IMDb RATING
4.8/10
3.6K
YOUR RATING
A sheriff and his son chase casino robbers, only to find the all of them are being chased by something else.A sheriff and his son chase casino robbers, only to find the all of them are being chased by something else.A sheriff and his son chase casino robbers, only to find the all of them are being chased by something else.
- Awards
- 1 nomination
Baadja-Lyne Odums
- Psychiatrist
- (as Baadja-Lyne)
Lawrence E Thomas
- Priest
- (as Lawrence Thomas)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaSheriff Reed is shown wearing corporal chevrons on the sleeves of his uniform. A sheriff would not wear corporal stripes.
- Crazy creditsFunded in part by the Council for the Ethical Use of Cell Phones at Gas Pumps
- ConnectionsFollows Reeker (2005)
- SoundtracksWine by Wine
Written by Roger Wallace
Performed by Roger Wallace
Natchez Street Music, BMI
Courtesy of Texas Round-Up Records
Featured review
In case anyone doesn't know, this movie is in fact a sequel (the first simply called 'Reeker'), and this time it follows the plot, well...almost identical to the first one.
This is a major problem.
In the original film there is a rather large twist at the end, and if you don't already guess it, it is a great twist. This film follows the exact same twist, so if you've seen the first, then there's not much to see here. It's basically a remake, with slightly different circumstances.
On a plus point, the baddie does have a little bit of background, unlike in the first movie, but that really is the only plus point.
In my opinion, this is a sequel to a film that didn't need a sequel, so again, if you have seen the first film this might be a little boring to watch.
On the other hand, if you haven't seen the first film you might just enjoy it. Even though it is a sequel, it stands alone (as I said, it's more of a remake) and there is no need to have seen the first one.
so, if you saw the first it's 3/10
if you didn't see the first it's 6/10
So overall (and being generous) it's 5/10
This is a major problem.
In the original film there is a rather large twist at the end, and if you don't already guess it, it is a great twist. This film follows the exact same twist, so if you've seen the first, then there's not much to see here. It's basically a remake, with slightly different circumstances.
On a plus point, the baddie does have a little bit of background, unlike in the first movie, but that really is the only plus point.
In my opinion, this is a sequel to a film that didn't need a sequel, so again, if you have seen the first film this might be a little boring to watch.
On the other hand, if you haven't seen the first film you might just enjoy it. Even though it is a sequel, it stands alone (as I said, it's more of a remake) and there is no need to have seen the first one.
so, if you saw the first it's 3/10
if you didn't see the first it's 6/10
So overall (and being generous) it's 5/10
- How long is No Man's Land: The Rise of Reeker?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Reeker 2
- Filming locations
- Lancaster, California, USA(Exterior)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $2,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $99,499
- Runtime1 hour 28 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was No Man's Land: The Rise of Reeker (2008) officially released in India in English?
Answer