We don't have a separate tutorial or a page about updating articles. Are these blockers?

It's the same in incognito mode, so it seems it's not on the browsers' side.

(Disclaimer: I'm not a designer. I just talk about design from time to time. So, relata refero)

can you point us to more info on the configuration of "tolerated typos" for Citoid?

Ofc, I didn't assume that there could be an English-centric bias. It just works for languages that don't use many endings.

Thank you, but I don't know the answers to many of those questions. :) I might guess, interpret, post sth on a personal blog, but I'm not competent to write anything on the behalf of the Prod... Audiences department. I'm a Wikipedian and I can help to communicate your answers to the communities.

I know this might be time-consuming, but please consider expanding the section 'Why'. Users should understand the reasons not only for this small change, but for the direction of changes as well. They should understand your motivation. Lately, I've been receiving some extremely negative feedback on this. The problem isn't mainly about the color or shape (experienced users have been editing despite of our UX), but about a lack of user-friendly explanation for any related change.

@Base, are you doing this now? Isn't it outdated?

We need to focus mainly on the English and multilingual projects, because there was little feedback. We established that out of all the rest, the biggest uncovered are the most important, so right now, there isn't much point any more in making a boundary between the least important and almost the least important projects.

Generally speaking, yes, although on Polish Wikipedia, it's about the FlaggedRevs only. We don't use Patrolled edits at all.

And now PolishWiki has a unanimous consensus asking for SingleEditTab to have a wikitext default.

I like the idea. I think grey should be default though: I can't see the reason of giving a colourful example, if the colours aren't meaningful. Examples:

Yup, it was my idea. I think the Meta Strategy Coordinators (3 persons: @Base, @Seraphimblade and me) need to keep each other ( @gpaumier and @Quiddity) informed about the tasks we're working on. We also need a tool to claim and discuss tasks.

We use flagged revs for that.

@Trizek-WMF, yes, you're right as for that list.

Please rethink names used in this filter. "Newcomer" equals "non-autoconfirmed" and it's more or less OK (one can be a newcomer despite having autoconfirmed account). But "not-entirely-new" or "newest among autoconfirmed" as "Experienced" is at least confusing. It's admins/authors of 1000 edits/long-term users who are considered to be experienced. And "More experienced" than "newest among autoconfirmed"... I'm not sure.

They do, but... not all of them :/ let's take ( i ) as an example. Most of the dots over ( i )s are clearly 1x1px, but some of them are bigger/blurred/faded. I think the change you suggested doesn't affect those icons that are next to 'required' parameters.

In T132510#2203581, @Dereckson wrote:

@Pokefan95 I see you raised the task priority, please give hints about prioritization: do you have some event or page you need right now? If so, when?

Announced at the tech village pump, goings-on, and fb group. This equals 'everywhere possible'.

@Ricordisamoa, that tool has a few bugs, look:

@Ladsgroup, here and here - that's what @Halfak asked me to translate.

I believe "ui translation", "form translation", and "wp:labels" is ready to be marked as done.

Given the fact that the following messages are editable locally and may look differently on a number of wikis, making this one editable is essential to maintain consistency from local perspective. Thx for pointing this out. By default, the newly created message should contain only text (no formatting), because...