How do you deal with feedback that is subjective or based on personal preferences?

When handling subjective feedback, understanding the context is essential. It not only facilitates proper feedback interpretation but also allows us to successfully solve the underlying issues. By asking such inquiries, one can show initiative toward development and guarantee that the criticism is helpful. It all comes down to creating a collaborative atmosphere where input is valued as a means of ongoing improvement.

An often-forgotten step is expectation-setting and culture-building with your team. Leaders have the opportunity to prioritize feedback, such that it is expected and welcomed as part of their organization’s DNA. Regular (weekly, monthly or quarterly check points) are helpful to ensure there is a consistent culture of dialogue within the organization. An expectation that the team is required to deliver critical as well as positive feedback encourages transparent communications and sets the stage for constructive feedback at the individual level.

I agree, but, that puts a lot on the creator. Creators should present their ideas in light of the objectives and expectations of the project, including the constraints and limitations taken into account. Then, those team members that provide feedback should be asked to do so within that context. This has the effect of elevating the feedback from subjective to objective, with a focus on the goals the design is meant to achieve.

In my experience, one of the biggest benefits of asking for specific examples, evidence or data is that it transforms subjective feedback into more objective criticism, making it easier for the designer to evaluate relevant suggestions. If effective communication is encouraged and implemented efficiently, this higher level of understanding will have a strong impact on the design improvements as well as the project timeline.

Having effective communication is essential when handling subjective feedback. Constructive communication not only makes the remarks more understandable but also opens the door to understanding on both sides. A more cooperative atmosphere is created by asking for concrete examples and explaining your design philosophy. Establishing trust and identifying shared interests is essential for continuous improvement.

Muchas veces dejamos de lado la importancia de las habilidades blandas a la hora de dar retroalimentación, construir y co crear. Es muy importante recordar que en un proyecto todos los involucrados deben recordar que no se trata de “tener razón” si no de quien tiene el mejor argumento de por qué se debería realizar algún ajuste. Entablar un debate mediado por el respeto por la opinión del otro nos permite construir una mejor propuesta que al finalizar, tiene los puntos de vista más fuertes de diferentes tipos de expertos, blindándola y haciéndola más fuerte ante cualquier comentario externo. El trabajo en equipo consiste en la sinergia que tuvo el desarrollo del proyecto, y velar por que se mantenga así es fundamental de parte de todos.

Completely agree! It is essential to critically assess subjective feedback to improve the design process. Focused and productive work is ensured by using clear criteria, such as following design principles and project goals. Striking a balance between being receptive to many viewpoints and figuring out what makes the project successful is essential. In addition to raising the design's quality, this systematic review also helps to save important time and money.

When it comes to managing subjective feedback implementation is essential. It shows a dedication to ongoing improvement when one takes the time to turn comments into specific steps, whether through testing, prototyping, or sketching. It goes beyond simply taking feedback and applying it to improve the design. Transparently showing the design's evolution and the careful consideration of input is made possible through the use of presentation and documentation.

💬 Recently, while presenting a new cabinet design concept to a client, I encountered feedback that varied widely based on individual tastes and preferences. 🏠 Instead of dismissing subjective opinions, I acknowledged their importance in understanding the diverse perspectives of our audience. 🤝 I engaged in open and constructive dialogue, seeking to uncover the underlying reasons behind their preferences. 🤔 By asking probing questions and actively listening to their feedback, I gained valuable insights that helped me tailor the design to better align with the client's vision.

Beyond seeing feedback as both a gift and a challenge, it's useful to consider it as a means to identify areas of ambiguity in your own and others' understanding. This can be achieved by breaking down the questions posed. For instance, when someone asks, "What is the value in this?" it doesn't imply the absence of value. Rather, it indicates that the person asking is not yet able to perceive the value presented.