VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,5/10
165.901
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una formica piuttosto nevrotica cerca di staccarsi dalla sua società totalitaria mentre cerca di conquistare l'affetto della principessa che ama.Una formica piuttosto nevrotica cerca di staccarsi dalla sua società totalitaria mentre cerca di conquistare l'affetto della principessa che ama.Una formica piuttosto nevrotica cerca di staccarsi dalla sua società totalitaria mentre cerca di conquistare l'affetto della principessa che ama.
- Nominato ai 1 BAFTA Award
- 6 vittorie e 14 candidature totali
Woody Allen
- Z
- (voce)
Sharon Stone
- Bala
- (voce)
Gene Hackman
- Mandible
- (voce)
Sylvester Stallone
- Weaver
- (voce)
Dan Aykroyd
- Chip
- (voce)
Anne Bancroft
- Queen
- (voce)
Jane Curtin
- Muffy
- (voce)
Danny Glover
- Barbatus
- (voce)
Jennifer Lopez
- Azteca
- (voce)
John Mahoney
- Drunk Scout
- (voce)
Grant Shaud
- Foreman
- (voce)
Christopher Walken
- Cutter
- (voce)
Eric Darnell
- Additional Voices
- (voce)
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Pat Fry
- Worker Ants
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizChristopher Walken's voicework was so excellent that Cutter's role was expanded. He was originally a faceless lackey to General Mandible, but Walken brought some unexpected depths to the character.
- BlooperIn real life, the situation between ants and termites is reversed from their roles in the movie. Ants prey on termites, which are much smaller - and ants are the ones who secrete acid to kill them.
- Curiosità sui creditiA child's hand holding a magnifying glass brings into focus the tiny names of the cast.
- Versioni alternativeIn 2008, Cartoon Network started broadcasting the film in an edited format, with all explicit language completely removed, despite airing it virtually uncut in 2004.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Masters of Fantasy: The Anime Filmmakers (1998)
- Colonne sonoreGive Peace a Chance
Written by John Lennon
Recensione in evidenza
I'm probably a weird guy, but I really appreciate a good animated movie even though I'm no longer a kid (I'm 26 years old). What I liked about this one is the great animation, the nice story, the humor...
I haven't seen A Bug's Life yet, which makes it impossible for me to compare both of course, but I really liked the style used in Antz. Usually a Disney production gives me the feeling I'm watching a movie which was intended for kids only (although A Bug's Life was created by the Pixar studio's, which gives me a bit of hope), while Dreamworks understood that adults too can appreciate this kind of movies, if only they take care of the style and the story. Most of Disney's animated movies are just too smooth, too perfect for me, and to be honest the songs almost make me sick.
The style in Antz is much grittier. It isn't as perfect and smooth as a Disney production and the message is a lot stronger. The film is probably exciting for little children, thanks to the humor, fantastic images and action, but the underlying subtext and social commentary on humans make this movie different from Disney's moralizing films. However, the different message isn't the only difference between Disney and Dreamworks. I don't think Disney ever risked to use very well known scenes from other movies in their own films. In Antz you can find some excellent scenes which refer to movies like Metropolis, Starship Troopers,...
Some people have some critics on this movie because it doesn't show how a real anthill is organized, how strong ants really are, that ants don't look for a partner, ... Let me tell this to these people: I respect you're way of thinking but I think you should have watched a documentary instead of an animated movie. I sure hope you understand there is still a big difference between a documentary, based on scientific research, meant to teach people and a movie like Antz, who's only purpose is to entertain people. Personally I liked the movie for what it was and I give it an 8/10.
I haven't seen A Bug's Life yet, which makes it impossible for me to compare both of course, but I really liked the style used in Antz. Usually a Disney production gives me the feeling I'm watching a movie which was intended for kids only (although A Bug's Life was created by the Pixar studio's, which gives me a bit of hope), while Dreamworks understood that adults too can appreciate this kind of movies, if only they take care of the style and the story. Most of Disney's animated movies are just too smooth, too perfect for me, and to be honest the songs almost make me sick.
The style in Antz is much grittier. It isn't as perfect and smooth as a Disney production and the message is a lot stronger. The film is probably exciting for little children, thanks to the humor, fantastic images and action, but the underlying subtext and social commentary on humans make this movie different from Disney's moralizing films. However, the different message isn't the only difference between Disney and Dreamworks. I don't think Disney ever risked to use very well known scenes from other movies in their own films. In Antz you can find some excellent scenes which refer to movies like Metropolis, Starship Troopers,...
Some people have some critics on this movie because it doesn't show how a real anthill is organized, how strong ants really are, that ants don't look for a partner, ... Let me tell this to these people: I respect you're way of thinking but I think you should have watched a documentary instead of an animated movie. I sure hope you understand there is still a big difference between a documentary, based on scientific research, meant to teach people and a movie like Antz, who's only purpose is to entertain people. Personally I liked the movie for what it was and I give it an 8/10.
- philip_vanderveken
- 2 ott 2004
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Antz?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 105.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 90.757.863 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 17.195.160 USD
- 4 ott 1998
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 171.757.863 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 23 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti