Stewards/confirm/2009/Sj

The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Sj

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en, de-2, es-2, fr-2
Personal info: statement here

Comments about Sj

Sj made no steward actions at all in 2008. That's not active enough in my book really. And the past 50 rights go back to June 2006. Majorly ^talk 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - clearly inactive. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Inactive, remove. --APPER 01:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same opinion. Marcus Cyron 01:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Inactive, remove. Prodego ^talk 03:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per Majorly. --Brownout^(msg) 09:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
COI I'm also up for confirmation. I've met SJ at Wikimanias and meetups. He is a nice guy and really dedicated to our mission. But no statement and no actions in the last year does satisfy our definition of inactivity. If he comes back during the next election cycle, then I will vote for him. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No steward edits for over a year? Remove. The Helpful One 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
These positions really should not be a gold watch and I feel that SJ came close to abusing our trust (although he was probably just being unrealistic with himself) by saying he'd make an effort to be more active. Thanks for all you've done and there's no shame in becoming inactive. But it's now more than a year past time to remove. --JayHenry 04:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, but I understand there are more important things than being online every day ;) →Na ·gy 19:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. John Vandenberg 06:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no activity.--Kwj2772 06:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
another dedicated, trusted, inactive user who is prone to overcommitting himself :) SJ has been involved in Wikimedia for a long time and certainly has done much work here; my statement about Oscar, above, applies. -- phoebe 06:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove not interested whatsoever in the steward role, therefore should not have it, probably should not have been given it in the first place fr33kman ^{t - c} 04:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Não mantem, too inactive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 16:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral aleichem 11:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Formally active enough. Too significant to let him leave us as a steward. He didn't leave the statement, but it is so regular behavior of Sj. I may bet that he will write something as a statement during the last moments ;) --Millosh 13:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
sadly remove - inactivity --FiliP × 17:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]