How can you design interview questions to assess problem-solving in a fast-paced environment?
If you are hiring for a role that requires solving complex problems in a fast-paced environment, you need to design interview questions that can effectively assess the candidates' skills and abilities. In this article, you will learn how to create interview questions that challenge the candidates to demonstrate their problem-solving process, creativity, and adaptability. You will also learn some tips on how to evaluate the candidates' responses and avoid common pitfalls.
The first step in designing interview questions is to define the problem that you want the candidates to solve. The problem should be relevant to the role and the context of your organization. It should also be realistic, specific, and clear. Avoid vague or hypothetical scenarios that do not reflect the actual challenges that the candidates will face on the job. For example, instead of asking "How would you handle a difficult customer?", you could ask "How did you handle a situation where a customer was unhappy with the product you delivered and demanded a refund?"
-
- Describe a time when you had to solve a problem without managerial input. How did you handle it, and what was the result? Give an example of a time when you identified and fixed a problem before it became urgent. -Share a situation where you predicted a problem with a stakeholder. How did you prevent it from escalating? Describe a time when you faced challenges in doing your job efficiently. How did you overcome them? - Recall a time when you successfully used crisis-management skills. How would you handle a new project with great revenue potential but potential legal implications for the company?
The next step is to choose the format of the interview question. There are different types of interview questions that can assess problem-solving, such as situational, behavioral, case, or technical questions. The format you choose depends on the level of complexity, detail, and interaction that you want to elicit from the candidates. For example, situational questions present a hypothetical scenario and ask the candidates how they would respond. Behavioral questions ask the candidates to describe a past experience where they solved a similar problem. Case questions present a business problem and ask the candidates to analyze it and propose a solution. Technical questions test the candidates' knowledge and skills in a specific domain or tool.
The third step is to craft the question that you will ask the candidates. The question should be concise, clear, and open-ended. It should not have a single or obvious answer, but rather invite the candidates to explain their reasoning, approach, and assumptions. It should also have a clear goal or outcome that you want the candidates to achieve. For example, instead of asking "How do you solve problems?", you could ask "What steps do you take when you encounter a problem that you have not seen before?"
The fourth step is to prepare follow-up questions that you can ask the candidates to probe deeper into their problem-solving process. Follow-up questions can help you to clarify, challenge, or expand the candidates' responses. They can also help you to assess the candidates' creativity, adaptability, and communication skills. For example, you could ask "How did you validate your solution?", "How did you handle any obstacles or constraints?", or "How did you communicate your solution to your stakeholders?"
The final step is to evaluate the responses that the candidates give to your interview questions. You should have a clear and consistent criteria for scoring the responses, based on the skills and competencies that you are looking for. You should also use a structured and objective method for comparing the candidates, such as a rating scale or a rubric. You should look for evidence of how the candidates applied their problem-solving process, how they generated and tested their solutions, how they adapted to changing situations, and how they communicated their results.
When designing interview questions to assess problem-solving, you should also avoid some common pitfalls that can compromise the validity and fairness of your assessment. For example, you should avoid asking questions that are too easy or too hard, that rely on memorization or trivia, that are biased or irrelevant, or that have multiple or unclear answers. You should also avoid leading or suggestive questions, that imply or reveal the answer that you expect. You should also avoid making assumptions or judgments based on the candidates' appearance, background, or personality.
-
Interviewing and selecting candidates requires skill and expertise. I found it beneficial to test out the claims that were made on a candidate's resume if it was a skill that was required for the position. To begin with, a telephone interview will assess a few basics. The first live interview will provide the opportunity to see how the candidate interacts. A second interview, which I recommend, will provide the opportunity to delve into deeper questions. This interview can also be an opportunity to provide the candidate with a live exercise of a needed skill, such as creating a power-point presentation on the spot, or solving something. This is a great indicator of the candidate's ability to perform the required tasks.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Creative Problem SolvingHere's how you can showcase your critical thinking and evaluation skills in an interview.
-
IT StrategyYou're preparing for an IT Strategy interview. How can you make sure you stand out?
-
Career Development CoachingHere's how you can showcase your problem-solving skills in an interview.
-
RecruitingWhat are the best ways to structure an interview for maximum results?