Bright Calcs LLC

BC – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – BC Introduction VI – Services I Some “new” BC followers ask about BC, BC technical approach, services, etc. Accordingly, next posts will be related to BC Process Safety (PS) & Loss Prevention (LP); e.g., mission, scope, purpose, technical approach, etc. BC services are focused on providing robust and accurate results to decision-makers and/or Authorities responsible to Manage PS. BC classifies the PS field into four main categories:   1. System/Process Characterization 2. PS Analysis 3. PS Assessment 4. PS Measures   Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #processsafety #lossprevention #PHA #HAZOP #decisionmaking #layersofprotection #mitigationmeasures #risk #consequence #Training #PSM #RAGAGEP #EHS #HSE #CFD #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #dominoeffect #detonation #deflagration #VCE #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #API #NFPA #ASME #COMAH #overpressure #PSV #OSHAPSM #SVA #BESS

BC – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – BC Introduction V – Experience, Co-Founder & CEO, Publications Some “new” BC followers ask about BC, BC technical approach, services, etc. Accordingly, next posts will be related to BC Process Safety & Loss Prevention; e.g., mission, scope, purpose, technical approach, etc. Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #processsafety #lossprevention #PHA #HAZOP #decisionmaking #layersofprotection #mitigationmeasures #risk #consequence #Training #PSM #RAGAGEP #EHS #HSE #CFD #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #dominoeffect #detonation #deflagration #VCE #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #API #NFPA #ASME #COMAH #overpressure #PSV #OSHAPSM #SVA #BESS

BC – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – BC Introduction IV – Scope-Purpose-Objective-Commitment Some “new” BC followers ask about BC, BC technical approach, services, etc. Accordingly, next posts will be related to BC Process Safety (PS) & Loss Prevention (LP); e.g., mission, scope, purpose, technical approach, etc.      1. BC Scope - Process Safety Analysis, Assessment and Measures in the Process Industry:      2. BC Purpose - Focused on avoiding: (1) Property Damage, (2) Personnel / Public Injury, (3) Environmental Impact, and (4) Operation Interruption      3. BC Objective - Providing advanced/reliable results and competitive, economic solutions. The BC objective is only possible when optimizing the combination of the following factors: a. Powerful capabilities in the creation, modification, analysis, and optimization of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) drawings or technical illustrations, and modern tools for digitization both vector-based or raster graphics; i.e., development of advanced 2D and 3D model representations in very short periods of time; e.g., 3D modeling, 3D reconstruction model development - photogrammetry, processing & editing 3D meshes. b. Knowledge of the state-of-the-art of the PS field, and LP. c. Robust techniques and tools using computers and information technologies in the design analysis and synthesis capable of solving challenging open-ended and/or integrated real-life problems; e.g., Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA). d. Performance of unimaginable processing power of computers; i.e., completion of robust simulations in very short periods of time. 4. BC Commitment - Providing most honest approach and detailed guidance to decision-makers. Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #processsafety #lossprevention #PHA #HAZOP #decisionmaking #layersofprotection #mitigationmeasures #risk #consequence #Training #PSM #RAGAGEP #EHS #HSE #CFD #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #dominoeffect #detonation #deflagration #VCE #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #API #NFPA #ASME #COMAH #overpressure #PSV #OSHAPSM #SVA #BESS

BC – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – BC Introduction III – Technical Approach & Key Point Some “new” BC followers ask about BC, BC technical approach, services, etc. Accordingly, next posts will be related to BC Process Safety & Loss Prevention; e.g., mission, scope, purpose, technical approach, etc. As concerns have increased in the process industry about the possible consequences of effects such as fires, explosions, and hazardous dispersions, so has the need for accurate predictions of such increased effects. The predictions have improved by carrying out experiments to ensure a better understanding by developing mathematical models, from simple experimental correlated-based methods, phenomenological modeling, up to advanced and modern Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) modeling such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Clearly, which technical approach is the most appropriate to be considered is directly a function of the purpose, scope, and objective of the analysis. *However: BC will always argue the need to account for the fluid-geometry interaction when analyzing potential hazardous outcomes and/or potential Layers Of Protection (LOP) to be designed and installed in the process industry. *How?: BC uses advanced, modern, validated, and robust computer software tools to simulate performance in order to assist in the resolution of engineering problems including simulation, validation and optimization of processes-systems featured in the process industry; i.e., CAE procedure, which requires the completion of the following generic tasks: a. Pre-processing, which requires the characterization of the process-system; e.g., system geometry development and representation, physicochemical properties of the system, boundary conditions or constrains. b. Solving, which applies the appropriate mathematical formulation of the underlying physics; e.g., CFD, FEA. c. Post-processing, which requires the representation of the results to be analyzed. Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #processsafety #lossprevention #PHA #HAZOP #decisionmaking #layersofprotection #mitigationmeasures #risk #consequence #Training #PSM #RAGAGEP #EHS #HSE #CFD #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #dominoeffect #detonation #deflagration #VCE #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #API #NFPA #ASME #COMAH #overpressure #PSV #OSHAPSM #SVA  #BESS

BC – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – BC Introduction II Some “new” BC followers ask about BC, BC technical approach, services, etc. Accordingly, next posts will be related to BC Process Safety & Loss Prevention; e.g., mission, scope, purpose, technical approach, etc. This post simply shares the simplified BC structure (see picture below). Next related posts will explain-illustrate each of the related structure topics… Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #processsafety #lossprevention #PHA #HAZOP #decisionmaking #layersofprotection #mitigationmeasures #risk #consequence #Training #PSM #RAGAGEP #EHS #HSE #CFD #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #dominoeffect #detonation #deflagration #VCE #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #API #NFPA #ASME #COMAH #overpressure #PSV #OSHAPSM #SVA  #BESS

BC – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – BC Introduction Some “new” BC followers ask about BC, BC technical approach, services, etc. Accordingly, next posts will be related to BC Process Safety & Loss Prevention; e.g., mission, scope, purpose, technical approach, etc. * BC Mission - Accurate calculations, robust results, and elegant cost-effective solutions; i.e., "The more accurate and robust the results, the more reliable information for decision-makers and/or authorities; i.e., conservative results entail unnecessary economic investment, while underestimation may cause a major disaster." Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #facilitysiting #processindustry #processsafety #lossprevention #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #detonation #deflagration #CFD #PHA #HAZOP #HAZID #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #decisionmaking #mitigationmeasures #training #HSE

BC - Sharing Cases-Topics- Knowledge – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – Elementary Information related to FSS - Summary Facility Siting Study (FSS) standards emphasize the importance of a consequence/risk-based approach to facility siting and layout, and provide guidance on how to identify and mitigate hazards associated with building location. They are intended to be used in conjunction with other industry standards and regulations, such as OSHA and EPA guidelines. Key/basic takeaways from FSS standards include: * Conduct a thorough hazard assessment to identify potential consequence/risks associated with building location * Use a consequence/risk-based approach to determine the acceptable distance between buildings and hazards * Design and layout buildings to minimize the risk of accidents and environmental harm *Implement fire protection and emergency response plans to mitigate the effects of an accident * Ensure compliance with relevant regulations and industry standards By following these guidelines, facility operators and designers can help minimize the consequence/risk of accidents and environmental harm, and ensure a safer and more sustainable operation. Summary - BC Mission: Accurate calculations, robust results, and elegant cost-effective solutions. *The more accurate and robust the results, the more reliable information for decision-makers and/or authorities; i.e., conservative results entail unnecessary economic investment, while underestimation may cause a major disaster. Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz #facilitysiting #processindustry #processsafety #lossprevention #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #detonation #deflagration #CFD #PHA #HAZOP #HAZID #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #decisionmaking #mitigationmeasures #training #HSE

BC - Sharing Cases-Topics- Knowledge – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – Elementary Information related to FSS BC Facility Siting Study (FSS) Guideline – Phase IV: Mitigation Plan Assuming FSS Phase II and/or FSS Phase III results confirm a non-acceptable/non-tolerable occupied building damage/risk level, FSS Phase IV should be applied. As per API RP 752/753, any existing building intended for occupancy and having a hazardous exposure that exceeds the applicable criteria should be included in the building siting evaluation for toxic/flammable material release, and a mitigation plan should be developed to address the issue. The mitigation plan shall include the mitigation measures and the schedule for implementation, and both the mitigation measures and schedule should be documented. While API RP 752/753 does not prescribe a time frame for completing implementation of the mitigation strategy, it is expected to track the implementation of the mitigation plan in a manner similar to that used for PHAs recommendations. Although this process requires time and upfront investment, the outcome of the process shall produce prioritized mitigation strategies or a combination of strategies that reduce facility damage/risk to acceptable/tolerable levels, while minimizing overall capital expense on mitigation plan. This is according to BC mission: accurate calculations, robust results, and elegant cost-effective solutions for decision-making. Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #facilitysiting #processindustry #processsafety #lossprevention #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #detonation #deflagration #CFD #PHA #HAZOP #HAZID #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #decisionmaking #mitigationmeasures #training #HSE

BC - Sharing Cases-Topics- Knowledge – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – Elementary Information related to FSS BC Facility Siting Study (FSS) Guideline – Phase III: Risk Analysis Assuming that all FSS Phase II technical criteria (i.e., screening, detailed, and advanced) confirm a non-acceptable occupied building damage that would require mitigation, etc.; an option could be to develop Phase III with the aim to verify if the “Risk Level” is acceptable or not. A risk based approach requires the execution of the following tasks:      a. Identification of ALL Loss Of Containment (LOC) scenarios by considering multiple release locations and release hole sizes; i.e., several release sizes are defined ensuring small, medium, large and catastrophic hazardous releases.     b. Consequence Analysis including explosion, fire, and dispersion modeling, which multiple atmospheric stabilities, wind speeds, and wind directions; i.e., occupant vulnerability criteria is established for acquiring the pursued distances of affectation.     c. Frequency Analysis including the estimation of release event frequencies based on equipment failure rates, estimation of ignition probabilities and other conditional events, and probabilities of all-weather combinations considered.     d. Risk Evaluation by combining consequences and frequencies of LOCs by using several available and recognized tools; e.g., isorisk contours, exceedance curves.     e. Comparison between the actual risk level and the selected Tolerable Risk Criteria; i.e., in the risk-based approach, the sum of the impact contribution of all LOCs are compared with the applicable vulnerability criteria using the concept of risk Next BC shall be focused on introducing FSS Phase IV… Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #facilitysiting #processindustry #processsafety #lossprevention #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #detonation #deflagration #CFD #PHA #HAZOP #HAZID #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #decisionmaking #mitigationmeasures #training #HSE

BC - Sharing Cases-Topics- Knowledge – Process Safety & Loss Prevention Selected Topic – Elementary Information related to FSS BC Facility Siting Study (FSS) Guideline – Phase II: Consequence Analysis With FSS Phase I (Screening Analysis), the responsible to execute FSS Phase II possesses a complete set of information that allows defining and model the defined Maximum Credible Events (MCEs), and FSS Phase II results shall clearly answer the following question: ¿which are the effects/damage level of all potential outcomes that MCEs could entail? To accurately answer that question, it is required to quantify the effects of fires (i.e., thermal flux or thermal radiation dose), the effects of explosions (i.e., overpressure or overpressure/impulse), and the effects of toxic dispersions (i.e., toxic concentration or dose). Results from consequence modeling are then compared with acceptable occupant vulnerability criteria for supporting decision-makers on how to proceed. Per each building under FSS Phase II scope of work, two subsequent occupant vulnerability criteria will be considered: a. A conservative criteria shall be applied for screening purposes, and if criteria is acceptable, the occupied building is considered to be in a safe location, and no need for further actions. b. Only if the “screening” criteria fails, a more detailed occupant vulnerability criteria shall be used. If the building complies with the more detailed criteria, the occupied building is considered to be in a safe location, and no need for further actions. If this is not the case, then the decision-makers and will decide if specific and advanced Computations Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are useful and relevant, if FSS Phase III has to be conducted, or if an effective mitigation measure is applicable. Next BC shall be focused on explaining FSS Phase II development… Follow BC: https://lnkd.in/e67XrJz   #facilitysiting #processindustry #processsafety #lossprevention #ventilation #dispersion #fire #explosion #detonation #deflagration #CFD #PHA #HAZOP #HAZID #dust #mist #BLEVE #runaway #decisionmaking #mitigationmeasures #training #HSE