Jump to content

Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2007/Endorsements/fr

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

La période de parrainage est désormais terminée.


Élections du Conseil de 2007
Organisation



Approbations

[edit]

Introduction

[edit]

L'objectif de l'exigence d'une approbation est d'essayer de s'assurer que l'élection n'ait que des candidats sérieux. Nous avons besoin de le faire parce que cette élection est menée pour Wikimédia, qui inclut de nombreuses langues, et nous essayons donc d'avoir les dires de chaque candidat traduits dans autant de langues que possible. Ce travail est effectué par des traducteurs volontaires et ne peut être fait que si le nombre de candidats reste dans la limite du raisonnable.

Les exigences de temps passé sur le wiki et de compteur d'éditions aident à s'assurer que seuls des candidats sérieux participent, mais la Commission électorale ne voulait pas que ces exigences soient trop élevées, car des candidats sincères pourraient être exclus, donc nous avons ajouté l'exigence des approbations. Étant donné que la Commission électorale croit que l'exigence d'approbation est importante pour le déroulement des élections du Conseil, nous encourageons à ce que les requêtes et discussions à propos des approbations ne soient pas vues comme une violation de toutes recommandations ou normes contre le démarchage électoral.

Critères pour l'approbation

[edit]

Il est exigé de tous les candidats se présentant à l'élection d'obtenir 12 approbations de leur candidature. Les critères pour l'approbation sont les mêmes que ceux pour le vote; les utilisateurs approuvant doivent compter 400 éditions dans tout espace de noms ou combinaison d'espaces de noms d'un même projet Wikimédia et un historique d'éditions d'au moins 3 mois avant la date du 1er juin 2007. Les candidats qui n'ont pas reçu le nombre d'approbations exigé ne seront pas autorisés à se présenter à l'élection.

Seuls les candidats qualifiés

[edit]

Seuls les candidats qualifiés peuvent être soumis à l'approbation. Si vous ne voulez pas être qualifié par la procédure de candidature (incluant la vérification de votre identité auprès de la Fondation, et avoir les critères minimums de qualification à la candidature), votre nom ne sera pas soumis aux approbations.

Comment approuver

[edit]

Pour approuver un candidat, localisez leur section d'approbation sur la page de soumission, et « signez » à cet endroit en utilisant quatre tildes (~~~~). Vous pouvez aussi laisser un très bref message (jusqu'à 100 caractères, à peu près l'équivalent de 25 mots dans de nombreuses langues) pour expliquer la raison de votre approbation. Les messages de plus de 100 caractères peuvent être effacés à la discrétion de la Commission électorale, bien que l'approbation restera valide. Les approbations ouvriront le 17 juin 2007 à 0h00 (UTC). Après le 23 juin 2007 à 23h59 vous ne pourrez plus soumettre ou retirer des approbations. Des approbations peuvent être retirées uniquement par des membres de la Commission électorale, et uniquement s'il s'avère que l'approbateur n'était pas qualifié pour cette élection ou si l'approbateur a approuvé trop de candidats pour l'élection. Dans ce cas toutes les approbations de cet approbateur seront retirées par la commission et l'approbateur sera informé qu'il peut resoumettre les approbations dans la limite du nombre maximum autorisé.

Combien de candidats puis-je approuver ? Je suis un candidat, combien d'autres puis-je approuver ?

[edit]

Chaque votant qualifié peut approuver jusqu'à 3 candidats pour l'élection. Les candidats ne peuvent en approuver que deux autres (leur auto-approbation est impliquée par leur propre nomination). Les candidats ne doivent pas « signer » leur section d'approbation et leur auto-approbation ne sera pas décomptée pour le nombre d'approbations exigées.

Quand pourrai-je approuver un candidat ?

[edit]

La période d'approbation commencera 7 jours après que nous commençons à accepter des candidats. Selon les prévisions actuelles, vous pourriez commencer à approuver le 17 juin 2007 à 0h00 UTC.

Un candidat a reçu une approbation invalide ! Que dois-je faire ?

[edit]

Ne retirez pas l'approbation. Merci de contacter un membre de la Commision électorale, qui étudiera le problème.

Approbation

[edit]

Seuls les membres de la commission électorale peuvent retirer des approbations.

Résumé rapide

[edit]

Avant d'ajouter votre approbation à la liste :

  1. Veuillez vérifier que vous satisfaites aux critères permettant de voter et d'approuver.
  2. Veuillez vérifier que vous êtes connecté à meta. Les approbations anonymes ne sont pas acceptées.
  3. Signez l'approbation en utilisant les quatres tildes (~~~~).
  4. Placez sur votre page de meta ou dans un commentaire suivant la signature une note donnant votre wiki principal et votre nom d'utilisateur sur celui-ci. Il serait aimable de rendre clair le nom du projet sous lequel vous êtes éligible pour le vote.
  5. Placez le lien vers votre compte meta sur votre page utilisateur de votre wiki principal.
  6. Assurez-vous que votre commentaire ne dépasse pas 100 caractères (hormis la signature).
  7. Vous pouvez approuver jusqu'à trois candidats, à moins que vous soyez candidats. Si vous êtes candidat au Conseil, vous ne pouvez approuver que deux autres candidats (votre soutien à votre candidature est supposé).

Si vous notez une approbation invalide, ne la retirez pas. Mentionnez-le sur la page de discussion, ou contacter un membre de la commission électorale.

Si votre identité ne peut être confirmée comme étant valide, votre approbation peut être retirée à la discrétion de la commission électorale.


Submission

[edit]

Only Election Committee members should add candidates' names to this page. Candidates may be listed before their identities are confirmed, but candidates who are not confirmed by the deadline will be disqualified and their endorsements will be invalid.

Users may endorse up to 3 candidates (users who are candidates themselves may endorse up to 2 other candidates).

Do not sign with a link to your home wiki, it will be ignored due to difficulties of distinction of anonymous votes. You must have an account on meta and sign with that account.

It is important to note that you must either include your home wiki and username with your endorsement, or include that info on your meta userpage. You must also, on your home wiki user page, tell us the meta name under which you are endorsing.

Further instructions are given on Board elections/2007/Endorsements.

Ausir

[edit]
  1. Marcin Suwalczan 19:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC) (PL)[reply]
    The linked userpage does not exist. Please link to a valid userpage on a WMF wiki so that we can confirm your identity. Philippe 22:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Link has been corrected, reinstated endorsement. Philippe 01:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    I'd like to endorse Paweł, and hope things clear re: his candidacy. RoaringMice 148.141.31.210 18:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No user page hence no link to local page. [reply]
    Note: The candidate is now confirmed. Newyorkbrad 19:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC) (election committee member)[reply]
  2. Masti 19:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 19:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lcarsdata 21:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Roo72 06:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Adziura 06:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Guérin Nicolas 07:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Szczepan talk 08:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yarl.PL 09:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. odder 09:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Roman 92 talk 12:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jakubhal 12:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Wiktoryn 13:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fjl 13:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from home wiki to meta. Philippe 23:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Link now exists, endorsement reinstated. Philippe 19:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  15. Paterm 14:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --212.76.37.180 16:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Philippe 18:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  16. Nemo5576 06:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    SETI3 15:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to meta from home wiki, that I could identify. Please let me know where it exists and I'll reinstate. Philippe 21:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  17. I am [1] at English wiki, my main one. --Paul Pieniezny 15:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andros64 18:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Balcer 23:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Szumyk 07:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Moumine 08:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    83.18.89.250 15:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC) sorry John Belushi 15:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)No user page, hence no link to the wiki under which the user might be voting eligible. --Aphaia 04:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. William Avery 20:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Cessator 17:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Danny

[edit]
  1. Danny has been a model user and is familar with the inner workings of the Foundation. Thunderhead 00:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Rory096 00:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —— Eagle101 Need help? 00:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sean William 00:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tawker 01:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Michael Billington 01:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  7. Zscout370 01:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. DarkFalls 01:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. (→zelzany - he's still at it) 01:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Makemi 02:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Pilotguy radar contact 03:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Coredesat (en.wp) 03:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 06:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Swatjester 06:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC) [2][reply]
    I read candidate statement and preview. he`s good choice.--Gordafarid 06:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Not eligible to vote. Jon Harald Søby 15:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. stv # 07:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Endorsed --Kalogeropoulos 08:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Shakuf 09:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to local user page. Jon Harald Søby 15:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ElinorD 11:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Mintz l 13:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Antandrus 13:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC) ([3])[reply]
    احمد-نجيب-بياباني-ابراهيمخېل 16:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to local user page. Jon Harald Søby 15:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anyway we cannot accept this vote, submitted by anon [4]　--Aphaia 01:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. KFP 14:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC) (Diff from en.wikipedia.org)[reply]
  21. Lurker 15:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC) en:User:Lurker[reply]
  22. filip ⁂ 16:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. — ABF — 17:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
    In order for your edorsement to be accepted, you must provide a link to your Meta user page from your local user page, which you haven't done yet. Feel free to remove this message and reinstate your endorsment when you have done so. Jon Harald Søby 19:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC) done, sorry and thanks. — ABF — 19:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Nahum 18:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)All endorsers until here have been confirmed by me. Jon Harald Søby Jon Harald Søby 19:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ascánder 04:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Edward Chernenko 05:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    You are limited to a maximum of three endorsements. I am striking all of your endorsements to allow you to readd only three. Philippe 06:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Agathoclea 08:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    User:Thewiikione - I, Thewiikione, do hereby endorse Danny as a candidate in the 2007 Wikimedia Board Elections. Thewiikione 08:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fewer than 400 edits on en and meta. Not qualified to vote or endorse. Philippe 03:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Mathias Schindler 08:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC) - Based on his behaviour, his actions and text he wrote, I do not endorse him.[reply]
    --Highdelbeere 12:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to local wiki on userpage. Philippe 03:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  27. Liran 21:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Doc glasgow 23:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cowman109 02:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. ~ Kalki 07:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --85.10.88.78 07:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No userpage, so no link to local wiki. Philippe 01:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  31. Chico75 09:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Sjc 09:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 09:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Benjism89 11:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. BeatrixBelibaste 14:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --BirgitteSB 17:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 19:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Vassyana 01:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Daniel Bryant 03:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Dovi 18:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 18:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from home wiki to meta. Please add that and let me know, and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 23:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC) links now exist. Philippe 15:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  41. Alexanderps 05:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Deb 17:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    No link to home wiki from meta. Once that's done, please let me know and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 21:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  42. Neutrality 05:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Cyde Weys 06:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Majorly (talk) 15:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Hello32020 23:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --The Joke النكتة‎ 05:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Computerjoe 10:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. SPQRobin 11:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DragonFire1024

[edit]
  1. It is my honour to be the first to endorse Jason Brian Wikinews / Talk 04:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jason is a very good user on Wikinews, and will make a great addition to the Board. Nzgabriel 04:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Adambro 09:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I believe Jason would bring more of a passionate user perspective to the Board. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  5. --SonicR 09:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. The Board doesn't need MediaWiki developers or lawyers, but people who will work with the communities, like Jason. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    For pluralism --86.71.160.235 10:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Vote submitted by anon. Must have a registered meta username and provide a link to a local wiki. Philippe 22:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  7. wikinews need a voice Divol 17:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For more pluralism in the future vote smiley Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Marcin Suwalczan 19:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC) (PL)[reply]
    The provided link to a local page does not work. Please fix the link or provide us with a local WMF wiki account so that we can verify. Philippe 22:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Link has been fixed, endorsement reinstated. Philippe 01:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Markie 20:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)anon vote diff --Aphaia 01:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. The board needs to mix it up a little. I think DF will be an excellent board member. Bawolff 21:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Roberth 00:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Jcart1534 02:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Wikinews[reply]
    Ya'll ain't gonna believe this one... but account was created on 2 March. Need to be created by 1 March. Sorry. Philippe 03:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  12. Markie 09:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --David Legrand 09:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Comte0 13:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --Gladkov 18:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to home wiki from meta. Please add link and let me know and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 21:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  15. -- Arwel 22:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Gianuruka 10:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please endorse using a meta account with a link to your home wiki and vice versa. — Philippe 17:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  16. Höyhens 09:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Cessator 17:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Tooby 19:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eloquence

[edit]
  1. Angela 13:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. GerardM 14:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fabexplosive The archive man 15:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Oops, sorry --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Timichal 15:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yann 15:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wizzy 16:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    All endorsers until here have been confirmed by me. Jon Harald Søby 16:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Thunderhead 16:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Millosh 16:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I didn't support his candidacy nine months ago, but I am pleased to admit that, on the whole, I was mistaken. Joe 17:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. IlyaHaykinson 17:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Purodha Blissenbach (of ksh, de, nds Wikipedias) 18:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    From which wikipedia do you intend to vote? Philippe 21:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    On ksh, he cannot, but on nds, at least he meets the criteria. I agree with Philippe this kind of presentation is not helpful. --Aphaia 23:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  11. Kipmaster 18:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Bèrto 'd Sèra 18:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    In order for your endorsement to be accepted, you must provide a link to your Meta user page from your local user page, which you haven't done yet. Feel free to remove this message and reinstate your endorsment when you have done so. Philippe 21:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi! not sure what I did is enough, so I won't reinstate anything myself. Can you please have a look at it? tnx 4 your time --Bèrto 'd Sèra 11:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your patience, now your endorsement is reinstated. --Aphaia 23:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. BigDT 18:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC) [5][reply]
    (→zelzany - he's still at it) 18:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. I am Wooyi on Wikipedia and commons, and I endorse Eric Muller for Board of Trustees. Wooyi 20:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Andre (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wikihermit 03:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 05:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Edward Chernenko 05:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    You are limited to a maximum of three endorsements. I am striking all of your endorsements to allow you to readd only three. Philippe 06:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Londenp 06:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Shanes 09:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --The Joke النكتة‎ 10:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Zephyrus 10:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --148.160.190.251 11:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC). english speaking only?[reply]
  22. Ascánder 11:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. MF-Warburg(de) 12:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Magnus Manske 13:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. -- Cyper 15:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. VasilievV 2 17:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Kim Bruning 02:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Seraphimblade 05:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [6][reply]
  29. ~ Kalki 07:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Chico75 09:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 09:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Greudin 09:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Benjism89 11:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Kyle_the_hacker 11:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sjakkalle 12:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Zocky 12:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Has a good record and strong plans for the future. Warofdreams 13:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. R at enwiki 14:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. BeatrixBelibaste 14:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Siebrand 14:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Divol 17:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Thogo (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Bucketsofg 20:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Snowolf 20:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" (en.wp) 21:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Walkerma 03:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    No link from local wiki to meta. Philippe 05:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  46. Adnergje 09:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Be peace ;-) --Neuromancien 09:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Shizhao 09:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Grimlock 10:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. 1ne 12:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. sometimes he makes me fear but of course i support him. Petrusbarbygere 18:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Dovi 18:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 18:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from home wiki to meta. Please add that and let me know, and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 23:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Links now exist. Philippe 15:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  54. Genium 20:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Laura Scudder | Talk 02:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC) (EN)[reply]
  56. Filnik 09:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. yes, jEs --Jonathaneo 10:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. riana_dzasta 15:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    200.60.106.35 15:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please endorse using a meta account with a link to your home wiki and vice versa. — Philippe 17:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  59. I'm w:pt:User:Malafaya --Malafaya 15:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Deb 17:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    No link from meta to home wiki. Please add link and let me know and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 21:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  60. --Netito777 19:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Neutrality 05:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  62. DarkFalls 10:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Eric's the real deal. --Steve Foerster 13:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Majorly (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Húsönd 17:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Computerjoe 10:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  67. SPQRobin 11:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  68. —Nightstallion (?) 18:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Deadhoax (Talk | Contr) 19:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Stefan Kühn 19:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Zanimum 20:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Sabine 20:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --Pro-Lick 21:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Mido 23:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frieda

[edit]
  1. the best Helios89 17:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Link back found at it:Utente:Helios89/index --Aphaia 18:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. hope in Frieda --Sbisolo 17:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. :-) --Giovanni 17:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)No back link to meta.--Aphaia 18:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Put, thanks --Giovanni 18:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. simply great. Has a clear idea of what Wikipedia is, is very active and has strong personal charisma --Jollyroger 17:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)No back link to meta.--Aphaia 18:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  5. --Leoman3000 17:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. in Frieda we trust --valepert 17:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Massimiliano L. 17:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Brownout(msg) 17:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. absolutely Nick1915 - all you want 17:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. con la speranza che (te lo dico in pvt :P) --Tooby 18:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Certo! --Alfreddo 18:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Of course! --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Senpaiottolo 18:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 18:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I could not locate a link from local wiki to meta. Please add it and let me know where, and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 20:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Actually there wasn't any. Now I added it [7]. Bye. --Paginazero - Ø 20:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Paginazero is qualified to vote from Meta, so there wouldn't be a problem anyways. Jon Harald Søby 20:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Gac 18:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. :O W Frieda!!! :-) --Filnik 18:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Here I am! --EH101 18:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Frieda for president --DracoRoboter 18:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Gvf 18:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. IMHO the best candidate so far. --Emc2 18:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Go frieda, go !--Cotton 18:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. strong support --piero tasso 19:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The link from local wiki to meta leads to another meta username. Philippe 20:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    please, check again (and don't be so Vogon, please :-) --piero tasso 20:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Restriking. I still don't see a link from your home wiki account to your meta user page. Let me know where it is, please, and then I'll be happy to reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 20:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Appropriate link exists, reinstating endorsement. Thanks for your patience. Philippe 20:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Maybe he meant this. --Brownout(msg) 20:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    (:Julien:) 19:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from local wiki to meta. Please add the link and let me know and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 19:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  23. I support her, I think she's the best among the candidates. --Broc 19:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from local wiki to meta. Please add that link and let me know and I'll reinstate the endorsement.
    Link now exists. Reinstating. Philippe 20:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  24. Windowsuninstall 19:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Wim b 19:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    support, support - Laurentius 19:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    No link from local wiki to meta. Please add a link from your local userpage to your meta account and let me know and I'll resubmit the endorsement. Philippe 19:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  26. yes. --Giannib 19:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. -- Lp 19:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Jacopo 21:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --M/ 21:43, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Salvatore Ingala 21:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --ChemicalBit 21:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC) see w:it:Utente:ChemicalBit[reply]
  32. Ludo29 22:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. E' una leggenda. ^^ Arria Belli 22:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. of course!! --Superchilum(talk to me!) 22:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. After reading the candidate presentation page. Pap3rinik Quack! 22:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Mido 23:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jouster

[edit]

This candidate has entered the election but his identity has not yet been confirmed. Endorsements may be entered but are subject to the identity confirmation process being completed.

  1. Noroton 02:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    71.245.156.223 18:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please endorse using a meta account with a link to your home wiki and vice versa. Philippe 23:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  2. A breath of fresh air. heqs 01:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Great candidate! Ey zee 23:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kate

[edit]
  1. Seems the best position statement so far. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Anthony DiPierro 01:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. .anaconda 01:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --Nick1915 - all you want 01:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC) withdrawn--Nick1915 - all you want 17:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kate has dedicated a huge amount of her time to Wikimedia projects, made thousands of edits, subm... Lcarsdata 06:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ~ Kalki 07:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Catchpole 09:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While I do not totally agree with her statements, Kate will bring an entirely different point of view to the board. Plus... Bryan 10:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Herby talk thyme 11:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Cryptic 11:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No meta user page diff --Aphaia 01:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Because, as on en:, I prefer to keep my user page redlinked, partly because of exactly this sort of assumption that all bluelinked usernames as legitimate while all redlinked ones are not. There are interwiki links on my user talk pages going in both directions, as thirty seconds of investigation would have told you. —Cryptic 13:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, no. We don't accept any forget signature including link to other wikis just for investigation purpose with huge number of links within this week. --Aphaia 14:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I agree it seems a good position statement. Endorsed!--Kalogeropoulos 18:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Edivorce 19:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Art Unbound 21:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Adds badly wanted refreshment to thinking on this medium. Please try again next time.[reply]
  12. Pomte from en.wikipedia 04:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Adnergje 09:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Waerth 09:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC) - Good person with good ideas.[reply]
  15. Comte0 13:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Fjl 13:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Gladkov 18:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 18:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from home wiki to meta. Please add that and let me know, and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 23:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Links now exist. Philippe 15:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  19. SarekOfVulcan 23:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Your emphasis on Wikipedia as the primary project would be valuable: monocultures are vulnerable.[reply]
  20. Utcursch 05:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. The technical contributions alone would sufice... Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 12:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Deb 17:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    80.119.38.228 05:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please endorse from a meta account with valid links to your home wiki and from your home wiki to your meta account. Then, notify me, and I'll reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 03:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  23. Fruggo 20:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Very interesting and refreshing ideas.[reply]
  24. China Crisis 21:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Edward Chernenko 11:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. —Nightstallion (?) 18:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Oops, sorry, maximum three votes --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Bruning

[edit]
  2. ~Kylu (u|t) 01:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cowman109 02:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. One of the six candidates whom I supported in '06, and one whom I'll almost surely support again. Joe 03:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Picaroon (Talk) 03:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. the candidate I voted for in 06. How could not support someone with New Zealand connections :) Brian Wikinews / Talk 04:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Very glad to see you here. Seraphimblade 05:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [8][reply]
  8. Timichal 06:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Kipmaster 08:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yonatanh 10:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sjakkalle 12:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lior 13:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Krator 14:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. R at enwiki 14:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Siebrand 14:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. GerardM 16:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ausir 19:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Snowolf 20:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. ♥ Stuart LaJoie → talk2me 22:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Vassyana 01:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    OldCar 07:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please endorse using a meta account with a link to your home wiki and vice versa. — Philippe 17:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  22. Adnergje 09:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Visviva 12:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Taw 13:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ciell 17:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Filnik 09:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. I am [9] at English wiki, my main one. --Paul Pieniezny 15:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. I'm w:pt:User:Malafaya --Malafaya 15:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Sustructu 09:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yes. [10] CharlotteWebb 04:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Höyhens 09:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yup LessHeard vanU 11:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. I am en:User:N and I approve! -N 14:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I don't know you, but I share your concern for interwiki communications. If there's any way I can help with actual issues just let me know. --Bèrto 'd Sèra 14:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Oops, sorry --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sabine 20:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Kurykh 23:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kingboyk

[edit]
  1. Let me be the first to endorse Stephen... Lar: t/c 12:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC) see my WikiMatrix for crosslinkages)[reply]
  2. Reedy Boy 13:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC) (en)no link back from local --Aphaia 06:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC); link given, endorsement is reinstated. --Aphaia 12:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ST47 13:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)no link back from local --Aphaia 06:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed, sorry. ST47 12:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Wickethewok 13:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Epousesquecido 14:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Doesn't meet criteria (edits > 400)count. --Aphaia 05:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Endorsement reinstated by review per request. --Aphaia 06:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Deiz 14:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from local. --Aphaia 06:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    reinstated - link now exists. Philippe 01:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  7. J'endorse! † Danbarnesdavies 14:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. W00t! (→zelzany - he's still at it) 14:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Definitely —METS501 (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Aotearoa 18:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from local wiki to meta. Please add a link and let me know and I'll resubmit. Philippe 03:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  10. Andreasegde 19:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Martinp23 19:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. LessHeard vanU 21:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC) (That's endorser 13 sorted, hopefully there will now be a pile on.)No link from local. --Aphaia 06:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC); links given, endorsement reinstated. --Aphaia 12:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    91.168.71.224 05:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)No anon vote. --Aphaia 05:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Brunodesacacias 05:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)No link from local. --Aphaia 06:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    All endorsers until here have been confirmed by me. --Aphaia 06:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. David Berardan 08:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Allow me to be NOT the last to endorse the very hard-working and dedicated Steve. --Setanta747 23:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC) (en)[reply]
  15. Haukur 22:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Chacor 04:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Please sign with your meta username. Philippe 04:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Sorry about that... done below. Chacor 05:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. NSLE 05:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Kurykh 23:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Snow

[edit]
  1. I am privileged to be the first to endorse this candidate. Danny 01:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Michael Billington 01:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. thoughtful user. --Elian 01:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. DarkFalls 01:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Endorsed. xaosflux Talk 02:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sean William 03:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Angela 04:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Endorsed. --Kalogeropoulos 08:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. sebmol ? 08:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Certainly.[reply]
  10. Datrio 08:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Longbow4u 08:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. IlyaHaykinson 09:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. viel Erfolg! Arne (akl) 11:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Valuable addition to the board! --Mbimmler 11:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Tomos 11:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fabexplosive The archive man 15:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Oops, sorry --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)All endorsers until here have been confirmed by me. Jon Harald Søby 16:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. filip ⁂ 16:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Achates 19:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Nina 20:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Andre (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Wikihermit 03:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. I'm not certain I'll ultimately support, but I certainly endorse. Joe 04:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Edward Chernenko 05:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    You are limited to a maximum of three endorsements. I am striking all of your endorsements to allow you to readd only three. Philippe 06:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Titoxd(?!?) 06:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Shanes 09:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. From the field of candidates, as it stands; the horse for the course. I am retaining two endorsements for later, depending on who decides to stand within the time limit for submissions. -- Cimon Avaro 15:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. guillom 07:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Sjc 10:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Cryptic 11:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Pwet-pwet 12:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --BirgitteSB 16:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Nahum 19:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" (en.wp) 22:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Bouchecl 02:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Bsm15 07:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Petrusbarbygere 17:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    81.132.246.221 21:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC) I endorse this person because he has a nice name.[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please endorse using a meta username with a link to your home wiki and vice versa. Philippe 23:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  36. Bapti 16:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Swatjester 20:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC). My final endorsement, which I've been holding out for a coupled days. Swatjester 20:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Pilotguy radar contact 00:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 06:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Majorly (talk) 17:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Nichalp 17:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Zanimum 20:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mindspillage

[edit]
  1. I am honored to be the first to endorse this user. Thunderhead 01:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Danny 01:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Rory096 01:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Elian 01:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    (→zelzany - he's still at it) 01:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Endorse. xaosflux Talk 02:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Makemi 02:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Coredesat (en.wp) 03:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sean William 03:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ≈ jossi ≈ 04:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. CComMack (en:User:CComMack) 06:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Swatjester 06:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC) [11]:Given her answer to my section, I 100% wholeheartedly endorse as strong as possible.[reply]
  13. Datrio 08:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Mbimmler 11:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Everything I've seen of her suggests a trustworthy, responsible user. ElinorD 11:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Fruggo 11:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Pilotguy radar contact 13:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Antandrus 13:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC) ([12])[reply]
  19. Eloquence 14:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Lurker 15:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC) en:User:Lurker[reply]
    Fabexplosive The archive man 15:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Oops, sorry --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC) All endorsers until here have been confirmed by me. Jon Harald Søby 16:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. BigDT 20:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC) [13][reply]
  22. Wooyi 20:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Andre (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Hégésippe | ±Θ± 05:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Auto-remove of my endorsement. Mindspillage seems to have enough smiley, so I can endorse another for more plurality in the future vote. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Edward Chernenko 05:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    You are limited to a maximum of three endorsements. I am striking all of your endorsements to allow you to readd only three. Philippe 06:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Titoxd(?!?) 06:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Shanes 09:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. MONGO 10:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Adnergje 10:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Tawker 13:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Lar: t/c 15:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC) (see my WikiMatrix for crosslinkages)[reply]
  30. Successful board member with a useful background and plans for the future. Warofdreams 16:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Hansjoseph 17:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)not eligible to endorsecontrib, unless the link under which he meets criteria is provided.[reply]
  31. FloNight 19:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Evrik 21:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Doc glasgow 23:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 23:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Kim Bruning 02:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. WODUP 07:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. guillom 07:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Pwet-pwet 12:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    201.34.71.185 12:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please provide a link to your local wiki. Philippe 22:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  39. Zocky 12:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Yonatanh 13:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. R at enwiki 14:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    LuciusValens 15:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Not qualified to vote (fewer than 400 edits on en, ko, and la) Philippe 02:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  42. Benn Newman 20:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. ♥ Stuart LaJoie → talk2me 22:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Walkerma 03:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. David Cannon 12:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC) No reflection on other candidates, but Kathleen is the one candidate whose work I've seen enough of...[reply]
  46. Cimon Avaro 16:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC) This is largely a symbolic act. Agree totally with previous speaker. Never have I known her to be but...[reply]
  47. Ciell 17:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Gladkov 18:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Nihiltres(t.u) 18:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. riana_dzasta 15:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. SarekOfVulcan 16:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC) - bass woodwind players have to stick together :-)[reply]
  52. --Celestianpower (en, wikt) 18:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Balcer 23:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Ridiculously good candidate. Neutrality 05:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Húsönd 17:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Amicalement - --Zivax 18:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    #:Amicalement - --Zivax 18:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Endorsement must be from a meta account, with a link to the local wiki (and back from local to meta) on userpages. Please resubmit with userlinks, and I'll be happy to reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 02:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  57. Hello32020 23:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    There is no real need for me to do this since you're already very well-endorsed, but it's impossible for me not to endorse you. Chacor 04:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Please sign with your meta username. Philippe 05:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  58. NSLE 05:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Computerjoe 10:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  60. —Nightstallion (?) 18:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Deadhoax (Talk | Contr) 19:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Zanimum 20:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Bawolff 23:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar

[edit]
  1. Ucucha 05:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Amicalement - --Zivax 18:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Endorsement must be from a meta account, with a link to the local wiki (and back from local to meta) on userpages. Please resubmit with the links and let me know, and I'll be happy to reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 02:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  2. ≈ jossi ≈ 04:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Endorsement reinstated. --Aphaia 01:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --Michael Billington 01:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
    No link to meta from local wiki. Philippe 05:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  1. MaxSem 06:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. stv # 07:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --RoswithaC 08:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Datrio 08:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. .Koen 08:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MF-Warburg(de) 08:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Vikiwiki 09:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kameraad Pjotr 09:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC) (nl)[reply]
  9. Chaemera 10:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to local user page. Jon Harald Søby 16:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I do now, sorry. --Chaemera 21:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fruggo 10:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Dick Bos 11:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Mbimmler 11:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Londenp 11:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Geograaf 11:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Erwin85 11:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fewer than 400 edits on a single wiki. Please provide a wiki w/400 edits for reconsideration. Philippe 04:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Reinstated based upon edits from nl user Erwin. Philippe 17:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  16. aleichem 12:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • KRLS 14:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
    Submitted by anon.[14] --Aphaia 01:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Venullian 12:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Nick1915 - all you want 13:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Eloquence 14:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. MigGroningen 14:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kattenfan 14:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Japiot 14:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    No link to home wiki. Please link from your meta page to home wiki. Philippe 04:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  22. JoJan 14:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC) en:User JoJan[reply]
  23. Lurker 15:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC) en:User:Lurker[reply]
  24. Fabexplosive The archive man 15:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    All endorsers until here have been confirmed by me. Jon Harald Søby 16:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. filip ⁂ 16:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Millosh 16:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Falcongj 19:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to local user page. Jon Harald Søby 20:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I added a link to my local user paga. Didn't know that was obilgatoryFalcongj 14:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Art Unbound 19:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to local user page. Jon Harald Søby 20:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    For link to local user page, see [15]. For link to Meta user page, see [16] - Art Unbound 20:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Do I have to add another vote? - Art Unbound 20:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Eligibility confirmed and there is now a link on the meta page to local. I have reinstated the endorsement. Philippe 22:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. - 194.109.245.121 20:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I hadn't logged in - Art Unbound 21:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Koen Amatata 21:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from local wiki to meta. Philippe 05:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Link from local wiki to meta added : see [17] Koen Amatata 07:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Reinstated endorsement. Philippe 21:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Robert Prummel 22:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC) An endorsement after having read your articles on musical subjects.[reply]
    No link back to meta from local wiki. Philippe 05:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  30. ♠ Troefkaart 01:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Wikihermit 03:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ascánder 04:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 05:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Edward Chernenko 05:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    You are limited to a maximum of three endorsements. I am striking all of your endorsements to allow you to readd only three. Philippe 06:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Richyf 06:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Sustructu 06:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Annabel 07:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Sr13 07:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --The Joke النكتة‎ 10:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Zephyrus 10:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Absar 10:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Highdelbeere 12:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Salaskan 17:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Does not meet criteria for endorsements. No link to local user page. Dark Falls talk 06:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    There you go, a link ^_^ Salaskan 14:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Also need a link from your local wiki back to your meta account. Must link both ways (to and from meta). Philippe 16:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    There it is. (although I wonder why you need it...) Salaskan 15:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Dolledre 17:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ken123 19:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. feydey 21:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. EvG 21:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. NielsF 22:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Advance 22:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. IIVQ 22:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • spade 22:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
    Submitted by anon.[18] Nishkid64 (talk) 22:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. AmiDaniel 23:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ~ Seb35 06:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --172.187.64.245 07:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please provide a link to your local wiki. Philippe 22:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  53. guillom 07:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Kyle_the_hacker 11:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Zocky 12:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krator 14:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Siebrand 14:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 19:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --Stepri2003 20:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Not qualified to endorse: no link to local userpage on meta, and too few edits on meta. Please submit a link to a qualified WMF wiki. Philippe 02:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  59. the wub "?!" (en.wp) 21:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  60. ♥ Stuart LaJoie → talk2me 22:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Plison 01:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Not qualified to vote: fewer than 400 edits on en, which is the only wiki linked from meta page. Philippe 02:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  61. Bouchecl 02:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Walkerma 03:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Waerth 07:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC) - We need an Ossie[reply]
    OldCar 07:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link to home wiki. Philippe 05:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  64. --Szczepan talk 08:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Adnergje 09:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --David Legrand 09:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Grimlock 10:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    86.144.44.88 16:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but anonymous users may not endorse. Please create a meta username, link it to your local wiki (and reverse) and then re-endorse. Philippe 16:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  68. Ciell 17:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Genium 20:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Greudin 19:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Japiot 21:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Arwel 23:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Laura Scudder | Talk 02:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC) (EN)[reply]
  74. Alexanderps 05:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  75. PNLL 11:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Cicero 14:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  77. I am [19] at English wiki, my main one. --Paul Pieniezny 15:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Bapti 16:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Aotearoa 18:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Helios89 19:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Brunodesacacias 05:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  82. China Crisis 21:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Jean-Louis Lascoux 10:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  85. SPQRobin 11:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Perky 11:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Romary 13:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Seems ok --Jollyroger 17:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --M/ 21:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SarekOfVulcan

[edit]
  1. LaughingVulcan 01:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Proud to be the first endorse a fellow Vulcan. Home Wiki: Wikipedia, Username: LaughingVulcandoesn't meet the endorsement submission eligibility criteria. --Aphaia 01:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Heron

[edit]
  1. --SonicR 17:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. -- Brian Wikinews / Talk 01:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Cessator 17:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Chendy 21:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC) we have to ensure Wikipedia doesn't suffocate itself![reply]
  5. Bawolff 23:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC) I think he'd make a good board member.[reply]

UninvitedCompany

[edit]
  1. --Rory096 23:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ≈ jossi ≈ 01:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Paul August 04:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eluchil404 04:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Iller 10:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Cryptic 11:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No meta user page & link back given --Aphaia[reply]
  6. Sjakkalle 12:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Nahum 19:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Bucketsofg 20:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Roberth 00:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ElinorD 01:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Daniel Bryant 03:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Bsm15 07:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Guérin Nicolas 07:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    OldCar 08:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)No meta user page --Aphaia 10:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  14. 1ne 12:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Comte0 13:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Utcursch 05:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Pomte (en.wp) 07:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SETI3 15:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. IlyaHaykinson 00:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Rosier 12:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. [20] — CharlotteWebb 06:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Salaskan 19:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC) awesome editor.[reply]

WarX

[edit]
  1. .anaconda 01:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Eluchil404 04:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ~ Seb35 06:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    82.122.197.250 09:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Bryan 10:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Kuszi 15:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No meta link, invalid vote. --Aphaia 01:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Powerek38 18:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    RoaringMice 148.141.31.210 18:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Please provide a link to your local wiki. Philippe 22:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  6. Masur 08:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC) (sorry for troubles with the invalid vote)[reply]
  7. Masti 19:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Marcin Suwalczan 19:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC) (PL)[reply]
  9. Wpedzich 19:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Carries a lot of the local chapter on his back, exceptionally solid.[reply]
    McMonster 85.128.107.244 19:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Anon vote, identity not confirmed diff Aphaia 00:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    JDavid 150.254.142.43 19:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Anon vote, identity not confirmed. diff Aphaia 00:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Adziura 06:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Guérin Nicolas 07:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Szczepan talk 08:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yarl.PL 08:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. odder 09:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jadwiga 10:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Roman 92 talk 12:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Jakubhal 12:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. :)) Wiktoryn 13:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Fjl 13:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. MF-Warburg(de) 16:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Drozdp 22:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)anon vote --Aphaia 01:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Rosebud Finland 20:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Please link your meta userpage to your home wiki. Once done, notify me and I'll reinstate this endorsement (also check to be sure your home wiki userpage links to meta). Philippe 05:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  22. Nemo5576 06:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Drozdp 13:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Pl[reply]
  24. SETI3 15:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --xRiffRaffx (talk) 18:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Andros64 19:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Balcer 23:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Moumine 08:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. k r i d  PL  11:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    83.18.89.250 15:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC) sorry John Belushi 15:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No userpage, so no link to local wiki from meta userpage. Please create a meta userpage, link to local (and link from local to meta) and let me know and I'll be happy to reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 01:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  30. Reliable and industrious candidate. William Avery 20:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I like your media project. --Rbraunwa 23:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Endorsement must be from a meta account, with a link to the local wiki (and back from local to meta) on userpages. Please resubmit from a meta account and let me know, and I'll be happy to reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 01:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  31. LUCPOL 16:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yann

[edit]
  1. Bonne chance - --Zivax 18:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Endorsements must be signed from a valid meta account, with links to your home wiki and from home wiki to your meta account. Let me know when that's done and we can reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 07:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  2. I am honoured to be the first person to endorse Yann. Yann has been an editor for a very long tim... Lcarsdata 06:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Moumine 07:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kipmaster 08:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. BernardM 08:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No link to home wiki on user page, hence no proof of eligibility. --Aphaia 04:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Link found, endorsement reinstated. --Aphaia 09:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    ~Pyb 08:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link back to meta from local wiki (at least that I could find...) Philippe 05:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  6. --Zephyrus 08:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Kropotkine 113 08:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No link back to meta. --Aphaia 05:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC); link given, reinstated[reply]
  8. Chico75 09:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 09:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No link back to meta.--Aphaia 05:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Je persiste et signe Bertrand GRONDIN 08:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)No link back to meta. Your French Wikipedia page, which you placed at the top of your user page has no link to meta as far as I noticed. --Aphaia 10:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. J'aurais aimé que vous eussiez regardé plus attentivement ma page sur wikiquote pour que vous vous rendiez compte que le lien en retour existe. En cas de doute, je vous eusses invité sur ma page sur Wikinews afin que vous la regardassiez aussi. Eu égard à ces nouveaux élements, je vous saurais infiniment gré que vous cessassiez de me chercher, me provoquer, bref, me persécuter. Wikipédia n'est pas le projet principal auquel je contribue, mais Wikinews, Wiktionnaire ou Wikiquote. Bertrand GRONDIN 18:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Greudin 09:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)no link from local user pages. Identity is not proved. --Aphaia 05:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Link provided, endorsement has been reinstated with confirmed eligibility. --Aphaia 11:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --David Legrand (fr.wikinews) 09:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No meta user page, hence authencity can be hard to proved (hardly combined to the history of this page).--Aphaia 04:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC). No problem, it's ok now.--David Legrand 09:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --David Legrand 09:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. A true Wikimedian. Has a lot of experience with the whole stuff. Bryan 10:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Benjism89 11:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC) No link from home wiki. --Aphaia 05:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC); link given, reinstated. --Aphaia 11:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Raziel 13:33, 19 June 2007No meta user page, hence authencity can be hard to proved (hardly combined to the history of this page).--Aphaia 04:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  14. Raziel {boudoir} 13:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC) désolé pour l'erreur d'identification. Contributeur Wikipédia France : Raziel.[reply]
  15. Kyle_the_hacker 11:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Pwet-pwet 12:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Grimlock 10:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    -- AlNo (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No meta user page, hence authencity can be hard to proved (hardly combined to the history of this page).--Aphaia 04:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  19. -- AlNo (talk) 13:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC). A link back to meta is also provided on my fr: user page (see when I added it and my account list).[reply]
  20. --BeatrixBelibaste 14:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. nojhan 16:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. GerardM 16:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC) In this way another continent gets some virtual representation.[reply]
  23. --Jusjih 16:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Rosier 12:17, 22 June 2007 (UTC): --86.201.173.84 16:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC) bon courage je ne suis pas un anonyme, je suis arbitre sur F user rosier sur commons et wikipedia F et je suis trop gourde pour arriver à voter --81.50.38.47 10:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please provide a link to your local wiki and a meta username. Philippe 22:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  25. --BirgitteSB 16:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. François 17:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Divol 17:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    81.192.13.157 18:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please provide a link to your local wiki and a meta username. Philippe 22:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  28. Mattisan 19:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Thogo (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 19:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. VIGNERON 19:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Benn Newman 20:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Vev 21:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Spy Jones hder m'âya 21:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
    The first edit for this user was 17 March 2007. The requirement is that the account be created no later than 1 March 2007. Philippe 02:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  34. Oblic 22:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Christopher Mahan 22:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bouchecl 02:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Bsm15 07:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. MHM-meta 07:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Since he's steward, his identity is already kinda garanteed, IMHO :) DarkoNeko 08:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Neuromancien 09:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Shizhao 09:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. I rarely endorse anyone I don't know personally, yet I did like your statement on en.planet --Bèrto 'd Sèra 09:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Xfigpower (yak yak) 11:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Sapcal22 11:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Petrusbarbygere 17:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Dovi 18:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Genium 20:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Philippe Kurlapski 20:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Marc 20:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Alexanderps 05:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Utcursch 05:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Viva Bharat! --Jonathaneo 10:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --P@d@w@n 11:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. PNLL 11:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Mirgolth 13:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Steward is a plus; good luck. (→zelzany - he's still at it) 14:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. riana_dzasta 15:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Jamin 16:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    86.203.2.46 16:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous users may not endorse. Please endorse using a meta account with a link to your home wiki and vice versa. — Philippe 17:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  59. Bapti 16:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Definitely. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Aotearoa 18:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  62. With satisfaction , observing Commons activity Andros64 19:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Otto ter Haar 20:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Brunodesacacias 05:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Selvejp 10:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Snillet 13:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  67. RuB 20:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Höyhens 09:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Jean-Louis Lascoux 10:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Romary 13:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Eukesh 18:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Deadhoax (Talk | Contr) 19:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Sabine 20:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --M/ 21:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Ludo29 22:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

^demon

[edit]
  1. Bucketsofg 20:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)No link back from the local --Aphaia 04:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC); link given, endorsement reinstated. --Aphaia 03:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vassyana 01:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    en:Rjgodoy 01:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Lack of meta signature, hard to tell from anon vote.[reply]
  3. Daniel Bryant 03:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Coredesat (en.wp) 03:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    1ne 12:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)No link back from the local --Aphaia 04:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Salaskan 14:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Endorse. xaosflux Talk 02:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Somitho (en.wp_ Somitho 12:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)No link back from the local --Aphaia 04:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC); link given, endorsement reinstated.[reply]
  8. ST47 13:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)No link back from the local. --Aphaia 04:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Corrected, sorry. ST47 12:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —METS501 (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Cla68 20:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)No link back from the local. --Aphaia 04:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FunPika 20:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Húsönd 17:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No link from local wiki to meta. Please add the link (or tell me where it is) and I'll reinstate once notified. Philippe 03:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
  11. WjBscribe 00:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    en:user:Thatcher131 Thatcher131 01:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Endorsement must be from a meta account, with a link to the local wiki (and back from local to meta) on userpages. Please resubmit from a meta account and let me know, and I'll be happy to reinstate the endorsement. Philippe 01:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
    Chacor 04:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Sign with your meta user name, please. --Aphaia 04:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NSLE 05:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. I am en:User:N and I approve! -N 14:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Kurykh 23:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Do not add the names of candidates yourself. Election officials will be responsible for adding names.

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/Board_elections/2007/Endorsements/fr&oldid=13039541"