Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm not really interested in writing for people with short attention spans. There are enough people out there writing short form, well summarised stuff that that role feels well filled.
The (currently) 92% helpful rating on this piece here on Steam seems to indicate that it's appreciated by some, and that's enough for me :)
However, this is more of an analysis than a review. A review should be easy to follow, to the point, and should help people decide whether they truly want to purchase the game. I couldn't even figure out what genre this game is from your Steam review (I assume point-n-click?), much less if I would actually enjoy this game.
From what I read on Steam (I did not get to reading the full review on your site) it seems like you enjoy writing these types of articles. Try to summarize what you wrote on your website on Steam, and, like mjc0961 suggested, try not to drive traffic to your website.
Remember, the average person has a short attention span; you have about seven seconds to grab people's attention!
i like art direction .i dont like clumsy controls(its still usable)which is same as in original.
this is a game i grew up