User talk:Veritasphere

Blocked

The reasons for your indefinite block are as follows:

You have not shown an ability to contribute to this wiki in a constructive way.
You have been in a string of arguments with other users who are experienced editors with fine records. They include users user:JJMC89, user:Boomer Vial and see user talk:Yunshui.
I note you have made many edits on your own and other user pages but very few constructive edits to articles. Controversies with other users is not the point of this wiki. As a user blocked elsewhere for sockpuppetry you should have been very careful to edit correctly. Instead, you have devoted most of your efforts to controversy.
An editor blocked on other wikis is only allowed to edit here if they do so strictly within our guidelines. The specific point which triggered this block are that you removed the contents of a discussion on user:CactusWriter's talk page, including his own edit. The block is indefinite, but not necessarily permanent. After a long period of time you may request for the block to be reviewed. In any event, the block would not be removed unless the community felt you were able to avoid controversy and edit in a calm and neutral manner. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Honourable Sir please give last chance i'll never edit any thing unless it necessary
Sir you don't give me a single warning suddenly you block me
If you want to block me please sir add limit of the blocking instead of indefinte please sir i not did sock puppetry here.

unblock me user:Macdonald-ross Hammadsaeed (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't given us a reason to; using an IP address after your block is not a good sign either. Only (talk) 18:55, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Only give me one chance Hammadsaeed (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Only now please unblock me. Hammadsaeed (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you, I will not be doing so Hammadsaeed (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we should unblock you. Only (talk) 14:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you i'll never argue with experienced Editor like you,and i assure you i'll agree with other editors edits. Hammadsaeed (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Only you can check my contributions on urdu wikipedia now i am agree with editors over changes made to a page Hammadsaeed (talk) 14:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- other editor

typo Hammadsaeed (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only Please set the block duration. you will unblock me insha allah👍 Hammadsaeed (talk) 09:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hope Hammadsaeed (talk) 09:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Only Please Unblock me. BukhariSaeed (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to unblock you. Please stop pinging me. If you want to request an unblock, use the {{unblock|your reason}} template. Only (talk) 13:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Veritasphere (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Please unblock me I assure you, I will not be doing so --BukhariSaeed (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock reason doesn't make sense. -- Auntof6 (talk) 15:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock request

I received the unblock request that you emailed to me. You are able to edit your talk page here, so please make the request here instead of using email. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Veritasphere (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

I know i was block for many edits on my own and other user pages but very few constructive edits to articles. Controversies with other users is not the point of this wiki. As a user blocked elsewhere for sockpuppetry i should have been very careful to edit correctly. Instead, i have devoted most of my efforts to controversy and i have been in a string of arguments with other users who are experienced editors with fine records. I did wrong and that it won't happen again. Check my urdu wikipedia contributions صارف کی شراکتیں..

Decline reason:

I can't check your Urdu Wikipedia contributions because I don't read Urdu. Your block here is a reciprocal one, based on the fact that you were making bad edits here while indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia. As such, I don't think we should lift it here unless your block on English Wikipedia is removed. If you make another unblock request, it would help if you say what you want to work on instead of just saying what you won't do. In any case, please do not ping me or anyone else if you request an unblock again. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Veritasphere (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

I have read WP:3RR and i know i did wrong. above admin decline my request because she/he can't check my Urdu Wikipedia contributions because she/he don't read Urdu. if you can't understand urdu please read Wikiproject:Christianity created by me, and i have made many christianity-related articles on urdu wikipedia. if you think i am changed please unblock me or not then don't unblock me. Thanks---BukhariSaeed (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are still blocked on en.wiki. Until you are unblocked there you are not likely to be unblocked here. -- DJSasso (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Request reason(s):
Hi, It's been a long time since I was blocked here. Last time the admin said me that i am still blocked on en.wiki, Until i am unblocked there i am not likely to be unblocked here (Now i am ublocked). I've learned the main reason the block on me i.e. Edit warring. I assure everyone that I will not resort to this in future. I also assure positive and constructive edits as well as a friendly approach for all my fellow Wikipedians. Thanks BukhariSaeed (talk) 07:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
I will unblock you with the same restrictions you have on en.wiki with the slight change that if you want to create articles you must do so in your own user space and have an admin or other editor in good standing evaluate your article and move it to article space if it is acceptable. The restrictions are as follows "As part of your unblock, you are not allowed to edit any pages about saints or other religious figures, broadly construed. You are also not allowed to create new pages in the Article space - you must use the ~~Articles for creation~~ process. Both of these restrictions can be appealed after six months, but if you break either of them, or are otherwise disruptive, you will be indefinitely blocked again and you will need a very good reason to get unblocked again." -DJSasso (talk) 02:31, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll follow the rules. BukhariSaeed (talk) 03:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Hey there! I apologize for the revert to your userpage and the unjustified warning on your talk page. That was a mistake on my part that Djsasso caught before I could fix it. You have my sincere apologies and I beg your pardon. Operator873^talkconnect 03:36, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its ok :)BukhariSaeed (talk) 06:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]