IMDb RATING
6.6/10
5.6K
YOUR RATING
A young woman who exudes sexuality battles temptation.A young woman who exudes sexuality battles temptation.A young woman who exudes sexuality battles temptation.
- Nominated for 2 Oscars
- 6 wins & 15 nominations total
Robert John Burke
- Dave Wilkie
- (as Robert J. Burke)
Taylor Sutherland
- Billy
- (as Matt Sutherland)
Robin Robertson
- Young Salesman
- (as Robin Dale Robertson)
John Ratch Hart
- Crowd Person
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaDiane Ladd and Laura Dern's Oscar nominations mark the first time a mother and daughter ever received such an accolade for appearing in the same film. The only other time that a parent and child received acting nominations for the same film was when Henry Fonda and Jane Fonda were both nominated for On Golden Pond (1981).
- GoofsWhen Rose is in bed with Buddy, the shot of the two of them shows her left arm being under the covers, and immediately the next shot is a closeup of Rose and her left arm is up and behind her head.
- Alternate versionsIn the UK, the BBFC removed around thirty seconds from the scene where 15 year-old Lukas Haas and Laura Dern are in bed together. This was judged to be in breach of the Protection of Children Act, which forbids the use of minors in sexual contexts on-screen. Despite this, the BBC have broadcast the uncut version several times and the cuts were later fully waived for the 2002 Guild DVD release.
- SoundtracksDixie
Music and Lyrics by Daniel Decatur Emmett
Performed by Louis Armstrong and The Dukes of Dixieland
Courtesy of MAJ Music, Inc.
Published by MAJ Music, Inc. (ASCAP)
Administered by Larry Spier, Inc.
Featured review
Which is a shame considering there was so much to like. Laura Dern's performance is astonishing as the Rose of the title who has a shady past and comes to live with a family headed up by Robert Duvall and Diane Lane (her real life mother) who gives a wonderful performance also.
The story is a cobweb, if story it is, I haven't read the novel,and the plot is character driven all the way.
The sexual content is handled sensitively and the fact that Rose is a 'nymphomaniac' of the era - i.e. she loves sex - is understood and tolerated by the family.
The eldest child, Buddy, is played by Lukas Haas who has many good performances to his credit - and has never turned down a movie role since he was five - who has an evil streak according to his mother but keeps certain secrets about Rose along with his father who also has secrets.
An amazingly tolerant and lovable family headed by a father with integrity - which was a bit of a stumble for me as Robert Duvall's incessant smirking does not translate as such to me. I find it irksome - and confusing. I would have preferred a different actor in that part a la Leslie Howard from the forties.
The sepia cinematography was breathtaking and the street scenes amazing as were the two actors who played the younger children.
The wraparound of the story didn't work at all. Rose deserved more that a verbal dismissal at the end. And the mother vanished inexplicably. Now there was a character. Too bad the viewer wasn't respected a little more.
6 out of 10 for all that.
The story is a cobweb, if story it is, I haven't read the novel,and the plot is character driven all the way.
The sexual content is handled sensitively and the fact that Rose is a 'nymphomaniac' of the era - i.e. she loves sex - is understood and tolerated by the family.
The eldest child, Buddy, is played by Lukas Haas who has many good performances to his credit - and has never turned down a movie role since he was five - who has an evil streak according to his mother but keeps certain secrets about Rose along with his father who also has secrets.
An amazingly tolerant and lovable family headed by a father with integrity - which was a bit of a stumble for me as Robert Duvall's incessant smirking does not translate as such to me. I find it irksome - and confusing. I would have preferred a different actor in that part a la Leslie Howard from the forties.
The sepia cinematography was breathtaking and the street scenes amazing as were the two actors who played the younger children.
The wraparound of the story didn't work at all. Rose deserved more that a verbal dismissal at the end. And the mother vanished inexplicably. Now there was a character. Too bad the viewer wasn't respected a little more.
6 out of 10 for all that.
- wisewebwoman
- Dec 27, 2006
- Permalink
- How long is Rambling Rose?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $7,500,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $6,266,621
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $314,631
- Sep 22, 1991
- Gross worldwide
- $6,266,621
- Runtime1 hour 52 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content