VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
19.816
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una casalinga sorprendentemente fantasiosa promette vendetta a suo marito quando lui inizia una relazione con una ricca scrittrice di romanzi rosa.Una casalinga sorprendentemente fantasiosa promette vendetta a suo marito quando lui inizia una relazione con una ricca scrittrice di romanzi rosa.Una casalinga sorprendentemente fantasiosa promette vendetta a suo marito quando lui inizia una relazione con una ricca scrittrice di romanzi rosa.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizActress Meryl Streep was considered for the "She-Devil" character. But due to some conceptual similarity with Streep's then previous picture Un grido nella notte (1988), Streep decided to portray romance novelist Mary Fisher instead.
- BlooperThe handwriting on the list that Ruth has made of Bob's assets changes several times throughout the movie.
- Citazioni
Mary Fisher: You"re still the butler--so get to work!
Garcia: I may be the butler, but I"m NOT the maid!
- Curiosità sui creditiAs the film ends, The End appears being used from 2 angels.
- Colonne sonoreTied Up
Written by Dieter Meier and Boris Blank
Performed by Yello
Provided Courtesy of Mercury Records
Recensione in evidenza
...a campy, soapy, over-the-top black comedy. This movie wasn't intended to win any awards, so I don't understand all the hate. It isn't a movie I seek out to watch, but if it happens to be on I don't change the channel, and always have a good time. I saw it when it first came out (as a young teenager) and have seen it several times over the years.
It was perfectly cast with one exception: Ed Begley, Jr as the desirable ladies' man/philandering husband. It's not that he is a *bad* looking guy, but the film may have been a bit more believable if there was someone with more sex appeal in the role. The movie explains the reason he married Ruth (Roseanne Barr) - he got her pregnant, and his parents insisted he marry her. I know plenty of very attractive guys who have hooked up with women far less attractive than they (the term "beer goggles" exists for a reason), so they could have made his character more physically attractive and maintained believability. No actors specifically come to mind, and I will say that Begley, Jr played his role very well in terms of his acting. He also has a decent bod, so there's that.
It was entertaining to see the metamorphisis of Ruth - the dowdy and frumpy housewife (with a horrific facial mole) becomes a well put together and successful business woman. While her agenda was clearly self-serving, she did improve the lives of a lot of women along the way (including her nemesis). I thought Barr played her role very well, and actually looked attractive and stylish after she changed her image (and lost the dreadful mole).
Now let's talk about the highlight of the movie (to me): MERYL STREEP! For those criticizing her acting - did we watch the same film? She was brilliant as the pompous, tacky, selfish, yet glamorous romance novelist. When you think about the lines her character was given in the script, it is dumbfounding what she did with that role. She can take the most basic line of dialogue and somehow turn it into something magical. She says it all without even having to speak. She was hilarious and perfect in this movie, and I think it's safe to say that it wouldn't be nearly as good without her.
So, if you are looking for same campy and over-the-top 80s fun, give it a try.
7.5/10.
It was perfectly cast with one exception: Ed Begley, Jr as the desirable ladies' man/philandering husband. It's not that he is a *bad* looking guy, but the film may have been a bit more believable if there was someone with more sex appeal in the role. The movie explains the reason he married Ruth (Roseanne Barr) - he got her pregnant, and his parents insisted he marry her. I know plenty of very attractive guys who have hooked up with women far less attractive than they (the term "beer goggles" exists for a reason), so they could have made his character more physically attractive and maintained believability. No actors specifically come to mind, and I will say that Begley, Jr played his role very well in terms of his acting. He also has a decent bod, so there's that.
It was entertaining to see the metamorphisis of Ruth - the dowdy and frumpy housewife (with a horrific facial mole) becomes a well put together and successful business woman. While her agenda was clearly self-serving, she did improve the lives of a lot of women along the way (including her nemesis). I thought Barr played her role very well, and actually looked attractive and stylish after she changed her image (and lost the dreadful mole).
Now let's talk about the highlight of the movie (to me): MERYL STREEP! For those criticizing her acting - did we watch the same film? She was brilliant as the pompous, tacky, selfish, yet glamorous romance novelist. When you think about the lines her character was given in the script, it is dumbfounding what she did with that role. She can take the most basic line of dialogue and somehow turn it into something magical. She says it all without even having to speak. She was hilarious and perfect in this movie, and I think it's safe to say that it wouldn't be nearly as good without her.
So, if you are looking for same campy and over-the-top 80s fun, give it a try.
7.5/10.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is She-Devil?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 16.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 15.351.421 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 3.509.647 USD
- 10 dic 1989
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 15.351.421 USD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was She-Devil - Lei, il diavolo (1989) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi