wikitech-static is precise. should be upgraded to trusty. it shows up in stuff like T55259 where it can't support Apache 2.4 with ECDHE ciphers.
are we going to "do-release-upgrade" here in place or reinstall?
wikitech-static is precise. should be upgraded to trusty. it shows up in stuff like T55259 where it can't support Apache 2.4 with ECDHE ciphers.
are we going to "do-release-upgrade" here in place or reinstall?
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declined | hashar | T64519 Upgrade git > 1.7 | |||
Resolved | None | T34317 PDF export extension fails to render Arabic characters in monospace font | |||
Resolved | • brooke | T69951 Vagrant TMH: webm transcodes don't play in Firefox (upstream Ubuntu/avconv issue) | |||
Declined | None | T65899 Upgrade Wikimedia servers to Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) | |||
Resolved | Dzahn | T94585 distribution upgrade for wikitech-static instance |
10:29 < andrewbogott> mutante: regarding wikitech-static, that’s a VM. So I’m sure it would be better to build a fresh one rather than try to upgrade it.
10:31 < mutante> andrewbogott: ok, i made a ticket for it. i don't necessarily see a difference whether it's virtual or not, but more that it's not puppetized obviously
quote from https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitech-static
"A (non-puppetized) cron on wikitech-static runs /usr/local/sbin/import-wikitech.sh which copies the files from wikitech and installs them. "
beware of more non-puppetized things that would all have to be found out before reinstalling this