Different experts make a stand against today's putatively criminal and harmful health system, focusing on Anthony Fauci and his role in the shaping of the AIDS and COVID-19 epidemics.Different experts make a stand against today's putatively criminal and harmful health system, focusing on Anthony Fauci and his role in the shaping of the AIDS and COVID-19 epidemics.Different experts make a stand against today's putatively criminal and harmful health system, focusing on Anthony Fauci and his role in the shaping of the AIDS and COVID-19 epidemics.
- Self - Internist, Cardiologist, Epidemiologist
- (as Dr. Peter McCullough)
- Self - Senior Research Scientist at MIT
- (as Dr. Stephanie Seneff)
- Self - DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
- (as Dr. Sherri Tenpenny)
- Self - Director of Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd
- (as Dr. Tess Lawrie)
- Self - Osteopathic Physician, 'mercola.com'
- (as Dr. Joseph Mercola)
- Self - Pharmacology
- (as Dr. Michael Yeadon)
- Self - Chief Medical Officer, Critical Care Specialist
- (as Dr. Paul Marik)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- Quotes
[first lines]
JFK (archive audio): The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.
It takes a lot of courage to go down this road and work on such a project. Yes it's based on a best selling book, hence we know there's already an audience out there willing to watch it. But hey you still need to have people on camera talking: that's really hard to do and it's the greatest accomplishment of this documentary.
Pretty sure they had a solid legal team behind because they are not shy: they name names and... oh boy are they relevant names.
That said: this documentary shows the same shortcomings that I find over and over again, these days:
- really fast paced and poorly edited: there is simply very little room to breath and to collect one's thoughts. Going in chronological order is obviously the best approach, but a recap every now and then was very much needed.
Having chapter titles on screen to break different scenes would have helped to better focus on the themes presented (eg power and corruption ; propaganda and censorship...)
- technical terms not explained in an understandable way: RNA, gain of function, gene editing and so on. The broll used throughout the documentary is generally cheap stock footage and it is useless. For this stuff either you have some props to use as an analogy by the guy talking or you get a decent animator to show that stuff on screen.
- there isnt a journey to follow: the starting point was inviting. We follow robert f kennedy in his quest to understand what happened to those agencies and to expose the bad stuff. We lost track of his journey after a while: too many events, dates, people talking.
- the free version I watched online had those terrible computer generated subtitles. Now considering the main host has speech issues (nothing incredibly crazy, but still) they do a disservice to the documentary. Good subtitles are a necessity nowadays.
- JustHavingALook
- Oct 21, 2022
- Permalink
- How long is The Real Anthony Fauci?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 51 minutes
- Color