I have had a lot of success litigating premises liability cases against various companies over the years. My success hasn't come from complex or novel legal strategies or anything like that. My success has come from the dumb employees that work for the Defendant. It's funny because many times the Defendant (and their insurance overlords) will hire top-tier law firms to represent them in the case. Lawyers with admirable legal pedigrees and significant trial experience. But unfortunately (for the insurance company) Defense lawyers can't fix stupid. I had a case where the lawyer from a big fancy firm, (Old White Man, White Man, & Associates) filed a well-researched and thoroughly written motion for summary judgment on a "rainy day" slip and fall case. Unfortunately, Defendant's employee testified, "Yeah, I knew the floor was wet before the customer walked it, but I didn't clean it up because I was busy and that's someone else's job to clean the floor." That motion was denied and we proceeded to trial. Another case, a lawyer from an even fancier defense firm (Even Older White Man, White Man, & Associates) filed a well-researched motion for summary judgment as well. Unfortunately, the discovery revealed that shortly after my client was injured, the Store Manager called my client on the phone and said, "Well, I guess one of my employees must've put the (50 lbs object) on the wrong shelf and it fell on you." That motion was denied and we subsequently settled for a reasonable amount. So the moral of the story is: never be intimidated by how many lawyers the insurance companies throw on a case or even how experienced opposing counsel is. The key is to dig deep and reveal how an employee's screw-up caused your client's unnecessary injury. Because Defense lawyers can't fix stupid.
To view or add a comment, sign in
36,550 followers