Why, no really why, if you've made and starred in two 'movies' with the same premise (which I haven't seen soooo soz, but asummed this might be interesting coming to it fresh) would you bother doing this?
I mean you'd think at the very least the acting/improvisation would be passable but the lead, who wrote and produced this, is unconvincing at all levels. Even the part where he's describing what a great naturalistic actor he is, its 'sleight of hand' I assume is suppose to be menacing, unnerving, kinda funny, revelatory is embarrassinly clunky and cliche - I mean dude cmon... its gotta work or....
I can't imagine this shiz sells so the only explanation is he's just doing this to get out of the house and away from the fam (oh and maybe some tax breaks on locations etc.,)
One star for having a go, and another for the co-star's convincing frustration and annoyance (even though it could well be life imitating art)
Advice - really don't bother - this is to the viewer and TBH to the makers too.
