User talk:Mordillo/archive13
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at user talk:Mordillo. |
Reap
--Sycamore (Talk) 14:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Congratulations! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- /me applauds —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
really?
did something change? it looked fine on my computer. :|
alright, i'll change it.
20:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- You are using the whole code instead of putting it in a template. You need to create a sig file under user:sofia/sig and place the code there. After that, change your preferences so in signature you place this: {{SUBST:nosubst|User:sofia/sig}}. And then tick the custom signature box. After that, you just need to put four tildes, and you get your signature without the mess. ~ 22:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Ugh...
You smell like diapers.
- He smells like a deadly, rotating Ninja Star you silly person.-- 09:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Is this seriously the best insult you can come up with? Grow the fuck up already and get out of here. Nobody wants to hear your petty complaints about those (not so great, but not absolutely horrible) pages that you've been bitching about since the summer. My God, man. Now hurry up and shit on my chest already. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
query
firstly, i must say that you smell decidedly not like diapers. perhaps a bit like the sunset over the pacific in the winter...but certainly nothing like diapers. on a less pointless note, i noticed that Andrew Schlafly currently redirects to Conservapedia and is locked for editing, by you. were i to eventually write a coherent parody of said schlafly, would you consider placing it there? 18:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost 26th February 09
Telling You Stuff You Already Knew, But With Different Words!
February 26, 2009 • Issue 36 • Picking the poppy seeds of truth from the teeth of the news
Imperial Coloni(s|z)ation For Glorification of Motherwiki Imperial Colonization made yet another triumphant return this week, after several months of languishing, inactivity, and Richard Nixon. Upon a general query from an annoying masked UnSignpost writer, another anonymous user stepped up and took control. That anonymous user is SysRq. Forums were created, ideas were exchanged, and the Cajek search party was sent out again. Only the last one was in vain, as an all-new Colonisation page was rolled out last week. Uncyclopedians wasted no time in signing up and nominating their first target: the utter garbage pile that was Al Gore. Previously containing banal tripe such as Manbearpig references, internet invention claims, lockbox bollocks, and other assorted drivel, the article is now, according to an official Colonization spokesman, "well on its way to not sucking." Future Colonisations have been lined up as well, leading this reporter to believe that this time around, Colonization is here to stay, even moreso that Manforman or the Poison Pee template. It looks as if the article on Jews is next on the Colonisation docket, since all articles relating to that topic are "utter bilge, consumed with hateful pointlessness and also secretly controlled by Jews." British Infiltration of Non-Existent Cabal Continues at VFS
The early opping was due to two factors, firstly, an unprecedented landslide, with two candidates polling so many votes that the final round was rendered an irrelevance, and secondly, new 'crat Mordillo being impatient to use his whizzy new powers to op the new admins before Codeine or Mhaille beat him to it. The most votes were polled by MrN9500, and your USP can't think of a more deserving recipient of a shiny new banstick. He's already thrown himself into his new role with gusto, banning, deleting, featuring and the like with gusto, and proudly declaring "I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing", thus showing he has as much grasp of the role already as any other admin. The numbers were made up by fellow limey Under user, who has been keen to get started using his whizzy new powers, but has been limited to mainly joke bans so far by MrN's astounding competence and annoying habit of doing all the work. UU was unavailable for comment (which is odd, seeing as he's writing this), but his wife had this to say: "you bastards! Do you have any idea what you've done? I'll be lucky to see him for more than about half an hour a week now!" She wasn't joking. |
| ||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Mordillo
I can't say I know a lot about what exactly happened, but you need to get over NXWave. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't recall hiring you as my psychotherapist. I pay Modus to do that. ~ 17:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Psychotherapist? No! I hate psychotherapists. It's just some friendly advise. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Noted. ~ 17:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- wondering if I could get banned for writing UnTunes:NXWave is Cool 17:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Good chance of that O_O ~ 17:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- You should write "UnTunes:Are we human or are we cancer?" Cancer is far less dangerous than NXWave. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I am now your god. Accept me or saturate in piss and vinergar for the rest of your life. Disorder 17:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Who are you? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I am now your god. Accept me or saturate in piss and vinergar for the rest of your life. Disorder 17:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- wondering if I could get banned for writing UnTunes:NXWave is Cool 17:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Noted. ~ 17:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Psychotherapist? No! I hate psychotherapists. It's just some friendly advise. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't recall hiring you as my psychotherapist. I pay Modus to do that. ~ 17:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
House marathon article.
I just gave it a read, and there's a glaring omission IMO. It needs a reference to Lupus and how IT'S NEVER LUPUS! Made me chuckle though. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:55, 26 Feb
- Quote: Thursday 19:30pm, chapter 23: It's Lupus. I knew it, and Doctor House knew it, we could have made a great team. ' :) ~ 17:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
"Him who shall not be named"?
What person/thing's name did you ban SOAUU for posting? I wanna know what is never to be said on Uncyclopedia! Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 01:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Voldemort.
- Huh. "Voldemort". You'd think there'd be an ingnorable pol-
01:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- B7'D!!!
- OW! MY INTERNET REFERENCE! Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 01:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I believe this was the offense. Rather minor, really, I think Mordillo meant it more as a caution than anything else, as per this. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think I rather meant it as a joke ban, but whatever works to intensify my enigmatic character! ~ 08:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Joke bans are urban legends. Therefore, this page does not exist.
- I think I rather meant it as a joke ban, but whatever works to intensify my enigmatic character! ~ 08:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
I saw wat u did thar
Classic. -RAHB 09:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Damn you're fast. ~ 09:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- The Native Americans call me, Stealth Penis, Clap Like Thunder. Still debating whether or not that's a good thing. -RAHB 09:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I hope that the clap part is about your thunder....~ 09:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- The Native Americans call me, Stealth Penis, Clap Like Thunder. Still debating whether or not that's a good thing. -RAHB 09:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
VFS
For your vote in VFS You have been awarded a Certificate guaranteeing you safe passage within Uncyclopedia's borders if Zionist domination is eventually established. |
(You probably already had safe passage anyway...Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC))
Could You Do Me a Favor?
Could you maybe create an airplane on User:Meganew/Aircraft Used By Uncyclopedia? Thanks. --Absolutely Not Benson 17:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Could You Do Me a Favor?
Could you maybe trim this image so that it fits in my sig? The problem is that I don't want the text at the top. Also, what do all these new buttons all over the screen do? MrN Fork you! 17:46, Feb 27
- You are talking to the wrong person, you need to talk with UU, I couldn't trim anything, even if it was to save my own life :). Also, just press them all, see what happens. Who knows, you might end up banning the internet. ~ 17:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Is this what you want? SOAUU 18:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
I made mine by editing Mordillo's sig in fireworks and just replacing every image with a corresponding dildo image. That's why it looks more like it's twirling than spinning. Also, loltits. -RAHB 22:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
A Little Thank You Note...
Your Majesty, A poor, insignificant and cowardly peasant is merciful to thee, O most great and powerful Mordillo, and has made a tribute to thee in form of a sexy picture of some of thine other fans. Shall I burn it like we do all the other tributes, sir? |
Feechure?
Morning Mordillo, if you're around and not kicking Geth arse in Mass Effect or off doing weekend stuff with Mordillia, could you take a look a the feature queue and see if you can spot what crashingly obvious n00b admin mistake I've made when trying to feature EDSAC? (Actually, it could be something confusing some template somewhere about feb's dates, seeing as last year was a leap year - is there a template involved that's looking for a Feb 29? Or am I just hoping it's something excusable like that when it's something much more simple?) --UU - natter 09:01, Mar 1
- OK, now it works. I suspect it to have been to do with one of several possibilities, the most likely of which is that I am comically incompetent. Pippings! --UU - natter 10:16, Mar 1
Greetings to one of a group of my favorite Jews
Thanks for welcoming me back from Limbo. You wouldn't know what that is, being a non Catholic. Limbo is where unbaptised babies go when they die... and apparently bat fuck insane people too. I wouldn't recommend it. It's like being licked by thousands of cats. Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 16:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- We have a similar place, it's called Stamford Hill. Seriously strange and boring place. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Of blowjobs and such...
I heard that you and Under user just got married??? What a cute couple you two must make. No, but seriously - I am interested in becoming an admin (whatever that means) on this site. Although I have been somewhat a pain in the ass in the past, and have probably pissed you off at least once in my long-term relationship with uncyclopedia, I would really like to take it to the 'next level', if you know what I'm saying, and be a little more serious about my role here. So I guess, what Im asking is: what do I need to do to be like you when I grow up? ;) – ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 22:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think I'm probably the only admin you didn't piss off or serviced during your long time relationship with the site O_O. Basically, it doesn't work like way. You need two things to happen: first, you work hard and you make enough impression that you're working hard. It can be writing, helping users some maintenance etc. If you take a look you'll realize that most (if not) most admins are writers first and foremost rather than maintenance jokeys. Second, you need this to happen when the site is in need of new admins, which is not the case at this point. Usually, when you aspire to become an admin, you don't get to be one - because what scares most existing admins is users who wish to have admin power for the sake of having power (which I don't think is the case with you). Bottom line, contribute a lot, and you might become one one day. Took me two years O_O. ~ 22:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wasn't expecting anything to happen right way... I'm pretty hip to that fact I'm gonna have to earn it. Hell, as it is I've been coming here for a good 2 years... But I think I'm finally at a point where I can really start to *contribute* to the community/content here, not just waste time. Thanks for the input, and don't be a stranger, I'm a huge flirty tease! – ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 22:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Having fun playing with yourself? – ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 09:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Foreigners
??? I have no idea what this is - But I think it is being used. I recreated it and you huffed it:-(--Sycamore (Talk) 08:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't really see that it was you. But I have no idea what's this for, it directs to a babel page that doesn't exist...~ 09:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it seems to exist sometimes, like one of those Star Trek things - I'll seduce Spang again and maybe he'll help:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I never want to hear about you Scots inbreeding again. Ever. ~ 09:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- If you think Scots inbreeding is bad, you should see a Scotch egg. Blech! Also, this isn't my talkpage. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I never want to hear about you Scots inbreeding again. Ever. ~ 09:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it seems to exist sometimes, like one of those Star Trek things - I'll seduce Spang again and maybe he'll help:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
/me found reason to sulk
I didn't get a chance to rape your new talk page :( Awww dang! Now I'll have to cuddle something in stead. Volunteers for being cuddled, report here! -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 11:52, 3 Mar
- Shall I archive again so you can have the opportunity? ~ 11:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hehe. Not yet. But you can volunteer to be cuddled, if Mrs. Dillo isn't watching. ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 11:59, 3 Mar
- Let's call it an unofficial one then. :) ~ 12:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yay :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 12:28, 3 Mar
- Let's call it an unofficial one then. :) ~ 12:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hehe. Not yet. But you can volunteer to be cuddled, if Mrs. Dillo isn't watching. ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 11:59, 3 Mar
Question about abusing powers
So, following a recent VFD discussion on the issue, I've combined Aberham Linkin and John Effkendee into the glorious whole of My Favorite Presidents. I'm now thinking redirects are the way to go - should I huff and redirect, or would this constitute hideous abuse of power on some kind of scale or other? Just thought I'd check. --UU - natter 15:55, Mar 3
- I think redirects are fine...did you just combine these two into a new piece? ~ 16:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
On a Bot flag and how to go about getting it
How would I go about getting a Bot flag for MnbvcxzBot. As you know, Sannse said I needed to get "community approval", but you left a comment on her talk page saying that admin approval used to be enough. Are you two working it out, or should I got post a "give me bot powers" topic (or ask an admin to post of "give MnbvcxzBot Bot powers" topic on my behalf) in the forum? Thankyou. --Mnb'z 18:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
On Banning Orian
I want people to mess with my page. I'm sick of it being all organized and whatnot. So... i dunno, use your admin powers to give him 12 minutes of un-ban... er... something. -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 00:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Old news man! ~ 00:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh you did it here too! That is just so cute RT really I wish you were real. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 16:28 6 March 2009
- *sigh*... that's one of my greatest aspirations. -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 01:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost 5th March 09
The Newspaper That Replaces Analysis With Flashy Graphics!
March 5, 2009 • Issue 37 • The News, Smelted to 93% Purity!
New parser causes havoc by requiring Uncyclopedians to get things right
Resident tame Wikia staffer Sannse tried to explain: "bad HTML is the most likely cause of errors. But there are some other changes that might cause errors. For example, the way that some complex parser tags work has changed. The best thing to do is to look for HTML problems first (not forgetting that the errors are often in templates used on the page). Then, if you can't find it, hassle anyone you know who knows HTML and wikimarkup better than you (nah, not going to link some poor guy). Then, if you can't find it, hassle me to find help (Uberfuzzy is on standby to assist where needed). Again I'd suggest that the template author should be the person who knows how to make it work!" Most Uncyclopedians had already gone cross-eyed by this point, but she gamely continued: "Don't forget that you can use Special:ParserDiffTest as a help in finding exactly what's different on a page. A lot of the changes don't mean anything. For example, on this page the only differences are to class and section titles. But this one shows problems with center and div tags (the last two green sections on the div)". Your USP offers the following, less confusing advice: if you open any kind of tag in html like <this>, you have to close it again, like </this> before the end of your page. And if you open more then one tag, be sure to close them in the right order <like><this></this></like>. Then shit should not get fucked up. The gnomes were unavailable for comment. February '... of the Month' Awards Hoedown Well, February is over, and that means it's time to look back at the shortest month of the year and make fun of people who won awards during that month, for they have only won 90.32% as much recognition as those who won the award during a robust 31-day month. Let's get started with...
|
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Blocking one of the very few worthwhile recent changes watchers?
?? - I respect that there's often divided views, but I don't understand that, it all looks cool to me, those reverts seemed correct?-Sycamore (Talk) 15:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- If I might wage in where not wanted... When you get LOTS of reverts, the users should TALK to each other. MrN Fork you! 16:00, Mar 6
- Based on previous talks, I am tired with blunt reverting rather than talking with someone who is obviously thinking he is doing the right thing. It is one thing to revert vandalism. It is another to do it to everything being conceived as vandalism without taking a minute to ponder if perhaps this can be resolved without constantly reverting. ~ 16:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thats not quite true is it, that paticular user was reverting back, obviously some explantion could be requested on the article talkpage, or on the users talkpage. If someone of some standing and trust within the community reverts, it should be considered in good faith, bottom line. If the reverts were dodgy (we all make mistakes) this can be brought up in a friendly way. Charitwo has had some really nasty flak lately on here (I would have been very upset if those things had been said about me on VFS), yet this guy still comes to help on here, it seems that with some that its 'what can you do?' and others its bans and threats?--Sycamore (Talk) 16:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- You might have noticed that I said "based on previous talks". This is not the first time this has happened. You might have noticed that the other guy got exactly the same treatment. I do not favor anyone in this case, or generally speaking. If someone feels that he has a superior stand over other users simply because he reverts more than the other person in question, well sorry - this is not the case. And I have to say, I very much dislike what you are hinting with your last sentence. ~ 16:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yah, I was seconds away from making the same bans, and for the same reasons (although obviously without the rollback threat as I can do nothing about that). Charitwo is a turbo-reverter, but he so rarely talks to anyone on the site - edit wars aren't solved by waiting until someone gives up, but by messages (preferably friendly ones) on talk pages. If, just occasionally, Charitwo would do something like that, I'd warm to him so much more. --UU - natter 16:59, Mar 6
- I apologized for the late reply, I've been traveling all day. stupid), and there's really no such thing as edit warring when you're reverting vandalism, I see it done more here than any other wiki I've ever visited. This situation isn't any different than if it were an IP, or a brand new account. I don't think neither blocking nor threatening to remove my rollback was warranted especially in this case. It'd be different if it was a content dispute (over something that should or should not appear in an article), Meganew was essentially page blanking. Also, this isn't the first time he was blocked. :/ --CharitwoTalk 23:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- The previous discussion I had with you in the past was here. You might recall that you original message to this guy, who only wanted to move a page was "STFU" and "Just just do X. Idiot". You may also recalled that at that point I asked you to try and be more friendly. The problem, as far as I'm concerned, is that you don't have any involvement what so ever with Uncyclopedia other than reverting. You revert. Period. Don't get me wrong, you do help around tremendously with fighting vandals - but you placed yourself in this specific role, viewing the recent changes via the IRC bot and whenever you see a lot of text removed, you revert - not questions asked, no explanations given. If you were more involved in the site and bothered to take a time to look at Meganew's history, you'd realize that he's simply noob believing he's doing the right thing. Yes, he did his share of stupidities, you might have noticed that I didn't spare him the ban for being involved in this revert war - but this doesn't mean that you don't have the responsibility to hesitate before you so eagerly press the rollback button. Having that option does not mean you can revert indiscriminately, and being the veteran that you are I'd expect you rather than Meganew to drop a line on his talk page and tell him - look mate, you're doing it wrong. That would make everyone else involved feel much better and this whole fucking drama would have been averted. Speaking from personal experience - when I was a noob, I did nearly the exactly the same thing Sabrown did - and Mhaille just quietly fixed it instead of reverting/banning me. Was I to be banned or involved in a revert war at that point, I'd probably leave and never coming back - not understanding why I'm treated like that. Many annoying noobs have turned into the site's greatest contributers - to name a couple: Tom Mayfair and ZB, they were both annoying as hell to begin with - but they turned to be central pivots for Uncyclopedia - and Meganew has the same potential, until he proves otherwise. Bottom line - PLEASE Charitwo - if you're not 100% sure that you're dealing with vandals, hesitate and talk. This is my new motto, I'll be putting that on my underwear. ~ 09:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure or remember any previous talks. The edits in questions were blatant vandalism (honestly...replacing a page with "Haxx0red by ASPTG." is neither funny or productive, it's
- I apologized for the late reply, I've been traveling all day. stupid), and there's really no such thing as edit warring when you're reverting vandalism, I see it done more here than any other wiki I've ever visited. This situation isn't any different than if it were an IP, or a brand new account. I don't think neither blocking nor threatening to remove my rollback was warranted especially in this case. It'd be different if it was a content dispute (over something that should or should not appear in an article), Meganew was essentially page blanking. Also, this isn't the first time he was blocked. :/ --CharitwoTalk 23:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yah, I was seconds away from making the same bans, and for the same reasons (although obviously without the rollback threat as I can do nothing about that). Charitwo is a turbo-reverter, but he so rarely talks to anyone on the site - edit wars aren't solved by waiting until someone gives up, but by messages (preferably friendly ones) on talk pages. If, just occasionally, Charitwo would do something like that, I'd warm to him so much more. --UU - natter 16:59, Mar 6
- You might have noticed that I said "based on previous talks". This is not the first time this has happened. You might have noticed that the other guy got exactly the same treatment. I do not favor anyone in this case, or generally speaking. If someone feels that he has a superior stand over other users simply because he reverts more than the other person in question, well sorry - this is not the case. And I have to say, I very much dislike what you are hinting with your last sentence. ~ 16:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thats not quite true is it, that paticular user was reverting back, obviously some explantion could be requested on the article talkpage, or on the users talkpage. If someone of some standing and trust within the community reverts, it should be considered in good faith, bottom line. If the reverts were dodgy (we all make mistakes) this can be brought up in a friendly way. Charitwo has had some really nasty flak lately on here (I would have been very upset if those things had been said about me on VFS), yet this guy still comes to help on here, it seems that with some that its 'what can you do?' and others its bans and threats?--Sycamore (Talk) 16:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Based on previous talks, I am tired with blunt reverting rather than talking with someone who is obviously thinking he is doing the right thing. It is one thing to revert vandalism. It is another to do it to everything being conceived as vandalism without taking a minute to ponder if perhaps this can be resolved without constantly reverting. ~ 16:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
On a related note, where are the instructions for editing the "Vandalism on Wheels" page? I remember seeing them somewhere, but I couldn't find them just by looking around the page. In Meganew's defense, I could see how someone could think that one is supposed to blank and otherwise vandalize the "vandalism on wheels" page. --Mnb'z 06:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Achtung! Your support for the Nazi party has been documented. Danke shein. That vill be all. |
Honestly, I never expected a vote from you for something like this. Thanks. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:23, 7 Mar
- Why? I don't have an issue with Nazi related articles, as long as they're funny. And this one was very much so. ~ 08:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I dunno how I got that impression. Probably just distracted with work. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:47, 10 Mar
AAN Program
I saw that you are an active adopter and I am interested--Dybas28 01:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. As long as you intend to stay around, my recent adoptees tend to vanish after a few days....~ 08:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Vanish?--Dybas28
- Sorry about that. I was kinda busy for a while, but now I'm back, and I assure you I'm here to stay this time.--Dybas28 15:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nothing at this time, I'll let you know if the situation changes.--Dybas28 17:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Favour?
Tomorrow's the start of the PLS (not that I've really got that out much or anything, I knew I shouldn't have volunteered for that job!). If you're about tomorrow morning, would you mind sticking User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/PLS/Main on the main page for me? –—Hv (talk) 8/03 19:32
- Was about to, but someone went ahead and did it before me. I'm telling you, I'm feeling completely obsolete, like an outdated model or something. I'll just go ahead and kill myself discreetly. ~ 08:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Purim
- So what are you planning to dress up as? ~ 11:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I thought maybe I'd be really original and go for Mordecai or King David. Bet nobody else thought of that! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's quite original. I didn't find any Purim parties to go to unfortunately....~ 11:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Me neither. The only synagogue in town, despite being allegedly reform, is far too conservative for my liking and the chabad house is too far to be bothered. Shame really, there are few things so amusing as a pissed-up Hasidic rebbe. I expect the missus and I will go and have our own party in the pub, then come home and, seriously drunk, set the flat on fire while trying to make hamentaschen. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- You can always come over here to have Hamentaschen, we're quite good in making them :) ~ 12:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- If it wasn't for the sheer distance, I'd be tempted - I'd quite like to spend Purim in Israel. I make a great loaf of chollah too, so we could have had a full-on carbohydrate festival to regain any fat we've lost since the almighty fry-up that is Hanukkah. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- You do know that I currently live in Amsterdam? ~ 13:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I thought you were the golden boy of Israel. As in, little Israeli boys painted you gold each morning as you went out to get your morning creams. —Sir SysRq (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was up until last April during which I moved to Amsterdam, now living on a little canal and trying to convert everyone to Judaism. ~ 14:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh? I was just in Amsterdam not too long ago, converting everyone to atheism. I even started an atheist church there where we read passages from the Book of Nothing Happens When You Die by the prophet Justbeagoodperson N. Dontliveinfearofeternaldamnation. If you happen to go by there, please send my blessings, and tell them Father SysRq will return one day, provided it is within the next sixty or so years because no one lives forever. —Sir SysRq (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- No, didn't know you were living in Amsterdam. The East Anglian topography (or lack of) being as it is, the highest point between there and here is probably someone's garden rockery at an oxygen-depleted two feet above sea-level, so if you were to frisbee one of those hamantaschen hard enough I could probably catch it. Might be worth a try - I used a new recipe for mine (rather than my mother's generations-old version, proving that you are right and I am a bad Jew) which seemed to call for rather a lot of baking powder. They're now about nine inches wide, two inches thick and look a bit like pizzas. Edible, but not very traditional... Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh? I was just in Amsterdam not too long ago, converting everyone to atheism. I even started an atheist church there where we read passages from the Book of Nothing Happens When You Die by the prophet Justbeagoodperson N. Dontliveinfearofeternaldamnation. If you happen to go by there, please send my blessings, and tell them Father SysRq will return one day, provided it is within the next sixty or so years because no one lives forever. —Sir SysRq (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was up until last April during which I moved to Amsterdam, now living on a little canal and trying to convert everyone to Judaism. ~ 14:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I thought you were the golden boy of Israel. As in, little Israeli boys painted you gold each morning as you went out to get your morning creams. —Sir SysRq (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- You do know that I currently live in Amsterdam? ~ 13:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- If it wasn't for the sheer distance, I'd be tempted - I'd quite like to spend Purim in Israel. I make a great loaf of chollah too, so we could have had a full-on carbohydrate festival to regain any fat we've lost since the almighty fry-up that is Hanukkah. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- You can always come over here to have Hamentaschen, we're quite good in making them :) ~ 12:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I thought everyone knows that 'Dillo lives in Amsterdam these days. Which is why I've made sure he found out I was passing through (four times since he's moved there) after I had left Schipol airport. Otherwise I might have been tackled, dragged off home to meet Mrs.Dillo and offered some hamentaschen (and some Chuddletachlechuggles) without having a clue of what it is... o.O -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 09:58, 10 Mar
- Me neither. The only synagogue in town, despite being allegedly reform, is far too conservative for my liking and the chabad house is too far to be bothered. Shame really, there are few things so amusing as a pissed-up Hasidic rebbe. I expect the missus and I will go and have our own party in the pub, then come home and, seriously drunk, set the flat on fire while trying to make hamentaschen. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's quite original. I didn't find any Purim parties to go to unfortunately....~ 11:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I thought maybe I'd be really original and go for Mordecai or King David. Bet nobody else thought of that! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- How'd it all go in the end? Find a party? My pizzataschens were ok in the end, if somewhat untraditional - we ate the last two with custard last night. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- No party unfortunately, but the whatchacallit hammentaschen were not bad at all! ~ 16:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- *Meow?* (Can anyone tell if I'm bored? Because I seriously am. And tired. Sleep deprivivified...) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 22:34, 12 Mar
- LUVVVY!!!!! ~ 22:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- circumcised male?! (I like...) *cough* Yup, I'm tired... :/ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 23:33, 12 Mar
- LUVVVY!!!!! ~ 22:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- *Meow?* (Can anyone tell if I'm bored? Because I seriously am. And tired. Sleep deprivivified...) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 22:34, 12 Mar
- No party unfortunately, but the whatchacallit hammentaschen were not bad at all! ~ 16:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Clifford Sumner
Hey, trying to contact you, not sure how? Can i create my Clifford Sumner page? He's a important figure down here in fields of Dorset. Wicked —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ragman205 (talk • contribs)
- Err...define "important"? I couldn't find anything about him that made him look like someone worth having an article on. ~ 17:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Okey-doke
Righto. Well, no harm done. Suppose it was a BIT snide to revert the edits. On the other hand I was only following the guidelines he put for asking a question but I'm starting to get the feeling that I made a balls of that one... Y'know, you got a good sig? How'd ya do it? Cos I'm super-confused. No, really! Shocking, I know, isn't it... --Noamshouseparty 21:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
House thingy
Yeah, I made a lengthy-ish abstain comment on the House VFH, but I thought I'd mention a little more here. I love the idea, and some of the stuff is very good. But I'm not sure you've really made the most of it there. It feels thin, for me - not actually that much content, stretched out a bit by the formatting. I think spending a little more time with House in more depth would help, as would investigating the symptoms, both imagined and real. More time on the thought processes that lead him to diagnose himself with all these various illnesses might help - I don't really feel at any point that the narrator is being dragged down into the pit of paranoia, and that's part of the problem.
And the ending - I like the idea, and the photos and the captions. It just feels like two abreast doesn't work somehow. I dunno, feels too much like an image gallery, as someone said. Maybe 3 per line would help - not make it so long, and with so much whitespace on either side? It's easy to put my finger on what I don't like about it, not so easy to come up with a suggestion, so i see why you did it, but... Oh I dunno, it's a decent article, I just hope you understand my abstain after all this wibble! --UU - natter 11:45, Mar 13
- Hellair hellair, I just deleted you from my Christmas card list. Yes. Oh, wait, I don't celebrate XMAS. Damn.
But seriously, thanks for the feedback. I much rather have a good long explanation why is that not to your liking rather than getting a MEH. I'm telling you, I'm about to turn that into a bannable offence. I think it's extremely vain especially coming from writers who I do not see writing a lot, or write at all for that matter. But that's another issue.
I know what you mean about this one, but I sort of lost the muse with it at one point, and just felt like releasing it rather than forcing more content. I think that for this kind of silly-ish article, the length is reasonable. I think perhaps I'll ask for someone to sort out a split screen TV image based on the gallery. It is bloody ugly. ~ 15:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost 12th March 09
The Newspaper the Whole Family Must Enjoy!
March 10th, 2009 • Issue 38 • Mucking up your talk page, one issue at a time
CONSPIRACY!!! WE ARE DOOMED! Head for the hills, Uncyclopedia users, there's nothing that can save us now! As of this morning, we NO LONGER EXIST!!! Now, if you are reading this, you may be thinking to yourself, "why, that Gerry fellow is quite mad. Since I am reading the UnSignpost now, then both I and Uncyclopedia must still exist." To this i say to you: THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK. Furthermore, it is also WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK THEY THINK YOU THINK. Reactions were mixed today at the wiki. Some theorized that uncyclopedia.wikia.com was, in fact, sinking. In response to this, the women (all 3 of them) and children were loaded onto lifeboats and fired out of the lifeboat-cannon, in hopes that they would land far away enough from the landlocked Uncyc as to find a body of water. Other preparations included the Cajek string quartet playing rousing versions of traditional ship-sinking music. While it might seem rash for an official non-cabal-run periodical to endorse panic, the UnSignpost urges all Uncyclopedia users to abandon all reason and logic in an attempt to save themselves. The best course of action is most likely the one that involves the maximum amount of screaming, arm-flailing, and general insanity. The Uncyclopedia Store is likely to be looted quickly, so be sure to stop by early to maximize you chances at getting the best stuff. Count to a Million: Update Uncyclopedians have continued their brave foray into the dangerous world of numbers, today reaching the long-awaited benchmark of 3,239. The constitutes nearly 1/300th of the total goal, meaning we are 0.32% of the way there! Users were overjoyed, confused, and generally apathetic about the achievement. Since its inception on February 20th, 2008, many different counters, or 'c-ters' as they refer to themselves, have contributed to the project. The content of the countup has varied greatly, from battleships to cartoon characters to road signs, and yet never deviating very far away from pornography. At any rate, it seems Uncyclopedia admin and Chair of the Committee to Investigate and Eliminate Needless Committees Spang's experiment to destroy the internet has not succeeded...yet. The project has advanced at a rate of 8.39 numbers per day, a respectable clip considering the enormous effort involved in adding the next number in the sequence. At this brisk clip, the project will reach completion at 18:45 UT on June 24, 2334. Until that day, Uncyclopedians can only hope, dream, and continue in the increasingly difficult task of adding one to a moderately large number. |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Shabbat shalom
In a situation such as right now, when a load of crap has appeared overnight and QVFD has got a load of red text, is there any reason why it can't be cleared out and archived at any point or several points during the day rather than just once? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Shabat shalom! No problem at all archiving whenever you feel it's crappy enough. I'm sitting in front of the machine waiting to buy U2 concert tickets. Pathetic isn't it? ~ 10:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I quite like U2, but I don't like to admit it because people take the piss. I saw 'em back in the day when Achtung Baby came out, having been a bit of a fan ever since Sunday Bloody Sunday. Someone here in Cambridge was offering a pair of free tickets they'd got from somewhere or other - I was too late, unfortunately. Anyway, I'm off to clear out QVFD. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's the thing about moving from Israel to Europe - you don't get a lot of shows over there since the bands are a bit stressed out to come over, so I got a few concerts - but not too many. And now when I'm here I'm trying to see everything at once :). ~ 10:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I can imagine. A lot of people in Europe seem to think bombs are going off 24/7 and shells rain down constantly with no let-up all over Israel - I suppose it comes from Israel not really being in the news often for any other reason. Any plans to see any other shows? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well... As an European voicing in, last time Israel had a little ruckus going on in southern Lebanon, my former commanding officer, who was at the UN survey station (the white one with "UN" in nice big blue letters painted all over it that should be marked as "NOT THIS ONE!" on maps) ended up going kablooie and a good man and a remarkably fair officer from back when Luvvy was still in the Marines died. They brought back a coffin that weighed about 150 kilos less than the guy really did... :( But don't worry 'Dillo, I still love you, just not necessarily the guy who pulled that trigger... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 10:53, 15 Mar
- Welll....you got Dave Mathews band, AC/DC, North Sea Jazz Festival and I hope Elton John as well. ~ 11:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- North Sea Jazz festival sounds my sort of thing. Cool, daddio. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I can imagine. A lot of people in Europe seem to think bombs are going off 24/7 and shells rain down constantly with no let-up all over Israel - I suppose it comes from Israel not really being in the news often for any other reason. Any plans to see any other shows? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's the thing about moving from Israel to Europe - you don't get a lot of shows over there since the bands are a bit stressed out to come over, so I got a few concerts - but not too many. And now when I'm here I'm trying to see everything at once :). ~ 10:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I quite like U2, but I don't like to admit it because people take the piss. I saw 'em back in the day when Achtung Baby came out, having been a bit of a fan ever since Sunday Bloody Sunday. Someone here in Cambridge was offering a pair of free tickets they'd got from somewhere or other - I was too late, unfortunately. Anyway, I'm off to clear out QVFD. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
RE QVFD archivng days that are still already days or something like that
Template:QVFD checked - I thought this was an admin job, and that we shitmunchers would move in if an op could be arse to add this. For the record they were not added overnight, I just produce a lotta QVFD:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think that specific template is not really used. I know I never use it. I think we QVFD, there's no checkin needed, if it's red it's gone :) ~ 11:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
John Deacon are using diapers
Why have you deleted John Deacon are using diapers?! I think that page was funny. It's about John Deacon AND diapers! --Pink Floyd man 11:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I fail to see what's the funny part in it. It had two lines that said "John Deacon wears diapers"~ 11:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- The title was kind of funny though - at least, it was if you've not been on the internet in the last few years where 'cute lolcat grammar' has begun to go ever such a little stale... Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it time to stick
This (or something similar) back for a bit? MrN Fork you! 09:03, Mar 16
- Let's give them a couple of days, it's only that site notices are very annoying...~ 09:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm too lazy to make a template...
But thanks for the vote on Driving in Bucharest, it's really appreciated, especially from someone such as yourself. –—Hv (talk) 17/03 18:04
- My pleasure, but someone such as myself? O_O ~ 18:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- You're the old fart of Uncyc, so of course you're special... We juniors just kill time by polishing your ego and trying not to get ourselves or others banned.
- I guess it's a bit like Daddy and his pants fixation... I'm cuddly, which I guess is my meme... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 08:33, 18 Mar
Question
O experienced and knowledgeable one, what is the policy regarding people using their own talk pages for what looks like cyberbullying bollocks? (Look at the history). I was thinking possibly huff and recreate with a warning? --UU - natter 09:28, Mar 18
- Morning, that sounds like a good mood. I'd even leave a warning there saying that this account will be blocked if they don't mend their ways :) ~ 09:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ah well, that's the end of that saga - looks like I'm too nice to people some times! --UU - natter 09:45, Mar 18
- We need some nice people here along side the rest of us old mean farts. ~ 09:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nice old fart you say? :-D. I don't think I can think of anyone who could manage to do the job of regulating Pee Review and telling people that their reviews sux without getting a single complaint or upset user. I mean seriously, has anyone ever complained to UU about anything? Ever? It's just ridiculous... Under_user, consider this a formal complaint. MrN Fork you! 12:59, Mar 18
- Indeed. He is too perfect to be real. I suspect he's either an android or a woman. Perhaps both. ~ 13:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thing is, Michael Jackson had already buggered the kids. --noamshouseparty 21:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Don't worry, your great great granddaughter or great grand niece still loves the lot of you :) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 02:47, 19 Mar
- Thing is, Michael Jackson had already buggered the kids. --noamshouseparty 21:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. He is too perfect to be real. I suspect he's either an android or a woman. Perhaps both. ~ 13:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nice old fart you say? :-D. I don't think I can think of anyone who could manage to do the job of regulating Pee Review and telling people that their reviews sux without getting a single complaint or upset user. I mean seriously, has anyone ever complained to UU about anything? Ever? It's just ridiculous... Under_user, consider this a formal complaint. MrN Fork you! 12:59, Mar 18
- We need some nice people here along side the rest of us old mean farts. ~ 09:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ah well, that's the end of that saga - looks like I'm too nice to people some times! --UU - natter 09:45, Mar 18
That's why I could never be an admin
As you already know, I sometimes I fail miserably at diplomacy. I'll try to stick to writing.--
10:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)- Actually we have had many less than diplomatic admins. I sometimes get the urge to ban first and ask questions later, but I remind myself that many of the annoying fucks I've met here became brilliant writers later. ~ 10:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Already I've seen some noob who I thought was going to crash and burn become a more productive citizen. I have to remind myself that people, especially the younger one's, need to be afforded the liberty of being human on occasion and not be judged too quickly.-- 10:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
(Block log); 11:39 . . MrN9500 (Talk | contribs | block) blocked MrN9001 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week (insubordination)
He's not getting any dinner tonight either. MrN Fork you! 11:52, Mar 19
Halal
Was just adding that to the VFD archive, not realising you were actually in the process of dealing with it. Do you want me to take it back out since you've redirected, or leave it as it is? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- WHY YOU LITTLE W#%R#RJ!!! it's perfectly fine .
Say, aren't you supposed to go to the meeting today? ~ 10:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- S'ok, I just updated the archive so it now has your comment informing people of the redirect. Yes to the meeting, but I don't need to be at the bus stop until 11.45. Photos will be available for viewing at some point tomorrow. :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- IN THE NUDE?!?!? ~ 10:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I assume so - after all, does Olipro ever wear clothes? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- On special occasions only. ~ 10:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Rubber ones. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I still say, you should have given us non-UK located people a heads up. When I'm drunk I supposedly get very cuddly with the gentlemen in my party, end up throwing extra clothes off and don't remember much the next morning. Or so I'm told... You're gonna miss it! :D -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 16:17, 19 Mar
- Rubber ones. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- On special occasions only. ~ 10:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I assume so - after all, does Olipro ever wear clothes? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- IN THE NUDE?!?!? ~ 10:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh and one thing
Chutzpah thinks you owe them a sporked eye or something like that. They threatened your blood pressure in case you fail. I'm confuzzled (that's what you get when you're conveying someone else's message). Oh, and irc is boring without my favourite Jew... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 20:39, 19 Mar
- Tell my good friend Chuzpah, that unless he wants to be dragged into a good old IDF interrogation room, he should stop making demands O_O. Also, apologies for now showing up to IRC, but I heard that you were treated good there ;) ~ 09:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- The good old... WHAT?! 0_0
- You do realise you're scary, right?
- Umm... I have no memories of who treated me how in irc last night. I had something else on my mind. Cute, furry, cuddly... *purrr* -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 10:49, 20 Mar
- That whole thing about an interrogation room... It's... disturbing. I woke up with a black cat licking my ear. That was... an interesting experience... I'm happy that's the only thing my cha'tal'tool did this time... Okay, so he was smothering my face... o_O How was Belgium? :) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 10:16, 23 Mar
UnSignpost 19th March
The Periodical That Is Too Sexy For Its Shirt, Among Other Things
March 19th, 2009 • Issue 39 • Committed to both Bringing You The News and The Happywood Insane Asylum
Forum topic created; Modusoperandi posts witty response At a certain point this week, a relatively green uncyclopedian posed a rather ill-advised question on one of the Forums quaintly known to patrons of this silly wiki as the 'Village Dump'. A few seconds after the aforementioned certain point this week, resident cheek-tonguer Modusoperandi responded by intentionally misinterpreting the meaning of the question, twisting the querist's words, taking advantage of some sort of delicious pun, or otherwise causing mischief in the usually serious, informative Forum. Reactions were, as usual, mixed in the community. Several anonymous users were outraged at the lack of tact and formality displayed by the wily Modus. "Uncyclopedia is serious business," said one pitchfork-wielding mob participant. "We would descend into total anarchy if it weren't for the court system, the press, the boron smelting plant, and the sanctity of our information distribution system." Other users seemed to support the flashing of rapier wit, claiming "if we can't laugh a little, then what's the point? Without humor, we'd end up in hell like all those poor souls who lived before Jesus invented comedy in 23 A.D." Modusoperandi himself declined to comment on the situation, only offering this brief reply to a query seeking a comment: "She told me that she was eighteen. She also told me that she human and was not, in fact, a bonobo. If you have any other questions, please direct them to my law firm; Alan, Whitcomb, Silverstein & Bonobo." It seems the elusive Mr. Operandi is free to continue in his forum havoc-wreaking, as nobody has stepped up to officially denounce his actions. All bonobos involved were unavailable for comment.
This week the Uncyclopedia community was outraged to learn that the UnSignpost, which recently received a Wikia bailout, will be giving hefty bonuses to the very dunderheads responsible for driving the periodical into the ground in the first place. The extremely active Uncyclopedia Senate has vowed that action will be taken against the editors set to receive the lucrative bonuses. It may be possible that they will be blocked from editing or even exiled to another wiki. Uncyclopedians were, for the most part, outraged. Popular user Mnbvcxz had an unrelated statement quote-mined by an UnSignpost journalist to produce the following comment:"I[...]is[...]finished," a possible indication that he will leave the site in protest of the bonuses. The founders of the newspaper refused comment, as they want nothing to do with it anymore, and true to that mission this reporter was chased off the the grounds of the Cajek mansion by bunnies wearing bee costumes. The current editors were hounded, with Under user having this to say: "I don't think there have been any "comically large" bonuses paid out. There have simply been adequate contractual remunerations allocated to key staff to reward their loyalty and unstinting efforts. Every penny of these almost insignificant amounts is richly deserved. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to buy a large yacht and fill a swimming pool with cash to float it on." Gerrycheevers was absolutely unavailable at press time.
|
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
MnbvcxzBot 04:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
jew
evening mordillo. just wondering if you could take one final gander at Jew and see if you think it's there. it has the feel of one of those articles with many, many contributors, and i'm not sure we were all going in exactly the same direction, but i like a lot of what's there, and it's been three weeks so we have to wrap it up tonite. in particular, me and opty were wondering about the 'audience' role in the foreward and such. we changed it to 'congregation'...is there a better word for the people the rabbi is addressing? thanks much. 19:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's much better than the original version, but still need some work, I'll try to edit it further, but I think at this point we're good enough to go with the next article. Also, congregation is certainly the right word. ~ 08:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Checkuser?
I was wondering why I can't ask for these anymore:)?--Sycamore (Talk) 11:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Because even if you get a positive answer, you can't do anything with it, plus there might be some behind the scene discussions involving the cabal which an open chekuser request will alert the sockpuppet that there are discussions regarding him. We had a lot of those during the NXWave period. Also, this is nothing new, it's just that Sannse started putting out to everyone O_O ~ 14:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Check out
Forum:Moar Checkuser. MrN Fork you! 15:24, Mar 23
- Oh! I'll finally be able to verify is YOU are NXWave! Wouldn't that be a laugh? O_O ~ 16:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks mr. He-who-secretly-controls-everything :]. You know, 'Son kills father' is my first unNews article, do you think it is good? Could you give me some tips on how to improve my reporting skills? Thanks in advance SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 10:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hya, no problem at all. I'd suggest putting pictures, that always helps. I think it was fine, got a few giggles out of it - I think maybe I relate to it a bit better than others since I'm from the neighborhood. Try to make more distinct brakes between the paragraphs and write it in a bit more organized manner. But other than that, I think it's fine and can only improve in the future. ~ 12:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- fine, I'll do another one by your advice tomorrow if I have time SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 12:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
PLS judging
I'm sending you this because you are signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If you no longer want to judge or are incapable of doing so, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go, here are the instructions:
First, read all of the articles in your specified category. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least fair and based on merit (one suggestion would be to use the Pee Review format). Post your top 5 articles here. Hit me up on my talk page for questions, comments, if these rules are not cognisant within you, or of you don't know what the word "cognisant" means.
Thank you again for your valued participation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise!
Of course, you already know that, since you're the one who reminded me to send this thing out in the first place! –—Hv (talk) 24/03 20:27
So
Is there a Cabal?Saberwolf116 22:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Whore
Damn...you suck it hard. The pope is waiting for his lap dance. Put on your diaper and get to work! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LolaHanghangeara (talk • contribs)
- Hmm, I appear to have accidentally banned the above. Finger must have slipped or something. MrN Fork you! 08:54, Mar 25
*אני מתרפקת עליך*
"Eek!" -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 20:11, 25 Mar
“zsjjjjjjjjjjjtdj娨¨¨¨¨¨¨utu”
- I needs the cuddlies. -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 21:48, 31 Mar
MrN and Signposts
Can I get your thoughts on MrN's current month-long ban-frenzy for the UnSignpost? How do you feel about the fact that he's banned more people this month than all the other admins put together? --UU - natter 16:48, Mar 26
- I believe the man is a menace, and danger to society. I believe he should be castrated, quartered, hanged, torched and his ashes should be scattered over France. I believe he should burn in hell for all eternity. What? Do I feel pity about all those who he banned? Fuck no, I didn't have anyone to ban because of the bastard! ~ 17:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- As can be seen MrN Fork you! 17:15, Mar 26
- 18:19, 13 March 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked MrN9500 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week (rättelse av en kollega administratör)
- The correct spelling would be more like "administratörkollega", you doofus! :o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 21:42, 26 Mar
- Well, Ms. smarty pants, perhaps you'd like to read this! O_O ~ 08:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- I did, but didn't get into correcting your Google Sveedish... :o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 09:06, 27 Mar
- Kanske jag borde lära dej svenska i utbyte för hebreiskan? :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 12:41, 29 Mar
- Ja tack, damen luvvy! det skulle vara trevligt för dig.~ 16:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ja, mein teil ist größ, ich bin nicht keine arschloch, hitler ist ein mütterficker, norsk arysk black metal rah! Ich bin ein Svenskastaner. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:26, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wrong language, ya sachbi ;) ~ 16:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3aref, ya sa7bi. Hey, d'you speak Arabic, or just what your ears pick up from the streets? :] SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Only basic street Arabic. Most of it would be foul language I'm afraid ;). I also have no idea how to translate Arabic to the Latin alphabet...~ 16:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nice for me, or nice for you, Matok? And as comes to my language skills, I'm fluent in three, and understand about eleven or so languages to varying degree. It made my day when I was told what "Nishbar li ha'zayin mehachara ha'ze" means yesterday, I was feeling like it at work... ^_^ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 16:38, 29 Mar
- dont tell me this is in Arabic, luvvy :).. dillo, care to tell me about some hebrew street language, you know, the equivalents of the Arabic ones you know about, like kossomak, yabn el sharmoota, yabn el metnaka, and so on.. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- What I quoted was in Hebrew. I can't understand Arabic, really. :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 16:54, 29 Mar
- Actually, MahmOOsha, we use some similar expressions. Kossomak and Sharmoota for one. I think a good one would be koos achotcha ha`tsolaat. ~ 10:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- All I will say to that is, since the above makes less sense to me than Hebrew, is... *אני מתרפקת עליך* :) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 10:41, 30 Mar
- Actually, MahmOOsha, we use some similar expressions. Kossomak and Sharmoota for one. I think a good one would be koos achotcha ha`tsolaat. ~ 10:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- What I quoted was in Hebrew. I can't understand Arabic, really. :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 16:54, 29 Mar
- Nice for me, or nice for you, Matok? And as comes to my language skills, I'm fluent in three, and understand about eleven or so languages to varying degree. It made my day when I was told what "Nishbar li ha'zayin mehachara ha'ze" means yesterday, I was feeling like it at work... ^_^ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 16:38, 29 Mar
- Only basic street Arabic. Most of it would be foul language I'm afraid ;). I also have no idea how to translate Arabic to the Latin alphabet...~ 16:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3aref, ya sa7bi. Hey, d'you speak Arabic, or just what your ears pick up from the streets? :] SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wrong language, ya sachbi ;) ~ 16:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ja, mein teil ist größ, ich bin nicht keine arschloch, hitler ist ein mütterficker, norsk arysk black metal rah! Ich bin ein Svenskastaner. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:26, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ja tack, damen luvvy! det skulle vara trevligt för dig.~ 16:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kanske jag borde lära dej svenska i utbyte för hebreiskan? :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 12:41, 29 Mar
- I did, but didn't get into correcting your Google Sveedish... :o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 09:06, 27 Mar
- Well, Ms. smarty pants, perhaps you'd like to read this! O_O ~ 08:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- The correct spelling would be more like "administratörkollega", you doofus! :o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 21:42, 26 Mar
You're an odd one
Totally. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- So a dinner and a show would have been the better option? ~ 10:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'd totally put out after dinner and a show, but even without it I can both bask in the fact that I'm always on the mainpage and be humbled by the fact that only a couple of people have noticed. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost 26th March 09
The Newspaper Made Entirely From Recycled Internet Memes
March 26th, 2009 • Issue 40• Spooning the Soggy Vegetables of Truth from the Luke-warm Soup of the News
MrN's banstick stuck in "on" position
Popular admin, underwear enthusiast and raconteur MrN9500 has gone on a ban-rampage unprecedented in the recent history of the wiki. Seemingly keen to win his first bastard admin award, the conscientious custodian has already banned more people this month than all the other admins combined. The other admins rallied bravely, with even Spang being seen to ban someone (only his third of the year) as they tried to show they were not now completely surplus to requirements. However, even as this story was typed, MrN banned another 3 vandals, rendering their efforts ultimately futile. Speculation that he is trying to ban more people on an individual basis than Hinoa managed in one go when he banned the whole of Italy cannot be confirmed or denied at the time of going to press. When asked about his phenomenal spree, MrN said "What do all these buttons with "Ban" written on them do? I keep pushing them, but nothing appears to happen". Banning legend Mordillo, when asked for a comment on MrN's ban excesses, said "I believe the man is a menace, and danger to society. I believe he should be castrated, quartered, hanged, torched and his ashes should be scattered over France. I believe he should burn in hell for all eternity. What? Do I feel pity about all those who he banned? Fuck no, I didn't have anyone to ban because of the bastard!" Uncyclopedia now famous In a totally unexpected development, Uncyclopedia has officially earned the worldwide recognition it has longed for since its inception. On the website digg.com, all internet content is sorted and ranked by coolness, similar to the process found in many middle schools. It seems Uncyc's page on spam has reached sufficient 'cool' status as to cause the rest of the site to become invited to the "cool kid's lunch table", along with theonion.com and cracked.com. Reactions were unusually mixed today in the Uncyclopedia break room. When asked what it's like to suddenly be cool, Optimuschris said, "shit, I'll let you know when I find out." Another user, DrStrange, was asked for a comment, and promptly responded "comment duly delivered!" Clearly, popularity has already gone to Uncyclopedians' heads, as such chippy responses are rarely seen. Uncyclopedians have become too cool for school. When asked for comment regarding adding a sentence to the end of this article to extend its length and make this week's UnSignpost look pretty, Gerrycheevers said, "bugger off." |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
User account renaming
Hi there, please can you rename my account from SunStar Net to Sunstar Net; thanks! I didn't want to have to create a new account for a trivial change in username... --Sunstar Net 20:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Lo, I'm afraid I can't help you with that one. You'll need to talk with sannse. ~ 21:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Archive this talk page.
It has become almost as long as my dick SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 20:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Overriding my block...
did you see this one also? I thought it was worth hammering the point home as she had done 1, created an account and then started to do more. It's almost like we all need checkuser or something eh? MrN Fork you! 14:19, Mar 30
- Yeah, I didn't see that one. Are you sure it's her? Thing is, I think it's worth talking with this one rather than banning, she seem to be a bit confused O_O. What happened to that whole checkuser thingy anyway? ~ 14:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- I can't be absolutely sure it's her no. I don't have checkuser so I made a guess. Just a guess (which I'm rather sure about) based on actions. In the history of Agnostic there are also some other similar edits... It would be nice if I did not need to make such guesses which I might be wrong about. It would be terrible to ban someone like that for a case of mistaken identity. The whole checkuser thing? I put a link on Sannse's page about it but she said nothing. Personally I think that all sysops should have access to the tool. Do we trust some admins more more than others? What the heck is that about? The use of the tool is logged, so if anyone uses it in "the wrong way" they loose it. I'm not even sure what "the wrong way" means anyway. Checkuser is a tool which would allow sysops to find people who have accounts but sometimes vandalise for the fun of it. It would also help with our problems of people voting twice (or more) using multiple accounts. If we gave it to all sysops you can bet your ass that people would realise, and stop whatever sockpuppetry they were doing. As it is now (or even with what would be 1 active crat (you)) with the tool then it would not make much difference. Checkuser needs to be in the hands of the people who are active on the site. There is little point giving it to people who are not here. Why don't we give it to all sysops? All the sysops at ED have it. I wonder why they don't get many of the problems which we do... By not giving all sysops this tool, we are protecting the "rights" of sockpuppets and vandals and suggesting that our Sysops are not trustworthy enough to know what someones IP address is... Yea... Had an argument with the misses last night. Can you tell? :P (I'm fine now thank you Susan) MrN Fork you! 14:54, Mar 30
- I think more or less like you on that matter, we need to have a serious chat with Sannse on this whole issue methinks. IRC sometimes? Also, sorry to hear about the missus. Come over here with her for the weekend, smoke some weed, drink a lot, and everything will be better. ~ 15:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- What? I came here for an argument! I demand my money back! Yea, IRC... I'm normally in there myself, and can be called in if I forget to join. You are blocked from work so I guess it's just evenings for you. Could you maybe drop Sannse a message and try to arrange a chat? I assume that's kosher stuff you are talking about? :-) MrN Fork you! 16:26, Mar 30
- I think more or less like you on that matter, we need to have a serious chat with Sannse on this whole issue methinks. IRC sometimes? Also, sorry to hear about the missus. Come over here with her for the weekend, smoke some weed, drink a lot, and everything will be better. ~ 15:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- I can't be absolutely sure it's her no. I don't have checkuser so I made a guess. Just a guess (which I'm rather sure about) based on actions. In the history of Agnostic there are also some other similar edits... It would be nice if I did not need to make such guesses which I might be wrong about. It would be terrible to ban someone like that for a case of mistaken identity. The whole checkuser thing? I put a link on Sannse's page about it but she said nothing. Personally I think that all sysops should have access to the tool. Do we trust some admins more more than others? What the heck is that about? The use of the tool is logged, so if anyone uses it in "the wrong way" they loose it. I'm not even sure what "the wrong way" means anyway. Checkuser is a tool which would allow sysops to find people who have accounts but sometimes vandalise for the fun of it. It would also help with our problems of people voting twice (or more) using multiple accounts. If we gave it to all sysops you can bet your ass that people would realise, and stop whatever sockpuppetry they were doing. As it is now (or even with what would be 1 active crat (you)) with the tool then it would not make much difference. Checkuser needs to be in the hands of the people who are active on the site. There is little point giving it to people who are not here. Why don't we give it to all sysops? All the sysops at ED have it. I wonder why they don't get many of the problems which we do... By not giving all sysops this tool, we are protecting the "rights" of sockpuppets and vandals and suggesting that our Sysops are not trustworthy enough to know what someones IP address is... Yea... Had an argument with the misses last night. Can you tell? :P (I'm fine now thank you Susan) MrN Fork you! 14:54, Mar 30
Sorry
Sorry. I needed the lock on my user page Lucas Duke 14:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Userpage? oh, sorry. I meant the Confederacy of Independent People. Lucas Duke 15:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh, excuse me, Mr. Bureaucrat, sir. Can you spare just a second for a lowly prole?
Well, I did some counting. Found out there are around 1700 old VFHs archived. Fun. Trying to decide the best way to go about it. I'm thinking just putting a copy of the Admin note of the failing, along with a link to the archived page. Might do the same for featured articles as well. Might as well. Any suggestions? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 02:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, for the featured articles I don't think you need to put anything on them, as all the details are in the {{FA}} template. As for the old stuff, you probably want to have a bot helping you. How you'll be going about that, I have no idea since I fail at bots. Possibly the prince of pants can help you there. But how about you start first with the current nominations, see how it goes, and then we can think about doing that to the old articles? ~ 07:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wouldn't even know how to make a bot regardless. That's a pretty good idea sticking with recent ones now. We'll see how it goes. I'll start around the recently failed area for now. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 07:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm...It seems I've run into a problem. Been testing out a way to do this. Created my own template, and what not, found here, but it doesn't seem to be enjoying Alternate Namespaces. I'm linking to the archived vote page using the SUBPAGENAME template, but the page's name doesn't include the Alternate Namespace title (i.e.: UnNews) which is messing up my beautiful template. I'm not sure I'm making any sense here... just check out the red link on UnNews talk:Francis Winkler get some sick. The link doesn't include the "UnNews" Prefix. Do you know how I could fix this, or should I be taking up my technical difficulties elsewhere? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, from the technical side I'm afraid I can't help you very much, I'm fail at technicals. One thought though, how about making the template a bit more "uncyclopedia"? So, a bit like "the buggers didn't want to vote and the writer himself bla bla". You know what I mean? ~ 09:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Are you talking about this new-fangled comedy thing? Nah, man nah. I think I'll just stick to the ole' tried and true: interpretive dance. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, from the technical side I'm afraid I can't help you very much, I'm fail at technicals. One thought though, how about making the template a bit more "uncyclopedia"? So, a bit like "the buggers didn't want to vote and the writer himself bla bla". You know what I mean? ~ 09:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I need you to look into something
I think DrStrange has crossed the line on Necropaxxs talkpage. --Docile hippopotamus 04:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Baldrick
Gets another day on the front page I reckon? We just don't FA anything today? MrN Fork you! 11:39, Apr 1
- I was thinking about that. Makes sense to bump the queue in one day forward. Also means, that my article will be featured on my birthday :) ~ 11:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Ha Ha.
That was very funny. Why couldn't you just unedit the main page? It would've been less cruel then to NOT LET US VOTE!!! Saberwolf116 12:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Cos unprotecting the main page was just what you were expecting. :P MrN Fork you! 12:27, Apr 1
- GAHHH!!! YOU DICTATOR!!! I SHOULD CALL YOU MR. STALIN 9500!!! Saberwolf116 12:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Facebook Haggadah
Oh yes. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:57, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's genius! I wonder if I can get my father to read this in the Seder...~ 06:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
So here is an odd thing...
This considering this. That IP was blocked for ever, but then appeared to still be able to edit. Odd eh? Oh, just so you know... I like to keep the Gay pages not protected as they are a magnet for idiots which makes it easier to find em. MrN Fork you! 18:15, Apr 1
- Here is another one When is judgement day again? Did I miss it? Cos it was crap if I did. MrN Fork you! 21:32, Apr 1
Umm
Even if it was an April Fool's joke, don't you still have to put a deletion tag on Fisher Price (and please, no in-jokes, serious answer)?Saberwolf116 01:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Go eat shit, fucker. Sorry, couldn't help it. If it was a joke nomination I think we can dispense with the tag. ~ 06:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, one of the reasons I nommed it was so I could go down in history on the discussion page. Saberwolf116 12:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
March Foolitzer Prize
UnSignpost 2nd April 09
Just like Grandma used to make!
April 5th, 2009 • Issue 41 • In the fashion of Illogicopedia, the only Newspaper that will recollect a flightdeck!
EVIL WIKIA DICTATORS SHUT DOWN UNCYCLOPEDIA Due to high operational costs and "the community being a bunch of gits", the nefarious Uncyclopedia overlords at Wikia shut down the comedy wiki yesterday. This resulted in much confusion, outrage, and blundering about in the dark. When asked to comment about the situation, Orian57 said, "No, because you'll actually put what I say into the paper, and last time you made me look really stupid. Although it is a tad inconvenient. And what do you mean 'Cabal'?" It should be noted that Orian is both exceedingly intelligent and unbearably attractive, and there most certainly is not a cabal of any kind. Other users seemed to have been expecting this for some time. Necropaxx had this to say: "Honestly, I'm surprised it took this long for Wikia to do this. We Uncyclopedians have been total jerks for far too long. I suggest we all go to Wikia and give Jimbo Wales a nice big "We're sorry" and hope he's feeling generous." This editor took this advice to mean that we should vandalize Wikipedia furiously, and redirected their page on Karma to Coincidence. At press time, Uncyclopedia still did not exist, and many in the community expressed doubt that the Wikia Council would ever reinstate the site. With the recent drama over the domain change, and the promise of ads descending swiftly into every corner and crevasse of our wiki, we seem to be simply too much trouble to be bothered with. This reporter considers it to be good while it lasted, and offeres up a toast to the good old days of Uncyclopedia. Image of Dog Holding Paper, not used in UnSignpost for over Nine Months, Makes Glorious Return to UnSignpost This reporter is proud to say that, after being absent from the UnSignpost for over nine months, our lovable mascot "DogNewspaper" has returned to grace this periodical once again. DogNewspaper made his debut in the second issue of the UnSignpost, which covered such stories as 'UnSignpost created' and 'Uncyclopedia is the worst'. After bringing you the second story in issues 2 through 5, DogNewspaper was promoted to "top dog", and accompanied the lead story for four issues in June 2008. DogNewspaper took an extended hiatus after Issue 9 to "see the world" and, more urgently, "sniff the world". After many exciting adventures, our mascot is back to stay, and will likely be used many more times in the coming months in what editor Gerrycheevers referred to as "blatant space-filler. DogNewspaper can take a story and squish it to the left side of the page, extending its length. Now get off my lawn!" DogNewspaper declined to comment, but did wag his tail enthusiastically before rolling over in an effort to have his belly scratched. |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
For your vote...
The Great Potato Massacre of March 2009 Thank you for supporting Sonje in her ruthless campaign for Potatochopper of the Month A baby potato shall be mercilessly sacrificed in your honour. |
--Dame 22:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I see this is on the front page...
Happy birthday Sir. I trust you will enjoy your day... Who would have thought it eh kids? Mordillo is 100 today. MrN Fork you! 06:53, Apr 3
- Yes. You still haven't taught me how to say "Happy Birthday!" in Hebrew, you old fart... *hugs* Congrats. Did airport security heed my warning and manage to frisk you again, btw? ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 07:45, 3 Apr
- happy birthday to jew! ;) here is your present
Thou Shalt Suffer Mahm00shA smiteth thee. Fire be upon thee <insert name here>. Mahm00shA maketh thee to burn. Thou who art hateful unto him. Mahm00shA pierceth thy head. He cutteth through thy face. He melteth thine countenance. Lo, thy skull is crushed in his hand. Thy bones are smashed in pieces. |
SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 08:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you children, I'm trying to hold it together with my failing memory and dwindling brain cells...*shivers* and feels cold as well. Luvvy, can you turn up the heating? O_O Much appreciated, I shall return as soon as the festivities cease! ~ 23:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- I trust you had a good day. I have new breasts incidentally. MrN Fork you! 23:28, Apr 4
- It's awfully chilly here, isn't it? :) Ah shite, 12 hours of work ahead again... I envy you for your holiday, Sabba... :/ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 03:37, 5 Apr
- I trust you had a good day. I have new breasts incidentally. MrN Fork you! 23:28, Apr 4
- Thank you children, I'm trying to hold it together with my failing memory and dwindling brain cells...*shivers* and feels cold as well. Luvvy, can you turn up the heating? O_O Much appreciated, I shall return as soon as the festivities cease! ~ 23:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- An admin is never late, nor is he early, he gives best wishes precisely when he means to. That means these here best wishes from me are exactly on time. --UU - natter 08:11, Apr 5
- I'm jealous, though. Someone had the guts to brag about the great summery weather in Israel while I was sitting in a grey dark office watching the rain drizzle it's way to the ground in a nearly freezing temperature... /me throws a pair of Luvvy sized flip-flops at 'dillo... :( -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:03, 5 Apr
Strip Scrabble this evening?
Good Morning and Shalom or whatever it is you lot say in the morning:) Can I move me PLS aricle over, I am getting annoyed by something - can you guess what?--Sycamore (Talk) 08:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's me isn't it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) 08:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, that comment fits better on Sycamore's talkpage. I'm so pathetic. *sniff* —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) 08:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Afraid I can't guess right now ;) I haven't been paying attention in the last few days, being on holidays. Can you ask HV, he's running the show with PLS, and I think you should probably wait until he announces the winners. ~ 08:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Help I need somebody, Help! Not just anybody, Help! I need Mordillo! Help!
Hey I saw you were on at the recent changes so I was wondering if you could help me with something. I just finished writing a UnNews article and it's been put up. I was wondering if you could add a blurb for it here. For some reason I can't edit it. It's probably just because I'm a new user. So can you? --MercenarylordEnter if you dare 16:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done. It's because you're new and it's semi-protected. You should gain access in a couple of days. ~ 16:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- EEKS! A MORDILLO SIGHTING?! @_@ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:15, 6 Apr
- WHERE!?!?!? ~ 18:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- /me looks as if she's seen a ghost and faints. -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:35, 6 Apr
- Quick quick! Someone get me 10CC of something! ~ 18:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- You really don't have much medical training, do you? :P /me goes back to playing unconscious (at least the headache I've got is real... *ouchie*) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:58, 6 Apr
- What should I do?! What should I do?! Should I use the crash cart? Should I do CPR? NURSE! OR NURSE!!!! ~ 21:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- If you opt mouth-to-mouth, make sure to take out your dentures and double check that I'm really unconscious, Sabba... ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 08:55, 7 Apr
- /me hands Dr Dillo chainsaw. Here Doctor, I think you know what to do with this... --UU - natter 09:08, Apr 7
- Ucle UU, you shock me! I'm too pretty to be mutilated! O_O -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 09:10, 7 Apr
- AHAHAHA! TIME TO CUT THE LUVVY TO SEE WHAT MAKES HER TICK! ~ 09:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- *meeps!* -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 09:31, 7 Apr
- AHAHAHA! TIME TO CUT THE LUVVY TO SEE WHAT MAKES HER TICK! ~ 09:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ucle UU, you shock me! I'm too pretty to be mutilated! O_O -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 09:10, 7 Apr
- /me hands Dr Dillo chainsaw. Here Doctor, I think you know what to do with this... --UU - natter 09:08, Apr 7
- If you opt mouth-to-mouth, make sure to take out your dentures and double check that I'm really unconscious, Sabba... ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 08:55, 7 Apr
- What should I do?! What should I do?! Should I use the crash cart? Should I do CPR? NURSE! OR NURSE!!!! ~ 21:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- You really don't have much medical training, do you? :P /me goes back to playing unconscious (at least the headache I've got is real... *ouchie*) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:58, 6 Apr
- Quick quick! Someone get me 10CC of something! ~ 18:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- /me looks as if she's seen a ghost and faints. -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:35, 6 Apr
- WHERE!?!?!? ~ 18:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- EEKS! A MORDILLO SIGHTING?! @_@ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:15, 6 Apr
- Hey how the hell did you figure out what I really look like?! O_O *hides* -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 20:21, 7 Apr
- Albeit my cup size is about 250% bigger and my blondeish hair is halfway down my back these days... :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 20:29, 7 Apr
- Hey how the hell did you figure out what I really look like?! O_O *hides* -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 20:21, 7 Apr
Ay, Mordillo
Could I possibly get some of that rollback thing that no one's been talking about? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- That depends on the services you are willing to donate in return. ~ 08:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I do windows. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good enough. The user management system is so fragged I managed to do it twice somehow. You have now double rollback. Go forth and enjoy your new plunger. ~ 08:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Double the rollback, oh man! Now I just need one more... Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good enough. The user management system is so fragged I managed to do it twice somehow. You have now double rollback. Go forth and enjoy your new plunger. ~ 08:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I do windows. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
press
howdy sir, would you happen to have any comment regarding the cabalist's recent decision to not induct any new cabalists this month? would you care to respond to allegations that there is, in fact, a cabal? 20:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- There's a Cabal?! O_o But gramps, you told me they don't exist!!! *sniffles* -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 11:38, 8 Apr
- Hey Gerry, sorry for the very belated response, of "There is no cabal". ~ 11:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- You sure there isn't one? What about the rumours of you actually being the one pulling the strings behind the scenes? O_O -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 22:58, 16 Apr
- Hey Gerry, sorry for the very belated response, of "There is no cabal". ~ 11:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Pesach
Belated Birthdaygradumalations
Out of reasons related to our relationship being that of a great great great great great *gasps for air* great gramps and greatest great granddaughter, it's highly inappropriate for it to be a Luvvy wrapped up in a bow. So here's a hooker for you to enjoy as you please... ^_^ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 19:18, 8 Apr
<youtube width="425" height="355">=VFNdFWVMGPo</youtube>
- Oh wow, who do I get to keep? ~ 11:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- The blonde wearing a red bow? I'm not even sure I want to know who you want to keep... :) Or get a bow for Mordillia... ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 17:48, 12 Apr
Awesome audio files
Hello, I came upon your audio file collection, and one of them "Jews take over the world" radio news segment is classic: in the words of Jew-phobic Borat: "is funny". I swore the announcer is Sasha Baron Cohen (sounds like him), but the "bad" Israeli accent sounds French, German or Alsatian (the mixture of both languages) to me. I have the same satirical sense of humor like you do, but it's nice to meet you...and happy PesaCh/Passover. 71.102.2.206 14:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- My pleasure indeed! Thanks for the compliments. I love making those, but I can't have anyone around while I'm making them, which is why I need to throw the missus out everytime I work on one of them :) ~
- Well, yours beat the time when I was asked to lend my voice to a villain in a video game but was unavailable to record it at the time. And it'd have been a little too close to my day job, it'd have felt like work...
- But at least we got a valuable nugget of information there... If and when the next UnMeet is in 'dam, you'll just claim to be "recording a new sound clip" and we can have the after party at the 'Dillo residence without the missus. :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 18:02, 12 Apr
UnSignpost April 9/10th, 2009
The Newspaper Not Secretly Controlled By ME, I Swear!
April 9th, 2009 • Issue 42• We Give the In-jokes Recycling Center 90% of Their Business!
Cabalists Decide Cabal Membership At Adequate Amount, Deny Existence of Cabal Uncyclopedia administrators this week decried the lack of need for new recruits, as they are wholly confident in their ability to secretly control the wiki from behind a moth-eaten curtain. On the voting page, which this reporter will probably be banned for pointing out to the common folk, the current cabal members expressed their desire to see more normal non-admins, or 'normies', be involved with the recent changes page. However, the option for another member being inducted into the cabal was declined, as things like the ban patrol and the Cajek Alert System seem to be running just fine, thank you very much. Cabalists were adamant about their opinions. RAHB had the following to say: "I cannot confirm the non-existence of the non-existent cabal, being that it does not exist, and I'm no Harry Potter-reading fantasy boy. I can however confirm the existence of puppies. THEY'RE ADORABLE!" The non-existence of the cabal was further emphasized by Mordillo who declined comment when approached as he was leaving the Secret Cabal Headquarters & Tiki Lounge. Experts were skeptical of the existence of the cabal, but point out that nothing should be ruled out. "Woof," said UnSignpost political correspondent DogNewspaper (pictured), citing the low level of vandalism and general dickery since the recent opping of Under user and MrN9500, who have become known to Uncyclopedians as "The Redcoats". Co-Creator of UnSignpost Introduces New Creation Dr. Skullthumper, co-founder of the very newspaper you are reading right now, has unrolled his newest creation, the NetBar. UnSignpost editors were too busy and ridden with jealousy to investigate the nature of this new invention, but our technology correspondant DogNewspaper (pictured) was willing to speculate on the new gadget. "Bark bark," he proclaimed, elaborating that this new thing is most likely some sort of candy bar or online tavern. This is not the first time the good doctor has abandoned the UnSignpost to work on other equally trivial projects. Fnoodle, disguised as a harmless spellcheck wiki-bot, is actually a perfect one-eight replica of Skull. This entity has nearly 20,000 edits, mostly vandalisms of pages in Thekillerfroggy's userspace. However, Fnoodle has sat abandoned in the doctor's sandbox since last October, since all of said doctor's time recently has been poured into his new project, the NetBar. Uncyclopedians had mixed reactions today. Sockpuppet of an unregistered user had this to say: "What the fuck is a NetBar?" A gathering in the Uncyclopedia break room formed, with users misguidedly attempting to ward off squirrels with the NetBar. When reached for comment, Dr. Skullthumper said, "What's an UnSignpost?" |
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Hand-delivered by MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
SotM
It's still stuck in March... —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) 13:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
In Graltitude
Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process.
So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate my next common typographical error to you. Thank you.
The following common typographical errors are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to dedicate to your user name.
UnJokes
Mr. Oh-So-Powerful MoarDildo, do we have an UnJokes portal on uncyclopedia? the answer is no, right? Well, can you -in your never-ending sysopian and Jewish influence, wisdom and money- create one? 'cause, you know, this is a humour wiki.. We should have a portal for jokes, just pure plain jokes, you get at what I mean? I hope so SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I got a vague memory of us having something like that somewhere, I'll have to look it up to see if I'm halucinating as always. ~ 16:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- halucination from Sinai-grown hashish, right? Right :p. Now go summon forth thy admins, for the Intergalactic Council Of Sysops Of Uncyclopedia Of Wikia Of Al-Gore's Internets is about to be held. Let him, he who hath understanding, reckon the main-page portal of UnJokes, for it is a nessecary portal. It's portal six-hundred three-score and six. Now that's tr00 halucination SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 14:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Fake portal
Seeing how active you are at things counter-vandalism - is it possible to create a few fake pages, on stuff that have strong vandal magnetism, and redirect proven vandals to them automatically? The articles could also be self-fixing after a reasonable interval, for instance 15 minutes. I'm sure it's feasible - also I think it would save work in the long run. Smash my face in if I'm wrong. Yours respectfully, -- Style Guide 18:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's not a problem to create it, but I don't think there's a way to direct the vandals there without directing anyone there...Got anything specific in mind? ~ 18:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It was possible in the former times, but I guess only because the BB:s were mostly one-user versions. Hm. Is there a way to govern what a certain IP address sees? If not, I'm stuck. -- Style Guide 18:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually I'm not stuck yet: if it's possible to create self-fixing articles, they would give vandals a hobby that wouldn't bother anyone else. Once an article is seen to be vandal prone, admins could decide to make it into a self-fixing one (with the interval I mentioned, to give the vandal momentary satisfaction). Everyone would get their 15 min of fame at nobody's expense. -- Style Guide 18:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Not really, the only thing you can do is create a bot that will revert edits every 15 minutes, but it means that someone who operates this bot needs to have an active session at all times, so this isn't practical. Also, you do have the spambox. ~ 19:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Mm. Wouldn't this still be less trouble than always reverting them by hand - or would you need to create a bot for each article, and one for each admin per each article? Could it be a bot that gets active each time an admin logs in? Just ideas, I don't have a clear clue about what's practical and what isn't. There would be no difference to a protected article but the obvious one: give the hapless one a hobby without too much fuss. It would be fun to write articles for that purpose. -- Style Guide 19:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- There is a bot like that in place already. I can locate the code for you if you'd like. That one reverts any specific IP/username you choose under a specific interval. It's not very usable for admins because we simply ban the vandals but it can be used by any user who wishes so. The thing with bots, you can revert based on IPs or revert specific articles, but then - how would you recognize vandalism? Large removal of text is not always an indication. Also, a bot would have a hard time dealing with deletion of crap articles (it's feasible, but then someone will have to double check everything it deletes) and page movements. Some of it might be doable, but we'll need to talk it over with some of the bot people. Mainly, MrN9500 or Skullthumper. But there are too many potential problems in my view. Is there anything specific that troubles you? We didn't have any unusual vandal flood lately. ~ 19:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Not really, the only thing you can do is create a bot that will revert edits every 15 minutes, but it means that someone who operates this bot needs to have an active session at all times, so this isn't practical. Also, you do have the spambox. ~ 19:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually I'm not stuck yet: if it's possible to create self-fixing articles, they would give vandals a hobby that wouldn't bother anyone else. Once an article is seen to be vandal prone, admins could decide to make it into a self-fixing one (with the interval I mentioned, to give the vandal momentary satisfaction). Everyone would get their 15 min of fame at nobody's expense. -- Style Guide 18:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It was possible in the former times, but I guess only because the BB:s were mostly one-user versions. Hm. Is there a way to govern what a certain IP address sees? If not, I'm stuck. -- Style Guide 18:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Block me Too!
I still don't know what the "you are banned" message looks like from the user's point of view. Last time I woke up in the morning and saw the block log... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 21:25, 14 Apr
- hey, me too, but not for too long.. A couple of minutes, maybe.. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 21:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm... Maybe it is true that Luvvies and alcohol don't mix. After another cognac (I ran out of wine and moved on to the next stuff), it's starting to feel like an idea to blank your user page just to make you
spankblock me, gramps... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 21:53, 14 Apr
- Hmmm... Maybe it is true that Luvvies and alcohol don't mix. After another cognac (I ran out of wine and moved on to the next stuff), it's starting to feel like an idea to blank your user page just to make you
That Picture
I trace its origin to scrapetv.com and some fake news story they made. They also happen to have a wiki called scrapeipedia. It's just some stupid chop that any of us could recreate (similarly) and use. There's even one with that Ledger pic with kids on a trampoline--
15:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)I SAW ELVIS!
On your user page while I was vandalising it, nonetheless... :o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 13:23, 16 Apr
UnSignpost April 16th, 2009
The Newspaper Made Entirely From Recycled Internet Memes
April 16th, 2009 • Issue 43 • It's News Because We Tell You It Is
Latest Poo Lit Leads to Quality Flood on VFH
The first article nominated to VFH from the competition also came with a bold prediction by one numbskull, who questioned his existence if Karl Lagerfeld did not receive 20 For. votes. At 03:57, 11 April 2009 the 20th For vote was cast by Thekillerfroggy and it's safe to say that the author of this instant Uncyclopedia classic should be considered the overall champion with his three entries garnering him two first place articles and one second place finish. Unscrupulous Unsignpost reporters One of our winners was not only a perfect 1/1 by winning the best rewrite category with Money but Sycamore also received the vaunted Writer of the Month trophy for March 2009! A user that happens to wander in and write us an offering on occasion claimed a share of first place in the alternative namespace category with the UnNews article Obama unveils education reform plans. Monika should drop in more often! Worst 100 of the Year Stumbles to 10 Things
There are several schools of thought as to why this situation has been allowed to arise. One gaining currency among quite literally possibly some Uncyclopedians is that everyone on the site is so busy producing quality material that they just don't have time to devote to such frivolities. However, the continued existence and rate of progress of Forum:Count to a million neatly quashes that theory. Another hypothesis advanced by as many as no or fewer people is that precisely nothing of any interest to anyone has happened, either on this wiki or on the interwebs in general this year. However, while this is significantly more likely than the first theory, the generally accepted explanation seems to be that, quite simply and predictably, Uncyclopedia is the worst. |
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Hand-delivered by —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) 15:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry about that
But this was actually a new case. I wasn't aware there was an article titled Jewish History up until now. What do you think is the proper action? Should I leave things be? Should I nom it on VFD and ask it to be redirected to Jew? Should I use {{merge}}? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) 21:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- If you think it's not good enough to exist by itself, you're welcome to put it on VFD. I wouldn't use merge - it's rarely being acted upon. ~ 22:00, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Sarcastic comment
When I welcomed this Theodore hole gravy guy, he had only created his userpage. I welcomed him as to give him quick access to all the guides and policies we have at Uncyclopedia. I wasn't aware he created a page in mainspace with the same content as his userpage up until now. Seeing as it was recreated multiple times, this guy can correctly be described as a vandal. However, my question to you is: Why did you consider it appropriate to comment "good job on welcoming another vandal" when you deleted his talkpage?
If you want me to stop welcoming people, just say so. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) 15:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- I don't want you to stop welcoming people, I want you to review what they're doing before you welcome them. When a username creates a 3000 characters userpage as a first edit, and if you glance quickly at it, it would be very clear that this guy is a cyberbully. And no, a user doesn't get immunity from cyberbullying bans even if he limits himself to his own space. ~ 15:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Um, in retrospect, I understand how all this may have appeared kind of twattish. I'm really really sorry if that was the case. Such was never my intention. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) 15:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Userspace question.
Hey, I have a question as to what exactly I could post in userspace. You see, while i'm at school, the filter blocks direct access to YouTube. Could I post a list of the songs I like under userspace so I could listen to them at school, or is it still considered Vanity in userspace? Saberwolf116 22:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Should I answer twice? It's not a problem. Userspace is pretty free as long as you don't use it for cyberbullying or post hard core porn picture of myself with that goat. Or with MrN. ~ 23:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Aren't you ancient people supposed to be asleep?
Did Mordillia kick you out of the bedroom and tell you to sleep on the sofa tonight? O_o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 23:50, 20 Apr
Oops
Terribly sorry about the double post. Please accept this Jew treat as a token of apology.
Saberwolf116 00:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's quite awful. Thank you very much ;) ~ 07:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have to agree, those are rather horrible. I never understood the reason for using excessive
- A) Sugar
- B) Blue food colouring
- And my daddy-in-law actually loves baking his blue sugar coated cookies and send them to me around christmas... O_o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 08:47, 21 Apr
I need help! I need penis! I need Moardildo!
HaShalom aleikom wa rahmat HaShem wa barakatoh ;)
I need penis help with this signature of mine, kinda like yours. There is a problem with the syntax, I hope you fix it up. Thank you in advance, my lovely, lovely cousin :p 11:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Salam aleikom wa`bismillah ya achi. I think that Sock took care of it already. BTW, it is forbidden for Jews to say the explicit name of God (Jehova and such), just so you wouldn't make that mistake when you meet one of our more friendly Israelis ;) ~ 12:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)