Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2016-11

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests | Permissions
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Mardetanha in topic Removal of access

Administrator access

Latest comment: 8 years ago15 comments9 people in discussion

[email protected]

Status:    Locally handled

In there have the bureaucrat but inactive. I already discuss more admin. And I want to become admin for fight any vandalism page, protect page for vandal. And else. In there many anonymous, so vandal is very big, not only vandal but user friendly also many. For vandal, I need admin for delete redudant page and other. I also contact admin, but no respon. Thanks for read myrequest. Murbaut (talk) 03:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

One of the bureaucrats were active recently. Have you asked them? Ruslik (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Not done One of the bureaucrats (w:ms:User:Yosri) was active today so this should be handled locally. -- Avi (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

notice in here and via E-mail

In there have the bureaucrat but inactive. I already notice he but no respon and I also already discuss more admin. And I want to become admin for fight any vandalism page, protect page for vandal. And else. In there many anonymous, so vandal is very big, not only vandal but user friendly also many. For vandal, I need admin for delete redudant page and other. I also contact admin, but no respon. Thanks for read my request. Murbaut (talk) 08:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

According to the list thera are two bureaucrats, one of whom was active recently (vide), please contact them. Please, contact us after a week, in case of none action and the permission will be granted. Now,  On hold, einsbor talk 09:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
I have explained the process in IRC but still it seems Murbaut didn't follow that, so i left a message on the local crat's talk pages--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 10:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
I would like to contest the above user request due the fact that (1) He is not meeting minimum edit counts required i.e. 500 edits (required) vs. 186 edits (actual) -->Edit Counter; and (2) The voting period also didn't followed/complied with ms.wikipedia.org's guideline i.e. obtain more than 70% votes in the following situation (a) There were 14 votes within a week, OR (b) ballout has been on going for more than 14 days. For this case, the user failed to meet all requirements. As such, I disagrees for him to be appointed as the sysop at ms.wikipedia.my. Zamwan (talk) 14:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Closing as not done - no reason to believe this will not be handled appropiately locally. Savhñ 14:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi @Zamwan: I see for the time being allowed to come out of the requirements to become an administrator in mswiki (evidence)Murbaut (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi @Murbaut:, you are correct. Nomination to be an admin is allowed at ms.wikipedia.org as long as you have meeting its pre-requisite requirements. Your case is totally different with Polar. Zamwan (talk) 11:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Savh. Hi @Zamwan: I just want to help tackle vandalism, I intend both to combat vandalism, I know you're administrator, but I want the board in mswiki it would be quick to respond. I just remind that administrators in mswiki many inactive. And also, admin are some active but does not care about the vandalism. Thanks Savh, Shanmugam7 and einsbor. Murbaut (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Your statement on admins do not care about vandalism is totally misleading. I understand your desire to be an admin and tackle vandalism but sadly to say, each wiki communicate has their own requirements and we (including you) should obey it. Your desire to combat vandalism doesn't warrant or give you privileges to bypass/waive the rules. Zamwan (talk) 11:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
@Zamwan: I don't intend to bypass requirement. But in this case we need more admin, I think you hinder me to be the admin, and it np, I still many other interests. Please do not edit this task, see the status of Not Done you know. Sincerely Murbaut (talk) 13:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

A lot of work is going on here from last one year. We are facing more problems in maintaining because of no active admin. So is my request. - Shubha (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Admiral Titan@startrektimelineswiki

Status:    Not done
  • Wiki: startrektimelineswiki.com.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
  • User: Admiral Titan (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
  • Discussion: We have been without a Bureaucrat since mid-April and without an Admin since Mid-September, which is starting to become problematic because we do not have the ability to delete pages, nor block user accounts that are created to spam. I'd like to request to be a Bureaucrat on the Star Trek Timelines Wiki, which is powered by MediaWiki (i believe this is the correct location to post this request on) so i can help to elevate the issues i stated above. While Admin would be ok, we don't have a Bureaucrat currently, and i think it would be helpful if someone had the ability to promote other users to be admins on the wiki. I have 479 total contributions to the site, and have been continuously active since joining at the beginning of April, 2016.

The site link above isn't working (this site is NOT a .org site), here are some links to the site: Main Page, List of Bureaucrats, List of Admins, Wiki Statistics

Thanks, -Admiral Titan (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

The startrektimelineswiki is not operated by the WikiMedia Foundation - the stewards will not be able to action this - see your website developers. — xaosflux Talk 19:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Latest comment: 8 years ago17 comments8 people in discussion

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Awaiting ANPI Noticeboard confirmation. After, please add checkuser to EVinente as he has been approved in a local vote (53/1/6). Thanks in advance, RadiX∞ 16:15, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

 On hold ~ Nahid Talk 16:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
I've posted a note at his talk page here, since he hasn't enabled email access apparantly. (@RadiX). Trijnsteltalk 22:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Trijnstel. I just saw you have already contacted him and asked him to inform his irc nick and cloak. Maybe there is something wrong with his Phabricator account. RadiX∞ 03:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Done. I'll also add him to the list/wiki etc. Trijnsteltalk 19:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Prométhé[email protected]

Status:    Done

Gratus (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

 On hold, awaiting ANPI Noticeboard confirmation. --Stryn (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Done. Will do the other stuff now too. Trijnsteltalk 23:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Temporary CU Permission for duties as a scrutineer for the 2016 ArbCom Elections. Kelapstick (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Temporary CU Permission for duties as a scrutineer for the 2016 ArbCom Elections. Kelapstick (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Temporary CU Permission for duties as a scrutineer for the 2016 ArbCom Elections. Kelapstick (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Matanya (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. And you're already on all the lists and wikis! :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Oversight access

Removal of access

Latest comment: 8 years ago77 comments40 people in discussion

[email protected]

Status:    Done

user request on my page. Itti (talk) 14:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their service. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

It is one year since Frisko was elected to Administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Frisko does not want to continue as Administrator. Svensson1 (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Done masti <talk> 22:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

It is one year since Lindansaren was elected to Administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Lindansaren does not want to continue as Administrator. Svensson1 (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Done masti <talk> 22:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Abuse filter@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

Please remove the admin flag, currently there is no abuse filter with the blocking feature enabled and thus having this pseudo admin in the admin list is currently unneeded. Thank you. --Vogone (talk) 00:19, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Done, einsbor talk 07:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

山田晴通@jawiki

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop rights for "w:ja:User:山田晴通", as per community consensus. Thanks.--rxy (talk) 11:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 12:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

User Dry [email protected]

Status:    Done

Please remove admin status. Dry Martini has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thanks. НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 05:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

User Ż[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please remove my admin status due to my lack of activity that is unlikely to change in the predictable future. Thank you. Żbiczek (talk) 15:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

User לערי ריינהארט@eo.wikipedia

Status:    Done

(your remarks) Ask for help:

I am a burocrate of the Esperanto-Wikipedia and we need the help of a Steward. The following user לערי ריינהארט (Leri Reinhart) possesses administrative rights in our Esperanto-Wikipedia. As he is inactive as administrator since more than two years, our community decided in a pooling to withdraw the administrative rights of לערי ריינהארט (Leri Reinhart) according to our regulation for inactive administrators. As no member of our community has rights as a steward, I now as burocrate of our community ask your help as steward to implement our decision. This decision concerns only the adiministrative rights of לערי ריינהארט (Leri Reinhart), whose contributions of course always will remain welcome.

Here the links to the user page of לערי ריינהארט (Leri Reinhart):

Our discussion was done here:

I thank you in the name of the Esperanto-Wikipedia community for your help. DidiWeidmann (talk) 12:50, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

I want to add a bit of information to the words by our respected bureaucrat DidiWeidmann. According to the rule about administratorship in Wikipedia in Esperanto, "If some administrator has not made any contribution to the Wikipedia since one complete year, his administratorship must be removed automatically by a steward. The administratorship removal must be announced beforehand on the Forum and on the talk page of the concerned user" (Se iu administranto ne faris ajnan kontribuon al la Vikipedio ekde unu plena jaro, li estu aŭtomate maladministrantigita de stevardo. La maladministrantigo estu antaŭsciigata en la Diskutejo kaj en la diskutpaĝo de la koncernita uzanto). לערי ריינהארט has not edited after 12 Sep 2015 and has not made protocol actions after 13 Mar 2014. Gamliel Fishkin 18:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their service. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of administrative actions during a 1 year period. Nedops (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 19:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of administrative actions during a 1 year period. Tar Lócesilion (queta) 19:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Done masti <talk> 19:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
    • @Tar Lócesilion: What about his checkuser rights? Right now he gets to keep them. Or isn't there a local policy for it? Trijnsteltalk 19:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
      • Also @Masti: Isn't this your homewiki? --Rschen7754 19:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
        • The steward policy suggests avoiding conflicts of interest. What is the particular conflict of interest here? – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
          • I can think of all sorts of things. --MF-W 01:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
          • It's avoiding the potential for any conflict of interest. In this particular case, there is some ambiguity as to whether CU rights should be retained or not. --Rschen7754 01:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
            • Masti didn't remove any CU rights, only the sysop rights that were requested here. Unless you can point to a specific conflict of interest that Masti might have (or could even possibly have) in removing the rights, then I don't think it's useful to bring it up. That part of the steward policy is obviously meant to prevent stewards from being "super-users" on their home project, and I don't think that actioning uncontroversial requests on SRP is at all part of that. Note that while I dislike the COI policy being thrown around in obviously clear-cut cases, I also don't see why it is so hard for stewards to simply recuse from taking actions involving their home wikis and prevent these discussions altogether... – Ajraddatz (talk) 01:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
              • But should he have removed the CU rights? Do we consider rollback to be a use of the sysop tools? (that issue came up on a wiki in the past, check the archives) Also, if we allow for stewards to act on their home wiki's inactivity policies, I could see selective enforcement taking place... --Rschen7754 01:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
    • @Trijnstel: there's no such policy. Since I have no access to CU log, I can't learn whether Karol007 is an active CU or not. Tar Lócesilion (queta) 19:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi stewards, please remove sysop access from [email protected] per failed confirmation (closed by me as I'm one of the 'crats). You can find it at w:cs:Wikipedie:Žádost o práva správce/Zdenekk2 (potvrzení 2). Thanks in advance, Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Done --Jyothis (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights. Thanks! TheStrayCat (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours, in case you reconsider. – Ajraddatz (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Done Thanks for your service. ~ Nahid Talk 06:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks again! --TheStrayCat (talk) 03:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

User ToSter@plwiki

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights due to my inactivity. Thanks! ToSter (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

 On hold for 24 hours, in case you reconsider. Linedwell (talk) 08:36, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Done, thanks for your work. --Stryn (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! ToSter (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Ash [email protected]

Status:    Done

Gratus (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The flag has been removed, @Trijnstel and Barras: could you please do the rest of the magic, as usual? einsbor talk 07:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Done -Barras talk 10:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

User not re-elected in biannual admin election. Did not receive 25 positive votes as required. Tarjeimo (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 07:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

User chose not to run for re-election. Tarjeimo (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 07:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Jon [email protected]

Status:    Done

User chose not to run for re-election. Tarjeimo (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 07:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Mycēs@lawiki

Status:    Not done

Hi. Per the local policy. This user is inactive for 3 years on Latiniate Wikipedia, and local policy requires administrative actions/edits in less than 6 months. Sysop access can be removed. Local bureaucrats cannot process the removal of sysop rights. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 23:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC).

Was the user notified and given one month of time to become active again, as the same policy requires? --MF-W 23:38, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
My bad, I've notified the user on his talk page. I withdraw this request. Moreover, his account hasn't unified in other wikis due to a forced change of usernames (e.g. Mycēs~lawikisource) I'm not secure that he response the notification. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 23:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC).

Dim Grits@ukwiki

Status:    Done

Per community decision user should be desysopped (has over 55% when 51% is needed). Anatoliy (talk) 18:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

I would suggest to wait until a bureaucrat makes an official decision and confirms here — NickK (talk) 23:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Agreed and 55 is rather tight, so, we will wait for community decision either way. --Jyothis (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
There is an official bureaucrat decision now. Please, desysoppe user --MaryankoD (talk) 20:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Done. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

شرف الدين@arwiki

Status:    Done

Our colleague شرف الدين doesn't use his bureaucrat rights since 2012, so as bureaucrat in ar.wiki I apply this removal request. Please remove bureaucrat flag only. Thanks in advance.--Abbas 22:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

OsamaK@arwiki

Status:    Done

Our colleague OsamaK doesn't use his bureaucrat rights since 2012, so as bureaucrat in ar.wiki I apply this removal request. Please remove bureaucrat flag only. Thanks in advance.--Abbas 22:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Neukoln@hewiki

Status:    Done

Pls remove my Checkuser flag. Neukoln (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 19:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Igna@global

Status:    Done

Per GR policy: "Global rollbackers who have not contributed to any Wikimedia project for the past 2 years should have their global rollback rights removed for inactivity." This user is inactive for two years, and according to the policy, GR flag should be removed. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 17:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC).

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Restu20@itWikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove admin status. Restu20 has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thanks. НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 23:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

User ayratayrat@baWikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove admin and bureaucrat flags because these was assigned by User:ZUFAr mistakely. User currently blocked - see log --Kaganer (talk) 22:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. Savhñ 23:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

As CU Log our colleague Antime doesn't use his check users rights since more than one year. As bureaucrat in ar.wiki and because of global check users policy and our local policy I apply this removal request. Please remove CU flag only. Thanks in advance.--Abbas 08:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

What does your local policy say? The global policy only allows for removal if the user is completely inactive for one year, which Antime is not, having recently edited. --MF-W 13:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Our local policy say if a Check user don't use his cu rights for one year, his rights should be removed.--Abbas 21:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
It looks like the local policy only allows removal if the user has been inactive for a year as well. I need to translate that section though, so I could be wrong. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
"أي مستخدم حاصل على صلاحيات التدقيق ولم يكن نشطاً لأكثر من سنة من الممكن نزع صلاحياته." Removing rights from users who holds the CU rights is possible when they are inactive for more than one year. also there was another removal request for this user because of same reasons and it has been done.--Abbas 22:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Comment I agree with Elph, unfortunately antime is not active for long time (almost 2 years), this is the removal request for him (Aug 2015), and this is the local policy link - section 2.3 for CU (you can read the translation here) --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 04:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Comment I agree with Elph and Ibrahim, as they said our local policy say if a Check user don't use his check user rights for one year, his rights should be removed--Alaa :)..! 11:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
removed per local policy Mardetanha talk 21:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Latest comment: 8 years ago20 comments12 people in discussion

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I want to make this project alive and I am still trying it. NehalDaveND (talk) 04:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

 On hold until 1 May. --Stryn (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-11-01. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
removed – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Sficbot@hiwiktionary

Status:    Done
This request is for sysop-bot. Bot user Sifc is sysop on corresponding wiki. Please give sysop rights atleast for 6 months. If possible, please give for 1 year.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-11-06. ~ Nahid Talk
removed --Stryn (talk) 13:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Can you give me a permanant right of sysop on lg.wikipedia.org because this project have not a sysop. I am already sysop on ln.wikipedia.org Apipo1907 (talk) 12:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Please, provide a link to your adminship request. Ruslik (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Ruslik0 her local communauty is very litlle. A link is lg:Wikipedya:Abateesiteesi/Apipo1907. Thanks in avance Apipo1907 (talk) 18:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

 On hold until 6 August 2016. --Stryn (talk) 07:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-11-07. Permanent adminship cannot be granted at this time. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio 11:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
removed, einsbor talk 16:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please give permanent adminship if possible or prolong temporary. Confirmation: [3].Anatoliy (talk) 09:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2016-11-18. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 08:23, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

shubha@sawikiquote

Status:    Done
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-11-18. Community is not big enough to grant permanent access. ~ Nahid Talk 14:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 08:23, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Quenhitran@viwikquote

Status:    Done

I've opened a discussion since November 8 and received no opposes. The only remark made by Tranminh360 was to remind me that stewards hadn't removed my rights as of November 9, meaning two days after my last deadline. I've been an administrator for a year on this wiki and I believe I can handle the tasks well. Sincerely, Quenhitran (talk) 09:53, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2016-11-21. q:vi:Special:PermanentLink/31493  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
extended for next year, to expire on 2017-11-22. einsbor talk 07:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Latest comment: 8 years ago12 comments10 people in discussion

Jayprakash12345@hiwikipedia

Status:    Done

I Submit Request for Transwiki Import Right. So Many Content On Englishwiki Which I Want To Import on HIndiwiki. --Jayprakash12345 (talk) 13:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

ː Removed voting from here. All votes mentioned here were present on hiwiki as well. Request you to pls do the needful basis community support ̊@hiwiki.--Anamdas (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Done Granted for 9 months to expire on 2017-8-08. MBisanz talk 02:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Motoko C. K. @kowiki

Status:    Done

For the Edit-a-thon @ Ewha W. Univ., this user needs accountcreator permission to bypass ratelimit. Since there is no formal process on granting accountcreator on kowiki, I think request from local admin is sufficient. Permission is only needed for 2016-11-05 and may be safely removed by 2016-11-06. — regards, Revi 08:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Granted temporary till 2016-11-06 masti <talk> 22:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Removed. --Stryn (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Murbaut@map_bmswiki

Status:    Not done

This is a request for transwiki importer rights, as explained below. --Vogone (talk) 23:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
list page testwiki:MediaWiki:Gadget-morebits.js

testwiki:Gadget-TwinkleTest.js
testwiki:Gadget-morebits.css

yes it only new revisions. Testing some gadget for map-bmswiki. Thanks Murbaut (talk) 06:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Question Question: This request should be moved to SRM. Or you request the import/transwiki rights? --Ks-M9 [disc.] 16:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC).
@Ks-M9: I want to request importer transwiki right, but in local communuty not grow well, then I request the page for import by importer. Thanks for respons Murbaut (talk) 23:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Not done You are already an admin, therefore you don't need this. --MF-W 00:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2016-11&oldid=16122845"