Brandon Hoffman

Great question by Jason Long on a previous thread ( link in comments below): """ I'd be curious to understand the SECs rationale for making sub-$1B valuation IPOs so difficult. The US public market might be losing its agility by effectively barring small-caps from having a fighting chance. As you mentioned, plenty of great companies IPO'd below the $1B range. """ Here's the 3 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission mandates with roughly # of employees devoted to each. 1. Investor protection -- Think securities police -- 2,500 2. Maintaining efficient markets -- think regulators -- 2,500 3. Capital formation -- think helping businesses raise capital -- 2 Why? The SEC has an impossible task of policing a $100 Trillion stock and bond market with 2,500 cops. So, they focus on the big banner cases that are most likely to get the rest of the market to pay attention and change behavior. Congress isn't going to ask the SEC commissioners to testify as to why small businesses struggle to IPO. But they do ask them to testify when stock markets collapse or we have derivatives crisis like 2008-09. And, so they work very hard to make sure investors don't get screwed, and that we have efficient public markets. But as a result, compliance to be a public company costs between $2-5 million a year. This is why there's half as many public companies as there were 20 years ago. Crowd-funding is a thing, but only a couple hundred companies take advantage of that every year, because if a crowd-funding investor buys stock in a small business, where can they resell the stock and take a profit? There's no stock exchange available to do that. So, small business capital formation is left to the venture capital community. VC's funds are structured so they and their investors can only make money on their fund when they invest in future unicorns.

3

3 Comments

Seed VCs are turning to new ‘pro rata’ funds that help them compete with the big firms Alpha Partners, SignalRank and now SaaS Ventures help seed VCs pay for shares when big VCs try to price — or push — them out Lee Edwards, partner at Root VC, has a saying at his firm that “pro rata rights are earned, not given.” That may be a bit of a stretch since pro rata refers to a term that VCs put in their term sheets that gives them the right to buy more shares in a portfolio company during consequent funding rounds to maintain an ownership percentage and avoid dilution. Still, while these rights are not exactly “earned,” they can be expensive. One of the latest trends in VC investing these days are funds dedicated to helping seed VCs exercise their pro rata rights. https://lnkd.in/dRM3RvdA By Christine Hall

13

Fundraising founders, don’t be too hard on yourself—it’s a tough fundraising environment, and that’s no secret. But remember to keep raising your standards because the bar for VC funding is getting higher, and you’ve got to meet it. As the venture capital landscape tightens, competition for dollars is fiercer than ever. At Startup Ignition Ventures, we’re seeing this shift firsthand, every day more and more apparent. In 2021 and 2022, many startups could secure VC checks despite being loosely thrown together and rough around the edges. Fast forward to 2024, and those same startups wouldn’t make the cut. That's not a knock on yesterday's startups as much as it is a contrast to today’s fundraising environment being completely different. Today, the founders getting funded are buttoned-up, detail-oriented, and operating at a much higher level. Everything has to be top-notch to catch a VC’s attention. Why the change? The number of active investors has dropped by 38% from 2022 to 2024 (PitchBook), meaning fewer deals are being made. VC funding is also down over 30% year-over-year (GlobalData). This means the standard has tightened, and startups must rise well above the average “2022 or 2023 fundability status” to secure 2024 investment. Startups now need to show exceptional business models, traction, products, and teams to stand out in a shrinking pool of opportunities. The landscape may be tough, but it’s also ripe for startups that prove they’re exceptional. Now is the time to build, to gear up, and then be ready for further opportunity as the market begins to turn. Which I personally think is around the corner in 2025.

138

13 Comments

Industry Ventures has announced a $900M early-stage hybrid fund, signaling significant movement in venture funding and the secondary market. - Fund allocation: 40% to VC funds, 40% to Series B startup investments, 20% to acquiring stakes in emerging investment firms from other LPs. - The fund is over 50% larger than its $575M predecessor. - Focus on Series B companies from manager relationships. - Industry Ventures now manages over $8B in total assets. This development reflects significant activity in valuation, funding strategies, and secondary market dynamics. For the latest secondary coverage and trading SaxonWeber | ShareWell #secondaries #saxonweber

9