So last night, I went to go see my local dance school’s idiosyncratic production of The Nutcracker. It’s half Nutcracker and half dance recital–this school focuses a lot on ballet but they also teach hip hop, tap, and various other dance forms, so they incorporate those classes into the show. This allows them to replace some of the cheesy international stereotype dances in the Land of Sweets, which is a not inconsiderable side benefit. Anyway, I went because my friends have a kid in the show and I wanted to support them.
I really enjoyed it, actually more than I was expecting to, and that made me happy. I do community theater, and as much as I love our shows, I’m always secretly wondering whether people in the audience are really enjoying the show or just being good sports because they love us (because the audience is inevitably mostly friends and family of the cast). So it was nice to be able to go to someone else’s amateur show and be genuinely glad to be there. I realized at some point that part of it had to do with the fact that most of the dancers had ordinary bodies.
Most professional ballet companies select for the same very specific ideal body type, and insist on sort of machine-sculpting all of their dancers to fit it. When you go to see The Nutcracker done by a professional outfit, all the women will have more or less the same shape and they will all also be able to do amazing feats of athleticism while also being slender and willowy to the point where they can actually sort of create the illusion that they are boneless. At this Nutcracker, there was a range of body types, and there was not the same uniformity of extension, toe-pointing, etc. Sometimes you could tell how @#$! hard it is to be on pointe. And as much as I enjoy the professionals, I found myself moved by this show in a different and maybe more profound way. Most of these dancers aren’t going to go on to do this for a living. But they’re doing it, well, because they love it enough to want to do it well, *while* doing all the other stuff that ordinary life demands that they do.
The root of the word “amateur” is from the Latin verb for love. And there’s something important and irreplaceable to me about being in a theater with all that love.
During the summer Olympics, Google ran an ad for their AI, Gemini, in which a father decides to ask Gemini to help his daughter write a fan letter to her favorite athlete. He asks Gemini to do it instead of letting his daughter write her own fan letter because, verbatim quote, “this has to be perfect.” This ad generated so much negative publicity that Google pulled it before the Olympics were over, though you can still find it on YouTube (the title is “Dear Sydney”). “This has to be perfect?” Why? Who is this perfection for? If you’re a (technically) amateur athlete and you get a physical letter from some little girl you’re inspiring, and you open it up, do you want to see perfection or do you want to see love? Obviously it’s love. Love is the point of a fan letter. Perfection, however these copywriters imagine Gemini is producing it, is in this context utterly beside the point.
I enjoy professional theater a lot. I enjoy professional ballet. It’s cool to see what elite performers are capable of. But the whole side-hustle thing, the assumption that you will stop doing art if you can’t make it professionally, the monetizing of every fucking talent or hobby or special interest driven by paid influencers infesting every fucking platform, is harming us partly because it pushes us to expect perfection in the places where we should be looking for love.