How can you use the singleton pattern in microservices?

The singleton pattern is a design pattern that ensures that only one instance of a class exists and provides a global point of access to it. It is often used to manage shared resources, such as database connections, configuration files, or logging services. But how can you use the singleton pattern in microservices, which are distributed, scalable, and independent units of software that communicate with each other through well-defined interfaces?

1 The challenge of singletons in microservices

One of the main challenges of using the singleton pattern in microservices is that it can create a single point of failure, a bottleneck, or a performance issue. If the singleton instance fails, crashes, or becomes unavailable, the whole system may be affected. If the singleton instance is accessed by many concurrent requests, it may become overloaded or slow down. If the singleton instance is located in one microservice, it may introduce a dependency or a coupling with other microservices that need to use it.

Add your perspective

Naresh Kukkala ~ iOS Lead / Architect

10x LinkedIn Top Voice | 19K Followers | iOS Developer Lead & Mentor | Mobile Architect | Trainer | Coach | Freelancer | Mock Interview
Report contribution
Using the singleton pattern in microservices can introduce complexities and challenges that need to be carefully considered. One of the primary challenges is the potential creation of a single point of failure within the system. If the singleton instance encounters issues, such as failure or unavailability, it can disrupt the entire system's functionality. This vulnerability to a single point of failure can be a significant concern in a microservices architecture where resilience and fault tolerance are critical.

Like

2 The solution of distributed singletons

One possible solution to use the singleton pattern in microservices is to implement distributed singletons, which are replicated and synchronized across multiple nodes or services. This way, each service can access a local copy of the singleton instance, avoiding network latency and increasing availability and fault tolerance. However, this solution also introduces some complexity and trade-offs, such as how to handle consistency, concurrency, and coordination among the distributed singletons.

Add your perspective

3 The example of distributed configuration

A common use case for using the singleton pattern in microservices is to manage distributed configuration, which is the process of storing and retrieving configuration settings for each service. For example, you may want to use a singleton class to encapsulate the logic of reading and updating configuration files from a central repository, such as a database, a file system, or a cloud service. However, instead of creating a single instance of this class in one service, you can create multiple instances in different services and use a mechanism to synchronize them periodically or on demand.

Add your perspective

4 The mechanism of publish-subscribe

One possible mechanism to synchronize distributed singletons is to use the publish-subscribe pattern, which is a design pattern that allows a publisher to send messages to multiple subscribers without knowing them or being coupled with them. For example, you can use a message broker, such as Kafka, RabbitMQ, or Redis, to create a topic or a channel for configuration updates. Then, each service can subscribe to this topic or channel and receive notifications when a configuration change occurs. The publisher can be any service that modifies the configuration and publishes a message to the topic or channel.

Add your perspective

5 The benefits and drawbacks of distributed singletons

Using distributed singletons with publish-subscribe can offer some benefits for using the singleton pattern in microservices, such as reducing network overhead and latency, increasing availability and fault tolerance, and decoupling services. However, it can also have some drawbacks, such as introducing inconsistency and conflicts, adding complexity and overhead, and losing control and visibility. By accessing local singletons instead of remote ones, you can take advantage of the benefits while mitigating the drawbacks. You must also manage the message broker, the topic or channel, and the synchronization logic and policies to ensure consistency. Additionally, you should consider relying on a third-party service or platform to handle the configuration updates and notifications.

Add your perspective