ArcSite’s Post

The best system architecture diagrams are accurate and *detailed*. These details are essential for new hires and those working daily in large, complex environments. Unfortunately, traditional image diagrams are constrained by space, meaning important system details must be put elsewhere or excluded entirely. Ilograph solves this with interactive diagrams. Information about system components (and their connections) is revealed as the user browses the system, allowing for nearly limitless detail in the diagram itself. For professionals working with large, complex systems, Ilograph is a game-changer. By upgrading your visual documentation with an interactive diagram tool, you can ensure that all the crucial details are exactly where they should be.

System design is the process of defining the architecture, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified requirements. It involves creating a blueprint for the construction of a software or hardware system, addressing various aspects such as functionality, performance, security, and scalability. The goal of system design is to provide a detailed plan that guides the implementation and development of the system, ensuring it meets the desired objectives and is capable of efficient and reliable operation. #systemdesign #striver #ScalingSuccess #TechTales

System design is the process of defining the architecture, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified requirements. It involves creating a blueprint for the construction of a software or hardware system, addressing various aspects such as functionality, performance, security, and scalability. The goal of system design is to provide a detailed plan that guides the implementation and development of the system, ensuring it meets the desired objectives and is capable of efficient and reliable operation. #systemdesign #striver #ScalingSuccess #TechTales

Great doc out for review 👍🏻 Authorization Best Practices for Systems using LLMs - This document targets engineers, architects, and security professionals, providing an understanding of the specific risks and challenges associated with using LLMs in system design. It aims to inform about the special considerations required and explore the pitfalls in authorization and security. The guide outlines design patterns and best practices for integrating LLMs into broader systems. It covers high-level patterns for extending LLM capabilities, such as adding context or enabling interaction with other components and services. Recommendations, considerations, and pitfalls for each pattern are discussed to help system architects effectively navigate trade-offs. https://lnkd.in/gi3r_HYQ

This document targets engineers, architects, and security professionals, providing an understanding of the specific risks and challenges associated with using LLMs in system design. It aims to inform about the special considerations required and explore the pitfalls in authorization and security. The guide outlines design patterns and best practices for integrating LLMs into broader systems. It covers high-level patterns for extending LLM capabilities, such as adding context or enabling interaction with other components and services. Recommendations, considerations, and pitfalls for each pattern are discussed to help system architects effectively navigate trade-offs.

🚀 Chain of Responsibility Design Pattern 🚀 The Chain of Responsibility pattern allows a request to be passed through a chain of handlers. Each handler can process the request or pass it to the next, promoting loose coupling and modularity. Key Components: Handler: Defines request handling and links to the next handler. ConcreteHandler: Implements specific request processing or forwarding. Real-World Applications: 🔹 Logging Systems: Different log levels handled by separate loggers. 🔹 Event Handling: GUI events processed by a chain of handlers. 🔹 Security: Requests undergo authentication, authorization, and auditing stages. This pattern enhances flexibility and extensibility in your systems! #DesignPatterns #SoftwareEngineering #ChainOfResponsibility #Tech #SystemDesign

What are the steps you should take as architect in.net environment to improve the performance of your application

Some learnabilities - System Architectural Characteristics 1. Performance efficiency a. Time behaviour-response time, resource utilization,capacity 2. Compatibility a.coexistence, interoperability 3. Usability a.recognizability, user error protection,accessibility 4. Reliability a. Maturiof software, fault tolerance of system, recoverability 5. Security a. Confidentiality, integrity,nonrepudiation, authenticity 6. Maintainability a. Modularity,reusability, modifiability, testability 7. Portability a. Adaptability, installability,replacablity Last but not least Funtional sutailbility, funtional completness, functional correctness Can we accomplish these tasks and its objectives while designing of software architecture?? Dm me if need more inputs.. #learn #think #design #software #architecture #process

Change is the only constant in software, we all have to deal with it. And every change increases the risk of problems. In this video, you'll learn about a technique you must adopt when building event driven systems. #serverless #eda #architecture https://lnkd.in/e8UbKD9A

Which of the layers of this diagram is most important to your end users? Are you familiar with the "clean architecture" diagram? By looking at this diagram, what's the most important piece? The big yellow circle draws your eye to it. it wants you to believe that entities are most important. if you showed this to a user of your software and asked what's most important, what do you think they would say? Do you think it would be entities? How about external interfaces, gateways, or controllers!? I don't think so. As a software user, which things do you care most about? I bet a majority of us care about the one thing that is in RED, "Use Cases". What can this software do for me? What problems does it solve? How will this help me be more productive or achieve my goals? How much do you think users care about how the use cases are implemented?