How do you identify code smells that hinder software reusability?
Code smells are indicators of poor design or implementation choices that can affect the quality, maintainability, and reusability of software. In this article, you will learn how to identify some common code smells that hinder software reusability and how to refactor them using object oriented design principles.
Software reusability is the ability to use existing software components or modules in different contexts or applications without significant modification or adaptation. Software reusability can reduce development time and cost, improve reliability and consistency, and facilitate reuse of best practices and domain knowledge. Object oriented design (OOD) is a paradigm that supports software reusability by promoting abstraction, encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism.
Code smells are not errors or bugs, but they can indicate potential problems or inefficiencies that can affect software reusability. Some common code smells that hinder software reusability include duplicated code, long methods or classes, feature envy, and inappropriate intimacy. Duplicated code can be refactored by extracting common functionality into methods, classes, or interfaces and using inheritance or composition to reuse them. Long methods or classes can be refactored by breaking them down into smaller and more cohesive units, and applying the single responsibility principle and the principle of least knowledge. Feature envy can be refactored by moving the method or class to the appropriate class, or by using delegation or dependency injection to reduce coupling. Inappropriate intimacy can be refactored by using abstraction, interfaces, or inheritance to define the contract between classes and applying the principle of least knowledge and the law of demeter.
Refactoring is the process of improving the design and structure of existing code without changing its functionality or behavior. This can enhance software reusability by eliminating code smells and applying object oriented design principles. Common refactoring techniques include extracting methods, classes, replacing inheritance with delegation, and replacing conditionals with polymorphism. Extracting methods can improve readability, modularity, and reusability; extracting classes can improve cohesion, encapsulation, and reusability; replacing inheritance with delegation can reduce complexity and brittleness while increasing reusability; and replacing conditionals with polymorphism can improve readability, extensibility, and reusability.
It is always better to prevent code smells than to fix them later, as it can save time and effort and avoid introducing new bugs or issues. To avoid code smells, you should follow coding standards and conventions to improve consistency, readability, and maintainability. Additionally, writing tests and documentation can improve reliability, quality, and usability. Using design patterns and principles can also help improve the design and structure of code. Finally, regularly reviewing and refactoring code can improve performance, security, and scalability while identifying and eliminating code smells before they become serious or widespread.
Learning about code smells can be a great way to improve your software development skills and knowledge, as well as enhance your software reusability. To do so, you can read books or articles on code smells, such as Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler or Code Smells and Refactorings by Sourcemaking. Additionally, tools and plugins such as SonarQube, PMD, or ReSharper can detect and suggest refactoring for code smells. Lastly, participating in code reviews or pair programming sessions is a great way to identify and discuss code smells with other developers and learn from their feedback and experience.
-
Priya Pandey
Front Office | Equities Trading | Engineering Lead | Product Manager | Analytics | Trade Life Cycle | AWS | Agile Coach | STEM
Code structure is the craftsmanship of software design. It is the core principle to avoid introducing bugs or failures in the future. One of the most time-consuming lifecycles of software is maintenance, where developers invest hours trying to find problems. A well-designed software makes it easier to analyze the code. Code smell is not a bug but rather relates to not having better craftsmanship of the software, thereby not avoiding the negatives associated with code smell. To avoid this: A) Follow SOLID and DRY principles. B) Verify that you are able to write unit tests. C) Read your code or let your team read your code. Find out if they understand it.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Object Oriented DesignHow do you determine if a software solution is reusable?
-
Design PatternsHow can you update old code with domain-driven design?
-
Application DevelopmentWhat are the best ways to design modular and easily updatable applications?
-
Software ArchitectureHow do you learn and adopt new DSLs in software architecture?