Author: netoholic
Description:
Redirects currently appear as normal links on the watchlist. Could these
be altered so that they appear in italics, or some other different way?
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
See Also:
Author: netoholic
Description:
Redirects currently appear as normal links on the watchlist. Could these
be altered so that they appear in italics, or some other different way?
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
See Also:
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | matmarex | T63072 VisualEditor: Apply styles for redirects/disambiguation links in suggestions in link inspector | |||
Resolved | TheDJ | T2166 Identify redirects with CSS class *everywhere* | |||
Declined | Nemo_bis | T4872 Distinguish links to redirect pages on Special:Watchlist |
zigger wrote:
(Undoing resolution as duplicate.)
Requests for rendering of redirection links differently from other links:
and bug 890 requests that redirection links on Special:Watchlist (&
Recentchanges & Recentchangeslinked) not automatically redirect.
gangleri wrote:
see bug 2318 comment 8 Special:Allpages should mark redirects distinctly
( http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2318#c8 )
patch from http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-cvs/2005-July/010231.html
If italic is not suitable for some writing sysmtems / fonts one could use a
special background. The "color" could be defined in MediaWiki messages or
Monobook.css or ...
yi:wiktionary will have probably more then 50% redirects doe to romanization /
transliteration and derived forms. This is why a "smart" Special:Allpages would
be required.
Regards Reinhardt [[user:gangleri]]
gangleri wrote:
(In reply to comment #3)
(Undoing resolution as duplicate.)
Requests for rendering of redirection links differently from other links:
- bug 759 - on watchlist edit pages
- bug 2318 - on Special:Allpages
- bug 2814 - on Special:Disambiguations
- bug 2872 (this bug) - on Special:Watchlist
and bug 890 requests that redirection links on Special:Watchlist (&
Recentchanges & Recentchangeslinked) not automatically redirect.
see also
bug 3941 &redirect=no should mark redirects distinctly (doubl, multiple
redirects and redirects to itself)
Is there any consensus for this change? I'd imagine some people might be irked when they see some entries on their Watchlist italicized and have no idea what that means.
For what is worth, WhatLinksHere adds "(redirect page)". I'm not a designer, but I would say that you can't go too wrong using consistently the same approach. Also, the string is already available and translated.
Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/R_v_Betts_and_Ridley
I don't have any objections with redirects being in italics.
But i suggest to add other distinctive elements in DOM for redirects to make it possible to create userscripts which will check automatically all redirect items to make it easier to remove at once all redirects from wathclist.
Something like r next to the page name with a tooltip saying "This page is a redirect". This is the way it currently appears for bot/minor/unpatrolled edits.
This would be pointless noise. Edits to redirects are rare (http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/consider-the-redirect ) and can't be assumed to be less or more important than any other edit.
Special:AllPages puts redirects in italics because they are not "real pages"; Special:WhatLinksHere because they are not true incoming links, but only a way for other pages to give incoming links; but edits are edits.