CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.2/10
698
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un abogado defiende a un trabajador migrante acusado falsamente de dos asesinatos.Un abogado defiende a un trabajador migrante acusado falsamente de dos asesinatos.Un abogado defiende a un trabajador migrante acusado falsamente de dos asesinatos.
Frank Baker
- Court Stenographer
- (sin créditos)
Marshall Bradford
- Coroner
- (sin créditos)
Ralph Brooks
- Courtroom Photographer
- (sin créditos)
Benny Burt
- Citizen
- (sin créditos)
Jack Carr
- Angry Citizen
- (sin créditos)
Robert Carson
- Jury Foreman
- (sin créditos)
Ralph Dumke
- Bartender
- (sin créditos)
Richard Emory
- Reporter
- (sin créditos)
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAfter Director of Photography John Alton agreed to shoot this movie, he asked Producer Benedict Bogeaus how much he had budgeted for rigging - the system of overhead pipes, brackets, ropes, and cables that suspend lights over a film set. Bogeaus told him four thousand dollars. "Give me two thousand dollars above my salary and I won't use any rigging," said Alton. He did it by using almost no overhead lighting at all, contributing to the film's rich visual atmosphere.
- ErroresThe screen shows a newspaper article stating that George Braden is about to go on trial for the murder of Fred Morgan. However, two people were killed, so both names should have been given.
- ConexionesReferenced in Mau Mau Sex Sex (2001)
Opinión destacada
This is far from the best Don Siegel movie. But, despite flaws in writing and acting, it's gripping and moves along, keeping the viewer on the edge of his or her seat.
Nothing is really credible. Theresa Wright as an itinerant farmer's wife? Actors with pronounced New York accents as menacing rednecks? And something about the script seems truly sub-par. The dialogue is not grammatical and this is not a matter of simulating regional speech or signifying class. The dialogue is just not well written.
The music, too, is strangely self-contradictory. At first it is pure schmalz, and Don Siegel is not the man for romance, even if it's romantic noir. Then a theramon is introduced and it sounds better.
Despite quibbling on my part, it's an engrossing movie. Believable? Not exactly. But, if one cuts it some considerable slack, it works well as a suspenseful kind-of noir.
Nothing is really credible. Theresa Wright as an itinerant farmer's wife? Actors with pronounced New York accents as menacing rednecks? And something about the script seems truly sub-par. The dialogue is not grammatical and this is not a matter of simulating regional speech or signifying class. The dialogue is just not well written.
The music, too, is strangely self-contradictory. At first it is pure schmalz, and Don Siegel is not the man for romance, even if it's romantic noir. Then a theramon is introduced and it sounds better.
Despite quibbling on my part, it's an engrossing movie. Believable? Not exactly. But, if one cuts it some considerable slack, it works well as a suspenseful kind-of noir.
- Handlinghandel
- 14 oct 2004
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Count the Hours!
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 16 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Horas amargas (1953) officially released in India in English?
Responda