PROFIL

Henrik

  • 100
  • Rezensionen
  • 141
  • Mal wurden Ihre Rezensionen als "hilfreich" bewertet
  • 149
  • Bewertungen

Scholarly gaslighting about racism.

Gesamt
2 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
2 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
2 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 14.08.2024

Everybody can nowadays be called a racist.
The author of this book would by some probably be called a woke racist, socialist, social justice, intersectional racist or neoracist.
The author of this book, though, would in stead talk about white racism, systemic racism or structural racism, or colourblind racism.
The scholarship is shoddy, the thinking and writing is little more than ritualistic. This entire school of thinking, I find, is nothing but academic activism, politicking and gaslighting.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

Mental Parity

Gesamt
5 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
5 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
5 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 09.08.2024

In an alternative world, there might be an America, where people max out on fighting cerebral injustice instead of social justice.
The story is witty, brainy, disillusioned and depressing, because people and states already all over the world exclude and suppress people for holding the wrong opinions. If there is only one truth, one reality, we can’t all be right. In fact only one religion/ideology/concept can be the true one. And - probably - we are all still in the dark, self delusional and self deceiving. Though Lionel Shriver does seem to see and glimpse, what is and could be.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

Admissions of a “self-absorbed narcissist”?

Gesamt
5 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
5 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
5 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 04.07.2024

Glenn Loury doesn’t use the term narcissist, except once in the very last chapter. Before that, though, I had been thinking it at least a dozen times that his admissions in all their hauntingly embarrassing honesty, were the most clear articulation of the narcissist personality, I had ever heard. His feeling of grandiosity, his entitlement and perennial need for admiration were textbook material.
I feel a bit despondent, as I thought Glenn Loury had been more of a better man. But maybe, as Thomas Mann wrote of Moses – Moses spoke so powerfully against killing, because he himself had killed – likewise Loury speaks of the failings of his “people” and the absence of black fathers, because he knows of them all too well.
“The enemy within” is the very same Loury who thinks he’s “The Master of the Universe”.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

“No solution, but a way out of Israel’s “Catch 67”

Gesamt
5 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
5 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
5 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 21.06.2024

And enlightening analysis to me of Israel’s Catch 67, and how it might be not solved, but ameliorated through either an idealistic or pragmatic idea…

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

Important, timely topic

Gesamt
5 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
5 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
5 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 14.04.2024

Well - I guess we need to find out, if we have been under protecting children at the ages 11-15 from social media through the smartphone in the last decade or so.
The thing about overprotecting parenting and play isn’t really relatable - it has just never been that extreme in my country, Denmark.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

How to succeed with big projects!

Gesamt
5 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
5 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
5 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 27.12.2023

Go from right to left, know why, think slow, execute fast, experiment and experience, anchoring your project, reference-class forecast (RFR), beware of uniqueness, fat tails, an bespoke solutions, have an experienced and great team, focus on and learn from modularity. Those were some of the words, I learned from this book.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

Easy listening about demography

Gesamt
4 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
4 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
4 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 19.12.2023

If you are interested in demographics, and how the future is shaped by who we are, this is basically are very good introduction. The prose is clear. It’s not repetitive, but nicely focussed in each chapter.
If I have one critique, it would be that Morland isn’t in any way alarmist or at least somewhat perplexed. It’s just the way of the demographic world…

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

Inclusive or extracting political institutions

Gesamt
4 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
4 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
4 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 06.12.2023

I hope, I’ll never hear the words “inclusive” or “extracting” political institutions, as this was how all the nations of the world and of history were interpreted to be either a success or a failure. The explanation was hammered out repeatedly ad nausea. The terms are probably legit and reasonable, but I also feel that they were burdened with to much explanatory power. It made me think of the Halo Effect, meaning if a nation has success, they have inclusive institutions, failure means extractive - the conclusion is almost written upfront. Any disconfirming evidence isn’t even a possibility, as what they write is almost definitional. Their framework and explanation seemed monotonic and monocausal. Yet, I’ll praise the book for the breadth of their exposition, their many examples. The cases with nations, I already knew, were to my knowledge pretty accurate, so it gave credence to their many other cases.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

What if voters are irrational?

Gesamt
5 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
5 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
5 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 14.11.2023

Finally reread Caplan’s book (this time with the book and audio at the same time) while it’s a book with ideas worth understanding. What I’ve taken away, is probably is concepts about the publics “anti market bias”, “anti foreign bias”, “make work bias” and “pessimistic bias”. I have doubts about, though, whether the biases are universal. Living in Denmark, which is a much smaller nation than the US, some of these policies are so blatantly economically irrational and destructive that even the least bright citizen can realise that giving into them would lead to a scarcity or non-existence if so many products, which we have no chance of producing ourselves. Being a small nation can give you an edge in realising what is in your material interest. Another idea, which I hadn’t thought of, was Caplan’s pointing out that unselfishness, irrational cognition and little slack for politicians is as bad as it gets. If voters are systematically biased and irrational, then when they cast their vote, they don’t even have a selfishness to safe them from choosing policies with bad economic outcomes. The juxtaposition of market fundamentalism to democracy fundamentalism was also worth understanding. Caplan is probably rigget, that we trust democracy to eagerly and are to sceptical towards markets. It’s one point where I myself have changed perspective as I’ve learned and read about markets and economy. It’s not all evident and some of it is counterintuitive, so some of people’s resistance comes from ignorance and inability to comprehend rather than irrationality. A fault in Caplan’s thinking, though, is the primacy of economic outcomes. I also care about prosperity, wealth, the eradication of poverty, but there are also other things which are important and which might impair economic development more or less. Isn’t it irrational only to fixate on economic development and disregard all other considerations and wants that people might rightly or wrongly perceive.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.

Judicial and executive blueprint for anti-woke action

Gesamt
5 out of 5 stars
Sprecher
5 out of 5 stars
Geschichte
5 out of 5 stars

Rezensiert am: 26.09.2023

Ever since I read Caldwell’s The Age of Entitlement, I’ve been convinced that Civil Rights Law and the judicial and bureaucratic elaboration of it, lay at the heart of and constituted the perhaps greatest societal stumbling stone for the US in the last 60 years. What civil rights was intended to be has ended in a state that seems illegitimate, because it’s the product of exaggerated judicial activism and bureaucratic zealotry.
Hanani’s simple , yet uplifting message is that what has been established through bureaucratic and judicial activism and executive orders, can also fairly easily be undone or reversed. The case for doing this is even good, as people have been voting against affirmative action every time there as Verna popular referendum.
As a believer in meritocracy as the more fair, just and prosperous alternative, I hope the US will succeed in the coming decades to move decidedly away from racist affirmative action programs.

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.