Achieva Credit Union’s Post

Vote Tripling is the simple act of asking your supporters, friends or family to text or call 2 or 3 friends and remind them to vote. In other words, it's taking 1 vote you already have...and tripling it. Click here to learn more: https://loom.ly/q7cdI6U #VoteTripling #GrassrootsStrategies #WinWithCHQ

It's #NationalVoterRegistrationDay! Take 30 seconds to register to vote, check your registration status, or find a registration event near you. #VoteReady #YourVoiceMatters https://lnkd.in/g_3vePg

This article speaks volumes on Judy!

🌟 One week left to cast your vote! 🌟 We're thrilled to have CYPFER as a contender and need your support to help us make a big impact! Every vote counts and we'd love to have yours. Voting is quick and simple—just click on the link below to get started. 👉 Vote for CYPFER https://lnkd.in/gHGWM7Vs Your support is invaluable to us. Let's make it happen together! 🚀 #VoteForCYPFER #CommunitySupport #FinalCountdown

BREAKING NEWS: The ACLU of Minnesota filed an amicus brief today seeking to help overturn decisions by a Mille Lacs County district judge that could steal the vote from more than 50,000 Minnesotans. “Shockingly, beginning about two weeks ago, a single judge in one Minnesota county began using the machinery of the judicial process to improperly disenfranchise Minnesota vote,” the friend-of-the-court brief said. Judge Matthew Quinn ruled that people who are on felony probation, parole or supervision cannot vote. That decision flies in the face of a law the Legislature passed this spring to restore the vote to more than 55,000 Minnesotans once they are no longer incarcerated, and a state Supreme Court ruling that clearly acknowledged the Legislature’s power to do so. “The district court’s orders are judicial activism that makes Minnesota’s judicial system a cause of voter confusion, suppression, and intimidation,” said the brief filed by the ACLU-MN and a pro bono team from Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. The amicus brief urges the state Court of Appeals to immediately halt the ruling and send it directly to the state Supreme Court for a decision “to promptly and conclusively stop the district court from its unlawful and injudicious behavior.” The brief says that Judge Quinn’s decision:  ◾ Violates the state Constitution.  ◾ Was made without a request from anyone.  ◾ Abandons “all pretense of exercising judicial restraint.”  ◾ Creates chaos right before an election in violation of U.S. Supreme Court precedent. ◾ Chills the exercise of voting, a core constitutional right, by making 50,000 Minnesotans’ ability to vote uncertain.  ◾ Disproportionately hurts people of color. At the end of 2021, Mille Lacs County disenfranchised 5% of Black residents and 15% of Indigenous residents, compared to 2% of all people.  Read it here:

Commission

Hi BPS, as a student member I would like to ask the candidates their thoughts on the Cass Review and its implications for the BPS going forward. Can I put this question to all candidates or do I need to directly ask each of them?

Solicitations typically define a strength, but sometimes they don't. As this case illustrates, if the solicitation doesn't define a strength, you need to be careful about inferring a definition from the agency's evaluation. Subscribe to Pub K here: https://lnkd.in/dfKsth #govcon #pubkgroup #governmentcontracts #bidprotests