Aldo Spadoni

Let me be clear: I think a major impact event is one of the most overrated "existential risks" around. Thanks for that, Hollywood. I may be behind the times, but I remember an estimate that a supervolcano event of similar magnitude was about seven times more likely. Think about it: when was the last time some driver behind you honked irritably, when you failed to notice that the light had turned green because you were deep in angst-drenched thought about the chance of a supervolcano eruption? On the other hand, such a geological catastrophe isn't something we can do much about except conduct risk-zonation studies and plan for very large-scale refugee flows. Now that a number of asteroid missions have succeeded, and more are planned, it's certainly interesting and a little disturbing that people still have little idea of how to address a threat that some "we" CAN do something about. I'm not sure any outfit has done more thinking about this than the folks at the B612 Foundation (Schweikart et al.). Admit it: you've never heard of them. But they are very smart. They've even looked at the geopolitics of decision-making when an object (comet or asteroid) could be nudged from hitting a richer nation to hitting a poorer one, or nudged to hitting a nation that's not part of the undoubtedly quasi-military alliance that would be attempting deflection. Looming over all of us is that "x-risks" still come mostly from humanity doing unto itself what none of us would want to have done to us personally. The ability to move asteroids is the ability to strategically weaponize them. Just because new asteroids can be discovered doesn't automatically mean that discoveries will be announced. And because their orbits are chaotic in ways that can be manipulated with relatively low thrust, even if we once tracked an asteroid before doesn't mean we can do it again. In fact, there's a whole niche of amateur astronomy -- asteroid occultation observation -- devoted to nothing more than seeing whether an asteroid is where it was predicted to be. We already know that it's possible to launch national-defense satellites that elude detection for a long time. If stuff can get lost or hidden even in Earth orbit, how much easier in interplanetary space? Thus a new Damocletian sword emerges: the ability to hide asteroids, nudge them onto Earth-impact trajectories, and continue to maintain deflection capability unless some other superpower snuffs yours. Which would work probably as well as MAD doctrine has for nuclear weapons -- until the day comes when there's a virtually unassailable society in space that has this deflection capability. Then who's running the world? https://lnkd.in/gRVpWAgr

The T-energy Units that create these phenomena in our physical universe or P-domain originate from C-domain. CTP processes create everything we see. #newscience #newcosmology #cosmology

'gravity control propulsion' isn't some 'New Age' woo-woo thing. (https://bit.ly/3HZBdYu) Was attempted previously. The main issue is they didn't have the correct science or know-how to make it work. Requires a different approach and a completely different way of thinking and different CTPSci Sciences. (https://lnkd.in/gmPDJV-H) #newscience #propulsion #CTPPropulsion #CTPSci #stakeholders #investors #capital #HNWI #HNWIs #UHNWI #UHNWIs #CTPcraft