I couldn't help but notice that Luther had the 'Condescending Wonka' pose in the recent page we put out, so this naturally HAD to happen.
I have so many more ideas for this. So many.
I have so many more ideas for this. So many.
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Unspecified / Any
Gender Any
Size 573 x 553px
File Size 290.8 kB
Listed in Folders
I honestly can't stand the faggots who "can't afford" art. We are Proffessional Artists. This is how we get paid.
I can't believe these leeches. If you can't afford it, you shouldn't be going onto this site in the first place.
I can't believe these leeches. If you can't afford it, you shouldn't be going onto this site in the first place.
Yea I don't think my art is worth anything. I don't complain about it though. Price is price and people can set it to whatever they want imo lol
You're undercutting real artists with your crappy art. You're encouraging the parasites.
OH NO! NOT THE PARASITES! Lmao @ you responding to a comment I made 8 months ago ... I'm dieing ...
such bad troll
very make-my-morning
such bad troll
very make-my-morning
Gah so true lately.
I stopped buying art not because I do not want it but I have no wall space left, I am thinking of moving walls in this place. I need a sledge hammer.
I guess once the new walls are up...
I stopped buying art not because I do not want it but I have no wall space left, I am thinking of moving walls in this place. I need a sledge hammer.
I guess once the new walls are up...
You could always make a scrap book for your art! :) Get a binder and some sheet protectors, that's what I do!
Than share them with us.
Perhaps make a con badge series that one could wear. with all the different sentences.
Perhaps make a con badge series that one could wear. with all the different sentences.
there's a big difference between overpriced and not worth money.
That's not the point. People, especially furries, tend to put little monetary worth on art; no matter the quality.
The more frugal ones tend to shop around and find artists with similar quality, and then pick the artist that is willing to work for the lowest price. And in many cases, the cheapest artist is underpricing/undervaluing their work. Regardless of why, the artist and the buyer both get what they want. The artist gets their price and the buyer gets artwork of a certain quality.
Its really not that much different from the world economy, there will always be someone who can either do the same quality work for a greatly reduced cost, or someone who doesn't know how to price/value their work.
Its really not that much different from the world economy, there will always be someone who can either do the same quality work for a greatly reduced cost, or someone who doesn't know how to price/value their work.
Your point is entirely valid, I've seen it quite a bit with up and comers. Which is why those of us who appreciate art as more than something to rub one out to, appreciate the efforts of up-and-coming artists and tend to be on more solid moral ground tend to over pay those artists and encourage them to value their art more realistically.
Moral is something fun to bring up. Cause in idea making everyone in the same level ask for the same amount sounds smart. But in practice, everyone wants money, and clearly If said offer is made the more famous/well known artist will thump the new guy in that game. So clearly It is wise If you are new to start on lower prices and work your way up. I know a fellow who takes $9 per char. I know people worse then him who want more. I've told him, (You should charge a bit more) and then he did comics to make more money. However the comic thing had some problems. (people taking 3 slots and taking ages to fill them out). So he spot that. It something when you use art as side job you gotta learn to control yourself and figure out time.
Also, lets not forget the fun people who take a year to finish something and dick around while they have Large amount of your cash. This person piss me off to the point that if I am gonna pay for someone work over a price, I want a sketch then they get paid.
Because in all do respect, this is a 2 way street. Artist do not want to be slaves, and buyers do not want to be treated like dumb pants with pockets full of cash.
Also, lets not forget the fun people who take a year to finish something and dick around while they have Large amount of your cash. This person piss me off to the point that if I am gonna pay for someone work over a price, I want a sketch then they get paid.
Because in all do respect, this is a 2 way street. Artist do not want to be slaves, and buyers do not want to be treated like dumb pants with pockets full of cash.
I always thought if the work was more professional, that people would have less of a problem paying more. I mean, technically it is a customer service, however, most current artists don't treat it as such. More so, they focus on who does the most brown nosing.
Actually, It is more of the fact some artist don't feel that their work reaches the point they want It. So,they charge. It is more or less a very odd thing. However,It does seem people who ask for less cash tend to get more commissions. It also helps If they can zerg rush though commissions like muskets to warriors in Civ 5.
So they get more done fast and get paid more. The quality is not the problem, It is usually speed. Some people will wait a month while some will not.
In long term people want more bang for there buck. Usually people will go more the faster guy who charges less.
Unless they really like the person in question and really like their work.
Don't know much about brown-nosing, I just like to know who is doing what so nothing goes astray.
So they get more done fast and get paid more. The quality is not the problem, It is usually speed. Some people will wait a month while some will not.
In long term people want more bang for there buck. Usually people will go more the faster guy who charges less.
Unless they really like the person in question and really like their work.
Don't know much about brown-nosing, I just like to know who is doing what so nothing goes astray.
With me, that's the problem (one of them) I find with offering commissions (I haven't actually started offering them yet...can't decide on price.)...everybody wants art...but doesn't want to wait for it. I am NOT fast at art, it's just the way I am. I concentrate on quality, not quantity, and I feel that if I don't price that higher than everybody else, I won't make it in the art business. But I won't make it with higher price for higher quality anyway if nobody buys because they are cheap/impatient.
And THIS is why the furry fandom doesn't tend to average professional rates, because many furry artists are NOT professional about how they do work. Rukis is an exception, of course!
That, and it's very difficult to get into a professional career as a pure artist, and then you lose all the rights to everything you draw. Freelance artists who get to keep everything they make and don't have their stuff being used for a pure profit tend to average $10-$25 an hour on their work, which is what I feel is also fair for the furry fandom.
That, and it's very difficult to get into a professional career as a pure artist, and then you lose all the rights to everything you draw. Freelance artists who get to keep everything they make and don't have their stuff being used for a pure profit tend to average $10-$25 an hour on their work, which is what I feel is also fair for the furry fandom.
Valid point...
Rukis does her work (almost always) in a very, very timely manner and I've never faulted her timing (OFC, all of the works I've gotten from her were con on-site sketches and nothing in glorious full color that's far beyond my financial means).
I've worked with other artists, notably who wanted some or all of the money up front, who took forever... or never completed the work at all and it took two years to get a refund. Granted, the artist was DAMN GOOD, but... that sort of stuff is untenable for any sort of business relationship.
Rukis does her work (almost always) in a very, very timely manner and I've never faulted her timing (OFC, all of the works I've gotten from her were con on-site sketches and nothing in glorious full color that's far beyond my financial means).
I've worked with other artists, notably who wanted some or all of the money up front, who took forever... or never completed the work at all and it took two years to get a refund. Granted, the artist was DAMN GOOD, but... that sort of stuff is untenable for any sort of business relationship.
In other words a balance needs to be met between price, quality, attitude, and notoriety and it's no single faction (for lack of a better term) that carries the brunt of the responsibility to ensure fair prices, respected work, and an understanding atmosphere between artist and client. Everyone needs to do their part, to make sure that nobody leaves a job with a bad taste in anyone's mouth.
I don't think cost applies to how much someone values their work. While it's true that people shop around for similar styles at a lower cost, it doesn't make the artist any less aware of what they do. Also, I don't believe its anyone's place to tell someone how much they should value their work. If they enjoy doing it, then so be it.
That's pretty much the way I look at it. Yes, a great artist is usually worth what they ask. However, we live in a Capitalist society where the service for the best value tends to do the best. Unfortunately this means some artists end up working for less than minimum wage, which is a big part of why I encourage people to look at what they're worth, but then there will always be the hobbyist artists who don't mind because they enjoy drawing so much and don't depend on their art for a living.
As for furries not putting much value on art, I find that one of the most disgustingly ironic things about this entire fandom. We are a visual fandom that enjoys each others' ideas by nature, and yet people aren't willing to make sure an artist can survive off their work by paying more than they might for a lesser luxury? Irritates me.
As for furries not putting much value on art, I find that one of the most disgustingly ironic things about this entire fandom. We are a visual fandom that enjoys each others' ideas by nature, and yet people aren't willing to make sure an artist can survive off their work by paying more than they might for a lesser luxury? Irritates me.
Sounds like what I do. I go for quality/price ratio that I can afford and enjoy. I don't want to undervalue some artists, but some artists aren't worth what they price. I don't want to over-value others, but, some also under-charge for what they do. There are few that hit the golden ratio of quality and price that are equal to one another.
Pretty much...if the price is right...I spend the money...if not...I'll keep looking.
also nobodies forces you to buy their art,... people do commission them, so apperently IS worth it, and it IS being requested. I always find people complaining about someones prices, after all,.. it's not like we have the option of choice nowadays or so....
Actually I would like to argue against one part of this, furries are probably the MOST willing people to spend loads on art that I have ever seen on the internet.
This isn't to say that there aren't cheap furries-of course there are, there are people like that everywhere.
This isn't to say that there aren't cheap furries-of course there are, there are people like that everywhere.
Compared to the actual industry prices which range in the thousands? Absolutely not.
I think he's trying to say that artists are a dime a dozen. The artists that get thousands are the lucky ones who made it in, hence the term "starving artist", because a vast majority of them barely make any money at all. It's a shame and I wish it was fixed, but that's also the truth.
The furry fandom is almost guaranteed money, but at the cost of not making as much of it per hour, I feel.
The furry fandom is almost guaranteed money, but at the cost of not making as much of it per hour, I feel.
this isn't the industry, its fa. if both customer and artist is pleased, that's all that matters, but one has to keep in mind, this is NOT the industry, so one cannot expect someplace like fa to match it. if one wants industry prices, go tot he industry =3 honestly, I think the point stands, not trying ot be a dick, but its a different economy on this site, and many don't seem to realize this, and keep going on about industry prices, which I never understand,. when this isn't it(not being a jerk, just a thing I keep seeing, and have had my thought on)
It may not be the industry, but a service is still being provided. The prices artists charge for their services compared to the industry is laughable. The prices here are already adjusted to this economy. An artist should be able to charge what they feel is worth their time, regardless of this being the industry or not.
no, I have to disagree. yes, there are artists here whos grade of art easily hits industry, but your opinion, being a skilled artist, is somewhat biased I feel(no disrespect meant of course). this is not the place to make industry, if artists want to his that pay grade, they have to break into the industry, which some are capable of. I don't understand why more don't try. staying here, and expecting to gain the money of a broken in professional simply isn't world realistic. in a perfect world, yes, this would be true, but with economic issues, one cannot expect fa, which mainly as I can tell consists of mid to lower class individuals, to mimic industry. whether or not the art is worth it, and the artist feels its worth it, it cannot be expected, and, further, will not be made to match it here, just because it isn't feasible. I say this with respectful disagreement of course. simply recapping, yes it is a massive hit here, but, on the other side, not every artist here, even the good ones, are all industry level, and thus, do no have the relative skills to make it, which is why they are on the net, doing it this way. and, lastly, just because one feels that their art is worth it, does NOT make this the official true case.
Hold on, Ming and I are making essentially the same point. An artist should be able to charge whatever the heck they want and not get hassled about it. If they charge industry prices are they going to get sales? Maaaaybe? But that's their choice. If they bitch about slow sales and refuse to consider pricing adjustments, then they're an idiot. That doesn't entitle other people to harass them about their pricing, though.
As a side note, you're right that "just because one feels that their art is worth it does NOT make this the official true case," but there are plenty of us who, because of our training and experience, DO have a good and objective sense of how much their work is worth. To brush off our valuations of our work is to do us a disservice. If I know that my time is worth $10/hour (btw, that's a crappy rate for an artist), and it's going to take 4 hours to do your piece, who are you to tell me that $40 is too damn expensive?
As a side note, you're right that "just because one feels that their art is worth it does NOT make this the official true case," but there are plenty of us who, because of our training and experience, DO have a good and objective sense of how much their work is worth. To brush off our valuations of our work is to do us a disservice. If I know that my time is worth $10/hour (btw, that's a crappy rate for an artist), and it's going to take 4 hours to do your piece, who are you to tell me that $40 is too damn expensive?
for that last comment, by no means. . you and ming chee are good, no doubt. I refer more to the industry rates I have seen where it hits the like, 1700-2k area for a full illustration( I think that's close to industry) that isn't a reasonable, or even fair price in the fa market. one has to be fair to their audience, and if few can afford it, you disservice yourself by denying customers, and potential customers by expecting them to reach a price rack they cant match. and thing is, your valuations fo your art may be accurate in the industrial level, but again,a s you acknowledged, this isn't industry. as you word it, agree with what you say, and it makes sense as you put It out, one shoudnt be harassed on what they charge, despite all else, as there are many out there, but just as common sense goes, on simply has to stake out there stomping grounds for selling art. im glad you put this up, as I get hwat ming was getting at now too =3
There may have been a misunderstanding here. I never said there were expectations for FA or any art community site to match the industry. I was stating that, industry or not, an artist should charge what they feel is worth their time which, is still WAY lower than industry standard. Many artists here have already adjusted their prices to fit the with the economy on this site to something affordable. I don't have much of a problem with this.
What I DO have a problem is when people will try to convince artists that they are over priced and charge WAY too much. When really, in comparison, the amount we charge is charitable. If an individual feels that X price is not worth X drawing, then that's a matter of opinion. It is not fact to be used as justification to harass or shame an artist into lowering their price. They can simply move on and accept that THEY cannot afford it rather than preach to the fandom how the artist is a selfish elitist. NO the artist is not over charging. It just means they are out of that person's price range. That doesn't mean artist have to dumb down their prices to make things easier for them.
Art is a luxury, the same as the latest console that everyone is saving up for, or the newest game that everyone is waiting to pre-order. If people budget and save money for those luxury expenses, then should art not be treated the same?
What I DO have a problem is when people will try to convince artists that they are over priced and charge WAY too much. When really, in comparison, the amount we charge is charitable. If an individual feels that X price is not worth X drawing, then that's a matter of opinion. It is not fact to be used as justification to harass or shame an artist into lowering their price. They can simply move on and accept that THEY cannot afford it rather than preach to the fandom how the artist is a selfish elitist. NO the artist is not over charging. It just means they are out of that person's price range. That doesn't mean artist have to dumb down their prices to make things easier for them.
Art is a luxury, the same as the latest console that everyone is saving up for, or the newest game that everyone is waiting to pre-order. If people budget and save money for those luxury expenses, then should art not be treated the same?
okay, now I understand what is being said =3 and I agree with the charge wars deal, because as I said to bluelynx, there are many artists here, with a massive range of prices, and if one wants to go and price match, it is comparable to complaining endlessely to lower a price, when someone is unlikely to. though, I disagree simply that, yes, there Is such a thing as an artist overcharging, but, in most cases it is never the case. there are some, however, that their degree of skill, as high or low as it may be, isn't worth it. i mean, if i draw a scribble stick figure, and feel it worth industry price, yes, it would be A:stupid"B overpriced. it can be applied to art but art is difficult to do so, as it is in most cases such a close to the chest subject,as many put their heat and soul into their work. also, thing is, there are artists who are elitest, as well, but that is not selective to artists, anyone can be so, but that's the only point im making there. as for artists dumbing down, if they wish to make a income, yes, they might have to, but bluelynx put it best." If they charge industry prices are they going to get sales? Maaaaybe? But that's their choice. If they bitch about slow sales and refuse to consider pricing adjustments, then they're an idiot.". i understand your frustrations, with you being an artist, but honestly, while art is all valued based on the purchaser, IN MY OPINION, and in no way based on any fact or ruling, there is a level of price tag one can put on art, ranging of course. its just the market system as i understand at least. finally, though, your right. it is a commodity, and no matter what is said, in the end, art is what a person is willing to pay,and if the artist sets a tag, and someone pays for that commodity, then it is, in all honesty, completely fair, as the person made that value fair by purchasing it willingly
Yeah, sorry I wasn't clear on that.
I think in the end, it does come down to opinion and personal values. So although we slightly differ on details, we are generally on the same page. Overall, if people feel something is over priced, it is their right to express that opinion as an opinion. I'm totally cool with that as long as respect and courtesy is still present regardless of disagreement. Which btw, I am grateful we had a civil conversation like this :)
I think in the end, it does come down to opinion and personal values. So although we slightly differ on details, we are generally on the same page. Overall, if people feel something is over priced, it is their right to express that opinion as an opinion. I'm totally cool with that as long as respect and courtesy is still present regardless of disagreement. Which btw, I am grateful we had a civil conversation like this :)
I agree, it does all come down to person to person in the end, which is why the topic is so tricky, and as long as a respect Is maintained, there is never an issue with one speaking or disagreeing, as long as its kept, well, respectful =3 it was very nice speaking to you on this subject
Oh yes absolutely! Respect goes both ways. It was nice talking to you too :3
An artist has the right to charge anything they want, but they aren't guaranteed to get enough customers because of that. Also, as I've said in a couple other comments, it's very difficult to break into the industry verses making money in the furry fandom, and once in the industry the artist tends to lose all rights to their work, bought by giant corporations that are going to use it for commercial reasons. I know a professional artist who was so burned out by that that they're now a freelance furry artist, and even though they don't make as much per hour, they have much more peace of mind and make just about as much money in general because it's no longer a chore to put in extra hours.
Basically, yes, industry rates are nice, but are they worth it?
Basically, yes, industry rates are nice, but are they worth it?
Looking back, I don't think I very clear in my comment so I'm sorry for any miscommunication. You bring up a valid point and I don't disagree. It's one of the reasons I've chosen to offer my services in this community. Compared to other clients, they're just much more enjoyable to work with. I have absolutely no problem with how the prices have been adjusted here. I have zero expectations of FA or any other art community site to match the industry.
What I DO have a problem is when people will try to convince artists that they are over priced and not worth money. When really, in comparison, the amount we charge is charitable. I dislike it when someone gets upset and tries to shame or harass the artist into dumbing down their price just to they can get what they want. All while saying the artist is unfair or selfish. Or a customer happily spends money on artwork they like and a "friend" tells them to get their money back because they could have gotten it for cheaper. By no means am I suggesting artists to charge for industry prices. I'm simply stating that I wish people can understand and appreciate the affordable price range artists have set up for themselves here. Or at least accept it and gracefully move on instead of making a fuss.
In the end, it's less about the fandom's economy and more about respect. If people want to express how they feel x item is not worth x dollars(to them), that's fine, as long as it's respectfully expressed as and opinion, not fact. After all, art is a luxury item.
What I DO have a problem is when people will try to convince artists that they are over priced and not worth money. When really, in comparison, the amount we charge is charitable. I dislike it when someone gets upset and tries to shame or harass the artist into dumbing down their price just to they can get what they want. All while saying the artist is unfair or selfish. Or a customer happily spends money on artwork they like and a "friend" tells them to get their money back because they could have gotten it for cheaper. By no means am I suggesting artists to charge for industry prices. I'm simply stating that I wish people can understand and appreciate the affordable price range artists have set up for themselves here. Or at least accept it and gracefully move on instead of making a fuss.
In the end, it's less about the fandom's economy and more about respect. If people want to express how they feel x item is not worth x dollars(to them), that's fine, as long as it's respectfully expressed as and opinion, not fact. After all, art is a luxury item.
Sorry for the late comment, but I did want to say that I totally 100% agree with your comment. :)
Yes, industry verses fandom aside, artists tend to make chicken scratch for pay verses what they deserve. I'm soon going to enter an industry that averages $20 an hour for STARTING pay. At that point I'm going to strongly urge my friends to charge higher prices for their work, and I will be the first to start paying those higher prices.
So trust me, I totally understand how much a fair rate should be. My business partner Libra-11 has amazing skill and yet at the end of the day he still makes below minimum wage, and that's just not right.
Yes, industry verses fandom aside, artists tend to make chicken scratch for pay verses what they deserve. I'm soon going to enter an industry that averages $20 an hour for STARTING pay. At that point I'm going to strongly urge my friends to charge higher prices for their work, and I will be the first to start paying those higher prices.
So trust me, I totally understand how much a fair rate should be. My business partner Libra-11 has amazing skill and yet at the end of the day he still makes below minimum wage, and that's just not right.
You're right, it's not the industry, so we artists can't necessarily *expect* to get paid at industry rates. We get that. What pisses us off, though, is when we do work for less than what our time is really worth (often less than legal minimum wage) and *STILL* get bitched at for charging too much.
Really, what we're asking for is a bit of courtesy and respect. If you can't (or won't) afford an artist's prices, please don't bitch and whine about how they're charging too much. Leave them alone and find someone you can/will afford.
Really, what we're asking for is a bit of courtesy and respect. If you can't (or won't) afford an artist's prices, please don't bitch and whine about how they're charging too much. Leave them alone and find someone you can/will afford.
that I agree with. its the same as trying to be like"oh I wish I could afford that..."it isn't respectful especially for those who, in a broken market in the states, rely on it just to live and pay bills. I mean, if one charges to much, one should simply find a price range that fits. fa is kinda free market, so there is a absolute plethora of artists of varying skills and expertises that fill the gaps.
Totally agreed with you on this comment. :)
Yes, people should stop bitching about prices. We live in a capitalist society, so find someone who will work at a lesser rate if you MUST, but until then recognize that everyone deserves a livable wage. To me this is at least $15 an hour for those who depend on their work, and still at least $8 an hour even to those who just do it for fun money on the side.
Yes, people should stop bitching about prices. We live in a capitalist society, so find someone who will work at a lesser rate if you MUST, but until then recognize that everyone deserves a livable wage. To me this is at least $15 an hour for those who depend on their work, and still at least $8 an hour even to those who just do it for fun money on the side.
Eh, to be fair, some artists DO charge way too much.
Though too many people complain about artists that are relatively fair in their pricing.
Though too many people complain about artists that are relatively fair in their pricing.
People can charge whatever they want.
Getting someone to actually pay that much, however, is a very different thing! There's maybe a dozen furry artists that can charge whatever they want and people will pay it. For everyone else, you're worth what people are willing to pay, and it's very much a buyer's market.
On the flipside, you do get what you pay for. If you don't mind crappy art, then you can get something for $5 or $10. If you want slightly less crappy art, then $20 or $30. If you want something that actually looks decent, then you'll have to cough up money into the 3-digit range.
And honestly, what furry artists charge, even the top ones, is a pittance compared to what 'real' commercial artists charge. Even if they would consider doing the type of work furries commission, and most wouldn't.
Getting someone to actually pay that much, however, is a very different thing! There's maybe a dozen furry artists that can charge whatever they want and people will pay it. For everyone else, you're worth what people are willing to pay, and it's very much a buyer's market.
On the flipside, you do get what you pay for. If you don't mind crappy art, then you can get something for $5 or $10. If you want slightly less crappy art, then $20 or $30. If you want something that actually looks decent, then you'll have to cough up money into the 3-digit range.
And honestly, what furry artists charge, even the top ones, is a pittance compared to what 'real' commercial artists charge. Even if they would consider doing the type of work furries commission, and most wouldn't.
Then there is the time invested angle. Some artists are faster than others, and again it shows. The simple sad truth is, even top-notch artists often barely break minimum wage, if they even do. There are a choice few artists who put out a decent product and can do it fast. That is extremely rare, quality costs in $$$ because it costs in time.
For an artist to actually make a 'good living' doing nothing but art, requires those prices you mention 'commercial artists' charging, when spread over the time invested in a piece, they are making a more respectable living. Furry artists, on the whole, love the art enough to tolerate making minimum wage or less to do it.
For an artist to actually make a 'good living' doing nothing but art, requires those prices you mention 'commercial artists' charging, when spread over the time invested in a piece, they are making a more respectable living. Furry artists, on the whole, love the art enough to tolerate making minimum wage or less to do it.
This is very much true. I'm only making minimum wage on my jewelery, I'd very much like to increase my prices so that I can buy more materials quicker and give my customers what they want, but unfortionatly for the time being I need to keep my prices low due to lack of customers.
I don't think people 'tolerate' the low prices as much as they have no choice in the matter. You either do it for that amount, or the customer will go to someone else will.
Example-- I was contacted for a commission not too long ago. Super-complicated-- 4 or 5 figures, full color, extremely complex background involving perspective, several action 'inserts' within the main image. For something that complex (not even counting preliminary sketches), my bare minimum would be in the $400 range, and that's low-balling it for the time and effort involved.
How much was I offered? $80.
Although I desperately needed the money, this was beyond anything I could take. That was about a week's worth of work I was looking at there. Could he get anyone to do something that complex for $80? Probably. Could he get someone who actually had some skill at draftmanship, composition and perspective? Probably not. It was up to him whether the saved money was worth the shoddy quality he'd get for it.
Example-- I was contacted for a commission not too long ago. Super-complicated-- 4 or 5 figures, full color, extremely complex background involving perspective, several action 'inserts' within the main image. For something that complex (not even counting preliminary sketches), my bare minimum would be in the $400 range, and that's low-balling it for the time and effort involved.
How much was I offered? $80.
Although I desperately needed the money, this was beyond anything I could take. That was about a week's worth of work I was looking at there. Could he get anyone to do something that complex for $80? Probably. Could he get someone who actually had some skill at draftmanship, composition and perspective? Probably not. It was up to him whether the saved money was worth the shoddy quality he'd get for it.
$400...
I only know one guy who would charge me that much for what you where asked. But he is a good friend of mine and I trust him to finish.
I know someone who would do It cheaper and faster with almost as much skill.
It is funny, art is a massive game of chance and alone I will use a quite of 4 I use.
Be cheap or Be fast or Be good or be friendly.
Be 2 you win the day
Be 3 you win the game.
It is how I take the people I pay for work.
I will play by there rules, and pay the prices. However, I only play for along as the rules are fair.
If you are to talk about the horrible evil freeloads known as buyers.
Then you get what you get.
If you talk about customers like they are dogs, then they will avoid you.
Many people don't mind paying for things, but they do mind the "All buyers are greedy" trope that has be fallen. You are not the only people with problems, some people have unforeseen things happen in life.
Some people get rent raised.
Some people have to help a brother out.
Some just have buy luck.
You have the right to ask for what you please, but just because someone does not wish to buy your crap for what you ask does not make them a freeloader.
You have your right to stand your ground, however don't act like the divide is clear.
For it is more faded then you think.
I only know one guy who would charge me that much for what you where asked. But he is a good friend of mine and I trust him to finish.
I know someone who would do It cheaper and faster with almost as much skill.
It is funny, art is a massive game of chance and alone I will use a quite of 4 I use.
Be cheap or Be fast or Be good or be friendly.
Be 2 you win the day
Be 3 you win the game.
It is how I take the people I pay for work.
I will play by there rules, and pay the prices. However, I only play for along as the rules are fair.
If you are to talk about the horrible evil freeloads known as buyers.
Then you get what you get.
If you talk about customers like they are dogs, then they will avoid you.
Many people don't mind paying for things, but they do mind the "All buyers are greedy" trope that has be fallen. You are not the only people with problems, some people have unforeseen things happen in life.
Some people get rent raised.
Some people have to help a brother out.
Some just have buy luck.
You have the right to ask for what you please, but just because someone does not wish to buy your crap for what you ask does not make them a freeloader.
You have your right to stand your ground, however don't act like the divide is clear.
For it is more faded then you think.
I've been doing this for many years and have never had complaints about work undelivered, too slow or substandard.
If you got anyone to do what I was asked to do for $80, I would love to see the image.
The saying is: "Do you want it fast, good or cheap? Pick 2."
If you got anyone to do what I was asked to do for $80, I would love to see the image.
The saying is: "Do you want it fast, good or cheap? Pick 2."
You bring up some very good points too. Basically there's always going to be people who complain about an artist's price. Typically the status quo is you price your work similar to what your peers are doing for similar quality. I've had one artist tell me they were making less than minimum wage by the time they took on a commission. The ironic thing is those types tend to work far too slow to qualify as a professional concept artist. Those people need to be FAST. Not this 9-10 hours on your average furry quality artwork. Sometimes they do get a project in which they're commissioned to do say.. a poster and maybe have a week to go about it. But when they are comparing themselves to actual commercial work, speed is essential as well as quality.
It's not my problem those types work slow. The solution is to either raise the price and likely have less clients or work to improve speed while maintaining quality. The thing is too in a sense this is still more or less a form of retail and generally that's why it is recommended you set pricing similar to your peers based on skill/quality and for the correct sector. Expecting the private sector to pay similar to what the commercial sector will is generally unrealistic unless the private individual has the several hundred to spend on the work. On the flip side there are people who simply complain about the pricing because they have an interest in that artist and simply want to get something from them. To me that's actually a good thing because it shows a demand for your talent. Doesn't mean the artist would have to lower prices to accommodate but the complaining should be expected and simply accepted as part of doing business. If you went to a store that complained about it's customers right in front of them as a whole, not simply from one or two associates, I doubt one would be inclined to go shop there when there are friendlier alternatives.
If I know an artist has angst against clients in general, I typically avoid them. Tends to wind up with them putting less effort toward the commission I have noticed with some. If I feel someone has too high of a price I simply don't commission them and pointing out my perception of too high a price isn't going to change their minds anyway. But like in any form of consumerism there are going to be the vocal ones and honestly that's all part of doing business. Accept it and grow a thick skin I say. But yeah at the end of the day, they decide their prices but everything is based on a perceived "market" value but no one other than lack of business is stopping these artists from charging more. They also have the right to refuse a negotiated price if it's too low.
It's not my problem those types work slow. The solution is to either raise the price and likely have less clients or work to improve speed while maintaining quality. The thing is too in a sense this is still more or less a form of retail and generally that's why it is recommended you set pricing similar to your peers based on skill/quality and for the correct sector. Expecting the private sector to pay similar to what the commercial sector will is generally unrealistic unless the private individual has the several hundred to spend on the work. On the flip side there are people who simply complain about the pricing because they have an interest in that artist and simply want to get something from them. To me that's actually a good thing because it shows a demand for your talent. Doesn't mean the artist would have to lower prices to accommodate but the complaining should be expected and simply accepted as part of doing business. If you went to a store that complained about it's customers right in front of them as a whole, not simply from one or two associates, I doubt one would be inclined to go shop there when there are friendlier alternatives.
If I know an artist has angst against clients in general, I typically avoid them. Tends to wind up with them putting less effort toward the commission I have noticed with some. If I feel someone has too high of a price I simply don't commission them and pointing out my perception of too high a price isn't going to change their minds anyway. But like in any form of consumerism there are going to be the vocal ones and honestly that's all part of doing business. Accept it and grow a thick skin I say. But yeah at the end of the day, they decide their prices but everything is based on a perceived "market" value but no one other than lack of business is stopping these artists from charging more. They also have the right to refuse a negotiated price if it's too low.
I'm kind of just sick of the hostel attitude from both parties. Weirdly enough It usually comes from the artist end,because most Spongers tend to stay quite because they know what they are doing.
And people have lives I understand that. However, to wait half a year for something. (which has happened) made me start making ground rules. Because of this one person, when I first commission someone I want to see a sketch. Then they get paid, right there.
There are art sponges,but also people who take the money and dick around for too long. And,It pisses me off. I had a person who was doing collage work, It took them 3 months to finish something. I understood that,I waited.
I had someone had a loss, I told them not to worry.
Someone was getting overworked with projects. I them we could change things to make It easier.
This person, has token nearly a year to finish something I paid him for. He has yet to show me progress, he has yet to show me anything. I've been on his listed,I've wait 3 months to ask someone If they are packed on stuff if they are done. He has never given me a reason why.
He is too slow to take the many commissions he has. He not only has money commissions but another type.
I really like the guy, but he is having too much shit go on and not updating progresses.
And It is kind of rattling my bones.
And people have lives I understand that. However, to wait half a year for something. (which has happened) made me start making ground rules. Because of this one person, when I first commission someone I want to see a sketch. Then they get paid, right there.
There are art sponges,but also people who take the money and dick around for too long. And,It pisses me off. I had a person who was doing collage work, It took them 3 months to finish something. I understood that,I waited.
I had someone had a loss, I told them not to worry.
Someone was getting overworked with projects. I them we could change things to make It easier.
This person, has token nearly a year to finish something I paid him for. He has yet to show me progress, he has yet to show me anything. I've been on his listed,I've wait 3 months to ask someone If they are packed on stuff if they are done. He has never given me a reason why.
He is too slow to take the many commissions he has. He not only has money commissions but another type.
I really like the guy, but he is having too much shit go on and not updating progresses.
And It is kind of rattling my bones.
In my experience that is a large problem I've had when it comes to commissioning people. I have more people take several months to finish something that takes them a few hours or run with my money for a while then simply cancel out. I've had more cancellations on me than anything but I'm glad at least I did get my money back without much of a fuss. Some artists appear to justify the excessive time period because things come up and.... somehow keep coming up. The one that really does irk me as well is when you are in the queue but then the artist takes on more work or "emergency commissions" and those automatically get done ahead of the others. Kinda why I stick to someone like lunalei because she gets the job done in a timely manner, she will work to make sure you are as happy as she can make you with her skill level and overall her prices are fair. But for me the important part is the reliability and she hasn't kept me waiting months for artwork. It's usually done within a month but very often it's more like a week or two.
But yeah some artists, particularly ones that do the sorta thing you've described really seem to have a severe lack of business sense. I think they get wrapped up in the notion they have this hobby that they likely wanna do as a pro... then they find it's as simple as basically posting an ad online for work and getting your name out there... then you pull in some money and that's it. They neglect the whole business aspect of it which includes customer service skill and a lack of understanding that you can be a high rate artist but if your reputation is not there you're very unlikely to thrive in the field. Customer trust is paramount above all else. Yes you can't please every single person possible but running around with people's money for months on end... that tends to damage trust. o.o
But yeah some artists, particularly ones that do the sorta thing you've described really seem to have a severe lack of business sense. I think they get wrapped up in the notion they have this hobby that they likely wanna do as a pro... then they find it's as simple as basically posting an ad online for work and getting your name out there... then you pull in some money and that's it. They neglect the whole business aspect of it which includes customer service skill and a lack of understanding that you can be a high rate artist but if your reputation is not there you're very unlikely to thrive in the field. Customer trust is paramount above all else. Yes you can't please every single person possible but running around with people's money for months on end... that tends to damage trust. o.o
$80 for something complex like that? That is just insulting. Something like that is definitely worth at least $400. That is how much I would charge for it.
this, this this this this! You hit the nail on the head. Could not have said it better.
I agreed with your comment until the last sentence of your third paragraph and your fourth paragraph. I know quite a few people who can make something more than "decent" for under $100. Implying that the only people who charge $30 are "slightly less crappy" artists is very insulting.
And as I've said before about a lot of commercial artists, first of all it's extremely difficult to break into that industry, and secondly most commercial artists give up the rights to their work, which is why they're paid more right away, but are not allowed to sell their work on art CDs or even use those same characters again for themselves, so it's a pretty massive sacrifice. How much money is worth being given a collar and chain on your imagination?
And as I've said before about a lot of commercial artists, first of all it's extremely difficult to break into that industry, and secondly most commercial artists give up the rights to their work, which is why they're paid more right away, but are not allowed to sell their work on art CDs or even use those same characters again for themselves, so it's a pretty massive sacrifice. How much money is worth being given a collar and chain on your imagination?
To begin with, art is a luxury item, not a necessity. People (more so in this community) tend to perceive art as something that is easy to create, and therefore only worth as much as they have in their pockets. Many are not willing to shell out a larger sum, despite wanting a high quality piece of art. If a person charges $200 dollars for a commission which took them 72 hours to create, they are only making just over $2 per hour. That's way less than minimum wage. People shouldn't complain if they can't afford something they do not require for survival.
Especially in the fursuit area I find. I've seen people trying to commission someone asking for a full fursuit with all the bells and whistles, and expecting to pay not a penny over two hundred dollars. Then they get pissy when you tell them that's impossible due to all the bells and whistles costing at least $400 in materials, let alone all of the work they put into it. Some even rage quit as if they're intitled to it. I saw one girl selling fursuit heads for $35 dollars. But guess what, it didn't even look like an animal. Had no fur, just scrap badly sewn fabric, no way to look out of it, just horrid. The higher the price, the higher the quality in most cases.
I believe it all boils down to a general lack of respect toward how hard an artist works to create appealing products. It's sickening to see just how many people in our community fail to recognize that luxury items, by definition, aren't cheap. Some people go so far as to feeling entitled to such items for dirt cheap prices, and I've seen some people make awful excuses to "guilt" artists into lowering their prices. I don't know what it is with furries specifically, but they need to realize that they are damn lucky artists on this site don't charge commercial prices.
Just to chime in on that... they generally would not be able to charge commercial rates because that's more of a specific area in terms of pricing which is actually starting on a decline with more artists being outsourced to cheaper labor. Commercial pricing also includes 100% copyright as well which is typically where the actual money is since the company is intending to make the investment on the rights obtained by the works which is partly why the pay can be high in some cases. Don't get me wrong, I do disagree with people who basically bash an artist who happens to have high prices as if it's really gonna work to get them to lower it down but commercial pricing would not really be highly successful in the private sector which boils down to why they simply cannot do it unless they've built up some sort of name for themselves (which... they get to typically end up getting extra ridicule for). After all if they're already complaining about current pricing, raising them to commercial grade is not exactly going to keep them afloat generally so... it's not that commissioners are lucky.. it's more that the artist simply won't thrive on commercially priced commissions in this community.
Not to mention he conned us out of $35 for a comic he posted on the site anyway.
He's getting on my nerves more and more. I hear he's kind of a douche to people in person, too. doesn't really surprise me.
I saw, at AC.. he was selling SKETCHES for $120. I'm sorry.. that's a bit unreasonable... he can't be spending more than an hour, two TOPS on those sketches.
Eeeeesh. I have no problem spending $100 on a single image, and have spent $700 on one comic in the past. The issue in my mind is just how much an artist is making per hour. I don't want to overpay nor underpay for what someone puts into a piece.
That's what I mean. It's one thing to pay $100 for something that's approximately 4 - 6 hours of work, and another to pay that for 20 minutes of work. But again, that's just me, and I don't say anything to those artists because honestly? if someone is willing to pay that for their art then.. technically it's worth that.
It may be unreasonable to you, but not to him or others. As an artist, you can charge whatever the heck you want. He's charging what he thinks his time and art is worth. The only problem is the higher the price, the less amount of people can afford, or are willing to pay. Value is different for everyone. One person may look at a Piece of paper signed by a president and is willing to pay millions of dollars for it, where another person thinks its worthless.
.. if you look at my later response, I stated that while I feel it is unreasonable, moaning and groaning isn't my style because ultimately the fans of his art are willing to pay the price, therefore by default of the definition, it is worth that.
Just a little truth about the whole selling sketches at $100 for you there, the selling of sketches by me at AC this year were all silent auction based and FIVE images were produced a day for the three days I was there in the artist alley. My starting prices ranged from around $20 to $30 as a starting bid, but to my surprise, I found that in a very short matter of time that each bid was drastically increased with every bidder. Some silent auction sketches reaching above $200....Naughty artist who takes advantage of everyone else, who makes his sketch auctions low as hell, and then all those naughty people walking around wanting one increasing it...shame shame shame on the artist. ^^
And I'm very happy to know that to all those who really have an issue, with not only my prices, but prices that other artists may charge here in this community have finally woken up to find all of us naughty money hungry, vile, rude, snobbish, up themselves artists are actually holding you at gun point with finger on trigger FORCING you to buy art from us.
I guess the jig is up. lol
And I'm very happy to know that to all those who really have an issue, with not only my prices, but prices that other artists may charge here in this community have finally woken up to find all of us naughty money hungry, vile, rude, snobbish, up themselves artists are actually holding you at gun point with finger on trigger FORCING you to buy art from us.
I guess the jig is up. lol
As I later said, I merely said I felt they were 'unreasonable'. I did not villify you or call you names, because.. as I have said twice in this thread of conversation: if the commissioners are willing to pay those prices, by definition of the term, the art is "worth" that.
From one artist to another:
As far as I'm concerned, If you can find people that are willing to pay that much then props to you!
I recently had an auction where for a single image (3 characters simple background) it ended up getting to around $600.. now.. auctioning is completely different then setting my prices. You're told exactly what your art is worth, but ONLY to the people bidding.
Whereas setting your daily prices is almost entirely based on demand. If you find your queue filling up quicker then you can swat a fly, it's time to raise your prices. Raise em as high as you like because if they keep coming, good for you! You're doin' something right!
I don't get upset when I see artists making a lot of money! Actors can make millions in a single film if they're demand is high enough. Singers can make HUGE bucks at a concert if they can fill the room.
People are upset that you make $X on a piece? People are upset that Jim Carry makes $X on one film?
They're jealous. Cold, cut and clear.
Am I jealous when I see artists make huge bucks on a regular basis? Heck yah, sure I am! I certainly wish my demand was that high at the moment!! Am I gonna call them a bitch/skank/jerk/douche/crazy/money-grubbing because they make it? Hell no! It's a positive jealousy. It's like, DAMN! Good on ya! You're a success and I am inspired in my jealousy to work harder and learn from your successes!!
There are a few artists that make big bucks and ARE douches/money-grubbing, BUT that doesn't effect their work XD (most of the time)
As far as I'm concerned, if people will pay you big bucks for your work.. why in GODS NAME would you charge small bucks?!
:P Now THAT would have me callin' you crazy ;P
huge comment aside, good for you! Keep it up! Give the furries what they want ;P <3 And take what they're willing to pay!
As far as I'm concerned, If you can find people that are willing to pay that much then props to you!
I recently had an auction where for a single image (3 characters simple background) it ended up getting to around $600.. now.. auctioning is completely different then setting my prices. You're told exactly what your art is worth, but ONLY to the people bidding.
Whereas setting your daily prices is almost entirely based on demand. If you find your queue filling up quicker then you can swat a fly, it's time to raise your prices. Raise em as high as you like because if they keep coming, good for you! You're doin' something right!
I don't get upset when I see artists making a lot of money! Actors can make millions in a single film if they're demand is high enough. Singers can make HUGE bucks at a concert if they can fill the room.
People are upset that you make $X on a piece? People are upset that Jim Carry makes $X on one film?
They're jealous. Cold, cut and clear.
Am I jealous when I see artists make huge bucks on a regular basis? Heck yah, sure I am! I certainly wish my demand was that high at the moment!! Am I gonna call them a bitch/skank/jerk/douche/crazy/money-grubbing because they make it? Hell no! It's a positive jealousy. It's like, DAMN! Good on ya! You're a success and I am inspired in my jealousy to work harder and learn from your successes!!
There are a few artists that make big bucks and ARE douches/money-grubbing, BUT that doesn't effect their work XD (most of the time)
As far as I'm concerned, if people will pay you big bucks for your work.. why in GODS NAME would you charge small bucks?!
:P Now THAT would have me callin' you crazy ;P
huge comment aside, good for you! Keep it up! Give the furries what they want ;P <3 And take what they're willing to pay!
who this person? I have heard of this guy before??? and he does kind of sound like a rip off artist....
He's not a ripoff artist, because honestly, if people pay those prices, then.. well, it's the customers at fault. It Does irk me slightly that he claimed he stood up and shook hands with -everyone- that came to his table.. on my passes through the Artist Alley, I did receive a greeting, but only briefly with eye contact, as is fairly standard of artists. Why's he trying to puff himself up and make himself sound greater than he was?
I also kinda twitch at -any- artist that makes over $500 in a weekend in the Artist's Alley because that Alley was created for beginners, for amateurs that couldn't necessarily recoup their costs of a table. Furry dealer tables are ridiculously cheap compared to anime/sci-fi/comic/etc conventions, and transient vendor's licenses are not hard to get, especially for Pennsylvania - I know, I did it for a one time furry convention in eastern PA a couple years ago when I paid for and got a dealer's table. That's not necessarily specifically his 'crime' though, as I know there are a lot of artists that do it. I just wish fewer artists did that.
I also kinda twitch at -any- artist that makes over $500 in a weekend in the Artist's Alley because that Alley was created for beginners, for amateurs that couldn't necessarily recoup their costs of a table. Furry dealer tables are ridiculously cheap compared to anime/sci-fi/comic/etc conventions, and transient vendor's licenses are not hard to get, especially for Pennsylvania - I know, I did it for a one time furry convention in eastern PA a couple years ago when I paid for and got a dealer's table. That's not necessarily specifically his 'crime' though, as I know there are a lot of artists that do it. I just wish fewer artists did that.
I hung out with him for an entire night with friends at AC and not once was he a "douche", he was actually a really great guy. Please don't make assumptions based on rumors
You hear im a douche in person? Well thats sad because you clearly have never met me in person (at AC for example) Where i was for the longest time the only artist standing up to receive and greet those coming to my table, hugging people, have laughs and even inviting random furs i had just met out to lunch and dinners (all payed for by me) just so that they could have a great time. You right im a real English douche. XP
Oh and FYI those who say that im probably a douche are those that have been denied art (either because morally not right to produce or just out right vile subject matter) and or were out right rude to begin with so make sure you know someone or at least make an effort to get to know someone for yourself before slandering them. ^^
Oh and FYI those who say that im probably a douche are those that have been denied art (either because morally not right to produce or just out right vile subject matter) and or were out right rude to begin with so make sure you know someone or at least make an effort to get to know someone for yourself before slandering them. ^^
This, pretty much this, it's easy to spout rumors about people you've never met in person and make someone look bad through 'word-of-mouth'. It's easy to do since a lot of them were never even there and as long as a LOT of people are saying the exact same thing than that thing they're talking about 'has' to be 'true' right? Or at least, that's the general 'danger' with this kind of stuff.
How many times didn't something like this happen? It happens in the industry all the time, there's a reason the bosses of big companies have doors that not even their secretary can enter during their abscense, there might be an angered co-worker that could install child-porn on the computer, call the police and have their 'personal justice'. (and yes, this happens.)
Case 'n point I'm trying to get at is: If you have the right to stand on a pedistal, other people will be all to eager to take you down. This is simply human nature at its finest, the inability to deal with other people's kindness and success.
How many times didn't something like this happen? It happens in the industry all the time, there's a reason the bosses of big companies have doors that not even their secretary can enter during their abscense, there might be an angered co-worker that could install child-porn on the computer, call the police and have their 'personal justice'. (and yes, this happens.)
Case 'n point I'm trying to get at is: If you have the right to stand on a pedistal, other people will be all to eager to take you down. This is simply human nature at its finest, the inability to deal with other people's kindness and success.
oh, wow. Color me wrong. You're right, I've never been to a con or met you in person. There was a discussion flying around on u18chan and that was one of the topics that got pretty heated before finally being removed.
Terribly sorry, that sure will teach me about spouting rumors!
Terribly sorry, that sure will teach me about spouting rumors!
People always seem to complain about his prices. And I always find it hilarious.
And yet, he gets plenty of commissions. If people are willing to pay what he charges then I say all power to him.
And yet, he gets plenty of commissions. If people are willing to pay what he charges then I say all power to him.
Precisely. Do furries really expect for an artist to reject a higher price they know they can achieve?
I've had complaints before about how my auctions tend to skyrocket to bidding levels that surprise me, but why would I change anything? To me it means more gas in my car and doing my best on each piece.
I've had complaints before about how my auctions tend to skyrocket to bidding levels that surprise me, but why would I change anything? To me it means more gas in my car and doing my best on each piece.
Oh, I don't think it's too expensive. I just have no money to use to buy it!
Average Fur artist prices range from $30-100 depending on things. some are more, some less...
Average Professional Artist working for a company, or movie studio, range from $3-5000 for the same quality of work some furs do for $100.
Moral: Quit yer bitchin' and be thankful the artists who do the world charge as LITTLE as they do.
Average Professional Artist working for a company, or movie studio, range from $3-5000 for the same quality of work some furs do for $100.
Moral: Quit yer bitchin' and be thankful the artists who do the world charge as LITTLE as they do.
though you have to keep in mind that thoose professional artists do get paid that but oftentimes get kicked to the curb after their project is done. see that all the time in the gaming industry. artist in henetal dont get the respect they deserve regardless the industry or fandom they work for.
Keep in mind, that even genera? furry artist might feel like being kicked after commission. They like Pro's ending their job, get paid, and no one will be holding them, because it will be losing money on someone, who isn't neded ;) Pro's working in movie and game industry know that perfectly, and none of them are surprised, so searching for another projects after first is common.
I would say working for furries is no different. Just because fuzzyraptor (making up a name) commissioned you for a particular piece doesn't mean he is ever going to commission you again, for anything at all. That's the same thing the professionals get. Furry artists don't get respect either. I have friends that, like myself, do not draw adult artwork. We just won't. Do you know how much we have been hassled about it? I know another artist that yes, she got known for an adult comic she draws, but when she posted that she was getting tired of drawing the porn, and might be quitting any adult work, the mass response was torches and pitchforks. ... and we have people that want and expect us to work for less than minimum wage.
That and they're really not paid that much for a single piece either. A close friend of mine did a movie poster concept, 3 versions for Mel Brooks. Total price: $500. Piece rate work doesn't typically go near the 3k-5k mark so the comparison really is not a valid one unless you've hired an artist that intends to spend a minimum of 30 hours on the piece and basically produces it as fine art. These types also tend to produce furry quality art in roughly an hour or two so.. vast difference in general skill.
A 2d concept artist on a payroll basis starting out can expect around $24 an hour starting so the 3k-5k figure begins to make more sense as a monthly income when the artist is on salary and does not do merely 1 piece of work in that time. There is some very good stuff on this site but there's really not a lot of it that would qualify as "fine art" and is more closely related to concept art instead, some just more 'finished' versions of it. That's not at all intended as a bad thing but concept art tends to have a lower dollar value than fine art. More so when commercial rights are not included which is a large reason why those that work in the industry tend to be paid more than they are in the private sector. As is common saying I hear from other artists, commercial rights are too valuable to give up on commissioned works here. Problem is... there isn't really much reason for the common commissioner to purchase the commercial rights on a pic they're just going to hang up on their wall and/or post up in an online gallery.
But yeah as you've pointed out, professional artists are very often kicked to the curb until their next project so the income is still not steady unless you're really just THAT good or have a skill that's in high demand such as 3d rigging. Also, as well all know the VFX industry is getting outsourced to cheaper labor as well.
At the end of the day, an artist can charge as much as he/she wants to or as little. But like anything that involves consumerism there will be people that complain about the prices. I mean there are some people on this site that flat out expect commissions to be GIVEN to them for free...literally. But simply put, I decide what I'm willing to pay for art from someone and if I don't like their price I just go elsewhere. Some artists here really are overpriced for the quality you get and the time it takes them to deliver, some offer a pretty awesome bargain and further still some are priced fairly.
A 2d concept artist on a payroll basis starting out can expect around $24 an hour starting so the 3k-5k figure begins to make more sense as a monthly income when the artist is on salary and does not do merely 1 piece of work in that time. There is some very good stuff on this site but there's really not a lot of it that would qualify as "fine art" and is more closely related to concept art instead, some just more 'finished' versions of it. That's not at all intended as a bad thing but concept art tends to have a lower dollar value than fine art. More so when commercial rights are not included which is a large reason why those that work in the industry tend to be paid more than they are in the private sector. As is common saying I hear from other artists, commercial rights are too valuable to give up on commissioned works here. Problem is... there isn't really much reason for the common commissioner to purchase the commercial rights on a pic they're just going to hang up on their wall and/or post up in an online gallery.
But yeah as you've pointed out, professional artists are very often kicked to the curb until their next project so the income is still not steady unless you're really just THAT good or have a skill that's in high demand such as 3d rigging. Also, as well all know the VFX industry is getting outsourced to cheaper labor as well.
At the end of the day, an artist can charge as much as he/she wants to or as little. But like anything that involves consumerism there will be people that complain about the prices. I mean there are some people on this site that flat out expect commissions to be GIVEN to them for free...literally. But simply put, I decide what I'm willing to pay for art from someone and if I don't like their price I just go elsewhere. Some artists here really are overpriced for the quality you get and the time it takes them to deliver, some offer a pretty awesome bargain and further still some are priced fairly.
Meh lol evil typos still getting used to the touch screen on my new cellphone, last sentence was to read : Artists in general don't get the respect they deserve regardless the industry or fandom they work for.
Company pays $$$$ for product artwork.
Company makes $$$,$$$ selling product.
Company makes profit.
Company is driven to maximize profit margin, monetary investment is but one of many factors considered.
Comissioner pays $$$ for custom artwork.
Comissioner rarely makes $ selling artwork.
Comissioner spends money.
Comissioner is driven to spend the least amount possible, monetary investment is typically the primary concern.
Company makes $$$,$$$ selling product.
Company makes profit.
Company is driven to maximize profit margin, monetary investment is but one of many factors considered.
Comissioner pays $$$ for custom artwork.
Comissioner rarely makes $ selling artwork.
Comissioner spends money.
Comissioner is driven to spend the least amount possible, monetary investment is typically the primary concern.
This.... just this...
I have pieces ranging from 60 dollars to 250 dollars on my mantle at home... the difference in quality and detail is blatantly obvious if you compared any of them.
One piece is a simple colour work of my character, white background, 60 bucks, another is of my mate's and my character with a complex background 120 dollars, yet another is both characters and an extremely detailed background, foreground and characters... 250 dollars.
Artwork is NOT cheap and considering minimum wage is 7.5 an hour in most places, with some artists putting an AVERAGE of 12 hours into a piece that's at least 90 dollars... just in labor let alone supplies and other things. Art in this community is so undersold it's absurd... but when you factor in that most are in their early to late teens and don't necessarily have that kind of money to spend... then it's kinda understandable, but what I hate is when people bitch about how much it costs.
I'll admit I hate auctions and will not bother with them since most auctions of artists I watch have hit 5-700 dollars for a single piece with on character.(too rich for my blood), but I have no problem paying a few hundred from an artist I truly love.
I have pieces ranging from 60 dollars to 250 dollars on my mantle at home... the difference in quality and detail is blatantly obvious if you compared any of them.
One piece is a simple colour work of my character, white background, 60 bucks, another is of my mate's and my character with a complex background 120 dollars, yet another is both characters and an extremely detailed background, foreground and characters... 250 dollars.
Artwork is NOT cheap and considering minimum wage is 7.5 an hour in most places, with some artists putting an AVERAGE of 12 hours into a piece that's at least 90 dollars... just in labor let alone supplies and other things. Art in this community is so undersold it's absurd... but when you factor in that most are in their early to late teens and don't necessarily have that kind of money to spend... then it's kinda understandable, but what I hate is when people bitch about how much it costs.
I'll admit I hate auctions and will not bother with them since most auctions of artists I watch have hit 5-700 dollars for a single piece with on character.(too rich for my blood), but I have no problem paying a few hundred from an artist I truly love.
This is exactly what I was thinking. Even in the comic world I was used to seeing some of the top named artists getting hundreds for a sketch or thousands for something a furry artist would get fifty to a couple hundred dollars for at the same skill level. And some artists idea of a sketch is far more detailed then what that term can mean to others.
A good chunk of that is because you are paying for the name. Imagine of a celebrity for example did some pretty crappy artwork. They would still probably EASILY make more than a talented furry artist simply because there is a big name attached to it. Whereas a big name in the furry world typically means nothing in the art community as a whole. Take Narse for example (he's a friend so I know he's not going to bite my head off for using him as an example :P ).. safe to say he's a pretty big name in this fandom yet... he doesn't really do commissions at all. Too busy with BD and he has some personal quips about his own artwork that stops him from doing it unless a closer friend really prods at him for it, even then he usually doesn't even charge. I'm fairly positive that if he opened up for a commission he could easily get a grand or more no problem.
Now take him and throw him in the ring with all of the other pro artists out there. His name means nothing compared to bigger names out there. He might get a low grade style project even with his portfolio but I strongly doubt he would be getting paid a grand or more for a single piece of artwork outside of the furry community. Name is a factor in how much an artist will get. For what Tojo charges I could get something of higher quality for the same if not less. People pay her rate because she is a popular name here and regardless of the quality, they will pay for it because it has her name and style attached to it. The sad part is artists of higher caliber tend to miss out on this simply because they do not have a popular name in the fandom.
Now take him and throw him in the ring with all of the other pro artists out there. His name means nothing compared to bigger names out there. He might get a low grade style project even with his portfolio but I strongly doubt he would be getting paid a grand or more for a single piece of artwork outside of the furry community. Name is a factor in how much an artist will get. For what Tojo charges I could get something of higher quality for the same if not less. People pay her rate because she is a popular name here and regardless of the quality, they will pay for it because it has her name and style attached to it. The sad part is artists of higher caliber tend to miss out on this simply because they do not have a popular name in the fandom.
My hat is off for you sir. For all of your comments in this thread providing a balanced view, calm non-inflamatory language and staying on point.
Thank you. :) I try to conduct my discussions in such a manner while not skirting around the truth via sugarcoating. An artist does not grow with false feedback and an artist that cannot handle negative feedback and criticism probably should consider another profession or keeping the art entirely private.
And again, they lose all the rights to what they create, have to inventory EVERYTHING, and tend to be forced to draw the exact same thing a dozen times over before the picture is completed, meaning they are made to put a lot more work into the same quality piece than freelance artists do.
And when it's done, if they're not fired, they're not even allowed under contract to draw the same thing for themselves for fun. This is made even worse if they created a new character on the job, as they're no longer allowed to use that character on their own accord or sell pictures of that character to fans. The ones who get to keep the rights are extremely rare and lucky.
Finally, it's also extremely extremely HARD to break into the industry, because there are very many competing artists and very few positions. In comparison, the furry fandom is almost guaranteed money, just not quite as much per hour.
And when it's done, if they're not fired, they're not even allowed under contract to draw the same thing for themselves for fun. This is made even worse if they created a new character on the job, as they're no longer allowed to use that character on their own accord or sell pictures of that character to fans. The ones who get to keep the rights are extremely rare and lucky.
Finally, it's also extremely extremely HARD to break into the industry, because there are very many competing artists and very few positions. In comparison, the furry fandom is almost guaranteed money, just not quite as much per hour.
I agree with this picture and lets think about this for a few moments.
You're a professional artist as far as my opinion goes: if you were a artist outside of any fandom with college training and all that. You'd be making thousands, lots of artists would.
You're a professional artist as far as my opinion goes: if you were a artist outside of any fandom with college training and all that. You'd be making thousands, lots of artists would.
Oh man, I didn't even think about it, but that face absolutely could be a meme! I have high hopes for this!
I've seen dozens of supernaturally amazing artists on this site that charge bargain basement almost nothing for commissions. this is the only place on the Internet where you can get a custom piece of art done by someone better than Lucian Freud for under 3 figures.
it makes my head spin
it makes my head spin
I like how your icon fits SOOOO well with this context XD
considering that's where the meme came from...
yeah, I guess it would. :U
yeah, I guess it would. :U
Real friends -- and real fans -- pay full price. They buy deluxe editions. They buy copies for their friends. And they tack on coffee and art supply money. *Then* take you out for dinner.
So basically, you can't be a real friend and/or fan if you don't have money? :P
lol
lol
Nonsense. That what money you have and can afford to spend, you put toward supporting your friends' businesses. Two of my friends own a brunch restaurant; I have brunch there when I can. Another friend is a landscaper; when I needed my yard designed, I went to him, asked for his 'stranger' full price rates, and paid half again above 'em. You can be a friend without paying a dime...but if you have a dime to spare, you don't tell a friend that s/he should sell to you for a nickel. You pay full price and tip high, because they *are* your friend.
This took the sting out of a lot of the more terrible comments. You are awesome.
Awww, thank you. *blush* It just seems so simple...the point of a friendship is mutual love and support. When applied to business transactions, of *course* you make sure your friend does well in the deal, and if you can't afford their work, you don't ask their prices to drop for your sake, but rather, you save up.
It blows my mind that people say "Well, I only have $X and not $Y" as an argument for an artist to drop prices. How did they accumulate $X in the first place? If one lives in such a way that surplus money accumulates at all, however slowly, then one can hold onto that money, and keep accumulating, and eventually have saved up $Y. It takes time, yes, but if one wants something badly enough, it's worth the wait.
I wonder sometimes what would happen if every single one of us who's grateful that there's an artist like Rukis in the world sent at least ten to twenty bucks -- more, obviously, if one can comfortably spare it -- and said simply "Because you're awesome. Nothing expected in return, just thanks." I think, next check, I ought to do just that. Care to join me and do the same?
It blows my mind that people say "Well, I only have $X and not $Y" as an argument for an artist to drop prices. How did they accumulate $X in the first place? If one lives in such a way that surplus money accumulates at all, however slowly, then one can hold onto that money, and keep accumulating, and eventually have saved up $Y. It takes time, yes, but if one wants something badly enough, it's worth the wait.
I wonder sometimes what would happen if every single one of us who's grateful that there's an artist like Rukis in the world sent at least ten to twenty bucks -- more, obviously, if one can comfortably spare it -- and said simply "Because you're awesome. Nothing expected in return, just thanks." I think, next check, I ought to do just that. Care to join me and do the same?
With my friends I like to make sure we are both happy with an exchange and sometimes, mostly only for friends, I will offer up art that I would charge an equal value in exchange for services they can do. Bartering is a favorite of mine when I don't have money and when someone wants art that is usually out of their price range.
If I wasn't an in the red artist myself I'd definitely consider it. Been meaning to pick up a book or print from rukis in the future when finances are a bit more stable though :)
If I wasn't an in the red artist myself I'd definitely consider it. Been meaning to pick up a book or print from rukis in the future when finances are a bit more stable though :)
I wish I could agree with you on all of this, but sadly I've had a friend take advantage of my generosity and spend MORE time on it than anyone else, putting me constantly at the bottom of the list because "I would understand", and then finally cancelling the commission without a refund because he spent my money already on video games and said that I was "holding him back". But I guess that's more a story of MUTUAL support that wasn't aimed toward the commissioner, which I'm sure you'd agree is pretty awful.
That artist ripped you off, plain and simple. Took your money, produced nothing, and wouldn't give you either refund or product. That's rather outside the context of a healthy transaction, though, I'm sure you'd agree.
The difference being expectation. The original article here was about customers complaining that rates are too high. You're suggesting that there may be many reasonable ways to adequately compensate a friend for services rendered that all parties are comfortable with, and that said friend is perfectly entitled to insist on cutting you a break anyway. Sure...but all of those involve the artist being happy about the arrangement, not a coercive and unidirectional 'This is more than I want to pay. You should sell me X for $Y because $Y is what I'm willing to pay.' Any deal you and your friend work out, in which both parties are happy with the terms, is your business and no one else's.
I also don't have a problem with friends doing favors for, or giving gifts to, one another. But that's a favor, or a gift -- a little different than a standard business transaction.
I also don't have a problem with friends doing favors for, or giving gifts to, one another. But that's a favor, or a gift -- a little different than a standard business transaction.
Agreed here.
I have a friend who insists that he's going to give me free art for life. I still tip him now and then to encourage him to continue to improve and be a sweet person. On the other hand, I have another friend who isn't getting enough work and has gotten depressed, so I offered him 50% more than he normallly charges for a really good picture of a new character I created. That perked him right up, and I know he will make it the best picture ever. It's all about paying it forward. :)
I have a friend who insists that he's going to give me free art for life. I still tip him now and then to encourage him to continue to improve and be a sweet person. On the other hand, I have another friend who isn't getting enough work and has gotten depressed, so I offered him 50% more than he normallly charges for a really good picture of a new character I created. That perked him right up, and I know he will make it the best picture ever. It's all about paying it forward. :)
My better half has had to resort to officially putting a cap on my budget here -
I do agree with this! :3 Though, on the flip side, when an artist you adore charges nearly three times what you make in two weeks... it's a little disheartening. D:
Naturally it will hurt, but people will not care, they spend what they want to spend and get what they crave for,
I Do applaud this very much so, I agree to this 110%
I don't really think that any artist who is making money CAN be charging too much. But I have heard that some artists only allow limited access to the art that the person who is requesting access commissioned. And THAT, I think, is evil. I don't understand it.
I think we've just found a new furry meme.
Please, do share your other ideas, if you have the time.
Please, do share your other ideas, if you have the time.
Oh man. I want to post this on my page so bad. I can empathize a little too well with this.
It's not that at all. it's that at minimum wage, I do not have the spare dollars to spend on the art that I love.
Sadly, art is a luxury, and if you're only making minimum wage, you have to understand that the artist needs to make at least that much as well to be a fair transaction.
I know how it has felt to want art badly and not be able to afford it, nothing wrong with that. But it's another thing for some people (not you, don't worry) to insist that they charge less just so they can have a deluxe piece when admittedly they're struggling financially.
I know how it has felt to want art badly and not be able to afford it, nothing wrong with that. But it's another thing for some people (not you, don't worry) to insist that they charge less just so they can have a deluxe piece when admittedly they're struggling financially.
And well I know it! This is why I do not even try to commission dear Rukis here, nor Mr. Bartrop nor Ms.Etuix nor Ms. Bruton nor Ms. Wyman. They are furiously high quality artists that deserve every penny they get. I would love to commission Mr. Wager to do his long forgotten Unicorn Paladin, but it's more important to pay the rent and the car insurance. (and pray nothing else goes wrong with it now) I am not one to even ask that they charge less, simply for the outstanding quality of their work. but this economy creates issues for both sides of the equation. An artist might think that s/he is no good because sales are down, might get depressed that their art is not moving. is it a fault of theirs? No. It's that a lot of fans are living on starvation wages when they would much prefer to have some mad money to buy a piece of art to hang on their walls. All I can do is comment on art, so at least the artists know someone is looking at their stuff. I know that does not help them pay their rent or car insurance, but with scant funds myself, it's all I can do.
Giving an artist deserved praise may not be money, but trust me, they appreciate it a lot. It's a good way to give a good impression in general, and eventually you may become good friends with a great artist who will happily collaborate with you on ideas and possibly charge less than usual. If you continue to encourage them from there, who knows? Maybe someday they will be one of the greats, and you'll be their best friend. :D
Point taken, and I will at least do that. Rukis here does Stunning work, wish she would do more straight pieces, but that's just my wish, vs all her commissioners....
There are no words to describe how perfectly this embodies the portion of the community with any common sense.....then again they are written on the pic itself.
Most artists I follow sell out their commission slots before I even see the announcement that they're open. If someone is selling out in less than an hour, they probably aren't asking for as much as they could get.
supply and demand people!
the more people request art from a person the more that person is gonna charger to keep queue from going crazy. cause lets say Baebunny started doing art for 10 bucks again for full color/shade etc with how good he is at his art, his inbox would litterally blow up.
So sure, it may seem unfair for an artist ya really like to charge so much money but they have worked up to it and they worked hard for it.
the more people request art from a person the more that person is gonna charger to keep queue from going crazy. cause lets say Baebunny started doing art for 10 bucks again for full color/shade etc with how good he is at his art, his inbox would litterally blow up.
So sure, it may seem unfair for an artist ya really like to charge so much money but they have worked up to it and they worked hard for it.
Yaaay, now I can have a picture to link to the next time I get into an argument with someone on this site who believes that all commissions should be free or under twenty dollars, and any artist charging more is not worth their time/just being greedy.
I got asked to do a two person full character piece for someone. They said they didn't have a lot of money, and my heart went out to them. I normally charge $40 for that, $30 with no bg (I'm a hobby artist, unlike Rukis so I charge nickles and dimes), so I said I could be flexible with it. They wanted it for five dollars. And then they were upset and offended I said I couldn't possibly do it for so little because I'd be getting roughly a dollar an hour for that.
-_-
I got into one of these fights with a 'freeloader' because I purchased a ref sheet that was about $120. They were half making fun of me for buying a piece of art, and half angry that I was contributing to something that I 'should have gotten for free'. I really don't understand people sometimes >.>
Or the time that I made a journal stating I was thinking of doodling some of my characters (is totally not an artist and says so in my profile), and I suddenly got a ton of notes from watchers that had never said a single word to me in the past saying that I could draw their characters if I wanted to. I see this happen to commission artists a lot, people begging for freebies or getting an attitude because their piece of free art was not done fast enough or at the quality they had wanted. I guess the concept of 'you get what you pay for' is dead
I got into one of these fights with a 'freeloader' because I purchased a ref sheet that was about $120. They were half making fun of me for buying a piece of art, and half angry that I was contributing to something that I 'should have gotten for free'. I really don't understand people sometimes >.>
Or the time that I made a journal stating I was thinking of doodling some of my characters (is totally not an artist and says so in my profile), and I suddenly got a ton of notes from watchers that had never said a single word to me in the past saying that I could draw their characters if I wanted to. I see this happen to commission artists a lot, people begging for freebies or getting an attitude because their piece of free art was not done fast enough or at the quality they had wanted. I guess the concept of 'you get what you pay for' is dead
The problem is that no one seems to realize how much time and work goes into drawing. It's not easy at all.
On the other hand, I've paid good money for commission work that hasn't been done for years. If artists want professional prices, they have to be PROFESSIONAL about their work, their customer relations, and being timely.
On the other hand, I've paid good money for commission work that hasn't been done for years. If artists want professional prices, they have to be PROFESSIONAL about their work, their customer relations, and being timely.
I didn't really take it as an insult. I don't think they were saying my art wasn't worth it, I really took it as them being entitled enough to think they deserve it for cheaper. Which was incredibly annpying regardless.
Even if they're like a best friend or mate, going as long as $20 (which is what I'm under the impression you were going to suggest) is extremely generous. Of course if this was just "someone" you know, it's probably best to just forget about them and their unreasonable offer. Hopefully they'll eventually learn.
It was a random person, stuff like that happens and it's not too bad. It's just annoying when someone asks, and then gets upset or accuses you of not caring just because you won't bend ass over backwards for someone you do not know.
As for people I do know...ugh. Honestly, that's worse. I do not want to say people close to me should know better than to ask for art, but it's honestly very upsetting to have people ask. I do not go up to them at work and ask them to give me clothes for free, or to let me eat for free. Most of the time those friends just "suggest." Like, any time they have a good idea they will be sure to point out they'd be okay with you drawing their character doing something. I've had real problems with friends I had doing that for awhile. I even had told them several times to stop. So that's the annoying thing. Random people are random people, and you can get over that quickly. When it's people you care about, that's when it's a lot more upsetting. Especially when you've told them to stop countless times, and explain why. I had a friend who was particularly bad about it for awhile, and in the end I would instantly stop talking to him the moment he mentioned anything about his character or my art.
As for people I do know...ugh. Honestly, that's worse. I do not want to say people close to me should know better than to ask for art, but it's honestly very upsetting to have people ask. I do not go up to them at work and ask them to give me clothes for free, or to let me eat for free. Most of the time those friends just "suggest." Like, any time they have a good idea they will be sure to point out they'd be okay with you drawing their character doing something. I've had real problems with friends I had doing that for awhile. I even had told them several times to stop. So that's the annoying thing. Random people are random people, and you can get over that quickly. When it's people you care about, that's when it's a lot more upsetting. Especially when you've told them to stop countless times, and explain why. I had a friend who was particularly bad about it for awhile, and in the end I would instantly stop talking to him the moment he mentioned anything about his character or my art.
Is thinking his character designs are generic and boring, he overuses internal shots, and there's no reason commissions from him should go up to $400 when he opens up commission auctions considered hate?
While I do respect your right to not like his art style, it shouldn't make you say it's not worth money. Look at Picasso, I think it's awful but I'd never sit there and badmouth the art he made. Art is subjective. The people who are paying for it, which are not you so it shouldn't even bother you, are fine paying for the price. I don't think 5 star restaurants are a good use of money and are overpriced, but I do not go around badmouthing and complaining about them. I don't think people should do that to artists, either. Art in the real world sells for thousands of dollars for a premade piece that's often a print and not the original (before arguments about it being digital art come in). Less than half a grand for a custom piece is an extremely good deal. And it's not unreasonable, and he doesn't deserve hate merely for making the amount of money people are willing to pay him.
Again, I wasn't trying to imply hate. Just expressing one of my unpopular opinions.
I understand, but I feel namedropping just because you don't find something is worth it, is rather rude. Especially because it's really ignoring the fact that the money he makes is nothing compared to other artists outside the fandom. Opinions are one thing, but opinions disregarding facts and based soley on bias are silly to have.
The big difference between the furry fandom and the professional industry is that furry art is almost guaranteed money, while it's very difficult to get into the industry, where you're then forced to work for hours on what a corporation wants you to make, and you lose the rights to your work as they then take what they had you draw and make GENEROUSLY ten times more than they paid you off of it.
That's not true, you're overlooking the self employed aspect of it, which I think is what Rukis is looking at. But besides that, furry art is NOT guaranteed money, even then. I have months where I sell 5-7 commissions. And months where I sell none. You have to compete with other artists' low prices, while also having to try to gain popularity - same as any other self employed artist. In fact, the furry fandom is less guaranteed money than in the outside world of art, because furry is such a narrow niche that finding the right balance is very hard to do. To live off it is even worse. How many furry artists do you know that solely live off commission work? I know about ten, and that's on a site full of thousands of artists. You can be extremely good and still not have the client base.
If you work for a company, that is guaranteed work. It's difficult to get in, but you'll always be working on a project. AND you'll be getting paid a lot more per hour than a freelance artist, especially if it's a fandom one. The business owners maky be making the big bucks, but you'll still be getting more working got a company than you would by yourself. As a freelance artist, you must seek the client base, put time and money into that, then try to find a good ToS and paysite, deal with difficult customers and scammers. People scam companies a lot less, because they have a legal team. And once you're done with one project, they give you another.
If you work for a company, that is guaranteed work. It's difficult to get in, but you'll always be working on a project. AND you'll be getting paid a lot more per hour than a freelance artist, especially if it's a fandom one. The business owners maky be making the big bucks, but you'll still be getting more working got a company than you would by yourself. As a freelance artist, you must seek the client base, put time and money into that, then try to find a good ToS and paysite, deal with difficult customers and scammers. People scam companies a lot less, because they have a legal team. And once you're done with one project, they give you another.
Hopefully if they don't lay you off once that project is done, but that entirely depends on the company you're working for.
I guess all I was trying to say is that it's extremely tough to get into the mainstream industry, and yet a lot of people seem to think they're automatically entitled to industry rates even when they're very unprofessional. Rukis is of course an exception and I personally think she earns every penny that comes in to her. :)
That being said, I do believe that every good and friendly artist deserves to be able to make a living off of their art, as long as they're putting in full time work and making good relations with their consumer base.
When I said "guaranteed money", I guess I meant relatively speaking compared to, say, the population of DeviantArt. No, not many will be able to make a big living off their art, but almost anyone can get commissions here on FA. But you're right, that doesn't mean they can live comfortably off of that, even if they do put in 40 hour work weeks, and that's really a shame.
I guess all I was trying to say is that it's extremely tough to get into the mainstream industry, and yet a lot of people seem to think they're automatically entitled to industry rates even when they're very unprofessional. Rukis is of course an exception and I personally think she earns every penny that comes in to her. :)
That being said, I do believe that every good and friendly artist deserves to be able to make a living off of their art, as long as they're putting in full time work and making good relations with their consumer base.
When I said "guaranteed money", I guess I meant relatively speaking compared to, say, the population of DeviantArt. No, not many will be able to make a big living off their art, but almost anyone can get commissions here on FA. But you're right, that doesn't mean they can live comfortably off of that, even if they do put in 40 hour work weeks, and that's really a shame.
I can see what you're saying, yes. I think it's harder to be a successful self employed artist than work for a company, however. I agree about it being hard to get into a mainstream industry, very very hard. But that's because it's mainstream, not just any job as an artist. Many self employed artists don't even claim it as a business and pay taxes on it or claim it as income, like small businesses in other areas have to do.
Unfortunately, what you believe should be, and what is, isn't so. I know plenty of very nice artists with good skills that struggle financially. Even Rukis here says she lives at a minimum. It would probably be easier, and more financially stable, for her to work for a company. And ah, yes. I think people on FA have a better time than DA, though I can't be sure, since I don't frequent there. My point was more that being self employed is a greater risk - financially, in every way - than finding and working for a company. Not just in art, but in other professions as well.
Unfortunately, what you believe should be, and what is, isn't so. I know plenty of very nice artists with good skills that struggle financially. Even Rukis here says she lives at a minimum. It would probably be easier, and more financially stable, for her to work for a company. And ah, yes. I think people on FA have a better time than DA, though I can't be sure, since I don't frequent there. My point was more that being self employed is a greater risk - financially, in every way - than finding and working for a company. Not just in art, but in other professions as well.
Criticize his style all you want, but what do auctions have to do with anything? That is ENTIRELY due to what people are willing to pay for his art. It's not like he sat down and declared that his auctions would go for hundreds of dollars. The buyers pushed it that high because there was someone willing to go higher.
You should tell them to do some difficult creative work for them, and then insist that it should be free or like $2 an hour or they're being greedy. If they insist that they can't even afford to eat with what you gave them, then point them toward a mirror. :D
Wow. I just posted something on one of Myenia's submissions that I'm going to share with you. I truly admire people like you who put their heart and soul into their work to have people say that you "charge too much". I'm not yet "financially independent" but when I do have my own money, I will spend it on hard workers like you and Myenia. So there's your spirit booster for the day! Haha
lol, very nice ^^
I can't help but feel like art is very expensive everywehere, but then again I understand the complexity and resources needed to make it (except I don't quite get how digital can be as expensive as, if not more than, non-digital since the only thing being used as materials is time and hand motions <w< but that's an entirely different topic I think) but honestly when I see "modern art" and think how much people buy that...stuff, it makes me feel a lot better about furry art prices X3
...sorry, kinda tired so hence why the above may not make much sense >w<
I can't help but feel like art is very expensive everywehere, but then again I understand the complexity and resources needed to make it (except I don't quite get how digital can be as expensive as, if not more than, non-digital since the only thing being used as materials is time and hand motions <w< but that's an entirely different topic I think) but honestly when I see "modern art" and think how much people buy that...stuff, it makes me feel a lot better about furry art prices X3
...sorry, kinda tired so hence why the above may not make much sense >w<
Think about how expensive the software is and how people go through computers every 5 years or so.... The cost adds up....sometimes more expensive than traditional supplies cost over a period of time. Digital is not always easier than traditional. That being said, traditional medias will always retain a one of a kind feel so long as digital allows for mass printing. A smart digital artist will limit editions of prints.
Oh...yeah, that makes sense =3
I'm going to go lay down now, I appreciate your informational replay ^w^
I'm going to go lay down now, I appreciate your informational replay ^w^
" ...since the only thing being used as materials is time and hand motions "
What, traditional artists use their feet now? Fascinating.
What, traditional artists use their feet now? Fascinating.
sorry, your reply confused me a bit. I'm not sure if you were trying to say something in retort as though I had meant that digital artists use their hands and traditionals don't, because that would be terribly silly. though it sounds like that's exactly what you meant, and that was rather baffling X3
I'm an artist... So this makes me very happy! if you don't like the prices, then don't buy the art. hahahah :3
you don't want that though. if people don't buy your art, you dont get money D:
jill0r shared with me this link about why handmade stuff is so expensive. It's a good read for anyone looking for answers to why artists set the prices they do.
http://whatthecraft.com/overpriced-.....dmade-pricing/
And yeah, I consider artwork a handmade thing.
Great image and message btw xD totally should start memes.
http://whatthecraft.com/overpriced-.....dmade-pricing/
And yeah, I consider artwork a handmade thing.
Great image and message btw xD totally should start memes.
As I've found. You get what you pay for. And also. If it seems too good to be true it probably is. And the classic. Quick, cheap, good pick two. Works for all industries not just furry art.
On a side note this Luther pose is perfect.
I think we have struck Internet gold here.
On a side note this Luther pose is perfect.
I think we have struck Internet gold here.
Never commissioned art, so most of this just soars over my head. Artist problems I assume :P
DX No fair lol you don't do commissions so this is cheating!!!! CHEATER I SAY
Crank up the prices so supply can meet demand =P
I got the pockets for it.
I got the pockets for it.
I love you.
Please tell me you have a tumblr that you posted this on that I can reblog from. Cuz damn. <3
Please tell me you have a tumblr that you posted this on that I can reblog from. Cuz damn. <3
Since when is art not worth paying for!? xD
Also, THIS IS GORGEOUS.
Also, THIS IS GORGEOUS.
True. Because 95 out of 10 furries don't understand simple economics; if someone's willing to pay that much for it, it's worth it. If nobody is paying that much for it, it's not worth it. If the artist doesn't want to take less money in order to sell their art, it's not worth their time and effort. If those furries had their way and could fix pricing at whatever amount they wanted, there'd be a huge demand and a tiny supply.
Its a fundamental rule of economics: the value of a good or service equals how much somebody is willing to pay for it :P If you think something's overpriced, then don't buy it!
While I agree with this statement as it applies to this topic, there are some who would say that without art, life isn't worth living.
Haha, this! For an artist, art is not a luxury...if I didn't have the drive to make artwork, my life would be pointless.
How many hours?
Seriously, I think most commission fees do not equate to minimum wage or any salary worth striving for.
Not that that's really bad, but it does point out that, for a luxury resource, you're getting quite the bargain. (not to mention most fees include things like administrative costs and taxes and whatnot)
Seriously, I think most commission fees do not equate to minimum wage or any salary worth striving for.
Not that that's really bad, but it does point out that, for a luxury resource, you're getting quite the bargain. (not to mention most fees include things like administrative costs and taxes and whatnot)
I have so many more ideas for this. So many. I have 2 words for ya.
DO - IT
DO - IT
I have never got a commission that i thought i paid too much on...actually, i usually feel like i didnt pay enough for the quality of the artwork!
So I guess all music, movies, video games, novels, and forms of creative expression should be free? Why not stop there? All blueprints and mechanical designs should be free! All research should be free! If you keep going, technically everything should be free and gladly provided to everyone else who shouldn't thank them even in the slightest for all the hard work they put into something custom designed for you.
Yes! Lets expand our knowledge of science through freedom of research and blueprints! Why not? Im all for that. Why arent you? Not that everything should be free means everyone can have use of them. What would you do with the blueprints of a nuclear weapon? Nothing, you have no resources to build one and hopefully no intent to. What is your point though?
My point is that it would be fantastic to live in a society where everything was free, but that's not reality. In reality we do need to pay for certain things, and that includes creative expression that we could not otherwise concoct on our own wits and creativity. I mean, how would you like it if everything single thing you did was taken and used by others and you didn't even receive a single thank you or any sort of aid for your trouble? Even the best people would get burnt out, and this is why communism doesn't work.
See this is why i only buy art that matches its quality with the cost
too many egotistical artist that think their shit doesn't stink and rake in the money by screwing over their commissioners.
and to top it all off, said artists are too blinded by arrogance to see their own corruption.
This is irony at its finest.
too many egotistical artist that think their shit doesn't stink and rake in the money by screwing over their commissioners.
and to top it all off, said artists are too blinded by arrogance to see their own corruption.
This is irony at its finest.
I agree you on this to an point of course. There are some who are quite egotistical, others who don't accept that the market is what it is, proven by when they've attempted to have prices closer to what a commercial artist will make... they tend to not get enough clients. Even the pro grade artists are losing out due to outsourcing that's now going on in the VFX industry.
Lol all I hear when this comes up is "This is the song that never ends... Yes it goes on and on my friend." <3
Yes this, and if you have more, a collage of them would be just spiffy, and id you have any others characters that have a pose and expression to fit the needs of other memes, please display those as well.
Permission to display?
Permission to display?
I could post a comparison to 'real-world' graphic designer/artist wages but I won't.
What I will point out is that it's more closely related to what the artist is willing to do and what the seller is willing to pay. This boils down simply to market demand for an item.
IF you're a popular artist on FA, you are going to get a lot of people interested in commissioning you. The best way for the artist to thin out the crowd? Yep, you guessed it, raise prices.
So, let's put it this way. If you had to make a payment within 30 days of $1000, you would open for commissions. If you're a quick artist, you could go the route of $10 sketches but then you have to average more than 3 drawings a day to come close (and it's still difficult to get 100 transactions within that month regardless of popularity). And there's no room for personal improvement. I've seen so many good artists just stagnate because they're doing 100s of micro-sales and they don't have time to just draw.
What if you're good at drawing and people recognize you for that? Maybe raise your prices to $50 for a more complete piece. At that point, you only need 20 within that month which reduces the stress load and that's very attainable for a popular artist.
Now, say you're willing to do a very complicated piece (like a comic) but don't want to offer it to every tom, dick, and harry. Charge as much as you want. I've seen a comic page (singular) go for a couple thousand before. That was because the artist did not want to have everyone that watched her to order something that will take up her life. But someone was willing to buy it and she obviously thought it was worth it.
Moral of the story: Price your piece however you want. If it takes you a solid week of work, slap a price tag of a couple hundred on there to make it worth your time. If you're not getting the commissioners you want, yes you can lower it but I implore you to never go below minimum wage (yes calculate your time). Otherwise you're better off working at McDonalds where they can at least respect your time enough to pay you that much.
Didn't mean to write a novel here but I wanted to get my opinion out there.
What I will point out is that it's more closely related to what the artist is willing to do and what the seller is willing to pay. This boils down simply to market demand for an item.
IF you're a popular artist on FA, you are going to get a lot of people interested in commissioning you. The best way for the artist to thin out the crowd? Yep, you guessed it, raise prices.
So, let's put it this way. If you had to make a payment within 30 days of $1000, you would open for commissions. If you're a quick artist, you could go the route of $10 sketches but then you have to average more than 3 drawings a day to come close (and it's still difficult to get 100 transactions within that month regardless of popularity). And there's no room for personal improvement. I've seen so many good artists just stagnate because they're doing 100s of micro-sales and they don't have time to just draw.
What if you're good at drawing and people recognize you for that? Maybe raise your prices to $50 for a more complete piece. At that point, you only need 20 within that month which reduces the stress load and that's very attainable for a popular artist.
Now, say you're willing to do a very complicated piece (like a comic) but don't want to offer it to every tom, dick, and harry. Charge as much as you want. I've seen a comic page (singular) go for a couple thousand before. That was because the artist did not want to have everyone that watched her to order something that will take up her life. But someone was willing to buy it and she obviously thought it was worth it.
Moral of the story: Price your piece however you want. If it takes you a solid week of work, slap a price tag of a couple hundred on there to make it worth your time. If you're not getting the commissioners you want, yes you can lower it but I implore you to never go below minimum wage (yes calculate your time). Otherwise you're better off working at McDonalds where they can at least respect your time enough to pay you that much.
Didn't mean to write a novel here but I wanted to get my opinion out there.
That is very true with many artists who do art for their livelihood...they just dont want the prices too low to where everything but the kitchen sink is commissioning them, causing extreme amounts of stress, but they dont want to overprice it to the point of almost nobody coming to them for something they would really want. Most of the better artists ive seen (beelow the tier of the people like W-N and a few others) are very well priced for the quality of their work, and sometimes i even feel like I underpaid for the quality of the artwork at times. But the final choice on pricing is always up to the artist. I will say the logic of when they need money they open is exactly the reason why they are able to cash in on commissioners wanting their arts :3
well this is the best way to reply to that comment: http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/32433283.jpg
You win all of my webs
You win all of my monies
You win...well...YOU JUST DO!
I wish I could favorite this 100 times without spamming your box. I'd do it so hard!
You win all of my monies
You win...well...YOU JUST DO!
I wish I could favorite this 100 times without spamming your box. I'd do it so hard!
You do realize you're talking about furries, right? They complain about free things, let alone things they have to pay some meager amount of money for.
Yeah, but Rukis' stuff? Look at the detail and obvious hard work she puts into these things!
Just so you know, it's not just furries that complain about free things. o.o Having worked at Amazon you would be surprised at the sheer number of people that would bitch about a free item or service we offer. Those were the types you really just wish you could hang up on and get on to the next customer with a REAL problem.
The only gripe I have with this is that all the respect people give to those who can draw hardly ever share that respect with those who are talented in other forms of art, such as writing, music composition, or photography.
It saddens me.
It saddens me.
THIS. So few people will even bother to look at a good story or listen to a really great piece of music, but they'll complain that they need art so badly, but not SO badly that they need to pay for it. ;)
What's more insulting is when you lower the prices and people automatically assume the quality is lowered as well.
I charge to little... People that have commented on my prices have told me that it's over priced and i think they most expensive was $25... and to me, that's just telling my my art is worth nothing. Oh well, not like anyone ever wants to buy from me anyway. *shrugs*
In business you have to grow a thick skin honesty. There's always gonna be someone out there that will complain about pricing. People complain about free things even. There's some decent stuff in your gallery just do your thing and keep improving yourself. Also, network with people and really push to get your name out there. That's how you compete. Word of mouth is very powerful.
Yes, I do actually have more stuff though on a different account on DeviantArt, I am trying to make more stuff for this because it's for different things lol. I am also going to be working on a comic soon and that'll for sure help me improve! I guess you're right, I need to make a decent pricing sheet that won't make people mad who are worth my time.
Yup! And remember there's always gonna be people who are going to complain about even low prices. Just stick to what's right for you. Business can be a tough cookie to deal with that's for sure.
oh I know that for sure lol I had someone tell me that 35 points (which is 24 cents) was expensive and it still sold to someone more deserving of it lol XD When I see people's art and see commission prices I usually say something like "I love you're art and I wish I had more money" something like that lol so i don't really complain about their prices XD
Funny! Though I think the question should be "You think furry artists charge too little?"
The message is a very good one. I use to get the same thing when I was running a welding/fab shop. Then they would get pissy when I wanted payment before the work left the shop.
then they go play an indian artists that will not draw so well but he's paif 1/8, right?
didn't meant to offend you, my boss menaces me with "I'll contract someone from INDIA!! they are cheaper than you!" whenever he has a bad day and I thinkg that a big issue people that sell themselves cheaper, not just people from india, it's also chinese, etc etc etc because fucking people always think on "less money spent = more money for me" and people want to eat, so, instead of getting paid for $100 they get $10
No offense taken, I was joking anyway. Though my job does feel like one of those cheap outsourced ones.
It's normally worth the price, if it's from someone you want. If you can get a spot.
I honestly think this is kind of disrespectful. I think it's in bad taste to add fuel to the fire. I have no problem paying for and working with the artist, and have done so in the past, and am not going to condone the bitter behavior of others in the community over prices of artwork which, to be fair, is a luxury.
I don't like it when I read comments on submissions like this calling out artist A or B over something they did or are doing when their own control over their talent and what they utilize it for is exactly what people pay for. There's just so little respect.
I don't like it when I read comments on submissions like this calling out artist A or B over something they did or are doing when their own control over their talent and what they utilize it for is exactly what people pay for. There's just so little respect.
All of this! XD
It's too true, i think a lot of the artists in the fur community are some of the most underpaid for their work and time, yet when an artist starts to charge a higher price for their talent, it's a gamble if people will still continue to commission them.
It's too true, i think a lot of the artists in the fur community are some of the most underpaid for their work and time, yet when an artist starts to charge a higher price for their talent, it's a gamble if people will still continue to commission them.
I've found a brilliant way to deal with having insufficient disposable income to purchase art: I do without.
... Well, I did barter, once.
... Well, I did barter, once.
you sir or madame, are the smartest furry I have ever met. Pity so many others don't seem to understand this easy solution.
That pretty much sums it up. Pay what you can and even if the artist's quality is not worth what they are charging (from the commissioner's perspective obviously) then you simply do not commission them. I mean no big deal asking if the artist would take a bit less. Worst they will say is no but it's not really grounds to tear them a new one because they didn't give ya a discount which is where I'm sure some of the problem is as well. Just as there are artists with too much of a sense of self-entitlement there are also commissioners that have the same problem.
It actually works! Though I find the lower text a bit over-articulate. A shorter form might deliver the point more sharply.
Ah, the furry commission paradox, nicely outlined by Luther. Sometimes it does take a military genius to put things into perspective.
Also, I need to borrow him for my job. "Yes, your repair will absolutely be covered under the warranty against manufacturer's defects. Clearly your dropping it 3 times including kicking it down the stairs shows how poorly manufactured it was..." I wish I were making that up...
(For the record, I have the opposite problem. Lots of money and a desire to hire an artist, but no takers...)
Also, I need to borrow him for my job. "Yes, your repair will absolutely be covered under the warranty against manufacturer's defects. Clearly your dropping it 3 times including kicking it down the stairs shows how poorly manufactured it was..." I wish I were making that up...
(For the record, I have the opposite problem. Lots of money and a desire to hire an artist, but no takers...)
Ironically, I read this tweet yesterday:
"Every time I see furry artists offering full-color, detailed commission work for $30 and under, I die a little inside."
My response was a sarcastic "Well I am very sorry!"
Some people are never satisfied! ;p
I also get really pissy with people who want something for nothing and those bastards who come out with all manner of self-important huffings when they are called out for re-posting a commercial work.
"Every time I see furry artists offering full-color, detailed commission work for $30 and under, I die a little inside."
My response was a sarcastic "Well I am very sorry!"
Some people are never satisfied! ;p
I also get really pissy with people who want something for nothing and those bastards who come out with all manner of self-important huffings when they are called out for re-posting a commercial work.
People are all interpreting this as a quality of art vs. money. If I'm not mistaken, I believe it's a jab at people who say, "I HAVE to get art from you, I love your work, but I think you're charging too much. Here's what I want ...... with a detailed background of ........ and etc.... and I'll give you $20. Thanks."
Basically people who want everything for nothing. It wasn't a jab at an artists talent. "have to have that's not worth paying for" means it's a requirement for the person wanting but they are too cheap to want to pay for it.
Also.... prices artists charge help regulate the workload of an artists in addition to doing commission slots. Imagine the queues if all the well known artists did all their great art for $20 a piece, no matter how intricate.... they'd be overwhelmed. The prices balance out between limiting the number of people who will pay to a reasonable number and the artist making making the most they can. Everyone has to make a living, I know I wouldn't work for free, I'd get a new job. Many great artists on here do art as their job to pay all the bills.
Basically people who want everything for nothing. It wasn't a jab at an artists talent. "have to have that's not worth paying for" means it's a requirement for the person wanting but they are too cheap to want to pay for it.
Also.... prices artists charge help regulate the workload of an artists in addition to doing commission slots. Imagine the queues if all the well known artists did all their great art for $20 a piece, no matter how intricate.... they'd be overwhelmed. The prices balance out between limiting the number of people who will pay to a reasonable number and the artist making making the most they can. Everyone has to make a living, I know I wouldn't work for free, I'd get a new job. Many great artists on here do art as their job to pay all the bills.
ood example: Fursuit builder who's suits run $2,500-$3,500 on average and sending them an e-mail saying, "OMG I HAVE to commission you for my fursuit, it'd look so awesome! I have 8 different colors, tattoos on the back and arms that I want sewn in, digi-grade, and follow-me eyes. From what I've seen though you charge too much, so I'll give you $500 for it, and I need it by next con at the latest! I can't wait to see it!!"
That kind of shit happens a lot too. Same exact thing.
That kind of shit happens a lot too. Same exact thing.
very cool :3
for the record Rukis, your work is absolutely fantastic and worth every penny.
for the record Rukis, your work is absolutely fantastic and worth every penny.
It's not the price that annoys me It's the demanding payment in full upfront. I've been screwed over by like 5 artists now. Lesson learned though and now I refuse to pay in full upfront which sucks because so many good artists are asking for payment in full now
This annoys me greatly, because some artists will just run around with the money they suddenly have, but haven't truly earned yet. And what happens if a commissioner asks for a refund for work an artist hasn't started yet after several months? Couple different things:
1. Artist has to convince to commissioner that they should still do the piece they were commissioned to do, so as not to go through with a refund. From here, the commissioner is probably not happy, and the artist is either rushed, thus decreasing the quality of work, or they keep on blowing it off, either of which is just more unhappiness all around.
2. They run out of money at some point and keep opening commission slots to get more money immediately, even going so far as to give streaming slots etc. to people so that their pieces are done on the same day as they paid. Meanwhile, the person who has been waiting months continues to get screwed over.
In either case, the commissioner is going to be unhappy, and if pushed to the side long enough, they will retaliate by slandering the artist's name, or possibly even take legal action if the transaction was large enough.
1. Artist has to convince to commissioner that they should still do the piece they were commissioned to do, so as not to go through with a refund. From here, the commissioner is probably not happy, and the artist is either rushed, thus decreasing the quality of work, or they keep on blowing it off, either of which is just more unhappiness all around.
2. They run out of money at some point and keep opening commission slots to get more money immediately, even going so far as to give streaming slots etc. to people so that their pieces are done on the same day as they paid. Meanwhile, the person who has been waiting months continues to get screwed over.
In either case, the commissioner is going to be unhappy, and if pushed to the side long enough, they will retaliate by slandering the artist's name, or possibly even take legal action if the transaction was large enough.
Because just as some artists have screwed you, commissioners screw us out too, running around with everything from sketches to full pieces they haven't paid for :U
Thats why ilike a half now half later system. That way nobody is screwing anybody. Ill even pay in full once ive seen a sketch. I just want to see SOMETHING before i go handing out my hard earned cash.
Yup. Any court will even tell you not to pay 100% up front on any sort of project work. Once they have your money they lose the incentive to finish it as people don't always follow through with threats of a lawsuit. Less likely in the furry art world, especially if it's adult work. Not even a studio will pay a freelancer 100% up front unless they've been well established with them in prior contracts. Both sides do need to protect themselves, absolutely. That's why the half now half later method works out for both sides since the risk is shared equally. Problem is even an artist I trusted in a 2nd transaction has dragged feet on my commission because the hours were underestimated who.. has admitted fault for it of course but still, waiting over a year now for a finished piece is not acceptable and the shading work is obviously less refined than in my previous commission with the artist as well. But I'll reserve final judgement when the work is actually done done.
My personal compromise is to pay in full, but only right before they start on the sketch. That way the commissioner sees something right away, and the artist gets paid before they start.
Like Keedot said, I've almost been screwed by several commissioners who didn't want to pay. So I require all payments up front. Unfortunately, what you said it true and I see just as many commissioners shorted and wronged. I'm an artist but I also commission a fair deal of art. What I can say is a good tool, is see how long it takes them to complete commissions, maybe ask some customers of theirs, check artist_beware livejournals, try to see what people are saying about them.
And if it still fails and you get an awful artist, try a paypal dispute. I commissioned someone for five icons once (for friends and myself). Two months later, after they said it'd take a week and they were going to show me preview sketches, I'd heard nothing. I sent them several notes on DA and FA, and a few had been read and not replied to. I saw they were still active on DA. I was sadly over the 45 day timespan to dispute, but I sent paypal an email explaining my circumstances and they gave me a full refund. Shortly after, the artist contacted me and asked why I'd done such a thing, and said me making paypal refund me had caused an overdraft fee to their bank. What a strange coincidence, they only found time to talk to a paying customer hours after a refund, when they had not contacted me at all despite several overdue promised due dates the past month! So yes, there are lots of horror stories with paypal, but it never hurts to try even after the allotted time.
And if it still fails and you get an awful artist, try a paypal dispute. I commissioned someone for five icons once (for friends and myself). Two months later, after they said it'd take a week and they were going to show me preview sketches, I'd heard nothing. I sent them several notes on DA and FA, and a few had been read and not replied to. I saw they were still active on DA. I was sadly over the 45 day timespan to dispute, but I sent paypal an email explaining my circumstances and they gave me a full refund. Shortly after, the artist contacted me and asked why I'd done such a thing, and said me making paypal refund me had caused an overdraft fee to their bank. What a strange coincidence, they only found time to talk to a paying customer hours after a refund, when they had not contacted me at all despite several overdue promised due dates the past month! So yes, there are lots of horror stories with paypal, but it never hurts to try even after the allotted time.
Thanks for this information. Really wish I knew about that option with paypal after I found out I was one of MANY people screwed over by an artist and after much rallying, we got our money back a year later. (And I heard it was the artist's friend irl that paid everyone back cause the artist didn't have our money anymore.)
I'm glad I can help! As an artist and a commissioner, and as a person, I really hate to see people get screwed out of money. Those who do it seem to forget there are real people on the other end who pay for such awful things. It makes me sick when people take advantage of others, all because they can or are selfish. Both sides need to be able to trust each other in this community, and it really hurts everyone when people end up ripping other people off or stealing from them.
I'm glad to hear you and everyone else got their money back, but I'm still sorry you had such an awful experience with it :(
I'm glad to hear you and everyone else got their money back, but I'm still sorry you had such an awful experience with it :(
What I would want to do if I ever commissioned you is to pay you up front, but only on the same day that you can produce the first rough sketch. That way you get paid up front, and I would get something to look at before the day is done. Win-win.
That makes sense to me, but unfortunately I generally do not do that. I generally get sketches to people 2-7 days after initial payment. If a commissioner was mine seemed that wary, I'd actually be wary that they planned to scam me as well. I'd probably research the commissioner first, before agreeing to something like that.
Not sure how someone could scam you by paying on the same day you start, but I'm glad to know that you're pretty quick, so you'd be a very easy exception to make!
Sadly I've been gipped by so many artists that I pretty much only commission friends these days unless I get a lot of reassurance of receiving a finished product quickly. And even my friends tend to delay pictures drastically for every excuse you could imagine, and not serious ones. One person told me that they're simply uninspired and don't know what to do with my idea (even though I gave them both clear ideas and gave them enough freedom to not suffocate them), and the other said they had an art block (really, for five months? Even with doing other commissions?).
And those are typically best case scenarios. I've waited years to not get anything. In total I've lost about $450 to untrustworthy artists.
Sadly I've been gipped by so many artists that I pretty much only commission friends these days unless I get a lot of reassurance of receiving a finished product quickly. And even my friends tend to delay pictures drastically for every excuse you could imagine, and not serious ones. One person told me that they're simply uninspired and don't know what to do with my idea (even though I gave them both clear ideas and gave them enough freedom to not suffocate them), and the other said they had an art block (really, for five months? Even with doing other commissions?).
And those are typically best case scenarios. I've waited years to not get anything. In total I've lost about $450 to untrustworthy artists.
I saw it as you'd pay after they gave you the sketch the first day, or would request the money back if they didn't supply it by the end of the day. Which isn't scamming someone, but I'd be wary if the person commissioning me didn't trust me enough that they'd completely lose faith in me if they had to wait even one day to see I was working on it. Especially since most people open slots of 3-10 so sketching every single one out on the day they get it isn't really possible.
And that really sucks dude, I'm sorry :( I can't even imagine losing that much money. Was there no way to get it back? Hit me up with a note, I'll make a chibi for you or something if you'd like. It won't make up for all the shit you got from awful artists, but my heart goes out to you for it.
And that really sucks dude, I'm sorry :( I can't even imagine losing that much money. Was there no way to get it back? Hit me up with a note, I'll make a chibi for you or something if you'd like. It won't make up for all the shit you got from awful artists, but my heart goes out to you for it.
Ahh, no, what I meant is that they'd open up a sketch stream and you'd PayPal them, and then get to watch them draw the sketch right away. I tend to feel that's one of the best ways to go about commissions, but then again this is what I politely request from my artist friends, and they always deliver on that. :)
You're very sweet to offer me something like that! :D I'll definitely check out your gallery and let you know what my favorite stuff is. <3
You're very sweet to offer me something like that! :D I'll definitely check out your gallery and let you know what my favorite stuff is. <3
Ah, I see :)
And you're welcome! It probably won't be done super fast though x3
And you're welcome! It probably won't be done super fast though x3
Hey, if it's free then take as long as you want. Hell, take ten years. XD
I feel that no one has the right to complain whatsoever about free art. Sadly, some of the people here that complain about artist prices also complain about getting stuff for free. :/
I feel that no one has the right to complain whatsoever about free art. Sadly, some of the people here that complain about artist prices also complain about getting stuff for free. :/
Artists get screwed over too, believe me; I've sunk a lot of time into custom jewelery commissions, only to have the commissioner have a fit of buyer's remorse and leave me holding a bag full of wasted effort and valuable resources; it's worse for illustrators, because auctioning off a portrayal of somebody else's character is an awfully hard and legally questionable sell.
There are ways to handle it without demanding full payment up front. Would you be willing to pay a material and commissioning fee up front, and/or sign a legally binding contract in hard copy? The latter is probably the best option (albeit the most complicated PITA), since it ensures compliance on behalf of both parties. Probably not worth going to the trouble on small commissions, though.
There are ways to handle it without demanding full payment up front. Would you be willing to pay a material and commissioning fee up front, and/or sign a legally binding contract in hard copy? The latter is probably the best option (albeit the most complicated PITA), since it ensures compliance on behalf of both parties. Probably not worth going to the trouble on small commissions, though.
I saw this in my inbox, and I knew right off it was going to have ALL of the favorites.
On the same page, I think Amon totally makes a Futurama Fry face ("not sure if X or just Y" style)
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/futur.....-not-sure-if-x
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/futur.....-not-sure-if-x
Furries have access to basically the cheapest market for custom commissioned artwork. It's seriously mind-boggling how awesome it is (from a buyer's perspective)...and even more mind-boggling how badly entitled so many furries act about it.
"Oh my gawd, that's 30% of what it would cost in any other market. How can you sleep at night charging that much!"
Etc, etc, etc.
"Oh my gawd, that's 30% of what it would cost in any other market. How can you sleep at night charging that much!"
Etc, etc, etc.
I don't have a problem with what anyone charges as long as they are not being lazy and doing YCH commisions.
YCH = Failure.
YCH = Failure.
YCH commissions are for people who have no imaginations. The kind of person who gives an insanely detailed description of their character, then when you ask "So what do you want them to be doing?" they say "uh, whatever." Then usually complain later about how the pose isn't what they wanted. This happens.
So YCH gives people the opportunity to see a prelim sketch and make an informed decision before they pay whether or not it's a pose or subject matter they desire. It becomes very much a 'vote with your money' scenario.
That said, an artist shouldn't rely solely on YCH. The good artists will provide some variety in commissions.
So YCH gives people the opportunity to see a prelim sketch and make an informed decision before they pay whether or not it's a pose or subject matter they desire. It becomes very much a 'vote with your money' scenario.
That said, an artist shouldn't rely solely on YCH. The good artists will provide some variety in commissions.
Untrue. 90% of the time, commissioners give me characters and give me free reign. I ask for a pose and they say "whatever you think would look good." And sometimes they aren't pleased with the sketch, so then I end up redoing art and cutting into time for other works because they weren't specific and expected me to read minds. I've had similar things happen when I commission people, because I also often have a bad habit of thinking the artist will do what I imagine in my head. Having a premade sketch offers people a chance to see a pose they may not have thought of before, or one they really would like. That way you know what you're buying ahead of time.
I understand what you're saying, some prices for YCH auctions are a LOT higher than what the artist normally charges, and it almost seems unfair that you can't even get a spot if that's all they open. However, you have to remember a lot of artists use this as income or supplementary income, so getting a higher amount of payment for their work helps them as well. They're still doing the exact same amount of work that they'd do if they didn't presketch it. After all, they made the sketch anyway, they're just doing it before the accepted sale.
I understand what you're saying, some prices for YCH auctions are a LOT higher than what the artist normally charges, and it almost seems unfair that you can't even get a spot if that's all they open. However, you have to remember a lot of artists use this as income or supplementary income, so getting a higher amount of payment for their work helps them as well. They're still doing the exact same amount of work that they'd do if they didn't presketch it. After all, they made the sketch anyway, they're just doing it before the accepted sale.
How are YCHs lazy? They're for people who can't come up with something, see a pose they like, and realize they want that.
It takes just as much work on the artist's part, it's just sketched ahead of time. Clearly you don't know shit about art. Whether someone has seen the sketch before or asks you to come up with one doesn't matter. The process to work on it is still the same. Idiot.
It takes just as much work on the artist's part, it's just sketched ahead of time. Clearly you don't know shit about art. Whether someone has seen the sketch before or asks you to come up with one doesn't matter. The process to work on it is still the same. Idiot.
And what exactly is wrong with ych commissions? There are a lot out there that have trouble coming up with creative poses by themselves. And frankly I'm grateful for artists who do YCH commissions and even the ones who do adoptables as well. The only adoptables I usually wont consider buying are when they are only recolored versions of mass produced drawings, unless the artist is in need of money ect..
I've gotten tired of the YCH spam lately. Artists find it as a good way to make money as furries are willing to shell out hundreds. By all means go for it but don't do a YCH every single day...Give it a break really.
I only dislike it if YCH is ALL the artist does anymore. Since I have a ton of very specific ideas for my characters, I wouldn't feel right plopping them into any predetermined scenario.
I think furry art is very cheap in compare to any other commercial art, or from other artist who commercially might draw on same quality.
I'm normally do one full col detail character on detail background for around 80-100$ , but I clearly see that prices here are various, mostly even from 100-150$ for same, but in toony style, which is much less time consuming and easier to do. It isin't secret that kind of art consuming sometimes easy more than 12-16h. I'm trying to draw in style what my commissioner want, and trying to draw everything.
In normal commercial market, or in studio, people pay for 'art' (various -concept, ilustraition etc) mostly starting from time, where price per hour is between 15-25$. Now we can easy count for example how 20h project might cost when we multiply x20$ = 400$. And it might be only beggining, because price to be fair, also must inlcude pc/mac energy, paying for health and taxes, often also for other employers. Thats why 600$ to 1200$ for digital illustration on for example similliar level what Rukis have Luther on this 'meme' - it's preatty general and common.
I observed many top traditional (it was always the most expensive) artists (and not only) prices, in not furry community. They do detail sketches for 800$ ;) They have price for one full illustration mostly between 2,5K to 6,5K$. Artist who do commercial art can focus on what they do the best. There is also much other things.
So yeah, furry art is cheap :) People should think twice before complaining, because someone want to earn 30-50$ for his/her 10h of work, when art is looking really nice and deserve for better paying =.="
I'm normally do one full col detail character on detail background for around 80-100$ , but I clearly see that prices here are various, mostly even from 100-150$ for same, but in toony style, which is much less time consuming and easier to do. It isin't secret that kind of art consuming sometimes easy more than 12-16h. I'm trying to draw in style what my commissioner want, and trying to draw everything.
In normal commercial market, or in studio, people pay for 'art' (various -concept, ilustraition etc) mostly starting from time, where price per hour is between 15-25$. Now we can easy count for example how 20h project might cost when we multiply x20$ = 400$. And it might be only beggining, because price to be fair, also must inlcude pc/mac energy, paying for health and taxes, often also for other employers. Thats why 600$ to 1200$ for digital illustration on for example similliar level what Rukis have Luther on this 'meme' - it's preatty general and common.
I observed many top traditional (it was always the most expensive) artists (and not only) prices, in not furry community. They do detail sketches for 800$ ;) They have price for one full illustration mostly between 2,5K to 6,5K$. Artist who do commercial art can focus on what they do the best. There is also much other things.
So yeah, furry art is cheap :) People should think twice before complaining, because someone want to earn 30-50$ for his/her 10h of work, when art is looking really nice and deserve for better paying =.="
But it's very very difficult to get into the professional industry, even if you're extremely talented, and even then you're being forced to draw stuff for a corporation that will take the rights to what you created and make even more money than they paid off of it, so a comparison to a professional industry and the furry fandom (where anyone can make money) isn't really fair.
That being said, everyone deserves at least minimum wage for their work, so I'm happy to pay $100 for a really nicely made piece.
That being said, everyone deserves at least minimum wage for their work, so I'm happy to pay $100 for a really nicely made piece.
I know, you need to have top skill, and a bit of luck to get in pro industry. However forcing to draw something for example (i'm talking for myself) what I even can't to draw, it never was a big problem for me (I can't draw cats, but when it comes commissions I do them xD).
In my last job, I was manager and web admin with few other multi-job in same position, I created everything for my last employer, was artist designer, photographer and camera man and others, hovever they pay shit, so I also have rights to photos what I've done to them (of course they use them for what ever they want - commercial and advertisement also - and I have nothing from that).
Personally I don't see any problem to work for someone when he give me satisfy cash, and it comes to gives him/her rights to 'my work'.
In actual days plenty of people hire artist to work for them. Mostly those people don't have any kind of knowledge how to visualise their visions, but final product in galleries often have only surname of that 'employer'. Also that 'job' isn't for $100, often 1 month of working have at least medium country sallary. If someone feels to be forced on such rules, then he/she might always look for better job for his/her.
In these country, pleeeenty of people work in job, who they don't like or hate, because that shit job, it's often only job what they've got. I also was in such position, in diffrence that my shit payed job turns to hell, when my bosses takes all great things, what gives me energy and motiviation for working for them, even for 'funny' money.
In last - I think same, really nice made piece deserve for $100 or much higher if it have quality for that :)
In my last job, I was manager and web admin with few other multi-job in same position, I created everything for my last employer, was artist designer, photographer and camera man and others, hovever they pay shit, so I also have rights to photos what I've done to them (of course they use them for what ever they want - commercial and advertisement also - and I have nothing from that).
Personally I don't see any problem to work for someone when he give me satisfy cash, and it comes to gives him/her rights to 'my work'.
In actual days plenty of people hire artist to work for them. Mostly those people don't have any kind of knowledge how to visualise their visions, but final product in galleries often have only surname of that 'employer'. Also that 'job' isn't for $100, often 1 month of working have at least medium country sallary. If someone feels to be forced on such rules, then he/she might always look for better job for his/her.
In these country, pleeeenty of people work in job, who they don't like or hate, because that shit job, it's often only job what they've got. I also was in such position, in diffrence that my shit payed job turns to hell, when my bosses takes all great things, what gives me energy and motiviation for working for them, even for 'funny' money.
In last - I think same, really nice made piece deserve for $100 or much higher if it have quality for that :)
Oh, absolutely. Most artists still undercharge themselves SEVERELY and I'm okay with trends where art prices increase, no argument there. I just don't like hearing about "industry rates" because the industry will SUCK OUT YOUR SOUL, and is that really worth the money?
Yup. For me, that industry will cuck out someone soul is preatty general thing, because I simply think any kind of job what you can do, can suck out your soul, if it isn't done properly - and I mean that anyone who is working in any kind of job need to in some case change himself and fits into standards for rhose who he/she is working. Corporations, industry, or even private investors can suck in many ways and be only machines for earning money. When you work in such job hard, you also should to know, that you are 'noone', and they might replace you with anyone other with similliar skills, if they will be wanted. I worked in such thing, I don't have any problem to work in such thing, I know it's commonly suck your half private time, however, I need good paying to by personal stability. If someone don't feel strong enough to work on such rules, he shouldn't work in such job (or work for to long), because it will suck out his/her soul :)
And of course some of them will undercharge themselv. I will copy what I said here in some other comment:
"In final it's always all up to the artist who make art and for what price they want to sell them. One thing about we don't write here is a place where artist live (country). These diffrent can market prices. For someone who live in Germany/USA, earning $50-100 from commishion 'it's begging' and small amount of cash, but for someone who live in my country or in other east countries - it's worth at least 3 times more, looking on actual earnings compare to west countries ;) These it's terryfing, because Pro from USA will be happy from earnings, but Pro who live in Czech Republic, will be live in well... in 'luxury' for same cash what will get a guy from USA ;) "
And of course some of them will undercharge themselv. I will copy what I said here in some other comment:
"In final it's always all up to the artist who make art and for what price they want to sell them. One thing about we don't write here is a place where artist live (country). These diffrent can market prices. For someone who live in Germany/USA, earning $50-100 from commishion 'it's begging' and small amount of cash, but for someone who live in my country or in other east countries - it's worth at least 3 times more, looking on actual earnings compare to west countries ;) These it's terryfing, because Pro from USA will be happy from earnings, but Pro who live in Czech Republic, will be live in well... in 'luxury' for same cash what will get a guy from USA ;) "
YES! Moar condescending Luther! Its what some of us positively love about him!
I'd rather not pay 10 dollars for a picture that's not atleast good quality. C:
Honestly, for some of the quality work I've gotten over the years, many furry artists charge to LITTLE.
Unfortunately, they can only charge what the market can bear... which is exactly too little these days.
Unfortunately, they can only charge what the market can bear... which is exactly too little these days.
You should consider doing a bunch of these and selling stickers at cons or something.
People don't seem to realize, commercialized art has resale value... Furry art is 90% porn and half the time it's all digital. Can't say I see a lot of art galleries around the big cities with dog penis on display or animals mating with copious amounts of cum leaking from various orifices.
You need to take into perspective that most of the furry art you see isn't traditional, it's digital. Digital art is never going to be worth as much as traditional because it takes much less skill to create than something painted, water colored, sketched, on paper/canvas. I could even see wood burning etchings costing more than most digital art. Now, don't get me wrong, what digital artists like Rukis here and many others are VERY talented in their field and know the tricks of the trade and I have huge respect for what they're able to do, but what they have at their disposal is a program with TONS of premade tools for them to use.
A huge reason why traditional art is so price is largely in part due to the supplies: paint they used, time they spent, canvas board, paper, pencils, pens, ink, and all the other art tools that one would need to create such a piece costs a LOT of money. Aside from that, time and names. Time spent on a piece obviously increases the value of said piece, as it rightly should, though one needs to take into account the fact that most people who draw on paper can't just flip their tablet pens over and magically erase the line or press the "undo" button. If you mess up with paints, water colors or acrylics, that could be hours of extra work trying to fix it. That also brings up the skill of the artist, weather they do mess up or what their artwork looks like in the end determines price. And finally, the name and reputation of the artist has MUCH to do with the pricing. This part, however, gives them a bit more leeway into overpricing. Because their name is out there and the work is obviously noticed as their own, they can charge for a certain uniqueness they add to the piece.
Aside from these few things, pricing on art is a very broad range. For digital art such as Rukis' here, I'd pay a bit above minimum wage per hour of work. Set pricing isn't something I like a lot because I feel the artist doesn't get paid properly for the amount of time spent on a commission. If you're to hire someone to draw something for you, pay them for the amount of work put into it, not just a flat fee. Considering that, Rukis should charge a lot more for the work, you guys are getting a huge deal. I've watched in livestreams before and it takes a good number of hours to sketch and finish a piece, even if it is digital.
Hopefully one day, people will start to appreciate the skill of a digital artist as much as a traditional. I feel that they have just as much talent working with a tablet as an artist has working with pencil and paper.
You need to take into perspective that most of the furry art you see isn't traditional, it's digital. Digital art is never going to be worth as much as traditional because it takes much less skill to create than something painted, water colored, sketched, on paper/canvas. I could even see wood burning etchings costing more than most digital art. Now, don't get me wrong, what digital artists like Rukis here and many others are VERY talented in their field and know the tricks of the trade and I have huge respect for what they're able to do, but what they have at their disposal is a program with TONS of premade tools for them to use.
A huge reason why traditional art is so price is largely in part due to the supplies: paint they used, time they spent, canvas board, paper, pencils, pens, ink, and all the other art tools that one would need to create such a piece costs a LOT of money. Aside from that, time and names. Time spent on a piece obviously increases the value of said piece, as it rightly should, though one needs to take into account the fact that most people who draw on paper can't just flip their tablet pens over and magically erase the line or press the "undo" button. If you mess up with paints, water colors or acrylics, that could be hours of extra work trying to fix it. That also brings up the skill of the artist, weather they do mess up or what their artwork looks like in the end determines price. And finally, the name and reputation of the artist has MUCH to do with the pricing. This part, however, gives them a bit more leeway into overpricing. Because their name is out there and the work is obviously noticed as their own, they can charge for a certain uniqueness they add to the piece.
Aside from these few things, pricing on art is a very broad range. For digital art such as Rukis' here, I'd pay a bit above minimum wage per hour of work. Set pricing isn't something I like a lot because I feel the artist doesn't get paid properly for the amount of time spent on a commission. If you're to hire someone to draw something for you, pay them for the amount of work put into it, not just a flat fee. Considering that, Rukis should charge a lot more for the work, you guys are getting a huge deal. I've watched in livestreams before and it takes a good number of hours to sketch and finish a piece, even if it is digital.
Hopefully one day, people will start to appreciate the skill of a digital artist as much as a traditional. I feel that they have just as much talent working with a tablet as an artist has working with pencil and paper.
I also forgot to add that physical properties come into play a LOT. I love seeing my artwork on my walls and the work on the original page that it was painted/drawn on. Digital art just can't cover that when you print it out, HD printer or not. Anywho, it's bedtime now.
Soooo true
Ps. I love digital art, but I always much more apreciate traditional, because it is harder to do, on maaany ways, and you aren't able to create fast for example 'same feew' diffrent versions with various background, clothes or colours.
Ps. I love digital art, but I always much more apreciate traditional, because it is harder to do, on maaany ways, and you aren't able to create fast for example 'same feew' diffrent versions with various background, clothes or colours.
Traditional art supplies sure are expensive. But so is a computer, Photoshop and a tablet. And they don't last forever either.
All those things don't take nearly as much, though. A good computer to run PS4 would only run you about 500 bucks and that's from BestBuy. PS4 itself can be pirated and the medium Bamboo tablet I bought only cost me 80 on sale. Even a used large is only about 150. All together you're looking at about 650 dollars AND it's only a one time buy. Art supplies will cost you over time and build up to much more than a set price.
hnnnng I feel compelled to comment about this.
Just RUNNING photoshop and running it WELL are two different things. I've needed about $100 of upgrades every year to keep the computer running happily with the size of my photoshop files. anything over 2500*2500 pixels in size would cause lag once I got into the colouring stage. My computer is currently worth about $1500, and every piece in there was put in for the intent of making photoshop run better. I ran out of RAM while running photoshop, so I had to get more. I needed faster swap space, so I got a SSD to run photoshop's swap and files from. While these aren't NECESSARY to make better art, they sure do help a LOT to make it less frustrating. Not to mention the time my motherboard died, and until I diagnosed the problem, I would lose photoshop progress because the computer would freeze randomly. Also, the cost of digital tablets. While better now than when I bought mine, the tablet alone was $450 when i bought it. HUGE cost for quality equipment.
To compare, it's like saying I could get a pack of watercolours or oil paints from walmart instead of Curry's or DickBlick. Sure, they'll put colour on my paper, but they aren't up to par quality and for really nice quality watercolour work, I need more expensive paint. I use markers and Watercolours traditionally, along with occassional acrylics (I gave up on them because they're much harder to work with than watercolours and more expensive than I'd like for the use i get out of them). I've spent more on computer upgrades than my traditional materials over the past 3-4 years. Even with the cost of a full set of Prismas, about $600.
So, hopefully, I've explained why you're completely wrong to believe that computer hardware is a "one time buy" of only $650 for quality digital work. Anyone who wants to keep up with increasing demand on their system WILL upgrade it, for at least as much as regular traditional materials will cost, probably more due to manufacturers charging up the ass.
Just RUNNING photoshop and running it WELL are two different things. I've needed about $100 of upgrades every year to keep the computer running happily with the size of my photoshop files. anything over 2500*2500 pixels in size would cause lag once I got into the colouring stage. My computer is currently worth about $1500, and every piece in there was put in for the intent of making photoshop run better. I ran out of RAM while running photoshop, so I had to get more. I needed faster swap space, so I got a SSD to run photoshop's swap and files from. While these aren't NECESSARY to make better art, they sure do help a LOT to make it less frustrating. Not to mention the time my motherboard died, and until I diagnosed the problem, I would lose photoshop progress because the computer would freeze randomly. Also, the cost of digital tablets. While better now than when I bought mine, the tablet alone was $450 when i bought it. HUGE cost for quality equipment.
To compare, it's like saying I could get a pack of watercolours or oil paints from walmart instead of Curry's or DickBlick. Sure, they'll put colour on my paper, but they aren't up to par quality and for really nice quality watercolour work, I need more expensive paint. I use markers and Watercolours traditionally, along with occassional acrylics (I gave up on them because they're much harder to work with than watercolours and more expensive than I'd like for the use i get out of them). I've spent more on computer upgrades than my traditional materials over the past 3-4 years. Even with the cost of a full set of Prismas, about $600.
So, hopefully, I've explained why you're completely wrong to believe that computer hardware is a "one time buy" of only $650 for quality digital work. Anyone who wants to keep up with increasing demand on their system WILL upgrade it, for at least as much as regular traditional materials will cost, probably more due to manufacturers charging up the ass.
500 bucks?
Och sorry, but I laughs loudly reading comment above
500 bucks it's a moooonster cash! You can buy for that much more powerfull pc than my laptop, used PS4, and any used Wacom tablet (all almost not used), sometimes new these things from shop because occasion or internet auction.
I have 7 years old laptop on which I'm still working! - Benq Joybook R56 (with weaker processor T5250 and slower old hdd). I have in it 1,5ghz core 2 duo. 3gb ram, 120hdd, GeForce 8400M (512mb ram), and 3bbit Win7. It's to powerfull for CS4, on what I'm working! :D
My problems start when I do 10 000pix x 10 000pix 300dpi commission, mostly closed PSD files are around 1gb. In these case, I need sometimes 15 minutes to save the work. Then, only thing what you need is patience. But who the hell on FA, do such big artworks? >.>
4K on 4K 300 dpi is mostly really enough - and for that my laptop, and and CS4 works amaaaaaazing.
Thats why I really smiles when I always read about that all machines upgrade, if someone is not a pc gamer like me (well I play flash games or web browsers.. or PS3/PSP/android), he almost don't need to do any upgrades
Och sorry, but I laughs loudly reading comment above
500 bucks it's a moooonster cash! You can buy for that much more powerfull pc than my laptop, used PS4, and any used Wacom tablet (all almost not used), sometimes new these things from shop because occasion or internet auction.
I have 7 years old laptop on which I'm still working! - Benq Joybook R56 (with weaker processor T5250 and slower old hdd). I have in it 1,5ghz core 2 duo. 3gb ram, 120hdd, GeForce 8400M (512mb ram), and 3bbit Win7. It's to powerfull for CS4, on what I'm working! :D
My problems start when I do 10 000pix x 10 000pix 300dpi commission, mostly closed PSD files are around 1gb. In these case, I need sometimes 15 minutes to save the work. Then, only thing what you need is patience. But who the hell on FA, do such big artworks? >.>
4K on 4K 300 dpi is mostly really enough - and for that my laptop, and and CS4 works amaaaaaazing.
Thats why I really smiles when I always read about that all machines upgrade, if someone is not a pc gamer like me (well I play flash games or web browsers.. or PS3/PSP/android), he almost don't need to do any upgrades
maybe where you are that money can get you all those items, that wouldn't be possible here =\ I'm in canada, for reference.
I was okay waiting for files to save, but I started to run out of RAM just running large files in photoshop, and I had 8 gb. now I have 16, and I regularly still use over 8gb ram with photoshop running. I was having problems with the computer being unable to properly render a brushstroke because of the RAM being full. I usually use about 3000-4000 * 6000 or 7000 or so for image sizes (dpi/ppi doesn't matter when talking about size in pixels -.-).
Maybe you don't see many people who regularly need upgrades for their art or uses other than gaming, but I've asked at least 10 people who are semi-serious artists about their equipment, and I get about the same reply from most of them.
Regardless, even if you manage to spend only $500 - $600 on computer equipment, it'll still take about 4 or 5 years for the cost of traditional materials to exceed that of computer costs, as far as I can tell with my actual expenses... Which is the original point of my comments.
I was okay waiting for files to save, but I started to run out of RAM just running large files in photoshop, and I had 8 gb. now I have 16, and I regularly still use over 8gb ram with photoshop running. I was having problems with the computer being unable to properly render a brushstroke because of the RAM being full. I usually use about 3000-4000 * 6000 or 7000 or so for image sizes (dpi/ppi doesn't matter when talking about size in pixels -.-).
Maybe you don't see many people who regularly need upgrades for their art or uses other than gaming, but I've asked at least 10 people who are semi-serious artists about their equipment, and I get about the same reply from most of them.
Regardless, even if you manage to spend only $500 - $600 on computer equipment, it'll still take about 4 or 5 years for the cost of traditional materials to exceed that of computer costs, as far as I can tell with my actual expenses... Which is the original point of my comments.
Well, I checked prices of used laptops at canada, and anyone can easy buy it for c $ 200-250, Good, cheap used Wacom tablet (for example Graphire 1 - I also have it and works great) is around $30. So sorry but for plenty people ... it's all about costs. Plenty graphics working on illegal software, also in furry. They don't buy it, just piracy. I also worked on piracy software, when I earn enough cash from commissions I bought used legal I bought Master CS3 one, which I'm using, and also CS4.
But if someone terryfing about 'piracy' and only thinks about it "NEVER", problem is very simple - CS4 is still ultra professional software, where plenty of people don't even used 70% of it's build functions. Plenty of digital artist only need about 50-100 layers , 2 to 4K pix canvas for working, and custom brushes, with basic editing options. In these case NEW licenced Paint Tool Sai is great program for about...$50-55 USD.
BUT if someone really need that fashion legal Photoshop, CS3 Design suite cost around $270, and you've got also Illustrator, Indesign and Acrobat. You have 'all' general used fancy options for brushes, pressure for tablets and other. And also CS3 works great with thing done even in newer versions. PSD 7.0 to CS2 are only cheaper, if someone want starting selling commission, having none of equipment, then spending 500$ bucks even in Canada is too much >.> For 10 years I usedWin XP and 2gb of ram I've got when I bough my laptop 7 years ago, in that time I also done commissions, Win7 with 1gb ram more, i've got for half year, and it's working great. However XP with that tech parametrs is fully enough to work on 6-8K artworks.
350$ it's fully enough for starting artisting hobby, and small commission business. For 35$ for full commission you don't be even need to have medium skills. Basic ones with some examples of work is fully enough, 10x comishes and your cash back.
On the end, backind to ressolution, I assure you that even 1K 300dpi art is much diffrent than same 1K 100dpi art. I worked on posters for my last employer. Scalling here is really visible when it need to be printed. In artworks bigger than 3-4K it's not such visible, when you do prints to A3 format, but try to do big poser from 4K 100dpi art and compare to same from 4K 300Dpi, and diffrence will be in (much) bigger pixels and overal printed quality.
Looking on that all things, I absolutelly don't agree with you, when it's all about cost to do digital art. If you don't do any prints for client, only digital files, you need small amount of cash to start it, work a bit, and getting cash, then working more to earn more to for example some day buy new 2K-3K$ machine with software and new tablet, etc. Starting small business in furry fandom, cost small, and 80% depends on your practice skills. If you are traditionall artist, you can have weak pc with weak scanner, do only good visible sketches, and collecting cash from that you can get $ for better machine in some time, depending on your fast working and quality level. Few pencils, paper sheets don't cost a lot ;)
When I heard about semi-serious artist, I think about earning at last minimum month country paying. Then yeah, you need better machine. If comishes are only 'bonus' cash for work, you don't need to matter about machine, weaker machine is fully ok.
Materials for traditional art and their costs also depends of quality, brand and places where you buy them, but diffrence in same materials costs (with or without shipping), might be reaaaally huge.
If someone isn't patience, other people presses on him/her, he might have weaker psyche or don't want to search, wanted to feel fully comfort (whis is cool when youre lazy) think a lot, and just buy because he need it... then it's a best way to loosing much more money on only materials :) You can also lost plenty of cash, if you don't know where to buy things, and just going to first shop ;)
But if someone terryfing about 'piracy' and only thinks about it "NEVER", problem is very simple - CS4 is still ultra professional software, where plenty of people don't even used 70% of it's build functions. Plenty of digital artist only need about 50-100 layers , 2 to 4K pix canvas for working, and custom brushes, with basic editing options. In these case NEW licenced Paint Tool Sai is great program for about...$50-55 USD.
BUT if someone really need that fashion legal Photoshop, CS3 Design suite cost around $270, and you've got also Illustrator, Indesign and Acrobat. You have 'all' general used fancy options for brushes, pressure for tablets and other. And also CS3 works great with thing done even in newer versions. PSD 7.0 to CS2 are only cheaper, if someone want starting selling commission, having none of equipment, then spending 500$ bucks even in Canada is too much >.> For 10 years I usedWin XP and 2gb of ram I've got when I bough my laptop 7 years ago, in that time I also done commissions, Win7 with 1gb ram more, i've got for half year, and it's working great. However XP with that tech parametrs is fully enough to work on 6-8K artworks.
350$ it's fully enough for starting artisting hobby, and small commission business. For 35$ for full commission you don't be even need to have medium skills. Basic ones with some examples of work is fully enough, 10x comishes and your cash back.
On the end, backind to ressolution, I assure you that even 1K 300dpi art is much diffrent than same 1K 100dpi art. I worked on posters for my last employer. Scalling here is really visible when it need to be printed. In artworks bigger than 3-4K it's not such visible, when you do prints to A3 format, but try to do big poser from 4K 100dpi art and compare to same from 4K 300Dpi, and diffrence will be in (much) bigger pixels and overal printed quality.
Looking on that all things, I absolutelly don't agree with you, when it's all about cost to do digital art. If you don't do any prints for client, only digital files, you need small amount of cash to start it, work a bit, and getting cash, then working more to earn more to for example some day buy new 2K-3K$ machine with software and new tablet, etc. Starting small business in furry fandom, cost small, and 80% depends on your practice skills. If you are traditionall artist, you can have weak pc with weak scanner, do only good visible sketches, and collecting cash from that you can get $ for better machine in some time, depending on your fast working and quality level. Few pencils, paper sheets don't cost a lot ;)
When I heard about semi-serious artist, I think about earning at last minimum month country paying. Then yeah, you need better machine. If comishes are only 'bonus' cash for work, you don't need to matter about machine, weaker machine is fully ok.
Materials for traditional art and their costs also depends of quality, brand and places where you buy them, but diffrence in same materials costs (with or without shipping), might be reaaaally huge.
If someone isn't patience, other people presses on him/her, he might have weaker psyche or don't want to search, wanted to feel fully comfort (whis is cool when youre lazy) think a lot, and just buy because he need it... then it's a best way to loosing much more money on only materials :) You can also lost plenty of cash, if you don't know where to buy things, and just going to first shop ;)
dpi/ppi does not matter when working on an image. It only matters when you PRINT. 300dpi/ppi or 100, your image will be the exact same size when you're working on it on the computer. there is absolutely no difference until you go to PRINT it, at which point, it affects the physical dimensions. when you save it to print, THEN it matters whether you're using 300 or 100 dpi/ppi.
Again, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT BEGINNER HOBBYISTS.
I am talking about semi-serious to serious professionals for whom the barebones minimum will not be enough to sustain a comfortable CONSISTENT work environment. The original comment I was replying to (which isn't yours) stated that digital art isn't as skilled an art because materials cost more for traditional. I provided a realistic cost scheme based on my experiences using both medium-better quality traditional materials and computer equipment that wouldn't fail on me (as I mentioned... my motherboard died flat out on me once, and now my monitors are dying). I don't buy used or refurbished hardware because it breaks far too often too easily. The laptop I'm currently using when travelling, for example, is constantly overheating and dying despite my efforts to clean it out properly. Just a bad/cheap fan, as a result of cheap design, which I only accept because it was practically a free laptop. I would not have paid for this thing.
semi-serious to serious artists, I feel, should include anyone who is TRYING to make art at least a major source of income. Not necessarily primary, but in lieu of a full time job, at least part time hours (20 a week average) should be considered semi-serious at least.
To reiterate my actual and recurring point: The original statement that I was replying to had several major underestimates in terms of cost of digital work that affected their opinion of digital art being "real" or "quality" art. I provided an ACTUAL account from a semi-serious artist. Whether you think it's possible to find a bare minimum starting setup for less than I've stated or not is NOT relevant here because I have never once been trying to talk about beginner or non-serious artists.
I'd appreciate it if you'd stop being argumentative and inciting unnecessary conversation, because as far as I'm concerned, this is long done and over with, and nothing that has been said can change the facts I've put out there. I'm not going to repeat myself again.
Again, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT BEGINNER HOBBYISTS.
I am talking about semi-serious to serious professionals for whom the barebones minimum will not be enough to sustain a comfortable CONSISTENT work environment. The original comment I was replying to (which isn't yours) stated that digital art isn't as skilled an art because materials cost more for traditional. I provided a realistic cost scheme based on my experiences using both medium-better quality traditional materials and computer equipment that wouldn't fail on me (as I mentioned... my motherboard died flat out on me once, and now my monitors are dying). I don't buy used or refurbished hardware because it breaks far too often too easily. The laptop I'm currently using when travelling, for example, is constantly overheating and dying despite my efforts to clean it out properly. Just a bad/cheap fan, as a result of cheap design, which I only accept because it was practically a free laptop. I would not have paid for this thing.
semi-serious to serious artists, I feel, should include anyone who is TRYING to make art at least a major source of income. Not necessarily primary, but in lieu of a full time job, at least part time hours (20 a week average) should be considered semi-serious at least.
To reiterate my actual and recurring point: The original statement that I was replying to had several major underestimates in terms of cost of digital work that affected their opinion of digital art being "real" or "quality" art. I provided an ACTUAL account from a semi-serious artist. Whether you think it's possible to find a bare minimum starting setup for less than I've stated or not is NOT relevant here because I have never once been trying to talk about beginner or non-serious artists.
I'd appreciate it if you'd stop being argumentative and inciting unnecessary conversation, because as far as I'm concerned, this is long done and over with, and nothing that has been said can change the facts I've put out there. I'm not going to repeat myself again.
Thats right, all that funny dpi/ppi it's important only when you want to print art. Hovewer I always thinking it's nice to do 300dpi comishes, if someone of my users would like to print their artworks :)
Well I was GENERAL TALKING ABOUT STARTING SMALL BUSINESS for small money, where it's possible to do, earn cash preatty quick and if someone want - think about something more serious.
Looking on semi-serious to pros, of course - they need good equipments, because their projects need to be done fast and good, without waiting plenty minutes to save on hdd. In these case I wasn't talking about technic failure etc, because it might heppen even in next week or two, when new equipment have full warantee. In my examples, mostly older used laptops have better matterials, or broken parts might be cheap to replace, becuase market is full. Also I never ever think anyone might just buy any kind of old technology 'just because'. When I buy something old, I always trying to get info much more of negative ways of such thing, than positive. When you know some bad things, what might happen you're much more calm :)
A bit other thing, people asking many times, 'when you're a 'pro' photographer from a job, not from hobby? When you get around 70-80% percent of your earning cash - if you're for example might have also other full time job'. On some way, it's of course very unprofessional thinking. But if we close doing art to these, when you spend your half time a month on doing art, and you have from it a properly month sallary, then you/he/she might to call semi-pro artist.
I know, but I write that, just also there is huge diffrents in these things, and many people don't even understand simply costs of something, also someone also might be curious about starting, and not spending a lot. Of course, there will be always of people who will be wanted pro art from semi-/pro artist for pocket money :D
In final it's always all up to the artist who make art and for what price they want to sell them. One thing about we don't write here is a place where artist live (country). These diffrent can market prices. For someone who live in Germany/USA, earning $50-100 from commishion 'it's begging' and small amount of cash, but for someone who live in my country or in other east countries - it's worth at least 3 times more, looking on actual earnings compare to west countries ;) These it's terryfing, because Pro from USA will be happy from earnings, but Pro who live in Czech Republic, will be live in well... in 'luxury' for same cash what will get a guy from USA ;)
Well I was GENERAL TALKING ABOUT STARTING SMALL BUSINESS for small money, where it's possible to do, earn cash preatty quick and if someone want - think about something more serious.
Looking on semi-serious to pros, of course - they need good equipments, because their projects need to be done fast and good, without waiting plenty minutes to save on hdd. In these case I wasn't talking about technic failure etc, because it might heppen even in next week or two, when new equipment have full warantee. In my examples, mostly older used laptops have better matterials, or broken parts might be cheap to replace, becuase market is full. Also I never ever think anyone might just buy any kind of old technology 'just because'. When I buy something old, I always trying to get info much more of negative ways of such thing, than positive. When you know some bad things, what might happen you're much more calm :)
A bit other thing, people asking many times, 'when you're a 'pro' photographer from a job, not from hobby? When you get around 70-80% percent of your earning cash - if you're for example might have also other full time job'. On some way, it's of course very unprofessional thinking. But if we close doing art to these, when you spend your half time a month on doing art, and you have from it a properly month sallary, then you/he/she might to call semi-pro artist.
I know, but I write that, just also there is huge diffrents in these things, and many people don't even understand simply costs of something, also someone also might be curious about starting, and not spending a lot. Of course, there will be always of people who will be wanted pro art from semi-/pro artist for pocket money :D
In final it's always all up to the artist who make art and for what price they want to sell them. One thing about we don't write here is a place where artist live (country). These diffrent can market prices. For someone who live in Germany/USA, earning $50-100 from commishion 'it's begging' and small amount of cash, but for someone who live in my country or in other east countries - it's worth at least 3 times more, looking on actual earnings compare to west countries ;) These it's terryfing, because Pro from USA will be happy from earnings, but Pro who live in Czech Republic, will be live in well... in 'luxury' for same cash what will get a guy from USA ;)
Oh man the horror of cost of materials in traditional art! >_< I was amazed at the sheer cost of just acrylic paints to do a large canvas painting I had done for an old friend. Including the canvas I wound up spending around $140 just in materials and that's not counting the 40 some odd hours I put into it.
Knowing all this is the price I pay for having friends who are art majors. x3
'Digital art is never going to be worth as much as traditional because it takes much less skill to create than something painted, water colored, sketched, on paper/canvas'
You're obviously not an artist
'paint they used, time they spent, canvas board, paper, pencils, pens, ink, and all the other art tools that one would need to create such a piece costs a LOT of money'
so do computers, graphics tablets, printers, ink etc.
'For digital art such as Rukis' here, I'd pay a bit above minimum wage per hour of work'
a bit above minimum wage? Really? You obviously don't value this artist's work very much.
*sigh*
You're obviously not an artist
'paint they used, time they spent, canvas board, paper, pencils, pens, ink, and all the other art tools that one would need to create such a piece costs a LOT of money'
so do computers, graphics tablets, printers, ink etc.
'For digital art such as Rukis' here, I'd pay a bit above minimum wage per hour of work'
a bit above minimum wage? Really? You obviously don't value this artist's work very much.
*sigh*
No, I'm not an artist, but I'm an art enthusiast. I own several pieces of art that I greatly enjoy and have studied art in my spare time. No I'm not a professional, no I don't consider myself to be an expert, but I do know quite a bit about pricing, marketing and the general sale of art given the friends I have and people I'm around who have taught me more than enough to know what to spend on an art piece. Again, my reasoning behind why digital art will not be nearly as expensive as traditional is justified in the previous comment. The physical work itself, the time, resources and namesake are all factors in the pricing of artwork.
You obviously need to do some research and maybe READ the above post. I already listed an estimate for the prices of what a computer running this stuff would cost and you don't need a high end computer to run CS4. not to mention, CS4 can be purchased from a College Bookshop for about 90% discount. I obtained Logic Pro that way for a fraction of what it would cost retail. If you knew this, you would know that art supplies over time would cost a fortune more than something that's a one time buy. Graphic tablets are cheap as hell on e-bay. My mate purchased an Intuos4 large tablet for 180 dollars. Learn to shop in your price range and you wouldn't have a problem with price. Printers and ink, fraction of a price compared to canvas and acrylics.
I have a large respect for Rukis, I've watched the streams and see the hours she works on a comic page or commission. Above minimum wage is MORE than enough for an artist in the furry fandom, especially when it comes to the amount of time put into the work. I'd actually be paying about the same as the set prices, which is probably what price chart is based on. You obviously need to reconsider your words and think about what you say before you say it.
One of the biggest benefits of art is it's appreciation over time. Art is an investment, not only a display for aesthetics. One of the biggest double edged sword situations I find with furry artwork is that art won't gain value unless the artist takes off and having a small community like the furry fandom keeps the prices relatively low given the graphic nature of most of the pictures. This is not necessarily a bad thing since I can afford pretty much any artist I'd like, but as stated before, there's not a lot of galleries wanting to sell dog penis for a fortune because that's not something you usually find hanging in the Louvre. Even clean furry artwork isn't going to be as appreciated because it's anthropomorphic and there's not a high demand for it in the modern world.
This concept also applies to DIGITAL ARTISTS IN GENERAL. Digital art is taking off, I'll give it that, but it's still not as appreciated as traditional art. That's not an opinion, that is a factual statement. I've found several digital artists on DA that I'd LOVE to see in a gallery and I think have a tremendous talent in that particular field BUT they're not in a gallery, they're not found, they mostly draw out of hobby, not a job, which is why MOST artists have DAY JOBS so they can AFFORD their projects.
TL/DR: Digital art isn't as valued as highly as traditional, that's a fact not an opinion; Art supplies cost more $$ > computer tablet CS3/4/5; I do respect Rukis but there's reasons behind my payment method, read up.
~Sigh~ Kids these days...
You obviously need to do some research and maybe READ the above post. I already listed an estimate for the prices of what a computer running this stuff would cost and you don't need a high end computer to run CS4. not to mention, CS4 can be purchased from a College Bookshop for about 90% discount. I obtained Logic Pro that way for a fraction of what it would cost retail. If you knew this, you would know that art supplies over time would cost a fortune more than something that's a one time buy. Graphic tablets are cheap as hell on e-bay. My mate purchased an Intuos4 large tablet for 180 dollars. Learn to shop in your price range and you wouldn't have a problem with price. Printers and ink, fraction of a price compared to canvas and acrylics.
I have a large respect for Rukis, I've watched the streams and see the hours she works on a comic page or commission. Above minimum wage is MORE than enough for an artist in the furry fandom, especially when it comes to the amount of time put into the work. I'd actually be paying about the same as the set prices, which is probably what price chart is based on. You obviously need to reconsider your words and think about what you say before you say it.
One of the biggest benefits of art is it's appreciation over time. Art is an investment, not only a display for aesthetics. One of the biggest double edged sword situations I find with furry artwork is that art won't gain value unless the artist takes off and having a small community like the furry fandom keeps the prices relatively low given the graphic nature of most of the pictures. This is not necessarily a bad thing since I can afford pretty much any artist I'd like, but as stated before, there's not a lot of galleries wanting to sell dog penis for a fortune because that's not something you usually find hanging in the Louvre. Even clean furry artwork isn't going to be as appreciated because it's anthropomorphic and there's not a high demand for it in the modern world.
This concept also applies to DIGITAL ARTISTS IN GENERAL. Digital art is taking off, I'll give it that, but it's still not as appreciated as traditional art. That's not an opinion, that is a factual statement. I've found several digital artists on DA that I'd LOVE to see in a gallery and I think have a tremendous talent in that particular field BUT they're not in a gallery, they're not found, they mostly draw out of hobby, not a job, which is why MOST artists have DAY JOBS so they can AFFORD their projects.
TL/DR: Digital art isn't as valued as highly as traditional, that's a fact not an opinion; Art supplies cost more $$ > computer tablet CS3/4/5; I do respect Rukis but there's reasons behind my payment method, read up.
~Sigh~ Kids these days...
I believe your original point was that digital art takes less skill to produce than traditional art. I can tell you from experience that this isn't true because I've worked in both. Whether digital art is valued more or less than traditional art is besides the point.
Also, I dispute your statement that art supplies cost more than computer equipment. There are factors you haven't considered, such as the cost of getting digital art professionally printed and framed.
> 'Above minimum wage is MORE than enough for an artist in the furry fandom' sadly that's what most professional artists are making in the fandom but it's not enough! It is insufficient recompense for the amount of work that goes into the finished piece.
Also, I dispute your statement that art supplies cost more than computer equipment. There are factors you haven't considered, such as the cost of getting digital art professionally printed and framed.
> 'Above minimum wage is MORE than enough for an artist in the furry fandom' sadly that's what most professional artists are making in the fandom but it's not enough! It is insufficient recompense for the amount of work that goes into the finished piece.
I believe we can both say that it depends on the piece itself that you're working on. Traditional work can range from sculpting to glass blowing to canvas and so on and so forth, each one with a various range of time and effort put into it. Digital art isn't all that difference if you think of it that way, but you'd have to admit, it's still a lot easier to use a pen and tablet with ALL your tools perfectly organized in a nifty little bar than having various paints and what-have-you scattered about.
Digital art printed out doesn't cost that much. To go out and get a digital printer can cost anywhere between 50 and 60 dollars, gloss paper is about 12 bucks and unless you're getting a museum glass frame, you shouldn't have to spend all that much on a simple 8x11 frame. If you get anything bigger than that, it doesn't cost all that much to get a poster sized print-out from Kinko's. Canvas, paints, acrylics and other art supplies will cost you a TON more over the long run.
As for the prices, the furry fandom isn't made of rich aristocrats and fortune 500 entrepreneurs. You need to appeal to the consumer and market prices or you're going to be left in the dust with your super expensive art. Again, being an artist (especially in the furry fandom) should NOT be your main source of income. Yes, there are people who can pull it off and kudo's to them, but for the average furry artist who's mostly unheard of, you're not going to end up selling a digital piece for a super huge wad of dosh.
Oddly enough, I find that names in the furry fandom regulate price better than the work they do. I've seen several VERY popular furry artist charge obscene amounts of money for horribly drawn anatomy, half ass'ed backgrounds and then charge half that price to add even more bad anatomy. People like them because they draw to a target audience who they know will spend that money for their name. To say, "I own a piece by (so-and-so)!" seems to be all the rage. So if you're that worried about making money from your artwork, get your name out there. I haven't heard of ya before now.
Digital art printed out doesn't cost that much. To go out and get a digital printer can cost anywhere between 50 and 60 dollars, gloss paper is about 12 bucks and unless you're getting a museum glass frame, you shouldn't have to spend all that much on a simple 8x11 frame. If you get anything bigger than that, it doesn't cost all that much to get a poster sized print-out from Kinko's. Canvas, paints, acrylics and other art supplies will cost you a TON more over the long run.
As for the prices, the furry fandom isn't made of rich aristocrats and fortune 500 entrepreneurs. You need to appeal to the consumer and market prices or you're going to be left in the dust with your super expensive art. Again, being an artist (especially in the furry fandom) should NOT be your main source of income. Yes, there are people who can pull it off and kudo's to them, but for the average furry artist who's mostly unheard of, you're not going to end up selling a digital piece for a super huge wad of dosh.
Oddly enough, I find that names in the furry fandom regulate price better than the work they do. I've seen several VERY popular furry artist charge obscene amounts of money for horribly drawn anatomy, half ass'ed backgrounds and then charge half that price to add even more bad anatomy. People like them because they draw to a target audience who they know will spend that money for their name. To say, "I own a piece by (so-and-so)!" seems to be all the rage. So if you're that worried about making money from your artwork, get your name out there. I haven't heard of ya before now.
funnily enough I am a full time artist and furry artwork is my main source of income (though admittedly I do other stuff as well). As you correctly surmise it is a hand to mouth existence.
> 'you're not going to end up selling a digital piece for a super huge wad of dosh' and yet that's exactly what I did :) http://www.furaffinity.net/view/10011776/ It would be pure fantasy to expect to sell every piece for that kind of money. More's the pity.
I'm basing my assessment of costs of digital vs. real media art from personal experience. When you factor in the cost of large scale archival quality printing from a specialist firm plus a decent professional custom made frame (clip frames just aren't going to cut it) it all adds up.
> 'you're not going to end up selling a digital piece for a super huge wad of dosh' and yet that's exactly what I did :) http://www.furaffinity.net/view/10011776/ It would be pure fantasy to expect to sell every piece for that kind of money. More's the pity.
I'm basing my assessment of costs of digital vs. real media art from personal experience. When you factor in the cost of large scale archival quality printing from a specialist firm plus a decent professional custom made frame (clip frames just aren't going to cut it) it all adds up.
But again, we're talking about the furry fandom here, not professional, high end digital artists who are well known and able to charge an exorbitant amount of money for very high quality work and ridiculous amounts of time put into it. That was my argument from the beginning. On top of that, MOST of the community itself can't afford works of that nature, not to say there aren't VERY talented furry artist out there, there most definitely are, but you still can't be charging prices like that compared to the upper echelon of artists.
The printing quality can be easily affordable in a larger format from a shop for WAY less than having to buy your own printer and a professional custom frame isn't something most people are going to want to spend the money on when a simple frame will do. Now if you're frugal with your money, you'd know to save up and then you MIGHT be able to afford a frame with that picture you so dearly want sprawled across your living room wall to show all your friends and family your lifted tail and bulging knot!
The printing quality can be easily affordable in a larger format from a shop for WAY less than having to buy your own printer and a professional custom frame isn't something most people are going to want to spend the money on when a simple frame will do. Now if you're frugal with your money, you'd know to save up and then you MIGHT be able to afford a frame with that picture you so dearly want sprawled across your living room wall to show all your friends and family your lifted tail and bulging knot!
You're missing the point then, we're talk'n furry artists, majority are not pro's. MOST of the people here aren't going to print professional work of their fursona and spend THAT much money on a custom frame or high end laser printer.
The estimates I gave are more than enough for art of this value, albeit some more valuable than others, but still all in the affordable range of the average blue collar worker which this fandom seems to be comprised of.
The software issue can be fixed by a plethora of free art programs such as GIMP or SAI. CS4 isn't the only pro out there and by using these other programs, you can easily pump out a few good commissions until you're able to afford the higher end programs. When you get better programs, you MIGHT be able to have better quality art by that time and charge maybe a bit more for your time and effort. From that, invest in a bigger tablet, better computer, etc. It all pays it's own over time and that's with the average furry price range for commissions or pictures.
You are correct that congestion doesn't apply to everyone, but the majority of artists I've seen or been around are cluttered/messy organizers. They have things scattered everywhere, but they know exactly where the objects they need are.
you're the one missing the point then, seeing as you've apparently changed the demographic you're talking about. The people who are going to print art out at home to put on the wall are NOT likely to be the artists. I don't know any artists who put their own stuff up on the wall.
I am NOT super rich. These costs I'VE quoted are actual values NOT estimates from someone who doesn't actually do serious commissions. If you go to any moderately known artist, their costs are going to be similar to what I've mentioned (including printing costs when going to staples or kinkos that I've mentioned). If not, they're likely to be FRUSTRATED with their equipment because it's not adequate for improvement. One friend of mine in particular was constantly having issues with her laptop that she was using for art. it was equipment in the $600 - $700 range. she didn't use photoshop primarily on it, she used SAI which as far as I remember is a lower-resource program. She still had issues. She's since upgraded, she found an okay desktop on sale, i think it was like $300 off of regular price. Much better for doing art, but it was another, higher cost. So that she could continue to take commissions. She's not hugely well known, her prices are in the lower end, but she still has large expenses regularly.
For artists who DO charge more appropriate values (read; higher prices), USUALLY they're either insanely famous, extremely talented, or a combination of both. The important thing you're missing here is that the people this image are talking about are generally people whining about THIS group of artists. The people who aren't famous/extremely skilled usually charge low prices, so there should be absolutely no reason to include them in this discussion. The lesser skilled artists, most of the time I've found, charge reasonably lower prices for where they are.
You don't need to be a high end digital artist to have larger costs. By upgrading slowly, you can incur MORE costs than just sucking it up and buying the better equipment to begin with. Your estimates are, again, laughably low for anyone, in or out of the fandom, who's considering trying to take commissions as a serious hobby/job. This DOES NOT MEAN HIGH END ARTISTS. Most furries ARE NOT ARTISTS. Drawing occassionally or even charging for drawings does not a serious artist make. It means those people have an understanding of wanting to be paid for their time. Heck, most non-artists don't even charge when they do drawings.
Back to the ORIGINAL point; the cost of traditional materials is NOT more by and large than the cost of digital equipment, because your estimates are lower than the actual costs, which I've provided to you. I'm not rich, I'm not hugely famous, but those are the costs as I, and many others who do digital work, have experienced. Actual experience ALWAYS outweighs guessing. Ask any serious, not necessarily famous, artist on FA what their equipment cost. If it's lower, I can guarantee you that most people wish they had better equipment. Which increases the cost. traditional materials may be expensive up front (Just like ANY COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), but they last a long time. I'm not going out every weekend to restock my materials! once every few months I'll need a replacement marker or a tube of pigment. oh the horror, $20 - $50 a year. Sketchbook is $10 ish, I buy 1 or 2 or those a year. I spend way less than $100 on traditional materials a year. i spend more than $100 on computer maintenance/upgrades each year. Sometimes that's just bad parts, sometimes it's necessary upgrading. It's all been for the sake of continuing digital art.
If you go back to the original context of this disagreement, you'll see that you've gone way off course with your argument. The points *I'M* arguing is that your estimates are way off for digital AND traditional materials. It would take me years for traditional materials to build up to a cost more than what I've currently put in for digital equipment. Heck, What I've paid for digital equipment in the past 4 years probably makes up more cost than exclusively traditional artists have put into materials in the same time. Being that you're NOT an artist, take an artist's word for it; Digital work costs more or at least as much as traditional works in material and time costs. Anything you could possibly say that isn't an acknowledgement of that fact is useless and not worth replying to.
The estimates I gave are more than enough for art of this value, albeit some more valuable than others, but still all in the affordable range of the average blue collar worker which this fandom seems to be comprised of.
The software issue can be fixed by a plethora of free art programs such as GIMP or SAI. CS4 isn't the only pro out there and by using these other programs, you can easily pump out a few good commissions until you're able to afford the higher end programs. When you get better programs, you MIGHT be able to have better quality art by that time and charge maybe a bit more for your time and effort. From that, invest in a bigger tablet, better computer, etc. It all pays it's own over time and that's with the average furry price range for commissions or pictures.
You are correct that congestion doesn't apply to everyone, but the majority of artists I've seen or been around are cluttered/messy organizers. They have things scattered everywhere, but they know exactly where the objects they need are.
you're the one missing the point then, seeing as you've apparently changed the demographic you're talking about. The people who are going to print art out at home to put on the wall are NOT likely to be the artists. I don't know any artists who put their own stuff up on the wall.
I am NOT super rich. These costs I'VE quoted are actual values NOT estimates from someone who doesn't actually do serious commissions. If you go to any moderately known artist, their costs are going to be similar to what I've mentioned (including printing costs when going to staples or kinkos that I've mentioned). If not, they're likely to be FRUSTRATED with their equipment because it's not adequate for improvement. One friend of mine in particular was constantly having issues with her laptop that she was using for art. it was equipment in the $600 - $700 range. she didn't use photoshop primarily on it, she used SAI which as far as I remember is a lower-resource program. She still had issues. She's since upgraded, she found an okay desktop on sale, i think it was like $300 off of regular price. Much better for doing art, but it was another, higher cost. So that she could continue to take commissions. She's not hugely well known, her prices are in the lower end, but she still has large expenses regularly.
For artists who DO charge more appropriate values (read; higher prices), USUALLY they're either insanely famous, extremely talented, or a combination of both. The important thing you're missing here is that the people this image are talking about are generally people whining about THIS group of artists. The people who aren't famous/extremely skilled usually charge low prices, so there should be absolutely no reason to include them in this discussion. The lesser skilled artists, most of the time I've found, charge reasonably lower prices for where they are.
You don't need to be a high end digital artist to have larger costs. By upgrading slowly, you can incur MORE costs than just sucking it up and buying the better equipment to begin with. Your estimates are, again, laughably low for anyone, in or out of the fandom, who's considering trying to take commissions as a serious hobby/job. This DOES NOT MEAN HIGH END ARTISTS. Most furries ARE NOT ARTISTS. Drawing occassionally or even charging for drawings does not a serious artist make. It means those people have an understanding of wanting to be paid for their time. Heck, most non-artists don't even charge when they do drawings.
Back to the ORIGINAL point; the cost of traditional materials is NOT more by and large than the cost of digital equipment, because your estimates are lower than the actual costs, which I've provided to you. I'm not rich, I'm not hugely famous, but those are the costs as I, and many others who do digital work, have experienced. Actual experience ALWAYS outweighs guessing. Ask any serious, not necessarily famous, artist on FA what their equipment cost. If it's lower, I can guarantee you that most people wish they had better equipment. Which increases the cost. traditional materials may be expensive up front (Just like ANY COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), but they last a long time. I'm not going out every weekend to restock my materials! once every few months I'll need a replacement marker or a tube of pigment. oh the horror, $20 - $50 a year. Sketchbook is $10 ish, I buy 1 or 2 or those a year. I spend way less than $100 on traditional materials a year. i spend more than $100 on computer maintenance/upgrades each year. Sometimes that's just bad parts, sometimes it's necessary upgrading. It's all been for the sake of continuing digital art.
If you go back to the original context of this disagreement, you'll see that you've gone way off course with your argument. The points *I'M* arguing is that your estimates are way off for digital AND traditional materials. It would take me years for traditional materials to build up to a cost more than what I've currently put in for digital equipment. Heck, What I've paid for digital equipment in the past 4 years probably makes up more cost than exclusively traditional artists have put into materials in the same time. Being that you're NOT an artist, take an artist's word for it; Digital work costs more or at least as much as traditional works in material and time costs. Anything you could possibly say that isn't an acknowledgement of that fact is useless and not worth replying to.
HOooooooooooooooooooooooooold up.
any QUALITY printer will NOT be in the $50-$60 range. that will get you a maybe decent black and white laser printer, at best. Maybe.
If you want a QUALITY printer to use at home that will give you almost quality prints like you'd get from a printing service, you NEED a $1000 Machine. Ones I was looking at were $1300. These are higher end printers that can actually do larger prints (11x14 instead of max 8.5*11), that can do a LOT better quality prints. Usually these are laser printers, and the cost of toner is practically like getting a new printer every time for a full set... maybe a bit cheaper.
If a person wants to get great quality without paying for a huge printer, they go to a print shop, and get prints for about $3 a page. Much cheaper in the long run and easily covered by $10 for a standard page size print. half page $5. 11*14 is still in the cheap range, so $15 - $20 (don't forget actual labour time to make the art, and time running around and costs to go to cons to sell things), should be a good range. for anything larger, generally you HAVE to get to a print shop, and then it becomes probably inkjet printers, and one 18*24 print costs $15. I have to make that about $30 - $40 because now I have to invest in safe ways to transport all this to cons, to sell.
Sure, you can find things on sale online. Congrats on finding the tablet for relatively cheap. I'm using my 5 year old tablet, but when it dies I'll need to replace it, and for similar quality, it'll be at least $300 IF I can find a decent sale. Not to mention I'm in Canada and everything seems to cost $100 more when you look over the border. I look on Amazon.com, and the exact same item is always cheaper than on Amazon.ca. Cost of shipping and customs, I'll be easily up to $500 for a replacement tablet when the time comes.
As far as I remember, NO college bookstore will sell student software to a non-student. Leaving everyone who ISN'T in college to buy software AT regular price. Not to mention you're not supposed to use student software for commercial applications (hello, commissions...). It's in the EULA.
Again, I've spent way more money on my computer and digital supplies than on traditional supplies. Oh, and about being disorganised with your art supplies? Get a simple container to hold your brushes, use one palette, and it's really simple to NOT have things "scattered about". Your disorganisation doesn't apply to everyone.
You're severely underestimating the ACTUAL price of many components to SERIOUS, ACTUAL ARTISTS. For people who try to be professional graphics artists/illustrators/designers, your estimates are completely laughable.
any QUALITY printer will NOT be in the $50-$60 range. that will get you a maybe decent black and white laser printer, at best. Maybe.
If you want a QUALITY printer to use at home that will give you almost quality prints like you'd get from a printing service, you NEED a $1000 Machine. Ones I was looking at were $1300. These are higher end printers that can actually do larger prints (11x14 instead of max 8.5*11), that can do a LOT better quality prints. Usually these are laser printers, and the cost of toner is practically like getting a new printer every time for a full set... maybe a bit cheaper.
If a person wants to get great quality without paying for a huge printer, they go to a print shop, and get prints for about $3 a page. Much cheaper in the long run and easily covered by $10 for a standard page size print. half page $5. 11*14 is still in the cheap range, so $15 - $20 (don't forget actual labour time to make the art, and time running around and costs to go to cons to sell things), should be a good range. for anything larger, generally you HAVE to get to a print shop, and then it becomes probably inkjet printers, and one 18*24 print costs $15. I have to make that about $30 - $40 because now I have to invest in safe ways to transport all this to cons, to sell.
Sure, you can find things on sale online. Congrats on finding the tablet for relatively cheap. I'm using my 5 year old tablet, but when it dies I'll need to replace it, and for similar quality, it'll be at least $300 IF I can find a decent sale. Not to mention I'm in Canada and everything seems to cost $100 more when you look over the border. I look on Amazon.com, and the exact same item is always cheaper than on Amazon.ca. Cost of shipping and customs, I'll be easily up to $500 for a replacement tablet when the time comes.
As far as I remember, NO college bookstore will sell student software to a non-student. Leaving everyone who ISN'T in college to buy software AT regular price. Not to mention you're not supposed to use student software for commercial applications (hello, commissions...). It's in the EULA.
Again, I've spent way more money on my computer and digital supplies than on traditional supplies. Oh, and about being disorganised with your art supplies? Get a simple container to hold your brushes, use one palette, and it's really simple to NOT have things "scattered about". Your disorganisation doesn't apply to everyone.
You're severely underestimating the ACTUAL price of many components to SERIOUS, ACTUAL ARTISTS. For people who try to be professional graphics artists/illustrators/designers, your estimates are completely laughable.
You're missing the point then, we're talk'n furry artists, majority are not pro's. MOST of the people here aren't going to print professional work of their fursona and spend THAT much money on a custom frame or high end laser printer.
The estimates I gave are more than enough for art of this value, albeit some more valuable than others, but still all in the affordable range of the average blue collar worker which this fandom seems to be comprised of.
The software issue can be fixed by a plethora of free art programs such as GIMP or SAI. CS4 isn't the only pro out there and by using these other programs, you can easily pump out a few good commissions until you're able to afford the higher end programs. When you get better programs, you MIGHT be able to have better quality art by that time and charge maybe a bit more for your time and effort. From that, invest in a bigger tablet, better computer, etc. It all pays it's own over time and that's with the average furry price range for commissions or pictures.
You are correct that congestion doesn't apply to everyone, but the majority of artists I've seen or been around are cluttered/messy organizers. They have things scattered everywhere, but they know exactly where the objects they need are.
The estimates I gave are more than enough for art of this value, albeit some more valuable than others, but still all in the affordable range of the average blue collar worker which this fandom seems to be comprised of.
The software issue can be fixed by a plethora of free art programs such as GIMP or SAI. CS4 isn't the only pro out there and by using these other programs, you can easily pump out a few good commissions until you're able to afford the higher end programs. When you get better programs, you MIGHT be able to have better quality art by that time and charge maybe a bit more for your time and effort. From that, invest in a bigger tablet, better computer, etc. It all pays it's own over time and that's with the average furry price range for commissions or pictures.
You are correct that congestion doesn't apply to everyone, but the majority of artists I've seen or been around are cluttered/messy organizers. They have things scattered everywhere, but they know exactly where the objects they need are.
OK, you're not making a lot of sense any more. You seem to be confusing people who make art to sell and those who just want to print stuff out for their own personal use, for example print out a reference sheet to show to an artist.
The original point still stands. Traditional art does not incur significantly higher costs than digital art. For high quality prints, which are a must for any artist trying to sell their art, the costs are about the same, maybe even higher.
I know this because I have a high-end printer that uses a six ink system. Replacement cartridges are a very significant cost.
The original point still stands. Traditional art does not incur significantly higher costs than digital art. For high quality prints, which are a must for any artist trying to sell their art, the costs are about the same, maybe even higher.
I know this because I have a high-end printer that uses a six ink system. Replacement cartridges are a very significant cost.
1300? your nuts, you can get a new photoshop quality hp or dell printer for about 250 dollars.
the $1300 quote specifically was mentioned for the 11*14 size format of printing, which you can't get at all cheaper, it's really frustrating.
that is if you print that big though, a large percentage of furry artists just send there work online, which saves the cost of having a printer like that.
....That's kindof the point of why I mentioned it? I stated that a printer of similar quality to one at a staples/kinkos/etc. would cost something in that range whereas you can get prints printed at locations as mentioned, for a few bucks. It was mentioned to point out that a decent printer cannot be gained for $50-$60 for ideal sellable print quality.
Instead of just talking after reading a few keywords, try reading the entire thing, or don't comment at all.
Instead of just talking after reading a few keywords, try reading the entire thing, or don't comment at all.
most furry artists do not do ideal sellable print quality, they send them over digitally. Which eliminates the need to even bring up large prints like that.
11*14 isn't large. 18*20 starts to be large. 20*30 is large.
most furry artists also aren't trying to do commissions and art as a professional income kind of job. For those that are, this number matters. Context.
Also, why the hell are you bothering to reply 3 months after the fact? That unnecessarily riles people up.
For the record, people don't print out prints for individual commissioners, typically. Yes, most stuff is sent digitally. Prints, however, are usually made to be sold at conventions. So, the persons who NEED the larger printers are the ones who are usually quite serious on a professional level about doing art for a living. Most furry artists aren't the subject of my points.
Please stop now.
most furry artists also aren't trying to do commissions and art as a professional income kind of job. For those that are, this number matters. Context.
Also, why the hell are you bothering to reply 3 months after the fact? That unnecessarily riles people up.
For the record, people don't print out prints for individual commissioners, typically. Yes, most stuff is sent digitally. Prints, however, are usually made to be sold at conventions. So, the persons who NEED the larger printers are the ones who are usually quite serious on a professional level about doing art for a living. Most furry artists aren't the subject of my points.
Please stop now.
funny, the person you where arguing against before was talking about all artists in general.
However the original topic in general, rukis' picture, is referencing people's complaint of high prices, which come with being more serious professionals taking commissions. Not the average furry artist. He was mistaken in his original assumption of context. Anyway, I won't be replying anymore since you've unnecessarily drawn this out.
All I know is that everyone deserves a good livable wage no matter what they do. Even if digital art isn't as expensive as traditional (I mostly agree with you on that one, after spending a ton of cash getting my boyfriend set up to do mere sketches at Anthrocon!), it's still hard work.
Rukis took a really long time and a shitton of effort to get to where she is today, so I think she deserves well over minimum wage if you ask me. Typical designer work goes for $23-$40 an hour, and if you keep in mind that Rukis is a self-made businessperson who doesn't get any health care or other employment benefits, not as much as you may think is going directly to her compared to a traditional job.
Rukis took a really long time and a shitton of effort to get to where she is today, so I think she deserves well over minimum wage if you ask me. Typical designer work goes for $23-$40 an hour, and if you keep in mind that Rukis is a self-made businessperson who doesn't get any health care or other employment benefits, not as much as you may think is going directly to her compared to a traditional job.
Which, is again, why most furry artists have day jobs on the side. It's their choice to live the life of an artist. No one said it'd be a cakewalk and instant fame and fortune doesn't come with an overabundance of talent in a saturated field.
Art can be a passion, a main source of income, but you should be prepared for the hard time.
Art can be a passion, a main source of income, but you should be prepared for the hard time.
Indeed. That's why I get frustrated when every furry artist thinks they deserve professional industry rates.
First, they need to be prepared to be extremely professional, themselves. This means deadlines, standards, tons of revisions, and putting up with difficult customers without throwing a tantrum.
Then they need to be prepared to draw the same thing over and over and over only to be told that maybe the second of seventeen versions was the best version. Then they give up the rights to their work and the character they created, only to have the corporation make 100 times more money back on their work.
What ticks me off is that certain furry artists seem to think that they can have open contempt for the consumer and demand $40 an hour when they are constantly having excuses for delaying stuff. A professional who comes up with excuses would be out the door in ten minutes.
First, they need to be prepared to be extremely professional, themselves. This means deadlines, standards, tons of revisions, and putting up with difficult customers without throwing a tantrum.
Then they need to be prepared to draw the same thing over and over and over only to be told that maybe the second of seventeen versions was the best version. Then they give up the rights to their work and the character they created, only to have the corporation make 100 times more money back on their work.
What ticks me off is that certain furry artists seem to think that they can have open contempt for the consumer and demand $40 an hour when they are constantly having excuses for delaying stuff. A professional who comes up with excuses would be out the door in ten minutes.
Faved xD This is incredibly true. I don't make enough money to commission people all the time...but when I can, I do, and I don't mind doing the expensive stuff because artists have bills to pay too!
I'm a strong believer in paying full price for art I want and going above the norm for people whom this is their livelihood. And if an artists go the extra mile on my behalf I'll always do my best to best to make it truly worth the time they spent.
I dunno if it is the exact same pose, but I love the point.
Thank you for having the idea and sharing it.
Thank you for having the idea and sharing it.
No kidding, there aren't as many gifted artists out there for sure and many don't even appreciate the work that goes into this. You pretty much hit the nail on the head, Man I'd love to see more of these memes
as a full time furry artist I barely make minimum wage and have no benefits or anything like that. tho I am thankful every day I get to do what I love for a living.
There are some of us who actually barely have enough money to buy a discount priced candy bar.Also it kind of sucks having every artist in the world ask for a ref any time there is some sort of major discount or raffle. Some us try and get these commissions because we suck at drawing in the first place. Any attempts we could possibly make at a visual ref are laughable and you can't even use a character who kind of looks like yours. Now imagine that and all your income goes to your bills, trying to make sure you have enough to eat, pay rent, and your job isn't exactly getting you six digits. There are indeed paintings I would spend fifty bucks a print for.However, when that fifty bucks goes to making sure you have at least a stash of whatever shitty instant food that keeps you alive you can't spend that much on a piece of art because you are on the very edge of plummeting of the edge. For example, that fifty bucks will likely go to the electricity that powers the computer you are looking at this stuff on. Then if you want to try and copyright it, you have to spend more cash.
That's why art is a luxury material. One would hope the costs of living come first before luxuries, but where one may be struggling to buy said artwork the artist could very well be making a living off selling their artwork.
Sadly, that means you'll have to do without art until you make a better living. I've had to do that several times. That being said, I do wish you well in finding a more comfortable income, because the point is that everyone deserves to have more money, just as artists deserve to be paid better.
Fur Affinity is full of non-contributing sponges just trying to fleece the system, you say?
Tell me more about those emergency commissions you're offering.
Tell me more about those emergency commissions you're offering.
I'm not really understanding what the whole Drama is, Can someone break it down for me?
Where do you see a drama in such simple 'meme' question? :)
its not drama, just rukis being her over bloated egotistical self.
FA is toxic for artists.
Most artists on this site undersell themselves. This makes it hard for other artists to have decent prices. Then you have a large portion of the userbase who feels like they deserve all the art without paying too much for it.
The only way you can actually ask reasonable prices here is by being popular enough that the backlash from being both popular and more expensive doesn't dry up your potential client base.
Most artists on this site undersell themselves. This makes it hard for other artists to have decent prices. Then you have a large portion of the userbase who feels like they deserve all the art without paying too much for it.
The only way you can actually ask reasonable prices here is by being popular enough that the backlash from being both popular and more expensive doesn't dry up your potential client base.
That's actually one of the most accurate things I've read. I'm a hobby artist, so I really hadn't thought of that. But from what I've see, you're absolutely right.
For what it is worth, some artists do charge to much. i came across one was was chargeing 500 british pounds for a full colour comission. thats almost 2 months rent where i live.
Charge too much on what YOU think. Artists off of FA charge thousands of dollars/pounds for a non custom piece. Half the time they're prints. Go to an art fair, or check things online. Just because you think it is too much, based on your current situation, does not make it so. Your opinions, while you are entitled to them, are not the law. You can't magically decide when something is too much money. Like I said above, I see people spending a hundred dollars on a dinner for two at five star restaurants. I think that is way too much, that's grocery money for me for a month! But people have a right to charge what they are worth, and what their clients think they are worth. Though I know you didn't mean to be belittling to artists with your comment, your comment and stance here is exactly causes artists to undervalue themselves, and cause others to believe they are entitled to art for next to nothing.
I guess some people just worry that if we went by this "professional standard", then every artist would be charging $40 an hour.
I understand that, I myself get commissions and I am always searching for good deals from good artists. But unfortunately a lot of artists undersell themselves and though it helps commissioners, it hurts the artist. I see people sell themselves for $4 an hour sometimes. I probably make around 7-8$ an hour, depending. I do it in my free time, so it's no skin off my back. But to all those artists who want to make this a career, it's not going to help them out. The hobby artists (myself included) are hurting the professional side of it because people see a piece of fully rendered art for $30 and then feel they are entitled to good things for cheap prices. Just like those indian companies out there who have sites full of logos that a bunch of underpaid workers shell out are hurting website developers and graphics designers. It makes the public eye think it should be less, thus becoming an entitled mentality.
Completely agreed. No matter what you do for a living, even if it's enjoyable, everyone deserves a fair and livable wage. It can differ from person to person but it typically starts at $15 an hour as far as I'm concerned.
Just so I'm not completely misunderstood, all of my comments are that artists deserve good wages, but also that the professional industry is a double edged sword and that an artist needs to EARN that position, not automatically expect that money from people before being ready for what the professional life entails.
Just so I'm not completely misunderstood, all of my comments are that artists deserve good wages, but also that the professional industry is a double edged sword and that an artist needs to EARN that position, not automatically expect that money from people before being ready for what the professional life entails.
haha This is great. X-D I can't wait to see some of the other ideas you have for it.
Might you post the text-less version for other people to meme?
Might you post the text-less version for other people to meme?
*snickers* Nice.
On that topic, I think people who complain are idiots who haven't a clue the amount of work, time and talent that goes into furry (or any) art. Artists are seldom ever given the proper compensation for their work.
On that topic, I think people who complain are idiots who haven't a clue the amount of work, time and talent that goes into furry (or any) art. Artists are seldom ever given the proper compensation for their work.
I WAN A 14 PAGE DIGITAL COLOR COMIC BUT I ONLY GOT TWO DOLLA
Compared to the professional standard, furry art is pretty cheep actually.
I once suggested to an artist charge $75 for conbadges, that it was too steep a price. I was called 'rude'.
My only intent was perhaps they'd sell more badges at a lower price.. having gone to cons for many years, I know there's lots of very talented artists selling the same kind of art for $20-30 at most. So $75 seemed steep. It's simple market competition. It wasn't 'rude'.
However, art does carry a hefty value, and good art is worth paying a lot of $ for. It's simply a reality that furries tend not to be the wealthiest people around. I think it's fantastic that so many talented artists will create custom works of art for <$100.
My only intent was perhaps they'd sell more badges at a lower price.. having gone to cons for many years, I know there's lots of very talented artists selling the same kind of art for $20-30 at most. So $75 seemed steep. It's simple market competition. It wasn't 'rude'.
However, art does carry a hefty value, and good art is worth paying a lot of $ for. It's simply a reality that furries tend not to be the wealthiest people around. I think it's fantastic that so many talented artists will create custom works of art for <$100.
One thing I've noticed is there is a lot of sensitivity in the air when you start suggesting pricing that does not go in the UP direction. It's common knowledge among actual professionals that you price according to what your peers are charging for similar product/quality not taking into account reputation of course. I have seen some artists flat out say there's no such thing as a 'market' when it comes to commissions. I think those ones might need to go take an economics 101 class honestly. $75 for a conbadge does seem excessive presuming it's just your typical run of the mill 2d art and not something like..engraved or holographic or anything. The $20-$30 price range is typically what I see as well on badge commissions. It's essentially a bust shot with stylized text printed on a small piece of paper or cardstock.
The pay does go up as artists increase in skill and recognition. However, there are market limitations. Conbadges are typically sold at cons, and should be priced to fit within a person's weekend budget.
However, there are many opportunities to sell standard commissions for far more, once an artist has earned their recognition and popularity. I've been a part of this fandom for more than a decade, and I've watched many artists rise from obscurity, to significant success.
Perhaps my comment was taken to suggest the artist can't sell their product for what they think it's worth, but I only meant to suggest the 'conbadge' market is too competitive for those prices.
However, there are many opportunities to sell standard commissions for far more, once an artist has earned their recognition and popularity. I've been a part of this fandom for more than a decade, and I've watched many artists rise from obscurity, to significant success.
Perhaps my comment was taken to suggest the artist can't sell their product for what they think it's worth, but I only meant to suggest the 'conbadge' market is too competitive for those prices.
Precisely. :) Business isn't an easy thing really. I mean it seems simple and all but I think at least with some artists, they need some education in that department because they have a talent, find they can easily make money on it by simply posting an ad online and there we go. You gotta know your markets to be successful in them and clearly you were simply calling attention to a given market and clientele.
It was rude! You basically told me that my time and skills are not worth paying a living wage. I was very frank with you about that. After each con, the market tells me that my prices are just fine, to the point where I slowly raise them as needed. I am very happy with the number of commissions I took from AC. With the higher price, I gladly give a lot of attention and care to the paintings.
I dump a lot of time into each piece. Why, oh why! should I charge less? So I can try to take home dozens of commissions and kill myself trying to complete them for a few bucks? How is that ok??
I'm sorry you got dogpiled into removing your comment from my page, but that was the rest of the market coming in to have a say about it.
I dump a lot of time into each piece. Why, oh why! should I charge less? So I can try to take home dozens of commissions and kill myself trying to complete them for a few bucks? How is that ok??
I'm sorry you got dogpiled into removing your comment from my page, but that was the rest of the market coming in to have a say about it.
Mmm I think that's merely a matter of perspective. From what I see he was merely giving business advice. Not telling you flat out you were wrong for charging the higher price. I mean obviously volume is not your area of concern which is fine and very likely why the higher price worked out for you. But someone chiming in with business advice generally isn't doing it to be rude. If you're happy with the wage you take home at your price level and you're not going around complaining about the lack of work then there you go. It's what works out for you but in this comment you're more or less coming off as insulted that someone would dare suggest a lower price point when a $75 conbadge is not exactly common. This is some of that self-centered attitude we see from certain artists that take it a just a little too passionately rather than merely politely disagree, note that the system as they have it works out for them, thank them for the advice anyway and carry on with your day. There is absolutely no need to simply automatically jump to the conclusion someone is being rude by suggesting a lower price. It's also extremely unprofessional behavior. In business you simply gotta learn that sometimes you just gotta nod your head, agree to disagree politely and move on.
I agree that my prices are uncommonly high. Goodness knows I can't afford it. That is why I offer cheaper art at my table, and I like to offer tiered commissions. That's my business. I stand by my stance that Smbalion's original comment on my page was rude. I don't think it's unprofessional to be blunt. My comment above here is frustrated sadness. Such business advice amounts to me making unlivable wages.
I'm truly sorry if you find me self centered and unprofessional.
I'm truly sorry if you find me self centered and unprofessional.
that.... was maddening to read.
i have nothing of value to add but that. i definitely facepalmed at that shit.
When someone suggests to you that your prices are too high, they're only suggesting. It's up to you whether or not you want to listen to the advice or shrug it off. Taking it completely personal, as an attack, is quite unprofessional and kind of silly. Their word has no effect on how you make your money so... why bother?
I'm incredibly dumfounded.
I'm incredibly dumfounded.
Yup. If only I could learn to my points while being less verbose with wording and examples. :P That's exactly what I was trying to explain.
It's not your product being sold, why should you have the right to barge in with retarded complaints?
I'm guessing you have nothing better to do than reply to almost 8 month old comments?
Yup and tiered commissions are a very good option to have available since it allows you to snag up a commission from someone with limited funds while still ensuring you are paid for your time. I mean you and I think will have to agree to disagree on the rudeness of someone's business advice. I mean this was part of my job with Amazon and I have ran a photography business back when I was into it and built up a small retail store in western WA that I happily sold off for a 3,500% profit. I do actually know what I am talking about. :)
When someone suggests a lower price they're very likely not even aware the wage you make off your work only manages to get you by. They don't know whether or not you are needing clients so you have the money you are wanting. Generally speaking of course, businesses with uncommonly high prices don't usually succeed unless they have a monopoly on a product or service which furry artists even of your caliber do not have have. Regardless however I do recommend caution before being blunt with people who are simply making a suggestion right off the bat. It makes more sense to do so if you have someone coming up to you actually demanding that you lower them or that you should lower a price for them because you already make money and can afford to give them the discount, etc etc.
Also just to clarify, I don't find you as self centered and unprofessional simply because I do not know you well enough to make that call. My statement on that though was more about your reaction to a suggestion someone made with honest good intent behind it who was not saying you're not entitled to a living wage or anything. Just want to make that clear because while customers in general have been known to avoid a business on the first sign of what they perceive as an issue such as an action that does come off as unprofessional, one instance of pushing back bluntly doesn't mean the person is flat out self centered and unprofessional. Ones that constantly display it are and honestly there has been a lot of self-centered and unprofessional behavior displayed by quite a few artists in the furry world who lash out publicly at their consumer base and tend to depend on the "white knights" to justify their actions. I apologize that you were given the wrong impression on what I was trying to explain.
People outright complaining about pricing AND being rude about it is honestly just a fact that comes along with doing business. It's not going to go away. It's SO not limited to the furry world either. Try and take it as a form of critique and just do your thing anyway because in the end people can tell you all they want you are not entitled to earn the money you feel you should because there are those out there who will even complain about FREE things. Some out there honestly do believe that custom art should be 100% free which is laughable to the point of tears. I have noticed that especially in the furry fandom there there is a strong sense of entitlement when it comes to some of the artists and practices that are put in place. Complaints about pricing for example in business standard is not actually deemed to be considered rudeness on part of the customer/patron. Turning it vulgar however does.
In short... too much sensitivity to something that every business deals with at one point or another if not frequently. For example, I feel Tojo's prices are quite excessive for the quality you receive. In my observations her work is heavily derived from Narse's style (not quite so surprising given the two are friends) which I suspect is the prime reason why her work sells for so much. But professional artists I've showed the work to as an example have also agreed the cost is fairly excessive and while I can easily get higher caliber work done, it doesn't negate that the costs are well above the market for something of that level of quality. That's not being rude at all. Rude would be going to her and accusing her plagiarizing Narse's style (throwing out the fact he's helped her in art studies and people tend to derive style and later find their own) in order to gain popularity and increase the value of her work since work by Narse is insanely inaccessible or demanding she lower her prices because I can get higher quality elsewhere and she should cater to my whim. That's the line some people who do complain about prices cross. But merely noting prices are excessive compared to comparable stuff that's out there is not at all rude but merely a sensitivity issue on the side of the artist and the white knights that will defend them no matter what.
Some artists work very slow and cannot compete very well because there's not a proper speed to quality ratio to keep costs down. A friend of mine charges roughly $35 for literally a sketch that's extremely scribbly and in the end looks more like a slightly refined gesture sketch. He has to justify the time he spends and he knows he's extremely slow and cannot speed up. Fortunately for him he has a full time job so he's fine. But some artists are really just flat out too slow to really be viable in the commission market to the point of making a living wage. Some compare themselves to those that have jobs in the industry itself and tend to neglect that those in the industry tend to also work quite fast as it's more or less a requirement for steady employment even when it boils down to fine art quality from my observations and interactions with those that do have high end resumes.
At the end of the day you decide your prices and the client decides whether or not it's worth the money. Beyond the badges I really don't know what your prices are like. Personally I find the cost of the badges to be fair. Most of the inexpensive badges tend to be done digitally and usually those artists have long paid off their tablet whereas with traditional art quality pencils and paper are not cheap. Watercolors are not cheap so with these badges you have an ongoing expense in materials on top of your time. Personally given the quality of some of your pieces (most especially the two underwater scenes involving the wolf) it's clear you know how to do artwork very well to the point of being impressive. Just when it comes to business people sometimes really do just have to grow a thick skin and brush off certain complaints and suggestions they're not fond of.
When someone suggests a lower price they're very likely not even aware the wage you make off your work only manages to get you by. They don't know whether or not you are needing clients so you have the money you are wanting. Generally speaking of course, businesses with uncommonly high prices don't usually succeed unless they have a monopoly on a product or service which furry artists even of your caliber do not have have. Regardless however I do recommend caution before being blunt with people who are simply making a suggestion right off the bat. It makes more sense to do so if you have someone coming up to you actually demanding that you lower them or that you should lower a price for them because you already make money and can afford to give them the discount, etc etc.
Also just to clarify, I don't find you as self centered and unprofessional simply because I do not know you well enough to make that call. My statement on that though was more about your reaction to a suggestion someone made with honest good intent behind it who was not saying you're not entitled to a living wage or anything. Just want to make that clear because while customers in general have been known to avoid a business on the first sign of what they perceive as an issue such as an action that does come off as unprofessional, one instance of pushing back bluntly doesn't mean the person is flat out self centered and unprofessional. Ones that constantly display it are and honestly there has been a lot of self-centered and unprofessional behavior displayed by quite a few artists in the furry world who lash out publicly at their consumer base and tend to depend on the "white knights" to justify their actions. I apologize that you were given the wrong impression on what I was trying to explain.
People outright complaining about pricing AND being rude about it is honestly just a fact that comes along with doing business. It's not going to go away. It's SO not limited to the furry world either. Try and take it as a form of critique and just do your thing anyway because in the end people can tell you all they want you are not entitled to earn the money you feel you should because there are those out there who will even complain about FREE things. Some out there honestly do believe that custom art should be 100% free which is laughable to the point of tears. I have noticed that especially in the furry fandom there there is a strong sense of entitlement when it comes to some of the artists and practices that are put in place. Complaints about pricing for example in business standard is not actually deemed to be considered rudeness on part of the customer/patron. Turning it vulgar however does.
In short... too much sensitivity to something that every business deals with at one point or another if not frequently. For example, I feel Tojo's prices are quite excessive for the quality you receive. In my observations her work is heavily derived from Narse's style (not quite so surprising given the two are friends) which I suspect is the prime reason why her work sells for so much. But professional artists I've showed the work to as an example have also agreed the cost is fairly excessive and while I can easily get higher caliber work done, it doesn't negate that the costs are well above the market for something of that level of quality. That's not being rude at all. Rude would be going to her and accusing her plagiarizing Narse's style (throwing out the fact he's helped her in art studies and people tend to derive style and later find their own) in order to gain popularity and increase the value of her work since work by Narse is insanely inaccessible or demanding she lower her prices because I can get higher quality elsewhere and she should cater to my whim. That's the line some people who do complain about prices cross. But merely noting prices are excessive compared to comparable stuff that's out there is not at all rude but merely a sensitivity issue on the side of the artist and the white knights that will defend them no matter what.
Some artists work very slow and cannot compete very well because there's not a proper speed to quality ratio to keep costs down. A friend of mine charges roughly $35 for literally a sketch that's extremely scribbly and in the end looks more like a slightly refined gesture sketch. He has to justify the time he spends and he knows he's extremely slow and cannot speed up. Fortunately for him he has a full time job so he's fine. But some artists are really just flat out too slow to really be viable in the commission market to the point of making a living wage. Some compare themselves to those that have jobs in the industry itself and tend to neglect that those in the industry tend to also work quite fast as it's more or less a requirement for steady employment even when it boils down to fine art quality from my observations and interactions with those that do have high end resumes.
At the end of the day you decide your prices and the client decides whether or not it's worth the money. Beyond the badges I really don't know what your prices are like. Personally I find the cost of the badges to be fair. Most of the inexpensive badges tend to be done digitally and usually those artists have long paid off their tablet whereas with traditional art quality pencils and paper are not cheap. Watercolors are not cheap so with these badges you have an ongoing expense in materials on top of your time. Personally given the quality of some of your pieces (most especially the two underwater scenes involving the wolf) it's clear you know how to do artwork very well to the point of being impressive. Just when it comes to business people sometimes really do just have to grow a thick skin and brush off certain complaints and suggestions they're not fond of.
If you can't afford your own work, that seems a little odd. But if people are willing to pay your prices, then you are charging just the right amount. :)
Well, I mean I don't have a large budget for luxury items like artwork. c:
I see what you mean, but how would you feel if someone came to your job and told you that you shouldn't be making $20 an hour for your work, you should be making $15 an hour. Your intent may have not been bad, but it really does come off as rude and insulting to another person to say those kinds of things, especially when they did not ask.
Yes however that's also the very nature of business. People go to stores and complain to the clerks about pricing as well. There is a vast difference between being rude and making a suggestion to be more competitive. The point is when you are the one doing business it's usually best to keep your more...negative opinions to yourself especially if someone is not flat out being belligerent about their suggestion either. When you put yourself out there in public view doing business your prices are actually other people's business and one must expect to handle this sort of stuff. It's called customer service. The type of work most of us out there do not like doing. It comes with the territory and unless someone is being belligerent toward you and intending to be condescending that person by definition is not being rude. I've worked CS operations for a very long time to know what does qualify as rude and what qualifies as a mere suggestion. Not to mention I've also assisted in developing policy at Amazon for professional standards of conduct in live chat support with a proven track record for increasing positive response rates. So I am very much qualified to make this assessment.
As a professional one does not take an aggressive stance against someone merely making suggestions in a civil manner. They may feel suggesting a lower price is being rude but in reality no, it's actually not. :) This is an example of doing the big no no of taking it personally. In business professional behavior is keeping negative personal feelings out of the mix. Using your example in which someone comes to the place of employment....If the artist were in an actual job flat out calling a customer/potential customer rude for making a suggestion of lowering prices to a more market standard could have escalated to the point of a write up and in some cases even termination and if they ever did that on a professional contract I can guarantee you there is a very high chance that client would walk away and in the world of the artist, word of mouth can be more damaging than anything since most of the client generation depends on it. The last thing an artist should risk is any remote chance of gaining a bad reputation on something in which they can simply swallow their pride on and merely agree to disagree politely and leave the situation as is. :)
As a professional one does not take an aggressive stance against someone merely making suggestions in a civil manner. They may feel suggesting a lower price is being rude but in reality no, it's actually not. :) This is an example of doing the big no no of taking it personally. In business professional behavior is keeping negative personal feelings out of the mix. Using your example in which someone comes to the place of employment....If the artist were in an actual job flat out calling a customer/potential customer rude for making a suggestion of lowering prices to a more market standard could have escalated to the point of a write up and in some cases even termination and if they ever did that on a professional contract I can guarantee you there is a very high chance that client would walk away and in the world of the artist, word of mouth can be more damaging than anything since most of the client generation depends on it. The last thing an artist should risk is any remote chance of gaining a bad reputation on something in which they can simply swallow their pride on and merely agree to disagree politely and leave the situation as is. :)
Just because you have some experience does not make you qualified to deem what is rude, and what is not. There's a difference between customer service and a person coming up to your business and telling you to charge less. What you see is rude, is not what someone else sees as rude. And if someone tells you they don't like your suggestions, or it isn't appreciated, you should step down. Customer service does not mean groveling to anyone. Customers and clients are the soul and heart of a business, but that does not mean you should let yourself be bullied by them or told you should lower prices. Do you have exactly what you told the artist? Maybe you did not mean it to come off as upsetting, but sometimes things can get lost in translation, especially over text.
One of my good friends is a website designer and coder. He doesn't charge a lot, though his skills are beyond what many people who've been in the business for years can do. He's had people say he should charge less, and he tells them upfront that his prices are fair, and he gets many sales, and will not be lowering them just because one client would like it. Sometimes, self employed people will make agreements and hammer out details, but they will not do so just because one person tells them they're making too much money. That IS rude, even if you don't see it that way.
I think your views are different than mine on what is acceptable to say to someone, even in a business. You can very well tell someone they are being rude, or that they are not being professional with you, even if they are your client. Being mean and aggressive towards them, of course, is a big no no like you said. But it all boils to how the parties are acting. People get thrown out of bars and restaurants (privately owned businesses) for being unruly, rude, and aggressive. I see zero reason why an artist should essentially not be allowed to do the same thing (telling someone they are being rude, block them, or whatever else). I see your point, and to a level I agree with you, but I see it differently than you do.
I see telling someone that they don't deserve as much money is a very rude thing, no matter how well meaning it is. That is not a critique or a helpful suggestion unless the artist/business is suffering. Especially if you're not their client/customer anyway. A person who orders from a restaurant could give tips or leave reviews, and there are sites and write ups and places dedicated to that. You wouldn't go into the kitchen and start complaining to the cook, or sit there and lecture your waitress. Well, you could but that's rather in ill taste and grounds for police to be called for harassment or threatening or disturbing the peace. A person who's never eaten there doesn't really have a right to complain, as they've never gotten anything there. Yes, they can tell others they think it's too much money and they wouldn't spend it. But you wouldn't walk in, tell everyone and the chefs and the manager it's too expensive, and then leave. I see that as essentially what you are doing. I do not see you being a helpful person for those comments, I see you as being rather rude for no reason, and telling someone else what they should and should not charge.
One of my good friends is a website designer and coder. He doesn't charge a lot, though his skills are beyond what many people who've been in the business for years can do. He's had people say he should charge less, and he tells them upfront that his prices are fair, and he gets many sales, and will not be lowering them just because one client would like it. Sometimes, self employed people will make agreements and hammer out details, but they will not do so just because one person tells them they're making too much money. That IS rude, even if you don't see it that way.
I think your views are different than mine on what is acceptable to say to someone, even in a business. You can very well tell someone they are being rude, or that they are not being professional with you, even if they are your client. Being mean and aggressive towards them, of course, is a big no no like you said. But it all boils to how the parties are acting. People get thrown out of bars and restaurants (privately owned businesses) for being unruly, rude, and aggressive. I see zero reason why an artist should essentially not be allowed to do the same thing (telling someone they are being rude, block them, or whatever else). I see your point, and to a level I agree with you, but I see it differently than you do.
I see telling someone that they don't deserve as much money is a very rude thing, no matter how well meaning it is. That is not a critique or a helpful suggestion unless the artist/business is suffering. Especially if you're not their client/customer anyway. A person who orders from a restaurant could give tips or leave reviews, and there are sites and write ups and places dedicated to that. You wouldn't go into the kitchen and start complaining to the cook, or sit there and lecture your waitress. Well, you could but that's rather in ill taste and grounds for police to be called for harassment or threatening or disturbing the peace. A person who's never eaten there doesn't really have a right to complain, as they've never gotten anything there. Yes, they can tell others they think it's too much money and they wouldn't spend it. But you wouldn't walk in, tell everyone and the chefs and the manager it's too expensive, and then leave. I see that as essentially what you are doing. I do not see you being a helpful person for those comments, I see you as being rather rude for no reason, and telling someone else what they should and should not charge.
Actually I would argue that I have significant experience in these matters and it does qualify me to deem what is generally considered rude or not in business. Not to mention that Amazon has been ranked #1 in customer service for years now and I was part of setting the standard in chat support as it rolled out so I have done this in a professional position with a multinational corporation successfully. It was my job to help get the standard put in place to ensure those associates knew when it would be acceptable to argue back and how. Not to mention I do have a strong background in business. :) So I'm going to need to disagree with you on that point.
Also since it appears you have not been following the conversation properly, just to clarify of course I am not the one who had suggested the artist in question reduce the conbadge pricing to a more market standard. The person who suggested it merely did so as a suggestion to increase volume of sales and thus more profit. That is not being rude at all. Going directly to calling that person rude literally is quite unprofessional behavior. See there is a difference that I don't feel you are understanding in my words in which the difference between suggestion and rude because you're automatically going right toward that someone is being aggressive about the suggestion to reduce the pricing to a market standard to increase volume of sales. Typically speaking some are fine with the lower volume and the person who made the suggestion was not aware of that. Now if he did come up there with an attitude about it and flat out told the artist that they don't deserve to earn x amount for their work, then yes that would constitute as being rude. Being unruly in a bar, poor example because it is not rude to throw out someone being unruly. It would however being rude to throw someone out merely because they suggest that your prices which are over 50% higher than everywhere else might benefit from being lowered by attracting more volume. While I do agree with you that perspectives can be different but in business you don't snap right to calling someone rude for making a suggestion in a civil manner. That's the key thing right there. Civil manner. Not being aggressive, not being condescending about it but just civil. The example you used regarding your friend, you've made no mention that he had called those types rude directly to their faces. He simply says his prices are fair and he won't be lowering them. Now if that person continues to press at him and especially uses a more aggressive position about it then yes that's when that person IS in fact being rude and should be called out on it.
The part I also don't feel you are understanding is suggesting someone lower costs to a more market standard for what something is going for doesn't automatically mean that person is saying they don't deserve as much money. On the contrary his suggestion was more to point out a potential for higher profits and more work BUT the artist jumped the gun and went straight to calling him rude for the suggestion because from my understanding it was taken in the context in which you are presently describing. Also, there's an inherent flaw in your example using the restaurant vs the cook scenario. The thing with an artist is they ARE the restaurant and when you do business with the public you will get complaints and you will get suggestions as well as compliments. That's the nature of the beast. Also with artwork, the 'taste' is right there in the artist's gallery and thus people can more or less judge if they deem the work worthy of the price point the artist is asking for.
However again you appear to be confusing complaints with suggestion. If I come up to an artist who is charging a significantly higher cost on conbadges let alone when higher quality ones are available for nearly half the price and then suggest to them politely that they might draw in more profit by bringing down the cost closer to what others are charging (as an FYI, it is pretty much industry standard and common knowledge in the professional world to price similar to what your peers are charging for similar quality/product/etc with the exception of any 'name' or 'brand' that's built up in popularity.) that does not make it proper for the artist to snap back and say I'm being rude. Rude is defined more or less as being coarse, vulgar and conducting oneself in an uncivilized manner. Seeing an unusually high cost on a product and politely suggesting lowering the price may churn out more profit is not either of those. :) However jumping the gun and tossing out a label due to the passionate response someone would have is actually rude. Remember, just because someone might be offended does not automatically make the person that offends them rude. Some people are a little overly sensitive, some simply are reacting out of some form of misunderstanding the context. However in business it's really not justified to be rude at all. That's really just bad business in the end and typically why rude associates tend to be punished if not flat out fired. I agree with you that customer service does not mean groveling 100% of the time but there are times you really do just have to suck it up, swallow your pride and ensure you are conducting yourself in a professional manner. Good customer service is keeping your personal emotions (well, the aggressive/negative ones anyway) OUT of the conversation even when you are being bombarded by rude people.
Part of the problem I see in the furry art world is a strong lack of actual business sense in general which becomes quite obvious with the artists that are quick to express their frustration with clients publicly, display poor financial management and readily ask for donations and emergency commissions while they have a sizable backlog already and keeping people waiting months for a finished piece of work that takes maybe 10 hours at best. So you have examples of poor customer service, poor PR, poor financial management and poor project management. That tends to happen sadly when a hobbyist (or hopeful professional with no background in business) attempts to turn a skill into a business while not treating it like a proper business. The LAST thing a reputable business will do is make public complaints about it's customer base. I mean honestly that's just flat out stupid. You will get your rude customers and you will get those people that will give you suggestions who are simply doing that... making a suggestion which is not being rude so long as they're not being vulgar about it.
So yes, your view is correct in that someone who flat out goes up to an artist and say hey.. you don't deserve to make that much money in those sort of words. Still professionally speaking, it's ill advised to jump right to the rude label in your rebuttal against that person. That's when you do basically what you described as your web designer friend had done. Then if it continues typically it's acceptable to politely note that the person is being rude but keeping a professional demeanor about it or not is going to be the key there. It is very much possible and recommended to keep it professional and simply last word them and if they continue, then end the conversation and block as necessary. However lowering yourself to the belligerent level even when it is justified won't typically gain you anything. It's often best to simply be the bigger person and maintain the professional demeanor in a business discussion whether or not someone's input was wanted in the first place. It's hard because I've personally dealt with customers who I've wanted to reach out and choke to death but you simply cannot do that in a reputable business. In the end it's best to simply kill them with kindness and know when to end the conversation.
Also since it appears you have not been following the conversation properly, just to clarify of course I am not the one who had suggested the artist in question reduce the conbadge pricing to a more market standard. The person who suggested it merely did so as a suggestion to increase volume of sales and thus more profit. That is not being rude at all. Going directly to calling that person rude literally is quite unprofessional behavior. See there is a difference that I don't feel you are understanding in my words in which the difference between suggestion and rude because you're automatically going right toward that someone is being aggressive about the suggestion to reduce the pricing to a market standard to increase volume of sales. Typically speaking some are fine with the lower volume and the person who made the suggestion was not aware of that. Now if he did come up there with an attitude about it and flat out told the artist that they don't deserve to earn x amount for their work, then yes that would constitute as being rude. Being unruly in a bar, poor example because it is not rude to throw out someone being unruly. It would however being rude to throw someone out merely because they suggest that your prices which are over 50% higher than everywhere else might benefit from being lowered by attracting more volume. While I do agree with you that perspectives can be different but in business you don't snap right to calling someone rude for making a suggestion in a civil manner. That's the key thing right there. Civil manner. Not being aggressive, not being condescending about it but just civil. The example you used regarding your friend, you've made no mention that he had called those types rude directly to their faces. He simply says his prices are fair and he won't be lowering them. Now if that person continues to press at him and especially uses a more aggressive position about it then yes that's when that person IS in fact being rude and should be called out on it.
The part I also don't feel you are understanding is suggesting someone lower costs to a more market standard for what something is going for doesn't automatically mean that person is saying they don't deserve as much money. On the contrary his suggestion was more to point out a potential for higher profits and more work BUT the artist jumped the gun and went straight to calling him rude for the suggestion because from my understanding it was taken in the context in which you are presently describing. Also, there's an inherent flaw in your example using the restaurant vs the cook scenario. The thing with an artist is they ARE the restaurant and when you do business with the public you will get complaints and you will get suggestions as well as compliments. That's the nature of the beast. Also with artwork, the 'taste' is right there in the artist's gallery and thus people can more or less judge if they deem the work worthy of the price point the artist is asking for.
However again you appear to be confusing complaints with suggestion. If I come up to an artist who is charging a significantly higher cost on conbadges let alone when higher quality ones are available for nearly half the price and then suggest to them politely that they might draw in more profit by bringing down the cost closer to what others are charging (as an FYI, it is pretty much industry standard and common knowledge in the professional world to price similar to what your peers are charging for similar quality/product/etc with the exception of any 'name' or 'brand' that's built up in popularity.) that does not make it proper for the artist to snap back and say I'm being rude. Rude is defined more or less as being coarse, vulgar and conducting oneself in an uncivilized manner. Seeing an unusually high cost on a product and politely suggesting lowering the price may churn out more profit is not either of those. :) However jumping the gun and tossing out a label due to the passionate response someone would have is actually rude. Remember, just because someone might be offended does not automatically make the person that offends them rude. Some people are a little overly sensitive, some simply are reacting out of some form of misunderstanding the context. However in business it's really not justified to be rude at all. That's really just bad business in the end and typically why rude associates tend to be punished if not flat out fired. I agree with you that customer service does not mean groveling 100% of the time but there are times you really do just have to suck it up, swallow your pride and ensure you are conducting yourself in a professional manner. Good customer service is keeping your personal emotions (well, the aggressive/negative ones anyway) OUT of the conversation even when you are being bombarded by rude people.
Part of the problem I see in the furry art world is a strong lack of actual business sense in general which becomes quite obvious with the artists that are quick to express their frustration with clients publicly, display poor financial management and readily ask for donations and emergency commissions while they have a sizable backlog already and keeping people waiting months for a finished piece of work that takes maybe 10 hours at best. So you have examples of poor customer service, poor PR, poor financial management and poor project management. That tends to happen sadly when a hobbyist (or hopeful professional with no background in business) attempts to turn a skill into a business while not treating it like a proper business. The LAST thing a reputable business will do is make public complaints about it's customer base. I mean honestly that's just flat out stupid. You will get your rude customers and you will get those people that will give you suggestions who are simply doing that... making a suggestion which is not being rude so long as they're not being vulgar about it.
So yes, your view is correct in that someone who flat out goes up to an artist and say hey.. you don't deserve to make that much money in those sort of words. Still professionally speaking, it's ill advised to jump right to the rude label in your rebuttal against that person. That's when you do basically what you described as your web designer friend had done. Then if it continues typically it's acceptable to politely note that the person is being rude but keeping a professional demeanor about it or not is going to be the key there. It is very much possible and recommended to keep it professional and simply last word them and if they continue, then end the conversation and block as necessary. However lowering yourself to the belligerent level even when it is justified won't typically gain you anything. It's often best to simply be the bigger person and maintain the professional demeanor in a business discussion whether or not someone's input was wanted in the first place. It's hard because I've personally dealt with customers who I've wanted to reach out and choke to death but you simply cannot do that in a reputable business. In the end it's best to simply kill them with kindness and know when to end the conversation.
I concede on the first point, but I still think that it's different for everyone. And apologies, I didn't check the usernames and I had a shotty internet connection at the time and wasn't fully loading icons, I got mixed up in who said the comment originally. And now we come to the problem that neither of us saw the way the question was asked, or how the response was. So I can't say whether it came off as rude to you, but to me, I still see it as such.
I see your point, but I don't fully agree. If someone is sad and I tell someone in a civil manner that I say they should consider suicide as an option, in addition to medical help as an option, is that not rude? I think that's pretty damn rude, no matter if the person was being civil about it. Things CAN be rude even when you're acting sincere and polite. I do not think people should go around offering someone business advice when they don't know the situation. So I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with your point. I just think it is in poor taste, unless you're a client giving feedback, a business partner, or someone they directly ask. It's not needed, and even when it's meant to just be a suggestion, not a personal attack, but more of a business model, it's still not wanted often times. I see it as a thing that you could say, but probably shouldn't because it's nothing to do with you. I will just say I think their actions and words were rude, as I'm not saying they're a rude person, just that at the current time it was so. And that's how I see it, you may not. Again, it's all about perspective.
I however, completely agree with the next part. The problem is professionalism is a two way street. And when you have some artists who bring their personal work to journals, to comments, and that, it comes off as very unprofessional. You see the artists here wanted to be treated with respect, and be seen as an actual profession. And it's hard when a lot of them seem to be acting in a very contradictory manner. At the same token, you have commissioners who treat artists with not a single ounce of dignity. A lot of people on both sides are professional, but sadly there are some who are not (popular people worsen this, as people see their bad attitude easier), and they ruin the image and standard for others. I've brought this up to some artists, and sometimes people will argue with me and say they enjoy seeing the artists speak out that way, and seeing the attitude and personality behind the artist. While I, too, enjoy seeing these things, I think there is a time and place. Like, recently someone on this site used their business account to condone abortion, which is an extremely unprofessional thing to do. The problem is this community is so close knit, and we use a single profile for so many things, our business and personal lives often end up tangling together. I'm only a hobby artist, like you've mentioned, and I've been guilty of that. I am very professional with my clients, and always try to keep them up to date, give WIP's, do not put my opinions on their lives or personal tastes. But I still make journals and pictures that are personal, and could very well come off as insulting or in ill taste, business wise.
That said, I 100% agree that an artist should try to remain civil and professional even in the face of someone who is rude and aggressive. Handling the bad clients' attitudes positively is probably the best sign of a good business. Asking them to leave, or escorting them out, or telling them you're not interested in their business if they're going to behave this way are good things. Being personally hurt and beginning to yell back and insult is not. Even if you feel justified because the other party started it, it's still a negative thing. I think we can agree on a lot, but we disagree on what we see is rude. The point I see is different; I see business/sales advice as potentially rude if not asked for, and you do not see it that way unless it is aggressive and hateful. We just have a different interpretation, I think.
I see your point, but I don't fully agree. If someone is sad and I tell someone in a civil manner that I say they should consider suicide as an option, in addition to medical help as an option, is that not rude? I think that's pretty damn rude, no matter if the person was being civil about it. Things CAN be rude even when you're acting sincere and polite. I do not think people should go around offering someone business advice when they don't know the situation. So I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with your point. I just think it is in poor taste, unless you're a client giving feedback, a business partner, or someone they directly ask. It's not needed, and even when it's meant to just be a suggestion, not a personal attack, but more of a business model, it's still not wanted often times. I see it as a thing that you could say, but probably shouldn't because it's nothing to do with you. I will just say I think their actions and words were rude, as I'm not saying they're a rude person, just that at the current time it was so. And that's how I see it, you may not. Again, it's all about perspective.
I however, completely agree with the next part. The problem is professionalism is a two way street. And when you have some artists who bring their personal work to journals, to comments, and that, it comes off as very unprofessional. You see the artists here wanted to be treated with respect, and be seen as an actual profession. And it's hard when a lot of them seem to be acting in a very contradictory manner. At the same token, you have commissioners who treat artists with not a single ounce of dignity. A lot of people on both sides are professional, but sadly there are some who are not (popular people worsen this, as people see their bad attitude easier), and they ruin the image and standard for others. I've brought this up to some artists, and sometimes people will argue with me and say they enjoy seeing the artists speak out that way, and seeing the attitude and personality behind the artist. While I, too, enjoy seeing these things, I think there is a time and place. Like, recently someone on this site used their business account to condone abortion, which is an extremely unprofessional thing to do. The problem is this community is so close knit, and we use a single profile for so many things, our business and personal lives often end up tangling together. I'm only a hobby artist, like you've mentioned, and I've been guilty of that. I am very professional with my clients, and always try to keep them up to date, give WIP's, do not put my opinions on their lives or personal tastes. But I still make journals and pictures that are personal, and could very well come off as insulting or in ill taste, business wise.
That said, I 100% agree that an artist should try to remain civil and professional even in the face of someone who is rude and aggressive. Handling the bad clients' attitudes positively is probably the best sign of a good business. Asking them to leave, or escorting them out, or telling them you're not interested in their business if they're going to behave this way are good things. Being personally hurt and beginning to yell back and insult is not. Even if you feel justified because the other party started it, it's still a negative thing. I think we can agree on a lot, but we disagree on what we see is rude. The point I see is different; I see business/sales advice as potentially rude if not asked for, and you do not see it that way unless it is aggressive and hateful. We just have a different interpretation, I think.
very well thought out response, thanks to you I know two artists I will never commission from, since they take suggestions in a unprofessional manner.
I'm happy you were successful. I assure you, my heart was in the right place. I love this fandom, and all of the talented artists who bring it to life.
I love this fandom too, and I am so thankful for everything it has done for me. :3 I believe you meant well, but it upsets many artists when they are told they charge too much. Believe me, I sometimes see prices (outside the fandom especially) and shake my head in sticker shock, however it's literally not my business to bring it up with the artist!
I wasn't trying to suggest you were charging too much for your art. I've paid more than that for some of my commissions, and I have no regrets in that regard.
My suggestion was based on the presumption that most congoers, at least at furry cons, often attend con with ~$500 spending cash. Conbadges, even very nice ones, typically go for around $30-50, so I felt your price might make it difficult for you to maximize your profits. But as you've stated, you were happy with your sales, so clearly I was wrong.
Almost ironically, I was having this same argument this morning on IRC, but from the other side. Someone was saying some artists charge far too much, and I argued that typical works of art (which sell) will often sell for thousands of dollars. Furries have perhaps grown a bit spoiled by the proliferation of low-cost or free custom artwork. At the same time, selling that low-cost artwork (and by low cost, I mean <$100.) has allowed many furry artists to make a full time career from their passion, which is fantastic.
My suggestion was based on the presumption that most congoers, at least at furry cons, often attend con with ~$500 spending cash. Conbadges, even very nice ones, typically go for around $30-50, so I felt your price might make it difficult for you to maximize your profits. But as you've stated, you were happy with your sales, so clearly I was wrong.
Almost ironically, I was having this same argument this morning on IRC, but from the other side. Someone was saying some artists charge far too much, and I argued that typical works of art (which sell) will often sell for thousands of dollars. Furries have perhaps grown a bit spoiled by the proliferation of low-cost or free custom artwork. At the same time, selling that low-cost artwork (and by low cost, I mean <$100.) has allowed many furry artists to make a full time career from their passion, which is fantastic.
What's worse is the artists coming in with those "reasonable" prices, undercutting the True Artists. Anyone who wants to pay only $30 or less is banned for their mental retardation.
To be frank, unless they asked for advice on their pricing from you, it can be perceived as very rude to solicit your personal opinions on their prices.
As for the argument at hand, yes on the surface, they could make more sales by lowering the price but more sales does not equal more money or necessarily more sound financial sense. If they spend more time making art for less, they are losing money. Besides that, I think most artists course correct if the demand and supply are out of balance and don't usually need random folks advice on the matter. There's a time and place to offer advice and I suspect the time and place you chose was inappropriate and unasked for, even if your intentions were good.
As for the argument at hand, yes on the surface, they could make more sales by lowering the price but more sales does not equal more money or necessarily more sound financial sense. If they spend more time making art for less, they are losing money. Besides that, I think most artists course correct if the demand and supply are out of balance and don't usually need random folks advice on the matter. There's a time and place to offer advice and I suspect the time and place you chose was inappropriate and unasked for, even if your intentions were good.
Thank you! I'm so sick and tired of people who think $25 is too much for inks and flats, digital; or inks and detail, traditional. Don't even get me started on how people start whining when it reaches anything toward $50. -_-'
I think that's the hard reality some artists do not realize. The industry standard also seems to be lowering with more commercial work being outsourced to those that will accept lower pay. They're now feeling the effects of what some of us in the tech industry have felt when our jobs started going to India. Even some of the most talented I've seen on this site don't have much in terms of a commercial portfolio to show for. It's not easy to get into the commercial grade pay. Long time friend of mine works as an animator in Canada and actually is on the payroll with the studio, not merely freelance... he's not exactly rolling in dough. To succeed in the industry you have to be pretty damn good AND fast. Not one or the other. Plus you have to have a style that they're looking for as well.
I do believe an artist should be paid fairly for their time and artists determine what their time is worth via the prices, commissioners determine what the art is worth via their money and there will be clashes since they won't always mesh, especially when you get ones who want something awesome for practically free. Another thing too is (and this is a generalization from my own observations) some artists really don't seem to have a clue about customer service or at least....think they do. Part of doing business is also doing customer service and anyone who has worked in the retail industry knows it's shit work. At Amazon I had to deal with people who bitched and moaned all the frigging time about FREE services and products. It's just all part of doing business and you really do need to grow a thick skin if you're gonna be involved in it. Moreso when you start to directly complain in front of your own clients and potential new ones. Reputation is very important to keeping a steady influx of clients/customers.
I do believe an artist should be paid fairly for their time and artists determine what their time is worth via the prices, commissioners determine what the art is worth via their money and there will be clashes since they won't always mesh, especially when you get ones who want something awesome for practically free. Another thing too is (and this is a generalization from my own observations) some artists really don't seem to have a clue about customer service or at least....think they do. Part of doing business is also doing customer service and anyone who has worked in the retail industry knows it's shit work. At Amazon I had to deal with people who bitched and moaned all the frigging time about FREE services and products. It's just all part of doing business and you really do need to grow a thick skin if you're gonna be involved in it. Moreso when you start to directly complain in front of your own clients and potential new ones. Reputation is very important to keeping a steady influx of clients/customers.
Totally agreed.
For the artists who want industry pay, why not break into the industry? Oh, that's right, because the industry is incredibly difficult to get into. They can't expect industry prices if they're not going to try to break into the industry first, but at the very least they do deserve livable wages if they're doing it as their primary source of income.
But then there are the hobbyists who just do art for fun and a little bit of fun money. They're so passionate about art that they're willing to do great works for very low prices. If they're happy with their low prices, then they become competition for professional artists, like it or not.
For the artists who want industry pay, why not break into the industry? Oh, that's right, because the industry is incredibly difficult to get into. They can't expect industry prices if they're not going to try to break into the industry first, but at the very least they do deserve livable wages if they're doing it as their primary source of income.
But then there are the hobbyists who just do art for fun and a little bit of fun money. They're so passionate about art that they're willing to do great works for very low prices. If they're happy with their low prices, then they become competition for professional artists, like it or not.
Any chance I can Tweet this with a link back here? If you have this on a Twitter, will totally retweet!
Thank you! You've gotten a few proxy faves and retweets already.
https://twitter.com/AlkaniServal/st.....15790548766720
https://twitter.com/AlkaniServal/st.....15790548766720
Oddly enough some of the very good artists who have yet to achieve 'popufur'status charge way less than they could easily do. I have brought this up with some of my favorite ones. even managed to get them to price themselves higher....andsometimes out of my ability to pay. They're worth it, i just can't afford them anymore. So it goes.
I love this, so very much. It's a huge bone of contention with myself as well. I make custom plushies, and I get people fussing that my prices are too high, with a base price of $45 for a Webkin sized critter in fleece. When you take into account almost all marking must be hand applied, we're looking at 5 hours for the labor, and then the cost of supplies for the fleece, the stuffing, but safety eyes and nose, etc.
Bottom line is, people need to learn to grow up a little. If you can't afford a car from a dealership, you don't go into their facility and cry and whine about how their cars are too overpriced at $25,000, that value deflation will make the car worth $17,000 after driving it off the lot at the very least, and it's something sitting in their inventory and wasting their space, and it's not like it's a custom order, and can't they just sell it to you for the $8500 that you have available?
However, on the flipside, with 'dat face', I'd love to see another posted with, "Oh, you made your own fursuit and two friends said it looks great? So yes, tell me the name of your fursuitmaking business again?"
Bottom line is, people need to learn to grow up a little. If you can't afford a car from a dealership, you don't go into their facility and cry and whine about how their cars are too overpriced at $25,000, that value deflation will make the car worth $17,000 after driving it off the lot at the very least, and it's something sitting in their inventory and wasting their space, and it's not like it's a custom order, and can't they just sell it to you for the $8500 that you have available?
However, on the flipside, with 'dat face', I'd love to see another posted with, "Oh, you made your own fursuit and two friends said it looks great? So yes, tell me the name of your fursuitmaking business again?"
I swear to god if I have to give the whole "art is a luxury" speech to a pissed off furry one more time....
thank you so much for making this XD
thank you so much for making this XD
Yup! It technically is defined as a luxury item similar to internet access, non-essential foods and cell phones just to name a couple. It's relatively easy to take your money to a more affordable artist rather than attempt to persuade them out of their pricing by bashing. It's one thing to ask if they'll take a lower price but when they say no.... there's no point in bashing them over it but on the flip side part of doing business is accepting the fact there will always be people that will complain. :) After all people complain about free things. It only makes sense they will complain about things that do cost money.
bwahaha... a new furry meme.. re-fit human memes with furry characters.. =^.^=
Well when I see how much some artist get of some illustrations I do think it's far too much.
Still, if people are ready to pay and are happy with that what's wrong?
Still, if people are ready to pay and are happy with that what's wrong?
ARTISTS NEED TO EAT TOO, WANKERS, AND THEY NEED INSURANCE ON THEIR PORSCHE AS MUCH AS YOU DO, SO CALM YOUR DAMN TITS...
seriously though, what an artist charges is THEIR OWN BUSINESS and if you think an artist charges unfair prices then just fuck off and don't commission them
seriously though, what an artist charges is THEIR OWN BUSINESS and if you think an artist charges unfair prices then just fuck off and don't commission them
This is just too true. And wow, so many comments o.o
Thank you for making me burst out laughing with this picture. I SERIOUSLY needed that this week. :] <3
Artists can charge whatever they want but please be kind to us *walking wallets*. I know a few of us that have been raked to the cleaners by some well known names over art so I can understand a bit of frustration over the art costs too much issue.
I get the other side though..having artists want to haggle for table prices or offer art/stuff for con space. Sucks to say no cause the hotel fees do not take art as payment for the space. Lots of good artists with darn good prices but like shopping for a new car you have to shop around if you want what YOU want as a price YOU can afford.
I happily support this message and art goodness :).
Gaia bless
Pakesh_De
Chaircritter for furnal Equinox
I get the other side though..having artists want to haggle for table prices or offer art/stuff for con space. Sucks to say no cause the hotel fees do not take art as payment for the space. Lots of good artists with darn good prices but like shopping for a new car you have to shop around if you want what YOU want as a price YOU can afford.
I happily support this message and art goodness :).
Gaia bless
Pakesh_De
Chaircritter for furnal Equinox
Pakesh_De? Holy crap that's a name I have not heard of in forever!
I rarely can justify commissioning art, but I can't be a condescending jackass about it to artists. I'm a broke college student - duh I can't justify a whole lot of expenses!
I did think for the longest time that furry art was oddly priced in a high way - I really questioned how one could support oneself fully on furry art.
What really opened my eyes were the YCH auction trends, and the supremely high prices (relative to a student's wallet) they were going for.
None of those prices are set by the artist. They're purley set by the open market. And it just goes to show, there's significant demand and significant investment by some, and that does validate how high the prices are for some artists.
But like all things, each individual artists' work is going to be worth more or less. The few times I've spent the money to commission, an artist's set price did make a difference in how I planned out my commissions. I'm sure those artists found commissioners, but those who priced more competitively won my business.
I did think for the longest time that furry art was oddly priced in a high way - I really questioned how one could support oneself fully on furry art.
What really opened my eyes were the YCH auction trends, and the supremely high prices (relative to a student's wallet) they were going for.
None of those prices are set by the artist. They're purley set by the open market. And it just goes to show, there's significant demand and significant investment by some, and that does validate how high the prices are for some artists.
But like all things, each individual artists' work is going to be worth more or less. The few times I've spent the money to commission, an artist's set price did make a difference in how I planned out my commissions. I'm sure those artists found commissioners, but those who priced more competitively won my business.
Rukis: My love for you burns with the white hot intensity of a thousand sun.... thank you for this.
Sigh.
You know, it'd be nice if I had money.
Otherwise, I hate pictures like this, just saying.
You know, it'd be nice if I had money.
Otherwise, I hate pictures like this, just saying.
From experience, it's not that they charge too much in general, it's just that they charge a rate that I personally would be unwilling to pay for a particular piece of art from that artist. I'd pay a lot for your work, for instance, but there are others with less skill (and certainly less attention to details!) that charge a great deal of money.
Then there are people who aren't charging nearly enough for their work, which is equally troublesome for them, I suppose. I'm just glad you don't draw archery much, or I'd be scrambling over myself to shove fistfuls of money at you like Fry. Seriously, not enough archery in the fandom. Not enough archery at all.
Then there are people who aren't charging nearly enough for their work, which is equally troublesome for them, I suppose. I'm just glad you don't draw archery much, or I'd be scrambling over myself to shove fistfuls of money at you like Fry. Seriously, not enough archery in the fandom. Not enough archery at all.
Heck, I see allot of art that is pre-made and sold regularly outside the fandom that is very expensive. I find many furry artists that provide similar or better quality for a similar or lesser price. Let's not forget the kicker that is commissions are something made specifically for me!
lots of people want free art, but it takes years of practice and work to get to that level, your payng for someone's skill lik a JOB. the reality a 10 minute drawing takes up to years of experience to get to that level. anyone who doesn't understand should watch, stephan silver's free art rant, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXYoD7wfOs
Oh wow XD Art is a JOB for some people and they do this JOB to make a living just like any other working person. Artists are going to charge you what they feel their skills are worth and the time they took to work on the piece. A lot of the commissioners out there should feel a bit lucky due to a lot of artists in this community not being that confident in their work and pricing themselves at a low amount. If their were more artists who worked in a professional manner...XD
Let's also not forget competition plays a role in this as well. *nods* Fortunately my art skill is still very, very low but in the long run my main goal is to essentially ensure I undercut the competition at every possible turn. I guess in short I'd be the bad guy in the eyes of those wanting to raise up overall art prices. But I won't know anything until 1. I actually get enough quality in my work to bother uploading. 2. Find out my typical time for commission work come time to take on those and 3, I'm very likely to throw in non-exclusive commercial rights as a freebie. Once I'm done with a piece someone has paid me for, only interest I have in that afterward is ensuring I still get fair use of the work I created. ^_-
True, true *nods* Don't really feel like I up to par enough to do commissions but I hope to one of these day. To be honest I'd probably do the same with my price up to a certain point so I don't feel like I'm cheating myself but yeah understandable to do undercutting ^_^; I wish you luck with your endeavors to improve to become commission worthy in your own eyes. Yeah kind of feel the same on the fair use thing as well just mainly to show what I can do if I really liked the results of said piece.
Holy lord, there are a lot of comments already!
I just gotta say that I sense being born... and all those other ideas you had, you should make them so. :D
I just gotta say that I sense being born... and all those other ideas you had, you should make them so. :D
It just sucks cause I spend 15-20 hours on a drawing. I charge $45 bucks for a fully detailed, include background of choice for free. But I tack on $20 for each extra character.
I haven't gotten a single commission in 2 months since I started posting journals about it. Now I've just given up.
I haven't gotten a single commission in 2 months since I started posting journals about it. Now I've just given up.
Ahh, this conversation again.
First off - here's the Industry Standard vs. Fandom Average link others have been bringing up: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l.....o1_r1_1280.jpg
As far as the conversation as a whole...there's two sides to this. The artist is in the right far more than the commissioner though.
I have no problem paying an artist $100 for a piece. I realize the time, effort, and talent that goes into a work of art. I'm not one of the people that expects a thousand dollar image for 50 bucks. However, there are some circumstances - albeit a very small number of them - in which case an artist may be in the wrong, partially or fully.
The biggest of those is Your Character Here auctions that do not scale upwards with the amount of money spent, where the expected rate the auction would take in is significantly above the artist's standard commission rate. If you normally pull in $100 for a piece and have been doing so for some time, and your YCH pulls in $300, and you're not offering to do three pages worth of work for that $300, then that's a dick move in my opinion. If your queue is so full up on your standard commissions that those who want to pay you for art can't, then maybe it might be an idea to finish out your queue rather than making the people in queue wait even longer by adding in an overpriced YCH?
Even outside of YCH, non-ladder auctions are ridiculous as a whole. There's the argument that that's what people are willing to pay, but on the flip side of that, that's what people are willing to pay only when they know that's their one and only chance to get something from an artist and thus have to beat out multiple other people for the "privelege" of purchasing. There's a different mindset when it comes to bidding on something as opposed to making a purchase that only serves to drive the price above and beyond fair market value.
There's also the nagging feeling in the back of my head about someone charging $40 tax per hour (an artist who actually collects and self-reports sales tax on commissions outside of a convention? o.o;) when people that seek to commission them are making less than a third of that. Is that selfish? Probably. I realize I'm most likely on the wrong side of that one particular point, but it's something that popped into my head. But if they're keeping that rate consistent, it's miles above having to deal with the bullshit that is non-ladder YCH.
One other gripe I have, though I know this one won't get as much support, is what happens with an artist who puts out an art CD using mainly commissioned works, and does not kick back a portion of the net proceeds to the commissionees in the form of "store credit" against future commissions.
If an art CD is sold for $20, but the net profit on each CD sold is $15, and let's say 50% of that is an artist's own work that wasn't commissioned, and 50% of it is commission stuff...then $7.50 of each CD's sales should be getting divided up amongst those who commissioned that artwork in the form of a future discount. This way the artist doesn't have to give those people any money outright, but it shows at least some kind of appreciation that it was those commissions that are what's bringing enough attention to an artist to be able to sell a CD in the first place.
On the flip side of that, there are artists that are severely underpricing themselves for what they're capable of, and even disregarding the potential that has to lower the market value for other artists, there's still the issue of an individual artist's queue getting out of hand at their current wage. I know one guy - great guy, extremely talented, number one at his particular kink of choice...he's probably got 6-12 months worth of backlog (though he hasn't taken money from those in the backlog.) Such an artist most likely needs to raise their price so supply can get closer to meeting demand.
Additionally, I don't expect an artist to work for below or at minimum wage. If an artist is listing their rate at $100 a piece, but it's taking them 10 hours to do the piece, then they're doing you a favor and you should be grateful to only pay $100.
There are other scenarios in which someone should be happy to pay a good, solid wage for a piece of art. Did an artist bust their butt to make sure you had a specific piece done by someone's birthday or other gift occasion? That should be considered even if the artist in question doesn't charge a rush fee outright. Is the artist you're commissioning the number one known artist for the particular piece you're getting done, to the point where it's going to get you attention that you never would have received without it? Factor that into the price even if it's going to push it above what you'd initially think "fair". The commission that put me "out there" as far as people knowing about my 'sona was a $200 commission and it's paid for itself several times over, not financially so much but it's led me to be recognizable within the group of people I want to be recognizable in. Is your commission putting a message out there that might get people to consider a point you've been trying to make? That should be considered and factored in as well!
TL;DR; both commissioners and artists can be dicks. It's usually the commissioners but people should be called out on dick moves on both sides.
First off - here's the Industry Standard vs. Fandom Average link others have been bringing up: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l.....o1_r1_1280.jpg
As far as the conversation as a whole...there's two sides to this. The artist is in the right far more than the commissioner though.
I have no problem paying an artist $100 for a piece. I realize the time, effort, and talent that goes into a work of art. I'm not one of the people that expects a thousand dollar image for 50 bucks. However, there are some circumstances - albeit a very small number of them - in which case an artist may be in the wrong, partially or fully.
The biggest of those is Your Character Here auctions that do not scale upwards with the amount of money spent, where the expected rate the auction would take in is significantly above the artist's standard commission rate. If you normally pull in $100 for a piece and have been doing so for some time, and your YCH pulls in $300, and you're not offering to do three pages worth of work for that $300, then that's a dick move in my opinion. If your queue is so full up on your standard commissions that those who want to pay you for art can't, then maybe it might be an idea to finish out your queue rather than making the people in queue wait even longer by adding in an overpriced YCH?
Even outside of YCH, non-ladder auctions are ridiculous as a whole. There's the argument that that's what people are willing to pay, but on the flip side of that, that's what people are willing to pay only when they know that's their one and only chance to get something from an artist and thus have to beat out multiple other people for the "privelege" of purchasing. There's a different mindset when it comes to bidding on something as opposed to making a purchase that only serves to drive the price above and beyond fair market value.
There's also the nagging feeling in the back of my head about someone charging $40 tax per hour (an artist who actually collects and self-reports sales tax on commissions outside of a convention? o.o;) when people that seek to commission them are making less than a third of that. Is that selfish? Probably. I realize I'm most likely on the wrong side of that one particular point, but it's something that popped into my head. But if they're keeping that rate consistent, it's miles above having to deal with the bullshit that is non-ladder YCH.
One other gripe I have, though I know this one won't get as much support, is what happens with an artist who puts out an art CD using mainly commissioned works, and does not kick back a portion of the net proceeds to the commissionees in the form of "store credit" against future commissions.
If an art CD is sold for $20, but the net profit on each CD sold is $15, and let's say 50% of that is an artist's own work that wasn't commissioned, and 50% of it is commission stuff...then $7.50 of each CD's sales should be getting divided up amongst those who commissioned that artwork in the form of a future discount. This way the artist doesn't have to give those people any money outright, but it shows at least some kind of appreciation that it was those commissions that are what's bringing enough attention to an artist to be able to sell a CD in the first place.
On the flip side of that, there are artists that are severely underpricing themselves for what they're capable of, and even disregarding the potential that has to lower the market value for other artists, there's still the issue of an individual artist's queue getting out of hand at their current wage. I know one guy - great guy, extremely talented, number one at his particular kink of choice...he's probably got 6-12 months worth of backlog (though he hasn't taken money from those in the backlog.) Such an artist most likely needs to raise their price so supply can get closer to meeting demand.
Additionally, I don't expect an artist to work for below or at minimum wage. If an artist is listing their rate at $100 a piece, but it's taking them 10 hours to do the piece, then they're doing you a favor and you should be grateful to only pay $100.
There are other scenarios in which someone should be happy to pay a good, solid wage for a piece of art. Did an artist bust their butt to make sure you had a specific piece done by someone's birthday or other gift occasion? That should be considered even if the artist in question doesn't charge a rush fee outright. Is the artist you're commissioning the number one known artist for the particular piece you're getting done, to the point where it's going to get you attention that you never would have received without it? Factor that into the price even if it's going to push it above what you'd initially think "fair". The commission that put me "out there" as far as people knowing about my 'sona was a $200 commission and it's paid for itself several times over, not financially so much but it's led me to be recognizable within the group of people I want to be recognizable in. Is your commission putting a message out there that might get people to consider a point you've been trying to make? That should be considered and factored in as well!
TL;DR; both commissioners and artists can be dicks. It's usually the commissioners but people should be called out on dick moves on both sides.
That pretty much hits the spot I would say. Personally I try and avoid artists who will use my commission on an art CD or art pack. For some reason that really does bother me that I've paid them to create something then they turn around and basically make a commercial product out of it using my intellectual property (the character and/or idea of the scene being rendered in the artwork). Commissioners as well really need to search for the artist's TOS and ensure they understand every part of it. Sure some clauses might be illegal and non-enforceable but that still requires a fight and probably going to court if the artist is not willing to budge. Some I'm sure are fine with it but some of us really aren't because outside of the money I paid to have the work created I abhor the idea of someone making money off of my property, let alone when there is no form of kickback whatsoever.
But yeah there's dicks on both sides of this fence.
But yeah there's dicks on both sides of this fence.
Basically the guy who I know put high-res of a comic that was done for me on his CD, I was happy to have there, and the fact that an image he did for me as Iron Artist was featured as something in his portfolio book on his table, I was delighted with. Having said that I would hope the guy gives me a little price break when I go to commission him next. If he does that, all's well.
Exactly. It's a little something to show the appreciation that your money help fund him to be able to create... to be able to ultimately sell.
Mere ideas are not intellectual property, this includes ideas of scenes for rendering in pictures. When the artist turns it into a picture, the picture that contains the idea is intellectual property, but never the idea alone. And characters in the fandom are rarely distinctive enough to be copyrightable.
If you bring the issue to court, you are only entitled --at most-- to the money you didn't earn that you can prove rightfully should have been yours. Make the calculations to determine if it is worth going to court for a fraction of the earnings of a furry art CD.
And most importantly, if the artist made clear in the TOS that he could use his commissions at a later time to make a CD and the commissioner is accepting that, then the artist is the one completely in the right; the only thing the commissioner can do is vote with his wallet and hire someone else.
If you bring the issue to court, you are only entitled --at most-- to the money you didn't earn that you can prove rightfully should have been yours. Make the calculations to determine if it is worth going to court for a fraction of the earnings of a furry art CD.
And most importantly, if the artist made clear in the TOS that he could use his commissions at a later time to make a CD and the commissioner is accepting that, then the artist is the one completely in the right; the only thing the commissioner can do is vote with his wallet and hire someone else.
You would honestly be surprised at what's copyrightable. Characters are actually relatively easy to copyright and typically conflicts that arise from someone making commercial use of someone else's property that is in a commissioned work doesn't automatically mean the artist will be in the right in every situation.
It's also important to be aware that not every clause in a TOS may be legally enforceable as well. Copyright law varies depending on where you at and in some cases have additional protections that vary at the state, county and even city levels. Just because you write it, doesn't make it so. This is why IP laws tend to be more or less open to interpretation and are very complex overall. Each case seen by a court is more or less judged on the situation itself. Also you can simply include court costs and attorney fees in the lawsuit. Fortunately though I do make it crystal clear to an artist I commission that they do not have my authorization to use anything containing my property (my character for example) for a commercial product which since communication is always in text... I have their agreement to it in writing and since my character is a registered copyright any violation of it of course means I would be entitled to court costs, attorney fees, punitive damages and a cease and desist order all of which would quite possibly bankrupt your typical furry artist. Copyright law really is in no way cut and dry as furries have this habit of believing and very often any dispute that the two parties will not simply agree on usually winds up with a judge having the final say which of course is all situational and weighing the rights of the client and artist for their given locale. It really does get fairly messy and complex which is why I simply avoid artists known for making a commercial product from work I've paid them to create. Things get further complex when you start involving commercial use.
But that aside my main issue of course tends to be with artists who automatically assume they have full exclusive rights on works they were paid to do that are not part of the guidelines under the Work for Hire clause in US Copyright law and the presumption that just because it's in writing means it's enforceable. Anytime you write a TOS especially when it involves anything having to do with copyright it's best to actually hire a lawyer to look at it and ensure everything is accurate and enforceable. However with the common 'starving artist' mentality that's seen here it would be a safe assumption to make that those who have written up a TOS did not have it verified through a lawyer that specializes in contracts and copyright law.
But yes, among furries in general the area of copyright tends to be a strong area of heated debate so to avoid it, this is my only comment on the matter. :)
It's also important to be aware that not every clause in a TOS may be legally enforceable as well. Copyright law varies depending on where you at and in some cases have additional protections that vary at the state, county and even city levels. Just because you write it, doesn't make it so. This is why IP laws tend to be more or less open to interpretation and are very complex overall. Each case seen by a court is more or less judged on the situation itself. Also you can simply include court costs and attorney fees in the lawsuit. Fortunately though I do make it crystal clear to an artist I commission that they do not have my authorization to use anything containing my property (my character for example) for a commercial product which since communication is always in text... I have their agreement to it in writing and since my character is a registered copyright any violation of it of course means I would be entitled to court costs, attorney fees, punitive damages and a cease and desist order all of which would quite possibly bankrupt your typical furry artist. Copyright law really is in no way cut and dry as furries have this habit of believing and very often any dispute that the two parties will not simply agree on usually winds up with a judge having the final say which of course is all situational and weighing the rights of the client and artist for their given locale. It really does get fairly messy and complex which is why I simply avoid artists known for making a commercial product from work I've paid them to create. Things get further complex when you start involving commercial use.
But that aside my main issue of course tends to be with artists who automatically assume they have full exclusive rights on works they were paid to do that are not part of the guidelines under the Work for Hire clause in US Copyright law and the presumption that just because it's in writing means it's enforceable. Anytime you write a TOS especially when it involves anything having to do with copyright it's best to actually hire a lawyer to look at it and ensure everything is accurate and enforceable. However with the common 'starving artist' mentality that's seen here it would be a safe assumption to make that those who have written up a TOS did not have it verified through a lawyer that specializes in contracts and copyright law.
But yes, among furries in general the area of copyright tends to be a strong area of heated debate so to avoid it, this is my only comment on the matter. :)
I have studied copyright law for two years, formally, after I graduated; I would honestly _not_ be surprised at what's copyrighteable.
I agree with the rest. Over and out.
I agree with the rest. Over and out.
You've got a lot of good points there, but this one is kind of sticking out to me:
There's also the nagging feeling in the back of my head about someone charging $40 tax per hour (an artist who actually collects and self-reports sales tax on commissions outside of a convention? o.o;) when people that seek to commission them are making less than a third of that. Is that selfish? Probably. I realize I'm most likely on the wrong side of that one particular point, but it's something that popped into my head.
I see where you're going with this, but I can't really call that selfish. Like a lot of other folks here have pointed out, art is a luxury item, and it doesn't have to be set at a price that everyone is easily able to afford. There's a lot of factors that an artist has to consider when they're determining their prices. Traditional work vs. digital, how quickly they can finish a piece, and--especially for some of the more popular artists out there--how much demand there is for their work. There's a point you hit when people are asking for more art than you're capable of producing, and it does drive prices up. Supply and demand and all that. That's all the artist's business. And it's the commissioner's business how they want to spend their disposable income. The fact that one party may be making more than the other doesn't necessarily mean the relationship is exploitative.
If I work a minimum wage job at McDonald's or wherever, I can save up and go buy a big-screen TV at Wal-Mart. It's probably not the smartest thing to do, but it's my money, and the store has no moral imperative to turn me away or offer me a discount.
There's also the nagging feeling in the back of my head about someone charging $40 tax per hour (an artist who actually collects and self-reports sales tax on commissions outside of a convention? o.o;) when people that seek to commission them are making less than a third of that. Is that selfish? Probably. I realize I'm most likely on the wrong side of that one particular point, but it's something that popped into my head.
I see where you're going with this, but I can't really call that selfish. Like a lot of other folks here have pointed out, art is a luxury item, and it doesn't have to be set at a price that everyone is easily able to afford. There's a lot of factors that an artist has to consider when they're determining their prices. Traditional work vs. digital, how quickly they can finish a piece, and--especially for some of the more popular artists out there--how much demand there is for their work. There's a point you hit when people are asking for more art than you're capable of producing, and it does drive prices up. Supply and demand and all that. That's all the artist's business. And it's the commissioner's business how they want to spend their disposable income. The fact that one party may be making more than the other doesn't necessarily mean the relationship is exploitative.
If I work a minimum wage job at McDonald's or wherever, I can save up and go buy a big-screen TV at Wal-Mart. It's probably not the smartest thing to do, but it's my money, and the store has no moral imperative to turn me away or offer me a discount.
I meant that it was being selfish to a point for me to think that way, about the mental twinge of being iffy on an artist making triple my hourly wage. Not selfish of the artist.
A good portion of freelance artists out there don't really make $40 an hour either. On the downside, the issue with freelance you can go for long periods of time between work. Ironically not all freelance artists get to determine their rates either. They're simply given an offer and they can basically accept or reject. However with more companies that actually hire on the freelancers moving to outsourced labor that doesn't bode well for those that presently enjoy higher wages.
But yup.. artists can price whatever they want. I sure in the hell will come time I get around to doing it. I don't apply the principle of supply and demand to commissioned art as a means of justifying higher costs either. Just means it's possible to actually make more if you really wanted to. With what I've seen people off FA and who actually work in the industry dish out in 1 hour they could severely undercut top end artists here and churn out a hefty profit with a wage in the $100 per hour mark given there isn't really much of a shortage of people who will pay $100 or more for high end art. Problem is not all of them really like furry style art in the first place so don't really do it. More so with the adult stuff.
Then again undercutting artists who appear to be struggling financially even with overall "high cost" commissions would be rather... pissed off I suspect since someone undervaluing themselves will often force prices to be driven in the opposite direction they want them to be. I like to call it the "Wal-Mart effect".. has more of a ring to it.
But yup.. artists can price whatever they want. I sure in the hell will come time I get around to doing it. I don't apply the principle of supply and demand to commissioned art as a means of justifying higher costs either. Just means it's possible to actually make more if you really wanted to. With what I've seen people off FA and who actually work in the industry dish out in 1 hour they could severely undercut top end artists here and churn out a hefty profit with a wage in the $100 per hour mark given there isn't really much of a shortage of people who will pay $100 or more for high end art. Problem is not all of them really like furry style art in the first place so don't really do it. More so with the adult stuff.
Then again undercutting artists who appear to be struggling financially even with overall "high cost" commissions would be rather... pissed off I suspect since someone undervaluing themselves will often force prices to be driven in the opposite direction they want them to be. I like to call it the "Wal-Mart effect".. has more of a ring to it.
Pffff. "Charge to much" my ass.
Professional commission work? In the real world? Get outta here...
Whinyfur: "ZOMG I had to pay that guy $80"
Bznesguy: "Really? An hour?"
Whinyfur: "What? No, for the whole thing."
Bznesguy: "...Seriously?"
Whinyfur: "Yeah, it's totally way to much."
Bznesguy: "Wow thats uh... harsh? So whats this guys number? I have some business cards and brochures that could use 600dpi full color art."
Professional commission work? In the real world? Get outta here...
Whinyfur: "ZOMG I had to pay that guy $80"
Bznesguy: "Really? An hour?"
Whinyfur: "What? No, for the whole thing."
Bznesguy: "...Seriously?"
Whinyfur: "Yeah, it's totally way to much."
Bznesguy: "Wow thats uh... harsh? So whats this guys number? I have some business cards and brochures that could use 600dpi full color art."
This needs to be posted around conventions. Every commission i've had, i've paid the artist an addition tip on top of their charge, to show my appriciation
See it all has to do with the economics of the Haves and the Havenots.
See artists Have art and since lots of furs cant even hold a min wage job because they are expected by their employers to actually work and said furs are not willing to do that they havenot have any money.
Now you understand the economics of the Haves and the Havenots. You understand why they need art and don't expect to pay for it.
See artists Have art and since lots of furs cant even hold a min wage job because they are expected by their employers to actually work and said furs are not willing to do that they havenot have any money.
Now you understand the economics of the Haves and the Havenots. You understand why they need art and don't expect to pay for it.
I remember asking for free art from an artist once. I've felt like a moron about it ever since.
Won't make that mistake again!
Won't make that mistake again!
This is very true, and is why furry artists can't always expect pro industry rates. Also, if they want pro industry rates so badly, why aren't they in the industry? Oh, that's right, because it's extremely difficult to get into! Some artists want all the shortcuts of the industry without the responsibility and competition.
I wish I could fave your comment haha.
Not to mention posts and pictures talking crap about your customers would get you fired if you were part of a company or no recommendations.
Not to mention posts and pictures talking crap about your customers would get you fired if you were part of a company or no recommendations.
And sometimes the industry has an artist draw the same thing twenty times, only to tell the artist that the first or second image was the best one.
Then the artist has to work on that picture a million more times, only to be told that the project was cancelled and they no longer need them. No, they don't get a full refund for that, or any notice, and they're not even allowed to use the character they created that will never be used because it was under contract and does not belong to them. Then good look getting back into the industry!
Industry work (which I have worked in!) can be SOUL-DEVOURING. And most furries aren't even ready for that, so why do they automatically deserve industry rates again?
Then the artist has to work on that picture a million more times, only to be told that the project was cancelled and they no longer need them. No, they don't get a full refund for that, or any notice, and they're not even allowed to use the character they created that will never be used because it was under contract and does not belong to them. Then good look getting back into the industry!
Industry work (which I have worked in!) can be SOUL-DEVOURING. And most furries aren't even ready for that, so why do they automatically deserve industry rates again?
Based on how long it took me to scroll to the bottom of the page here. I have to assume that there is a huge debate going on, probably due to the fact that a majority of the people have not taken an economics class yet.
i understand like some ppl just want free art but some artist do charge too much not all but iv seen some where there art was ok but not like what they charge good i mean like from what iv seen of ur art i would think what you charge is worth it but SOME are way over charged
The art is worth paying for. The issue is that most artists do charge way too much. You being an artist don't understand that
I'd say the opposite is true: most artists charge very little.
and ur an artist correct? thus why you think that.
i think good artists (such as blotch, rukis, blackteagan[now that i think of it im pretty sure its the same two chicks]) can charge whatever they want because their art is beyond amazing. But others who dont draw as amazing and charge roughly the same are just ridiculous. Nuff said
i think good artists (such as blotch, rukis, blackteagan[now that i think of it im pretty sure its the same two chicks]) can charge whatever they want because their art is beyond amazing. But others who dont draw as amazing and charge roughly the same are just ridiculous. Nuff said
No, I think this way because I put several things into consideration. How long did it take the person? What is their quality at? What materials did they use? How do they feel about their own art?
Many artists end up making below minimum wage, which is not at all "over priced". That's under priced. More popular artists are able to up their prices to a reasonable level.
People can charge however much they want. If their stuff is being bought, then that is good. If it's not, then they need to re-think their prices.
You may have this feeling because you can't afford certain art. That just means they are out of YOUR range. They aren't over priced, however.
Someone who may have low quality art, but take 8 hours on a piece should ask for $60, as that is $7.50 an hour which is around minimum wage. That's not a lot.
Many artists end up making below minimum wage, which is not at all "over priced". That's under priced. More popular artists are able to up their prices to a reasonable level.
People can charge however much they want. If their stuff is being bought, then that is good. If it's not, then they need to re-think their prices.
You may have this feeling because you can't afford certain art. That just means they are out of YOUR range. They aren't over priced, however.
Someone who may have low quality art, but take 8 hours on a piece should ask for $60, as that is $7.50 an hour which is around minimum wage. That's not a lot.
out of my price range, cant afford, thats a funny thing to say to a rich person :3
anyway yeah i get what you mean, but art isnt necessarily a job on here, its something people do to make a lil extra cash (though some do do it as a profession and i say good for them they are most likely skilled artists who's art is worth it), minus that a lot of artists do DIGITAL ART so the materials that u proclaim cost so much are free with the click of a mouse, thus making them obtain 60$ times however many people are ordering art, say a good 5-10 people?
thats 300-600 dollars in ur pocket, not to mention that most people pay an extra however much for a second or third character.
anyway yeah i get what you mean, but art isnt necessarily a job on here, its something people do to make a lil extra cash (though some do do it as a profession and i say good for them they are most likely skilled artists who's art is worth it), minus that a lot of artists do DIGITAL ART so the materials that u proclaim cost so much are free with the click of a mouse, thus making them obtain 60$ times however many people are ordering art, say a good 5-10 people?
thats 300-600 dollars in ur pocket, not to mention that most people pay an extra however much for a second or third character.
People deserve that money.
And yes, it is a job. If you are paid to do something, it's a job.
Art is a luxury, please keep that in mind.
And my equation didn't even put in the costs of materials. It was purely on time. Time is valuable.
From what I have been seeing, artists deserve to get more money than they ask for. Lots of artists try to live off of it, so yes, it's VERY underpriced if they have a steady stream of commissions yet still barely make it.
And yes, it is a job. If you are paid to do something, it's a job.
Art is a luxury, please keep that in mind.
And my equation didn't even put in the costs of materials. It was purely on time. Time is valuable.
From what I have been seeing, artists deserve to get more money than they ask for. Lots of artists try to live off of it, so yes, it's VERY underpriced if they have a steady stream of commissions yet still barely make it.
Never said they didnt deserve the money i said its roughly 300-600 in the artists pocket.
Im fully aware being an artist is a real job and that it is a luxury.
Im saying on here it isnt because this isnt a business its a website for art.
And you still aren't understanding me, i have yet to say artists dont deserve money, and i never said they dont deserve mor than what they get paid, and if they are trying to make a living off something they know is underpriced then thats there fault, get a real job or something
Im fully aware being an artist is a real job and that it is a luxury.
Im saying on here it isnt because this isnt a business its a website for art.
And you still aren't understanding me, i have yet to say artists dont deserve money, and i never said they dont deserve mor than what they get paid, and if they are trying to make a living off something they know is underpriced then thats there fault, get a real job or something
Then why are you saying they charge too much? They aren't. You're implying they shouldn't make that much. You are also implying that art is a need because people get upset that they can't afford it.
And "Im fully aware being an artist is a real job and that it is a luxury.
Im saying on here it isnt because this isnt a business its a website for art." contradicts itself. You're saying it's a job, then it isn't because it's on here. ANY time you're given money to do something for someone else, no matter where it is, it's a job. What I do on here IS a job. Some people are getting by on here by doing commissions. It's a job.
If I made money on FB, it would be a job.
If I made money from some other site that isn't business centered, it is a job.
And "Im fully aware being an artist is a real job and that it is a luxury.
Im saying on here it isnt because this isnt a business its a website for art." contradicts itself. You're saying it's a job, then it isn't because it's on here. ANY time you're given money to do something for someone else, no matter where it is, it's a job. What I do on here IS a job. Some people are getting by on here by doing commissions. It's a job.
If I made money on FB, it would be a job.
If I made money from some other site that isn't business centered, it is a job.
And with that you completely lost your argument, if all you can do to respond to someone's really good point is to laugh at them. :3
This has been over and done with for 2 days now, if u read further u will notice one person had no clue what they were talking about when they attempted to get smart with me and the other one made a persuasive argument and then I apologized.
you on the otherhand were in no way involved in this and are trying to start something back up after two days of it laying dormant, so just hush and be about your business.
you on the otherhand were in no way involved in this and are trying to start something back up after two days of it laying dormant, so just hush and be about your business.
um what... Rukis IS an artist. An exceptionally talented one at that. I must ask, are you being a troll or just stupid? because that is the dumbest statement I've seen on here.
actually you did in your comment to the picture itself and i qoute "You being an artist don't understand that" End Quote.
yes, meaning
Rukis being an artist does not understand that to others who do not have a lot of money do not want to spend a crazy amount of money for art
Rukis being an artist does not understand that to others who do not have a lot of money do not want to spend a crazy amount of money for art
It would be best to re-word the things you type, then. You come across as someone saying that artists must lower their prices because those who can't afford it, want it.
We take what you say and go by that.
This is what you said to begin with:
"The art is worth paying for. The issue is that most artists do charge way too much. You being an artist don't understand that "
Because of your second statement, it's not me just assuming, it's your poor word choice. When someone says "artists charge too much", that indicates you want them to lower their prices. You did not say "some people feel that artists charge too much, and that's why they feel upset."
It's completely different.
Then your final statement was hurtful. Most artists on here, from what I see, buy art as well. I buy art. You're assuming we don't understand because we are artists. That's not right...
This is what you said to begin with:
"The art is worth paying for. The issue is that most artists do charge way too much. You being an artist don't understand that "
Because of your second statement, it's not me just assuming, it's your poor word choice. When someone says "artists charge too much", that indicates you want them to lower their prices. You did not say "some people feel that artists charge too much, and that's why they feel upset."
It's completely different.
Then your final statement was hurtful. Most artists on here, from what I see, buy art as well. I buy art. You're assuming we don't understand because we are artists. That's not right...
Yes what i did say was rather hurtful and for that im sorry
I assumed because if i was an artist i wouldnt buy peoples art, i would wanna just make it myself, why waste money on something you can do?
Thats my bad, but at least i have the common decency to apologize.
I assumed because if i was an artist i wouldnt buy peoples art, i would wanna just make it myself, why waste money on something you can do?
Thats my bad, but at least i have the common decency to apologize.
Thank you for understanding why we commented the way we did because of what you said. D:
Buying art from people is so fun and exciting. I enjoy making art for others, but also seeing my characters come to life in a different style is what is so fun. I like to collect art from others when I can.
There are some things other artists can do that I just can't.
Buying art from people is so fun and exciting. I enjoy making art for others, but also seeing my characters come to life in a different style is what is so fun. I like to collect art from others when I can.
There are some things other artists can do that I just can't.
No problem, and hopefully no hard feelings
I myself do spritework and though it takes days to finish even a small non-animated sprite i do them for free (thus why im so naive on the concept)
I prefer to just get art from other artists because i cant draw to save my life though sprites on the otherhand i would like to continue to work on so one day i feel im good enough to actually start charging for them
I myself do spritework and though it takes days to finish even a small non-animated sprite i do them for free (thus why im so naive on the concept)
I prefer to just get art from other artists because i cant draw to save my life though sprites on the otherhand i would like to continue to work on so one day i feel im good enough to actually start charging for them
the better question would be can you read? Because it doesn't say anywhere in there that rukis isnt an artist.
"and ur an artist correct? thus why you think that.
i think good artists (such as blotch, rukis, blackteagan[now that i think of it im pretty sure its the same two chicks]) can charge whatever they want because their art is beyond amazing. But others who dont draw as amazing and charge roughly the same are just ridiculous. Nuff said"
me asking if the person was an artist
and me pointing out that he/she is an amazing artist.
"and ur an artist correct? thus why you think that.
i think good artists (such as blotch, rukis, blackteagan[now that i think of it im pretty sure its the same two chicks]) can charge whatever they want because their art is beyond amazing. But others who dont draw as amazing and charge roughly the same are just ridiculous. Nuff said"
me asking if the person was an artist
and me pointing out that he/she is an amazing artist.
oh hey right, i guess i can't read xD my bad then. Sorry for the misunderstanding xD
i 'thought' i was simply pointing out an idiotic comment... i should go sleep or something. I'm obviously not awake enough to be browsing the internet right now xD
exactly how this all happened to me dude, woke up hung over, saw something i thought i could have my freedom of speech on, got fucked by a bunch of butt hurt artists
Excuse me, that's an extremely ignorant comment.
I'm an artist, but I also get commissions. I have an entire profile dedicated to the art I've gotten. I've spent over $600 in art in the past two years, either on myself or gifts to friends. Telling someone they don't understand buyer and consumer pricing because they sell it is very honestly, showing that you lack understanding. A business HAS to know how to price themselves according to the market, and to others. If they didn't, they wouldn't be able to compete with others, or find a good niche of how much they can charge while still maintaining clientele. If anything, these artists understand their pricing more than you ever will.
That aside, you clearly must not have ever looked at art outside of FA. There's an art fair I've gone to, with hundreds of self employed artists whose skills range from panting, to sculpting, to glass blowing, to photography. I've seen prints of art sell for eight hundred dollars (and have seen people paying that much for them), just at this little public fair, let alone at big art get-togethers where paintings and prints call sell for thousands. Your words and point of view are ignorant on how art works, as a business and as a luxury. You should educate yourself before so blatantly insulting and demeaning others because they make more money than you think they should.
I'm an artist, but I also get commissions. I have an entire profile dedicated to the art I've gotten. I've spent over $600 in art in the past two years, either on myself or gifts to friends. Telling someone they don't understand buyer and consumer pricing because they sell it is very honestly, showing that you lack understanding. A business HAS to know how to price themselves according to the market, and to others. If they didn't, they wouldn't be able to compete with others, or find a good niche of how much they can charge while still maintaining clientele. If anything, these artists understand their pricing more than you ever will.
That aside, you clearly must not have ever looked at art outside of FA. There's an art fair I've gone to, with hundreds of self employed artists whose skills range from panting, to sculpting, to glass blowing, to photography. I've seen prints of art sell for eight hundred dollars (and have seen people paying that much for them), just at this little public fair, let alone at big art get-togethers where paintings and prints call sell for thousands. Your words and point of view are ignorant on how art works, as a business and as a luxury. You should educate yourself before so blatantly insulting and demeaning others because they make more money than you think they should.
You completely ignored the point. It's the same concept, no matter where it is. Art is art, even if it's on FA, and artists here charge very little compared to artists outside of FA. Why does it matter that they're here? It doesn't make their time, skill, or value any less.
Artists on FA are charging chump change compared to other people with jobs, and it doesn't even equate to minimum wage half the time. Charging minimum wage is not overpricing. But I doubt you'll see that, because you are so biased that you can't even understand the points I just made to you.
Artists on FA are charging chump change compared to other people with jobs, and it doesn't even equate to minimum wage half the time. Charging minimum wage is not overpricing. But I doubt you'll see that, because you are so biased that you can't even understand the points I just made to you.
then have them ask for more damn money, i never said they shouldnt do that im simply saying that not all people want to do that.
> "The issue is that most artists do charge way too much"
Those were the words you said in your first post that I had an issue with. It was based on your opinion of how much you think it's worth. That is why I was explaining to you that they really do not charge much, at all, if you look at the bigger picture. They charge nowhere near what artists outside of FA do, and they often times don't even make minimum wage even if the prices seem high, according to hourly wages. For example, $200 may seem like a lot for a piece, but if they're spending 20 hours working on it (which many do) They're getting between 8-10$ an hour, the former being around minimum wage level.
Those were the words you said in your first post that I had an issue with. It was based on your opinion of how much you think it's worth. That is why I was explaining to you that they really do not charge much, at all, if you look at the bigger picture. They charge nowhere near what artists outside of FA do, and they often times don't even make minimum wage even if the prices seem high, according to hourly wages. For example, $200 may seem like a lot for a piece, but if they're spending 20 hours working on it (which many do) They're getting between 8-10$ an hour, the former being around minimum wage level.
Excuse me, lemme add some general knowledge into this fuss -
I do art as a living and thus I earn anywhere between 100-400$ a drawing (or more, depending on subject matter and amount of persons). 600 if the person is claiming rights to the artwork in order to sell/reproduce it.
In the professional art world -which, mind you, I am in- an average artists' pay is about 23$/HR, professionally.
So let's say you spent 8 hours on a drawing today, how much would that net you? $184. How about two days? $368. Not including rights to the image, which should be anywhere between another $100-200.
That means on average I should be earning around $468 per drawing.
Know how much I charge? Usually $100, because people are cheap.
This ends up causing me to go without food for days, maybe a week or longer, because I am 'not worth enough money because it's just art', because somehow my job is worth less to the market than every other job just because I pick up a tablet and draw instead of a keyboard to type out documents.
I do art as a living and thus I earn anywhere between 100-400$ a drawing (or more, depending on subject matter and amount of persons). 600 if the person is claiming rights to the artwork in order to sell/reproduce it.
In the professional art world -which, mind you, I am in- an average artists' pay is about 23$/HR, professionally.
So let's say you spent 8 hours on a drawing today, how much would that net you? $184. How about two days? $368. Not including rights to the image, which should be anywhere between another $100-200.
That means on average I should be earning around $468 per drawing.
Know how much I charge? Usually $100, because people are cheap.
This ends up causing me to go without food for days, maybe a week or longer, because I am 'not worth enough money because it's just art', because somehow my job is worth less to the market than every other job just because I pick up a tablet and draw instead of a keyboard to type out documents.
Good for you dude, by all means if you are pursuing art as a profession then i say do it man.
Though i never said artists aren't worth the money because its just art, i feel that good artists, hell even bad artists deserve all the money they can get, though i do feel that some art is a tid bit overpriced (such as artists who aren't good and they charge more or just as much as a good artist would)
All in all i dont give a damn how much it is that i have to pay because i will still pay it, i just find it ridiculous some times when i see horrible artists charging an absurd amount of money for crummy art.
Though i never said artists aren't worth the money because its just art, i feel that good artists, hell even bad artists deserve all the money they can get, though i do feel that some art is a tid bit overpriced (such as artists who aren't good and they charge more or just as much as a good artist would)
All in all i dont give a damn how much it is that i have to pay because i will still pay it, i just find it ridiculous some times when i see horrible artists charging an absurd amount of money for crummy art.
That makes more sense; when I see these comments they usually mean artists as a whole, not just 'beginning/inexperienced' artists. /:
this comment is actually quite biased. its too much about you, that's just ridicoulous. are you American?that hardly matters, mind you,as so many struggle to find jobs. its not always"people are cheap"or"you aren't worth it"(seriously silly thing to say)its more realistically, a lot of people cannot AFFORD IT. a little courtesy to your customers, instead of viewing them as meisers. I find that just ungrateful. maybe you should make so much more, but if people cannot afford the luxury you offer, then they will mostly not buy it. sorry, that's the world sir or maam. learn to respect the possible situations of your customers instead of bashing them as cheap
It does not matter if I am American, or from Japan, or Germany, or Russia, or the UK. The general wage of professional artists remains about the same.
It shouldn't matter if you can't afford it, no one is demanding you buy their art, if you can't, then don't complain about it and find another artist willing to work until min.wage. I do not see them as 'misers', but rather as CUSTOMERS; which is what they are. Customers. A paying person to receive a product. Do people tell car high quality designers that they should give away cars for 1000$? No, of course not, because they're PAID to do their job of high quality degree, which is to design for a consumer and/or customer, be it commissioned or elsewise.
Are designer clothes to be offered 5 bucks like walmart clothes? No, because the designer was paid a high amount, because he's just that; a high quality designer.
You can opt for the cheaper choice. No one forces you to buy Gucci or a Mercedes, but people do, because they want quality products, which is what these 'expensive' artists are offering. Just the same, no one's forcing you to buy high quality art, or to order from a high priced artist. If you want a low price, then find a lower quality artist. That's just common knowledge of how the world works. You can't buy a computer for 50 bucks and expect it to be top-of-the-line, high quality graphics, and an undamaged case.
You get what you pay for.
I get paid my worth when I open my commissions. It just saddens me that so many artists devalue themselves because many assholes like to tell us 'your art isn't worth that much', or 'you're overcharging'. Which, excuse them, it isn't UP TO THEM how much my art is worth, it's up to my hourly time and how much I see my art to be worth.
It shouldn't matter if you can't afford it, no one is demanding you buy their art, if you can't, then don't complain about it and find another artist willing to work until min.wage. I do not see them as 'misers', but rather as CUSTOMERS; which is what they are. Customers. A paying person to receive a product. Do people tell car high quality designers that they should give away cars for 1000$? No, of course not, because they're PAID to do their job of high quality degree, which is to design for a consumer and/or customer, be it commissioned or elsewise.
Are designer clothes to be offered 5 bucks like walmart clothes? No, because the designer was paid a high amount, because he's just that; a high quality designer.
You can opt for the cheaper choice. No one forces you to buy Gucci or a Mercedes, but people do, because they want quality products, which is what these 'expensive' artists are offering. Just the same, no one's forcing you to buy high quality art, or to order from a high priced artist. If you want a low price, then find a lower quality artist. That's just common knowledge of how the world works. You can't buy a computer for 50 bucks and expect it to be top-of-the-line, high quality graphics, and an undamaged case.
You get what you pay for.
I get paid my worth when I open my commissions. It just saddens me that so many artists devalue themselves because many assholes like to tell us 'your art isn't worth that much', or 'you're overcharging'. Which, excuse them, it isn't UP TO THEM how much my art is worth, it's up to my hourly time and how much I see my art to be worth.
and I don't disagree with you setting your own price, but the level of condencending behavior you put into how you refer to your customers is nothing short of une your words, not mine, when you say they are too cheap, or don't feel your worth your time. those are your exact words, and were I one of your customers, that comment alone would make me look elsewhere for high quality art, cause it says to me what you think of all your customers. I already had this convo with another artist here, and he made perfect sense. im not argueing your self value, this isn't what its about. its about your judgemental behavior of those that pay you is shit. not all those that don't buy you are "cheap"but that's what you said. if they bitch you up, yeah, I get that, your prices are your prices, but making a generality is just plain wrong, and sends a real bad image of your opinion of those that PAY for your comodity. personally, attitude to me is a major, MAJOR PART of my spending. if I am gonna spend 400 for something im just going to look at and enjoy, the least I expect is the person im paying to look well and think well of me, not get bitch slapped when I see a comment like yours of people who pay you
I've never had any complaints from any of my commissioners and many of them remain within contact. I've befriended most of them and many of them are very kind and appreciative, and I vise-versa.
My attitude is toward people who throw tantrums, (insults, defensively attacking artists for their prices, trying to weasel freebies out of them..) about artists' pricing more than 20 bucks for a drawing that takes longer than 2-3 weeks to complete. That's ridiculous and unfair, and frankly, I find THAT more rude than me saying people as a whole are generally cheap.
My attitude is toward people who throw tantrums, (insults, defensively attacking artists for their prices, trying to weasel freebies out of them..) about artists' pricing more than 20 bucks for a drawing that takes longer than 2-3 weeks to complete. That's ridiculous and unfair, and frankly, I find THAT more rude than me saying people as a whole are generally cheap.
I understand your opinion on the freebie shit, and couldn't agree more. if this is a misinterpretation, I sincerely apologize, but to me, it sounded very negative on those that pay you, and all I feel is respect should always be mutual, consumer and producer. that is all. it sounded to me, you had no repect for those who couldn't afford you, but remainded silent, like a majority
I believe there was a misunderstanding. I use my words more bluntly than others do online and it usually comes off very rude when I don't intend for it to.
The only disrespect I have ever had for a customer is when one told me I was 'making up' my grandfather's death to postpone their commission - and even then, I silently blacklisted them, and didn't respond rudely to them. /:
I am greatly thankful for all my customers as they pay for my food and elsewise. And all my followers who support me even if they do not buy a commission - they feel like extended family to me. In no way would I try to attack them. /:
The only disrespect I have ever had for a customer is when one told me I was 'making up' my grandfather's death to postpone their commission - and even then, I silently blacklisted them, and didn't respond rudely to them. /:
I am greatly thankful for all my customers as they pay for my food and elsewise. And all my followers who support me even if they do not buy a commission - they feel like extended family to me. In no way would I try to attack them. /:
well, that makes perfect sense to me. I thought you meant all, because I agree wth the mooches, cause even though I am hardly a profesional artist, I have a relative knack and learn semi quick, and people see it and try to get free art as I am new I think, and I find it insulting. if I offer, of course, but to demand free, like others ask artists to lower prices, is wrong. there are so many, and instead of asking that, there is many other artists, merely move to another, and not bother one who has set a line in the sand
My comment meant more than 'people are cheap in that they will buy for cheap over more reasonable prices', (thus the 100$ instead of 400$) just dumbed down.
Apologies for the misunderstanding.
I've had many people recently attack my art saying it isn't worth the prices I charge, and it begins to miff me when I see people agreeing with the thought that 'artists charge too much', that was my reason for discussion only, not to say everyone is a penny pincher. u ___ u
Apologies for the misunderstanding.
I've had many people recently attack my art saying it isn't worth the prices I charge, and it begins to miff me when I see people agreeing with the thought that 'artists charge too much', that was my reason for discussion only, not to say everyone is a penny pincher. u ___ u
ahhh, so I see, and sorry about that situation. thing is, I find a part of the issue the seeming, well "worship" people have for name artists, as I don't see many complain over, like, wolfynails prices(not to name drop, or anything, he seems to be big around here or something :/ so I figure hes most relatiable to this) but new on the block artists really seem to catch this flack, so I figure bigger your name, less people try to take advantage of it :/ but I could be totally off
Also - I realize you nitpicked at a comment I made about people being cheap - it's true. People are cheap, and thus my work sells better if it's not at the value I should be offering. They will jump at the chance of a discount or a cheaper price, because it's more preferred.
It's not an insult, it's fact of human nature.
People don't like spending money on things they don't feel is worth it. And many times, art isn't worth it, because to them it's not someone sitting at a desk writing out paperwork.
It's not an insult, it's fact of human nature.
People don't like spending money on things they don't feel is worth it. And many times, art isn't worth it, because to them it's not someone sitting at a desk writing out paperwork.
and nitpicked. you have no respect, and justifying it by"people are cheap"is a weak cover for a insulting comment
Hardly the case. You're reading into my words too strongly and seeing something you want to see that is not there.
I have never been rude to any commissioner, and all of them can vouch that for me, and I can send them your way if you really are so strongly convinced I am 'rude' to my customers. Even when customers have outright insulted and attacked me for little reason other than 'I took too long' or 'I forgot a scar', I am always very tame and respect them because they went out of their way to purchase from me.
It's ridiculous to assume I feel all my commissioners are something lousy from one word I opted for over another.
I have never been rude to any commissioner, and all of them can vouch that for me, and I can send them your way if you really are so strongly convinced I am 'rude' to my customers. Even when customers have outright insulted and attacked me for little reason other than 'I took too long' or 'I forgot a scar', I am always very tame and respect them because they went out of their way to purchase from me.
It's ridiculous to assume I feel all my commissioners are something lousy from one word I opted for over another.
well, than I apologize, I did indeed read to srtrongly into your words, and apologize for my coment above
I agreed fully with your rant about pricing. I would love to have several artists to commission. But honestly. I for one would not be comfortable asking for a /cheap/ commission, for I know as a writer how much work goes into making a masterpiece. I can see that artists would have to do the same.
However if I had the money to give for commissions, I would. Right now rent, utilities, food, medical and car is the most critical aspects of my life. Even with my GF's income we still have to budget.
However if one wished a commission, there is the option of saving for it. $150 for example would be about a month's savings for me. But it limits me how many artists I can commission then.
However if I had the money to give for commissions, I would. Right now rent, utilities, food, medical and car is the most critical aspects of my life. Even with my GF's income we still have to budget.
However if one wished a commission, there is the option of saving for it. $150 for example would be about a month's savings for me. But it limits me how many artists I can commission then.
I don't see the big deal. If you cannot afford it, do not buy it. I don't see why this would not apply to artwork commissions.
So there is really no point in getting mad if someone thinks you charge too much. If you can't agree on a price, then just don't take the commission.
That aside, this still made me laugh because the "condescending Wonka" meme has always been a favourite of mine. Great piece.
So there is really no point in getting mad if someone thinks you charge too much. If you can't agree on a price, then just don't take the commission.
That aside, this still made me laugh because the "condescending Wonka" meme has always been a favourite of mine. Great piece.
No, I think the point is more that it is rude when they push unsolicited financial advice on an artist minding their own business. If a customer says they love my art but can't afford it, I don't turn around and tell them maybe they could if they thought about getting a better job. I think it's very much the same in reverse and in the end it's about being polite/respectful and knowing when to stop one's thoughts from proceeding through the door and into the mouth x].
Doesn't it just all fall into opinion, if I feel an artist charges out the ass, then I'm gonna state it, not all the time but certainly when appropriate, and as the above guy said there is no need to get upset just cause 1 person had something to say about your prices.
And if you were to turn around and tell me to get a better job to afford your art, well I would probably laugh because you have a point and it's true. Is it not? Haha
And if you were to turn around and tell me to get a better job to afford your art, well I would probably laugh because you have a point and it's true. Is it not? Haha
In this case it was inappropriate. Do you deem it necessary or appropriate to speak your opinion anytime you have one? If you walk into a grocery store and you think that bottle of milk is too expensive, do you call the manager just to tell them that? To what end? Because I think that's the point here. If the goal of stating your opinion is to help the artist in some way, you want it to be heard and taken into consideration, you will take into consideration how and where you state this opinion. Otherwise you are wasting your breath and stepping on toes unnecessarily which is called being rude and socially awkward.
I wish there was a "like" or "share" button for this. As an artist myself, I feel the same way.
As a buyer and an artist, I have my own opinions for both sides. Overall, yes, just price your pieces and time by what YOU think they're worth. And buyers, if you think the price is worth what you're getting, go for it.
Buyer Opinion:
It's like name brand stuff to me honestly. The more popular the artist, the more they can and likely WILL add to the price. And that's what they need to do to keep from being overburden with commissioners. I don't buy name brand stuff irl, that's just how I am. So I don't go for popular people to commission except on ultra rare occasions (and they never work out. Slots always close or I'm not chosen. =3= )
That's why as a buyer, I will likely go looking for newer artists, OVERSHADOWED artists or artists in need to commission and not harm my wallet. I don't like that people think I won't be getting the same quality as someone who charges $300 for a flat colored piece. Now THAT'S rude. An artist's price doesn't always reflect their skills, but more likely derives from their popularity (if they're able to sell at their price). Out in the professional world (which we only have a little of here), is where you'll find people's prices backed by degrees and skills and such.
Then it just comes down to what you can afford and what you want. I would rather have 10 pieces priced at $10 each instead of getting 1 picture for $100. That's cause MY concerns isn't the name attached to the art or high quality. I just have flexible standards in quality and I'd much rather see my OCs in multiple styles and scenes.
Bottom line: If you want cheap, go for hobbyists instead of "professionals" or "popular". It may take a little more browsing than you like, but you CAN find wonderful quality and super friendly artists for a very affordable price. Leave the professionals alone about 'charging too much', as there's no such thing. Make someone's day by commissioning someone who opens commissions and honestly believes no one will care about them.
Artist Opinion:
LOL BUYERS, WAT R U LOOKIN FOR? ><;
I see so many beautiful artists completely overlooked cause they have no idea how to attract buyers. I'm usually quite modest, but i see people rake in commissions that I know I can do better. I just have nothing backing my name sadly. So I just watch buyers and wonder "what is it that they want that I can't do?" I by no means can blame the artists, I envy what they got going (whatever it is). But buyers? If you're complaining about the price, why? Why is is more important to get a piece done by X well known artist that X hidden artist? Do you need to brag that you got a piece from so-and-so?
I'm constantly monitoring my peer's prices and comparing them to my own. If it's price you want buyers, you can find that price if you just look. I've seen them. No complaining has to be done from either side then. Artists have a right to charge what they want, and you have a right to browse and choose who has what you want... and that goes for price and skills. So really...everything you guys complain about IS ALREADY available to you.
That includes FREE as well.... I see giveaways everywhere. D8
Buyer Opinion:
It's like name brand stuff to me honestly. The more popular the artist, the more they can and likely WILL add to the price. And that's what they need to do to keep from being overburden with commissioners. I don't buy name brand stuff irl, that's just how I am. So I don't go for popular people to commission except on ultra rare occasions (and they never work out. Slots always close or I'm not chosen. =3= )
That's why as a buyer, I will likely go looking for newer artists, OVERSHADOWED artists or artists in need to commission and not harm my wallet. I don't like that people think I won't be getting the same quality as someone who charges $300 for a flat colored piece. Now THAT'S rude. An artist's price doesn't always reflect their skills, but more likely derives from their popularity (if they're able to sell at their price). Out in the professional world (which we only have a little of here), is where you'll find people's prices backed by degrees and skills and such.
Then it just comes down to what you can afford and what you want. I would rather have 10 pieces priced at $10 each instead of getting 1 picture for $100. That's cause MY concerns isn't the name attached to the art or high quality. I just have flexible standards in quality and I'd much rather see my OCs in multiple styles and scenes.
Bottom line: If you want cheap, go for hobbyists instead of "professionals" or "popular". It may take a little more browsing than you like, but you CAN find wonderful quality and super friendly artists for a very affordable price. Leave the professionals alone about 'charging too much', as there's no such thing. Make someone's day by commissioning someone who opens commissions and honestly believes no one will care about them.
Artist Opinion:
LOL BUYERS, WAT R U LOOKIN FOR? ><;
I see so many beautiful artists completely overlooked cause they have no idea how to attract buyers. I'm usually quite modest, but i see people rake in commissions that I know I can do better. I just have nothing backing my name sadly. So I just watch buyers and wonder "what is it that they want that I can't do?" I by no means can blame the artists, I envy what they got going (whatever it is). But buyers? If you're complaining about the price, why? Why is is more important to get a piece done by X well known artist that X hidden artist? Do you need to brag that you got a piece from so-and-so?
I'm constantly monitoring my peer's prices and comparing them to my own. If it's price you want buyers, you can find that price if you just look. I've seen them. No complaining has to be done from either side then. Artists have a right to charge what they want, and you have a right to browse and choose who has what you want... and that goes for price and skills. So really...everything you guys complain about IS ALREADY available to you.
That includes FREE as well.... I see giveaways everywhere. D8
I wish I could plus this to add it to the pic, this is a very fair unbiased view, and I support it =3
Yes, I know what you mean. One of my favorite artists used to do relatively cheap commissions and I got 3 pieces from her for a grand total of $110. Basically $36 a picture, and one was 2 characters with a full background. Late last year her prices were set to triple digits for the type of art I got. I still love her stuff, but I can't bring myself to make that kind of purchase. So I browsed around and found new artists to support within my price range. When they go up, I'll keep repeating my actions. Because that's the needs I have and if anyone should change, its me and not the artist.
There is no official search system but its relatively easy to find artists with good prices. Watch people who advertise a lot or look for commission groups. I buy most of my stuff from DA cause their group system is very easy to navigate. But there are commission groups here to. :3
There is no official search system but its relatively easy to find artists with good prices. Watch people who advertise a lot or look for commission groups. I buy most of my stuff from DA cause their group system is very easy to navigate. But there are commission groups here to. :3
"Do you need to brag that you got a piece from so-and-so?"
^- That.
This... ... Well, this is just a personal observation, some may disagree, and I can't argue with them on that because it's just been my experience, but, quite a few fans seem to form a sort of ... 'Construct', based around one artist or another. I liken it to, somebody who's really lonely, they start following somebody's blog and pretty soon they consider them a friend with out having ever talked to them directly (or rather, they make comments but never get replies from the OP themselves). ~ I'd say, this is usually from the younger members of this fandom, most folks grow out of that pretty darn quick, but sooooome...
Well, I just can't help but wonder, if they pay such exorbitant prices for (quite frankly lack luster) work, because ... they feel it some how brings them closer to actually being legit friends or some such.
~~~ Anyway, me too. There's only a select few high dollar artists I'd ever consider commissioning because I like their style. Currently, there's 2. And it always zings me a little when I see they have slots open, and my empty wallet x3 (Housing, the fact I decided to change careers due to extreme burnout and boredom, I'm not complaining honest!) ... But yeah, I when ever I get the itch to price, I look around for newer artists or folks that seem to have been shuffled under the rug somewhere.
... For one, and this will probably sound purely selfish, but a lot of the "pro artists" I see, produce dull, lifeless, cookie cutter arts which look as if they've been optimized for mass production. (I won't name names, but there's a difference between style, and making every single character look like a generic canine-ish gal with big jugs, and a side or 3/4 profile shot of the same recycled pose :D!) I find newer artists usually want to give it their all, and while they may not be technically perfect, the attention to character detail, and enthusiasm make up for it in my book <3.
^- That.
This... ... Well, this is just a personal observation, some may disagree, and I can't argue with them on that because it's just been my experience, but, quite a few fans seem to form a sort of ... 'Construct', based around one artist or another. I liken it to, somebody who's really lonely, they start following somebody's blog and pretty soon they consider them a friend with out having ever talked to them directly (or rather, they make comments but never get replies from the OP themselves). ~ I'd say, this is usually from the younger members of this fandom, most folks grow out of that pretty darn quick, but sooooome...
Well, I just can't help but wonder, if they pay such exorbitant prices for (quite frankly lack luster) work, because ... they feel it some how brings them closer to actually being legit friends or some such.
~~~ Anyway, me too. There's only a select few high dollar artists I'd ever consider commissioning because I like their style. Currently, there's 2. And it always zings me a little when I see they have slots open, and my empty wallet x3 (Housing, the fact I decided to change careers due to extreme burnout and boredom, I'm not complaining honest!) ... But yeah, I when ever I get the itch to price, I look around for newer artists or folks that seem to have been shuffled under the rug somewhere.
... For one, and this will probably sound purely selfish, but a lot of the "pro artists" I see, produce dull, lifeless, cookie cutter arts which look as if they've been optimized for mass production. (I won't name names, but there's a difference between style, and making every single character look like a generic canine-ish gal with big jugs, and a side or 3/4 profile shot of the same recycled pose :D!) I find newer artists usually want to give it their all, and while they may not be technically perfect, the attention to character detail, and enthusiasm make up for it in my book <3.
I've had hints of the same feelings from my own observations. Especially when I go into a livestream and there's that one crazed fan who has to comment about the artist doing everything so perfectly... even if the artist isn't replying to them at all. I say if we can think it, there's bound to be a person like it. So yeah, even though a lot buy from popular artists cause they honestly liked the art enough for the price, there's also the ones I'm damn positive exist that do it so they can possibly feel closer or better "friends" with the artist. Ones who want to brag about art they got, and ones that are just too lazy/stuck up to look at hidden artists to...
I can name maybe 1 popular artist I'd like art from, and have tried to get art from them just to not be chosen/fast enough for their slots. And honestly, now I'm closed to paying over a certain price for my pieces because I'm not making a constant paycheck anymore. So I'm likely not even going to blink an eye at the next time they're open and just delete the journal. And when I look at some of the pieces I've received for LESS THAN HALF... maybe even less than a 3rd, of what popular artists charge... I don't think I will ever commission one. But, it's me, and I'll be who I am.
As you said, I not only choose hobbyist and new artist for their prices, but because of the flare and effort they clearly throw in. Overall, how GRATEFUL they are when they see you sent them a note titled "Commission". They're always such a pleasure to talk to and work with, and there's nothing "routine" feeling about the way they work. They honest to goodness show they want to leave a lasting impression on you.
"Generic canine girl with big jugs" .... heh, I know what you mean. Cookie cutters. Those who never thought to notice that a wolf and fox don't look alike. Or not all females have huge eyes and full breasts... or not all men have 10" dicks. o___o
I can name maybe 1 popular artist I'd like art from, and have tried to get art from them just to not be chosen/fast enough for their slots. And honestly, now I'm closed to paying over a certain price for my pieces because I'm not making a constant paycheck anymore. So I'm likely not even going to blink an eye at the next time they're open and just delete the journal. And when I look at some of the pieces I've received for LESS THAN HALF... maybe even less than a 3rd, of what popular artists charge... I don't think I will ever commission one. But, it's me, and I'll be who I am.
As you said, I not only choose hobbyist and new artist for their prices, but because of the flare and effort they clearly throw in. Overall, how GRATEFUL they are when they see you sent them a note titled "Commission". They're always such a pleasure to talk to and work with, and there's nothing "routine" feeling about the way they work. They honest to goodness show they want to leave a lasting impression on you.
"Generic canine girl with big jugs" .... heh, I know what you mean. Cookie cutters. Those who never thought to notice that a wolf and fox don't look alike. Or not all females have huge eyes and full breasts... or not all men have 10" dicks. o___o
If anything you are some of the most underpaid talent I've ever seen... I greatly respect what you do for the community and am grateful to have people like you fuel the fandom
Delicate topic!
Personally I think all “trouble” could be resumed in 3 things. Demand, professionalism and target audience!
The first one is simple. If the artist is known he/she will charge more till it reaches a point people will just stop "commissioning" him and he'll need to rethink his fares. Why? Simple as well, there’s more demand… :p
The second one isn't that simple, not everyone is "as professional" as most people claim to be. I remember once a friend told me how an artist worked on a piece he bought and how said artist pretty much did everyone in the professional industry would expect... I mean, she constantly kept sending sketches of "ideas" of the character in different poses and stuff before even doing the final art (so the final piece would be great and she would "understand" what she'll be drawing in the final piece) and how she respected the timelines she set and how clear her terms of service where, she even honored something that wasn’t quite “beneficial” to her. Besides of all that she did everything well and on time, so to me, that level of involvement, celerity and good, non-abusive terms of service make that artist an extremely professional person in my eyes. On the opposite side not a lot of furries (or even general people) are like that like that, they don't quite respect timelines and barely have a decent communication with the customer, a lot claim to be professionals because their final product is good, but at the same time they don’t act as professionals because anything that happens gets more priority over what they do and sometimes they don’t even respect their own terms of services! And to even make it even worse they change them when there are still things in their queue, making it retroactive! (as an example, when I commission stuff I don’t expect artists to be professional and I don’t get anal if times aren’t met because even when they might be dedicating a lot of time to do art I doubt they actually trying to do it “professionally”… and at the same time I get super surprised when it happens XD)
And the last one is the target audience. Art is a luxury, ornamental item most of the times but one artist needs to "know" where he/she is offering the item. Example, you want to sell a very special type of sock that heats alone and will never get dirty, it's also nature-friendly and 100% organic! But, what’s the price? $500 USD a pair. Knowing that price it'd be silly to offer it at a low-class neighborhood because pretty much no one will buy it, even if it's the best product in the world because it's being sold at the wrong place and at the wrong price. Want to sell it in the low-class neighborhood? Lower the prices or change your strategy and offer it at high-class neighborhoods where it'll more likely that someone will buy it. Same happens with art, this fandom and other places. I’d call the professional industry the high-class neighborhood while everything else goes from low-class to mid-class with a few exceptions because the professional industry has other needs and terms, so who does said art needs to follow them or they’re screwed… but in return they get charge big numbers!
In few words, the furry fandom is a place where there are a lot of students and people who don't get paid well enough to pay the right price for the art they are receiving. And sure, there are a good number of furries as well who do have the cash to pay a decent amount for a commission (not the majority). There are also a lot of furries who abuse artists and artists who abuse their terms of service.
So, why a lot of furries cry that art is expensive? Because they can’t afford a professional piece of art. And why the art is expensive? Because a good number of artists expect to get paid professional fares while they are offering their products in a non-professional place and not always they act as professional as they should. There’s also a moment where the artists reach a very special “spot” in popularity where the furries with more acquisitive power start commissioning them and things start to get nicer for them.
Personally I’m against people giving their time, work and effort for free or extremely low prices (artists in the fandom deserve to get paid decently!) but at the same time I think it’s rather silly to charge a lot when your target audience can’t pay your services. It’s all about balance. So, what do you want? Be more exclusive at the risk of having less or no clients at all, have a lower fee and more clients or a mix of both?
By the way, thanks Rukis for opening this can of worms, with some luck something good can come out of it!
Personally I think all “trouble” could be resumed in 3 things. Demand, professionalism and target audience!
The first one is simple. If the artist is known he/she will charge more till it reaches a point people will just stop "commissioning" him and he'll need to rethink his fares. Why? Simple as well, there’s more demand… :p
The second one isn't that simple, not everyone is "as professional" as most people claim to be. I remember once a friend told me how an artist worked on a piece he bought and how said artist pretty much did everyone in the professional industry would expect... I mean, she constantly kept sending sketches of "ideas" of the character in different poses and stuff before even doing the final art (so the final piece would be great and she would "understand" what she'll be drawing in the final piece) and how she respected the timelines she set and how clear her terms of service where, she even honored something that wasn’t quite “beneficial” to her. Besides of all that she did everything well and on time, so to me, that level of involvement, celerity and good, non-abusive terms of service make that artist an extremely professional person in my eyes. On the opposite side not a lot of furries (or even general people) are like that like that, they don't quite respect timelines and barely have a decent communication with the customer, a lot claim to be professionals because their final product is good, but at the same time they don’t act as professionals because anything that happens gets more priority over what they do and sometimes they don’t even respect their own terms of services! And to even make it even worse they change them when there are still things in their queue, making it retroactive! (as an example, when I commission stuff I don’t expect artists to be professional and I don’t get anal if times aren’t met because even when they might be dedicating a lot of time to do art I doubt they actually trying to do it “professionally”… and at the same time I get super surprised when it happens XD)
And the last one is the target audience. Art is a luxury, ornamental item most of the times but one artist needs to "know" where he/she is offering the item. Example, you want to sell a very special type of sock that heats alone and will never get dirty, it's also nature-friendly and 100% organic! But, what’s the price? $500 USD a pair. Knowing that price it'd be silly to offer it at a low-class neighborhood because pretty much no one will buy it, even if it's the best product in the world because it's being sold at the wrong place and at the wrong price. Want to sell it in the low-class neighborhood? Lower the prices or change your strategy and offer it at high-class neighborhoods where it'll more likely that someone will buy it. Same happens with art, this fandom and other places. I’d call the professional industry the high-class neighborhood while everything else goes from low-class to mid-class with a few exceptions because the professional industry has other needs and terms, so who does said art needs to follow them or they’re screwed… but in return they get charge big numbers!
In few words, the furry fandom is a place where there are a lot of students and people who don't get paid well enough to pay the right price for the art they are receiving. And sure, there are a good number of furries as well who do have the cash to pay a decent amount for a commission (not the majority). There are also a lot of furries who abuse artists and artists who abuse their terms of service.
So, why a lot of furries cry that art is expensive? Because they can’t afford a professional piece of art. And why the art is expensive? Because a good number of artists expect to get paid professional fares while they are offering their products in a non-professional place and not always they act as professional as they should. There’s also a moment where the artists reach a very special “spot” in popularity where the furries with more acquisitive power start commissioning them and things start to get nicer for them.
Personally I’m against people giving their time, work and effort for free or extremely low prices (artists in the fandom deserve to get paid decently!) but at the same time I think it’s rather silly to charge a lot when your target audience can’t pay your services. It’s all about balance. So, what do you want? Be more exclusive at the risk of having less or no clients at all, have a lower fee and more clients or a mix of both?
By the way, thanks Rukis for opening this can of worms, with some luck something good can come out of it!
Then don't read and go ahead, no need to post useless messages :p
Fantastic comment, I couldn't agree more with the whole point of "artists want to charge professional prices for unprofessional attitudes and environments", that's the major problem I have with this whole comparing prices to industry standards. That, and the industry is so hard to get into when there are so many talented artists out there. The reason you can't charge industry prices here is because obviously that artist didn't make it into the industry if they're settling for the furry fandom in the first place. XD
See people dont think............
Its NOT that artists charge too much ,... its that IRL our jobs dont pay us enough to afford to commission EVERY great artist >atchoo< >Atchoo< >rukis< >atchoo< >atchoo<
and that pisses us off
Its NOT that artists charge too much ,... its that IRL our jobs dont pay us enough to afford to commission EVERY great artist >atchoo< >Atchoo< >rukis< >atchoo< >atchoo<
and that pisses us off
True, but why does everybody need to be able to afford to commission every great artist?
If those great artists couldn't get enough from their art, then they're jobs don't pay them enough to afford things... see where I'm going with this?
If those great artists couldn't get enough from their art, then they're jobs don't pay them enough to afford things... see where I'm going with this?
If an Artist is worth $50 or $60 then Id like to pay them for their time and work ...
I feel they are deserving of the money in order to draw what I want ...
I WANT to commission a great artist ... an Artist I like that I am a fan of .... in order to draw what I like ... that the artist inspires my imagination ...
and why not... I work hard at a job and I deserve to pay my bills and pay for necessities and spend my leftover money on what I want ... and deserve .... like movies... beer, music and furry porn ...
if I work hard I deserve to enjoy the fruits of my labor ... and
why shouldnt I make enough money to spend on what I want ... like commissioning great artists... or artists that spend their lives honing their talents and skills ... that is HOW they got to be GREAT in the first place...
I feel they are deserving of the money in order to draw what I want ...
I WANT to commission a great artist ... an Artist I like that I am a fan of .... in order to draw what I like ... that the artist inspires my imagination ...
and why not... I work hard at a job and I deserve to pay my bills and pay for necessities and spend my leftover money on what I want ... and deserve .... like movies... beer, music and furry porn ...
if I work hard I deserve to enjoy the fruits of my labor ... and
why shouldnt I make enough money to spend on what I want ... like commissioning great artists... or artists that spend their lives honing their talents and skills ... that is HOW they got to be GREAT in the first place...
Trust me, I understand where you're coming from. I've been in the same boat and I have felt exactly the same way as you. Why can't we have nice things when we really work hard to earn them?
The thing is, though, a great artist took a lot of hard work to get to where they are. They, too, need to be able to pay for bills and necessities and luxuries like movies, beer, music, and porn of their own. ;)
In the end, everyone deserves to have some nice things, and even though each individual luxury is just that, a luxury, it's important that everyone has at least SOMETHING that they can depend on and enjoy. If you want to afford that great artist and make sure they are well paid for their work, maybe you'll have to cut into your movie or beer money to afford it. Otherwise, they're undercharging and will have to cut out something else that they would like and probably deserve. The best we can do is save up for that truly great artist, or try to find other artists who charge less, and there are a TON of those. Sometimes it's not worth it just to pay for the big name attached to the art, but you can find an unsung hero to make you a fantastic piece for a little less than the big name artist. That's American capitalism working for YOU! :D
$50-$60 for a good color piece is still a bargain, I feel. And, no, I'm not wealthy but I do understand that a good color piece can take 5-8 hours to make, which only gives them about $7-$10 an hour. Keep in mind that they have a lot of other expenses that come straight from drawing, too, such as computer upgrades and electricity.
The thing is, though, a great artist took a lot of hard work to get to where they are. They, too, need to be able to pay for bills and necessities and luxuries like movies, beer, music, and porn of their own. ;)
In the end, everyone deserves to have some nice things, and even though each individual luxury is just that, a luxury, it's important that everyone has at least SOMETHING that they can depend on and enjoy. If you want to afford that great artist and make sure they are well paid for their work, maybe you'll have to cut into your movie or beer money to afford it. Otherwise, they're undercharging and will have to cut out something else that they would like and probably deserve. The best we can do is save up for that truly great artist, or try to find other artists who charge less, and there are a TON of those. Sometimes it's not worth it just to pay for the big name attached to the art, but you can find an unsung hero to make you a fantastic piece for a little less than the big name artist. That's American capitalism working for YOU! :D
$50-$60 for a good color piece is still a bargain, I feel. And, no, I'm not wealthy but I do understand that a good color piece can take 5-8 hours to make, which only gives them about $7-$10 an hour. Keep in mind that they have a lot of other expenses that come straight from drawing, too, such as computer upgrades and electricity.
oh no no no you misunderstand me...
I dont mind PAYING what artists ask for.. I trust artists will ask for what they feel is fair...
Why cant the society we live in PAY US wages and earnings on our hard work so that we can pay our bills and enjoy life...
I dont blame artists for their prices
I blame real life for treating us financially like shit...
I dont mind PAYING what artists ask for.. I trust artists will ask for what they feel is fair...
Why cant the society we live in PAY US wages and earnings on our hard work so that we can pay our bills and enjoy life...
I dont blame artists for their prices
I blame real life for treating us financially like shit...
Ahh, I gotcha, and I totally agree. That's social injustice and class warfare, which are really big hot topics for another time. :D
I Just wanna say a couple of things.
First I LOVE the piece. It expresses a valid point and one that should be taken seriously. Many commissioners are Asshats.
I would like to also express a view for the other side that many artists take their customers for granted. I know this from very personal dealings with sever artist. Some popular- some not, some are even friends.
I have experienced. Delays, not just in weeks, but YEARS for work that I was made to pay for in full, that hasn't even been started yet. It does piss me off when i see others that have commissioned the Same artist get their work done and posted before mine. and those same artists bitch abut people not wanting to pay or that people think their prices are too high.
I have seen - on many occasions through personal experience commissioned work be started but never completed.-= like just enough work tio justify the cost paid, but the project is never completed so its a big screw you to me.
I have also Seem work be done half assed. primarily because it has been weeks months etc, beyond andy reasonable amount of time for commissioned work to be completed- and then I get bitched at becasue i am dissatisfied.
I have buried associations with people over this- though I have never singled out a specific offender. That is not my style. - though i will occasionally post a "if the shoe fits" Journal on my page - which on one ever reads.
In the end i think Artists and commissioners have to meet in a place where both people feel comforable with the expectations of the other. Save any correspondence between each other and hold each other accountably in a professional manner.
Sorry for the soapbox thing. Just my unbiased 2 cents
Great Pic Rukis !
First I LOVE the piece. It expresses a valid point and one that should be taken seriously. Many commissioners are Asshats.
I would like to also express a view for the other side that many artists take their customers for granted. I know this from very personal dealings with sever artist. Some popular- some not, some are even friends.
I have experienced. Delays, not just in weeks, but YEARS for work that I was made to pay for in full, that hasn't even been started yet. It does piss me off when i see others that have commissioned the Same artist get their work done and posted before mine. and those same artists bitch abut people not wanting to pay or that people think their prices are too high.
I have seen - on many occasions through personal experience commissioned work be started but never completed.-= like just enough work tio justify the cost paid, but the project is never completed so its a big screw you to me.
I have also Seem work be done half assed. primarily because it has been weeks months etc, beyond andy reasonable amount of time for commissioned work to be completed- and then I get bitched at becasue i am dissatisfied.
I have buried associations with people over this- though I have never singled out a specific offender. That is not my style. - though i will occasionally post a "if the shoe fits" Journal on my page - which on one ever reads.
In the end i think Artists and commissioners have to meet in a place where both people feel comforable with the expectations of the other. Save any correspondence between each other and hold each other accountably in a professional manner.
Sorry for the soapbox thing. Just my unbiased 2 cents
Great Pic Rukis !
You could just get a better job, you know. "I can't afford it." How stupid can you get?
The amount of entitlement here is astounding.
The amount of entitlement here is astounding.
Jesus, and more than half the furries I've talked to seem to wonder why they can't move out of their parent's house. Oh, I know! It's because they keep spending money on new fapping material every paycheck they get.
Besides, it's not as if anybody is forcing you to buy their art.
Besides, it's not as if anybody is forcing you to buy their art.
It boils down to this: "Everything is worth what the purchaser will pay for it."
Done.
Done.
I can think of 4 artists who have insane bullshit prices lol
Ahem I recall seeing oh idk $300 to like $500 dollar a page er something for a comic, with like 4-5 panels? Pffffftt.
Ahem I recall seeing oh idk $300 to like $500 dollar a page er something for a comic, with like 4-5 panels? Pffffftt.
And some artists are putting in 30 hours per page. For that much work that price is pretty low, honestly.
There is no other reason why furry art is as cheap or as expensive as it is other than supply and demand. It's not about valuing the artist. You're selling a service for a price you're willing to ask and a customer is willing to pay.
I feel ya. I hear that shit all the time. I work as a photographer and every now and then I get people telling me "Hey, you will throw these prints anyway - why don't you give them to me for free?" Well, no shit, asshole. I just like leaving my family back home and working my ass off for months without day off so I can give shit for free.
There should be a "Stand your ground against cheap assholes" law that let us shoot them on the spot. I'd actually happily pay higher taxes to support a law like that. :)
There should be a "Stand your ground against cheap assholes" law that let us shoot them on the spot. I'd actually happily pay higher taxes to support a law like that. :)
*laughs*
Such a good point! I have a few friends that underestimate the value of art, furry or otherwise, that are the quintessential target of this joke.
Such a good point! I have a few friends that underestimate the value of art, furry or otherwise, that are the quintessential target of this joke.
XD the perfect way to instantly have dramatic conversations begin in your comments!!!
<3 I'm glad you made this exist <3
<3 I'm glad you made this exist <3
cool but sanctimonious *nostalgia* I miss the days when artists did it because they wanted to, so others could enjoy it - however they made money in their spare time, jobs or whatever, was irrelevant; everyone has bills to pay. I think it sucks how the best artists are all about the $$$ now, and the notion that this should be standard practice. I'd suffer having less art, more freely available.
I'm going to be honest with you, I think you are retarded.
Kill yourself and any surviving offspring.
Kill yourself and any surviving offspring.
Are you serious? Where the fuck did that come from...
I'm going to be honest and say, you're a fucking keyboard warrior and deserve beating to death.
I'm going to be honest and say, you're a fucking keyboard warrior and deserve beating to death.
People who bitch directly at artists about their prices being too high are assholes. Seriously, if they're too high for you then don't buy. :U Artists charge what they want and they have every right to.
Sadly I haven't had any commissions but just started photoshop.... either way it takes hours to make it on there(especially if you know what your doing) and its extremely awful when people pester you going 'hey do you still do requests' .... its my own downfall that I did soo many before doing commissions.. however I haven't received any :(
the picture seems to imply that people are unwilling to pay for the art they want to have done
which, in the vast majority of the cases, is simply not true.
however i find it annoying if i ask an artist on how much he/she charges, i then decide to look for another because it is to expensive for me, that same artist is like "oh, so you're not willing to pay for the art you want done, hm?"
and that is just not cool
which, in the vast majority of the cases, is simply not true.
however i find it annoying if i ask an artist on how much he/she charges, i then decide to look for another because it is to expensive for me, that same artist is like "oh, so you're not willing to pay for the art you want done, hm?"
and that is just not cool
It's not cool, parasite. These are PROFESSIONAL ARTISTS. This is how they get paid.
okay, you replied to a post that is 8 months old
who are you calling a parasite? are you trying to insult/attack me? if so, why? what have i done that offended you?
if i commission an artist, i pay them. i don't ask for free art, ever.
if i want to commission an artist i haven't commissioned before and i can't see their prices posted anywhere, i PM them and ask them about their prices.
if i find their prices agreeable, meaning do i think that i for myself like their art enough to pay them what they are asking in their price list, i commission them and pay them.
if i do not like their art enough to be willing to pay what they are asking for, then i am going to look for another artist whose art i like enough to pay what they are asking.
after all, this is about what I want because it is my money and i certainly am not going to spend a lot of my hard earned money on something that i don't really want.
so i ask you now
is that wrong?
what is wrong with that?
be so kind and explain yourself before throwing around insults and accusations for no good reason. especially considering that in order to throw these insults/accusations around, you are digging up a topic that has been dead and buried for more than half a year. that is pretty rude, you know.
who are you calling a parasite? are you trying to insult/attack me? if so, why? what have i done that offended you?
if i commission an artist, i pay them. i don't ask for free art, ever.
if i want to commission an artist i haven't commissioned before and i can't see their prices posted anywhere, i PM them and ask them about their prices.
if i find their prices agreeable, meaning do i think that i for myself like their art enough to pay them what they are asking in their price list, i commission them and pay them.
if i do not like their art enough to be willing to pay what they are asking for, then i am going to look for another artist whose art i like enough to pay what they are asking.
after all, this is about what I want because it is my money and i certainly am not going to spend a lot of my hard earned money on something that i don't really want.
so i ask you now
is that wrong?
what is wrong with that?
be so kind and explain yourself before throwing around insults and accusations for no good reason. especially considering that in order to throw these insults/accusations around, you are digging up a topic that has been dead and buried for more than half a year. that is pretty rude, you know.
Fave, a hundred times over! Furry artists are very much underpaid for their efforts.
Well I guess this is where my two cents will go.
Now I am just making a point here on the current state of artists and customers. I think most of the reason that high price comes into play is that too many furry artists are unwilling to get jobs and try to live off their art which causes crazy pricing. Of course this is not all occasions some artists simply do not have the time to do a considerable amount of art and must be paid for their time which is understandable and I think a good reason to have high but fair prices. The biggest problem is that there is no way for most people who desire art to always afford something nice from a qualified artist of great caliber unless they get lucky on a sale or auction.
Of course quality enters into artwork but this should not be the lone reason that prices so high. Art should be priced at time and availability and then quality not the other way around.
As for the earlier statement about artists trying to make a living off their art, this is simply a terrible idea unless you work for a company making art. Staying at home and doing art for any type of niche market is no way to make a living and causes outlandish prices for mediocre work so that an artist can feed themselves.
I think there needs to be a better level of communication between artist and customer as well. Its nice to see some down to earth artists that are willing to talk and negotiate with customers [baring those demanding free art or stupidly low prices] but also some artists need to not let popularity turn them into snobs, which happens all too often.
This is by no means directed at you Rukis or anyone in particular.
I think the development of some commission platform would be greatly helpful to this community.
Also to all artists that charge outrageous prices for art remember what Spotz said way back up top there. If you cost too much there are people out there with similar talent that will charge less for something just as good.
Know as well that right now you might be super popular but there is always another artist out there better and cheaper then you just entering the fandom to take your place in the hearts of the people.
Okay and that's me done.
Hate me for saying it but I did
Again this is not directed at anyone and is simply an opinion nothing more and loves to all the artist that even bother to share their beautiful talent with us at all and that means you Rukis, Thank you
Much love to all
Now I am just making a point here on the current state of artists and customers. I think most of the reason that high price comes into play is that too many furry artists are unwilling to get jobs and try to live off their art which causes crazy pricing. Of course this is not all occasions some artists simply do not have the time to do a considerable amount of art and must be paid for their time which is understandable and I think a good reason to have high but fair prices. The biggest problem is that there is no way for most people who desire art to always afford something nice from a qualified artist of great caliber unless they get lucky on a sale or auction.
Of course quality enters into artwork but this should not be the lone reason that prices so high. Art should be priced at time and availability and then quality not the other way around.
As for the earlier statement about artists trying to make a living off their art, this is simply a terrible idea unless you work for a company making art. Staying at home and doing art for any type of niche market is no way to make a living and causes outlandish prices for mediocre work so that an artist can feed themselves.
I think there needs to be a better level of communication between artist and customer as well. Its nice to see some down to earth artists that are willing to talk and negotiate with customers [baring those demanding free art or stupidly low prices] but also some artists need to not let popularity turn them into snobs, which happens all too often.
This is by no means directed at you Rukis or anyone in particular.
I think the development of some commission platform would be greatly helpful to this community.
Also to all artists that charge outrageous prices for art remember what Spotz said way back up top there. If you cost too much there are people out there with similar talent that will charge less for something just as good.
Know as well that right now you might be super popular but there is always another artist out there better and cheaper then you just entering the fandom to take your place in the hearts of the people.
Okay and that's me done.
Hate me for saying it but I did
Again this is not directed at anyone and is simply an opinion nothing more and loves to all the artist that even bother to share their beautiful talent with us at all and that means you Rukis, Thank you
Much love to all
i remember a while ago reading a post on FA how Professional Corporate artworks cost over 2000 a piece for a full portrait with text, and that furry art is EXTREMELY cheap in comparison, especially because of how amazingly talented a lot of furs are. we kind of get the "Mates rates" sorta thing.
I Totally agree with Luther here. And it's not the art your paying for really. It's the artist's time they put into the masterpiece your paying for. More time equals more money. It's common business practice.
Love the picture of Luther too.
Love the picture of Luther too.
Look in the end an artists work is only worth what people are willing to pay. If they open and fill up their slots in a time that suits them then they are not charging too much for their art. If they open and don't fill up fast enough for their tastes then they are charging too much. Quality/worth of work to the artist them self/time spent on pieces, none of that matters. Now its not only quality and price that determines if customers will deem your art as too expensive. If you are known to take forever to finish commissions or for bad customer service then you will likely have to charge less than an artist of the same quality to attract the same number of customers.
This makes me want to do a study test just to see what people will and will not actually pay for my crap-tastic art just for fun.
Well :D! Now that really depends. How willing are you to draw creepy fetishes? The more isolated and disturbingly specific, the more bank.
umm no people do auctions without having to draw creepy fetishes. I hardly draw fucking as it is i don think im gonna draw some of those creepy things people are into.
<3, I know. I'm not saying you should. In fact, that shows you have integrity, I like that <3.
I'm no prude, nor am I judging perse; but I feel there's too many artists who trade their personal preferences, for some quick cash. And once you feed someone some fetish fuel, all their friends/rp buddies catch wind of it, and start asking for their own fetishy pictures; you may be making some bank but ehhh, at what price?
I'm no prude, nor am I judging perse; but I feel there's too many artists who trade their personal preferences, for some quick cash. And once you feed someone some fetish fuel, all their friends/rp buddies catch wind of it, and start asking for their own fetishy pictures; you may be making some bank but ehhh, at what price?
THIS THIS THIS
I just scrolled to the bottom to see any new comments since the last time I was here, and I spotted you again with this comment. XD
I don't watch half as many artists as most do, but I've spotted at least 3 during my time here who would do 1 porn commission/YCH with the phrasing "I know you don't see this from me often, but this is the ONLY time I'll do this! yadda blah bloo don't expect more." and after it sells... THAT IS ALL I see filling their gallery from then on out. Usually it just grows and grows into crazier fetishes.
Some people need the cash, but it's a bit heartbreaking to see them drop their own personal tastes and morals.
I just scrolled to the bottom to see any new comments since the last time I was here, and I spotted you again with this comment. XD
I don't watch half as many artists as most do, but I've spotted at least 3 during my time here who would do 1 porn commission/YCH with the phrasing "I know you don't see this from me often, but this is the ONLY time I'll do this! yadda blah bloo don't expect more." and after it sells... THAT IS ALL I see filling their gallery from then on out. Usually it just grows and grows into crazier fetishes.
Some people need the cash, but it's a bit heartbreaking to see them drop their own personal tastes and morals.
It's not heartbreaking at all. Movie studios turn out crappy blockbuster films to make bank so they are able to do more experimental/risky projects like "Pacific Rim, Riddick, Kick-Ass, God Bless America,"
Same thing is true here. Just as many artist on Deviant art will do fan artwork because a character that's recognized by thousands and millions of people will garner more views then a made up character no one knows or has any reason to vest any interest with no matter how well you write their biography.
Point is, get people's attention and then hit them with your own style. It's either that or be good at marketing and selling your work. And put some money into advertising.
Right now I'm going with the second option. And personally I don't think I could draw subject matter that didn't interest me, tried it a few times by request...didn't turn out well.
Same thing is true here. Just as many artist on Deviant art will do fan artwork because a character that's recognized by thousands and millions of people will garner more views then a made up character no one knows or has any reason to vest any interest with no matter how well you write their biography.
Point is, get people's attention and then hit them with your own style. It's either that or be good at marketing and selling your work. And put some money into advertising.
Right now I'm going with the second option. And personally I don't think I could draw subject matter that didn't interest me, tried it a few times by request...didn't turn out well.
Meh personally i don't care about being on the client side as in i see something one of my friends got i like it and then i want it too. Ill do that in a minute if its for a reasonable price. But i don't think ill be drawing heavy bondage with water sports or some crazy shit for some quick cash lol.
The few times i have done porn its stressed me to death with how picky people are with their porn. Im not willing to do kinkier stuff that people will be more picky about.
im not about that life.
The few times i have done porn its stressed me to death with how picky people are with their porn. Im not willing to do kinkier stuff that people will be more picky about.
im not about that life.
This is how I reacted when a friend of mine expressed surprise at the thought that people actually charge for artwork.
...YEAH. Have you never heard the term "starving artist" before?
...YEAH. Have you never heard the term "starving artist" before?
Here are some statistics for those cheap furs who work minimum wage.
A logo design can range from $200 to $5000
Totals - Cost to Paint Bedroom
100 square feet $416.89 $743.13
A logo design can range from $200 to $5000
Totals - Cost to Paint Bedroom
100 square feet $416.89 $743.13
"Compared to professional world, anything less than 3 digits is a discount."
Because spending possibly over 40$ is a good way to get whatever porn they want.
People like you is why we can't have nice things. But I guess you just don't understand art.
This is OUR JOBS. This is HOW WE GET PAID. Why not work harder at your job for a promotion, rather than telling me that my artworks are overpriced. Because, you know, otherwise I don't get to eat that week. Bloody hell.
"No, go on, tell me about all that art you have that's not worth paying for."
This is OUR JOBS. This is HOW WE GET PAID. Why not work harder at your job for a promotion, rather than telling me that my artworks are overpriced. Because, you know, otherwise I don't get to eat that week. Bloody hell.
"No, go on, tell me about all that art you have that's not worth paying for."
I don't have a job, I'm going to a university. But I don't need a Biochemical degree to realize that a Furry image macro isn't art. People will pay for you to literally shit on them, and I've yet to hear anyone say that's art.
I agree completely with Rukis. if you want a piece of art that badly, shut the fuck up about the price and just buy the damn thing. if your an art coinsure or something similar you can easily make your money back. Furry art and prices are no different then going to a normal art bid. I know I haven't posted anything interesting on here but people actually like my work. I lack the equipment to scan my art on computers but my specialty are hands. I've been wanting to make a small book about drawing them but haven't had the $$$....
Most humans are just plebian philistines who will never understand art. They just think it's something cheap that can be used as a doormat.
Everything has a price, and I hope you're not asking for any less than $100. Because that is not the price.
Save up and buy a gun, and shoot yourself if you "don't think it's a good price." Because its MY PRICE.
Everything has a price, and I hope you're not asking for any less than $100. Because that is not the price.
Save up and buy a gun, and shoot yourself if you "don't think it's a good price." Because its MY PRICE.
i'm not sure if that statement is aimed at me or another person but you seemed a little "edgy" on that statement. I just agree with that picture that's all. if you really want an art piece go ahead and buy it already
I was just explaining why some people do try to leech of society. Didn't mean to aim it at you.
This is how we get paid. I quit my old job so I could become a full-time professional artist, and to have people say it's "too expensive" is just retarded.
This is how we get paid. I quit my old job so I could become a full-time professional artist, and to have people say it's "too expensive" is just retarded.
ok well I apologize if I was sounding defensive. honestly though if your whole career is based on Art you won't last to long financially and this is why, people saying it's "too expensive" and not buying your art because of it. just trying to say that you should at least have a part-time job on the side. 2 or 3 days a week, just for a little extra income, or money for materials.
I'm so very late to this party and I know I'm not going to say anything new, but take this comment as another thumbs up for the message here. The commissions artists offer is like any other person selling their labour for a wage. Why some people can't grasp this fact is beyond me. If I want to purchase art, I save money for it. If I can't afford it, I either wait and save more, or accept I can't afford that. Some people are just greedy, and expect they have a right to whatever they desire without a thought of the cost. If anything, I take pride in paying artists a fair price for their work, as I want to keep a community thriving where artists can earn a living by making art on commission. If there was no such community, there would not be the means for me to purchase a commission in the first place.
The rage and controversy, what have you started you monster!!! Think of the children!
There was one instance when someone accused me of stealing from other's hard earned money because i wouldn't take his request, that i only have time for commissions. He then proceeded to tell me that i needed to get off my lazy ass and get a job...but what he doesn't get is that i DO work 30-37 hours a week full-time xD
i hate people's ignorance to the time and effort put into an art piece.
i hate people's ignorance to the time and effort put into an art piece.
Me I got a price, I say if I can get a brand new video game then the art is to much for me
Holy
goddamsweetjesusmotherfucking
Cow.
Ten minutes. It took me TEN. MINUTES. to scroll to the bottom of this page, and now I forgot what I was going to say.
goddamsweetjesusmotherfucking
Cow.
Ten minutes. It took me TEN. MINUTES. to scroll to the bottom of this page, and now I forgot what I was going to say.
Holy shitting fucks I have never seen even CLOSE to this many comments for a picture o_O
Brilliant! Just plain Brilliant. I've had my share of "Art Enthusiasts" who demanded drawings from me with only the offer of being honored to be allowed to draw the artwork for them. For free.
I don't give a damn if I have to pay or not, I'm just checking out the style and class of the picture.
Comments