Steward requests/Checkuser/2023-04

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in April 2023, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

[email protected]

Status: Cannot be undertaken

List of users: Baldurar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Zolapin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2001:861:8C95:18C0:3485:CB66:D07F:1C77 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2001:861:5E42:5F00:5DA1:B16C:44C5:319D (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2A01:E34:EC5D:5010:44CE:5B7C:4857:964 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Noah Sokolowski (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): they participate in long term abuse with the help of IA tools to imitate other contributors on all wikis. The specialist (RCU) is @Poudou!: but he does never found enough proofs unfortunately so he will need help for other wikipedias . Baldurar is nationalist, temporary blocked and Zolapin is a "professional" troll and I think they participate to the contribution imitation contest which takes part now in the french wikipedia with the help of IA software based on chat GPT. The vandalism is very perverse because some times they make a vandalisme with one account and an IP they revert the vandalism so they make believe that they are a membrer of the RC patrol! one of them wants even to become an admin thanks to his patrol although he is banned defninitively! See also https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Faux-nez/Noah_Sokolowski 2A01:E34:EC45:6400:FD87:896:3CE3:5D39 18:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose The requester is blocked for 3 months on fr.wp for repeatedly trolling the various community spaces [1]. Zolapin and Baldurar's profiles have been known for years, they are completely different in their contributions and attitudes, and Zolapin's socks have been the subject of dozens of CU resquests without any evidence concerning Baldurar and Noah S. ever having been provided. Best regards. --——d—n—f (fr.-sysop) (talk) 19:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

no i NEVER trolled, thats the contrary because I explained several usurpations and i denounced the usurpation contest they do since about one month with the help of IA software to imitate other contributors and force the admins and the check-users to make errors!2A01:E34:EC45:6400:FD87:896:3CE3:5D39 19:12, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

@Do not follow: read the pages on FR in RCUS and in the pages dedicated to each banned, they explained that the banned imitate themself among them which explain why sometime the RCU can not be sure who is who, thats normal because the trolls just play with them and their nerves!

To eliminate all doubt: it should be clear that I charge nobody but it is clear that this IP are linked to one "usual suspect" i DONT say that zolapin and baldurar or Noah are the same personne but the job of the RCU is to know who it is! 2A01:E34:EC45:6400:FD87:896:3CE3:5D39 19:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Please, this is not a place for discussions. The request was already declined, thanks. Superpes15 (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Hello and thanks for reporting! Stewards cannot perform a CU in a wiki with local CU unless there is an emergency and no one is available (see Stewards#Access). Please note that, according to CheckUser policy and ANPDP, IPs cannot publicly associated with a registered user. --Superpes15 (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Opky9407 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Turpd (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Opky9407#2023年4月2日

Reason(s): Very similar editing pattern under main space (ex. zh:Special:diff/73095043 & zh:Special:diff/37612895, etc.). Local users have suspected that these types of small edits were aimed for the two users listed above to "earn" auto-confirm status to participate in article candidate discussions, such as DYKC, GAC, and FAC; the submitter also commented that both users "barely contribute to articles" (Chinese:「近乎完全不編輯條目」) after they have earned auto-confirm status. I personally think that it could be purely coincidence, given how limited the number of ways new users can give to the Wikipedia community, but, after viewing their contribution history, I found it hard to persuade myself that there could be two users who have near-exact editing behavior in main space (purely small edits such as changing wording of a phrase in large amounts, mostly in low notability articles). Thanks in advance.

\int

（☎） 01:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed Maccomcre, Turpd

Unrelated Opky9407

Opky9407 used proxies or VPN.

From a technical point of view. Co-editing or socks? --Sotiale (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

I would say they behave more like socks than co-editing.—

\int

（☎） 07:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: MihalisKesk (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); YannisCagalis (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:el:Βικιπαίδεια:Μαριονέτα

Reason(s): Both are SPAs with multiple (re)creations (5) and editing of only one article and protesting its deletion on various pages. It's a duck but it's always ok to have a confirmation if it is a sock or meatpuppet. Geraki ^T_L 08:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed--Vituzzu (talk) 09:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Ivenchiu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 方豔曦 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Naruto16898 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Ivenchiu

Reason(s): Please check if these are socks. From local admins. Please also check if these users are evading bans through IP addresses. 1233 （T / C） 16:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Please explain why this investigation is required, there are very few stewards who read Chinese(or could be alone). --Sotiale (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, this is admin from zhwiki. Sorry for the confusion. This request is submitted because it is reported that --

all three accounts involved in adding contents with copyright concerns to the article zh:天道_(台灣電視劇);
their behaviors (i.e., the contents they added) are very similar;
the time they presented are close;
two accounts are created very recently;
a series of IP edits also involved in the above mentioned copy violations with a similar behavioral pattern.

Therefore, I, along with our SPI clerk 1233, think that an investigation is necessary. -- KirkLU (talk) 08:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Unrelated Ivenchiu, 方豔曦 and Naruto16898

Thanks for your straightforward explanation. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 08:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη@el.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Papakostasgiorgos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Giorgoseleftheriadis (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Giorgoseleftheriadis1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Giorgoseleftheriadis2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: [2], [3], [4]

Reason(s): Admin @Kalogeropoulos: has blocked the accounts of two users, falsely claiming that they are mine. I would like it to be confirmed via user check that they have nothing to do with me, in order to restore the rights of the users. Notice also admin @Geraki: ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Comment A new account, created after the blocking of Papakostasgiorgos is ̺Stavrougiorgos, and seems to be related with them. Most likely there is a connection with this case of sockpuppetry (= accounts Giorgoselefteriadis, Stavrougeorgios & Giorgosneris; note that username Giorgoselefteriadis is a variation of Giorgoseleftheriadis, and username Stavrougeorgios a variation of Stavrougiorgos). ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 08:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

PS. There's also another "Giorgoseleftheriadis"-type of account, Giorgoseleftheriadis2. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 08:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

In general, it is not allowed for a user blocked by socks to directly request themselves as the subject of investigation unless it is specifically necessary. If you need to investigate, discuss it locally or ask the admins to request. In this regard, I will hold this request for 3 days, but if there is no consent to the request in the meantime, I will close this request. --Sotiale (talk) 04:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I see...you can check requests from ip but not from accounts!! ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

It seems that some condition(which account) is missing. In any case, I would like your cooperation to process this request. --Sotiale (talk) 05:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Normally, just like Sotiale, I would have declined your request. But there was a need for both a sleeper check on you and the other users listed. Further requests by a blocked user on the wiki should be declined. So without further ado:

Confirmed Kostaselliniadis, Giorgoseleftheriadis2, Papakostasgiorgos, Giorgoseleftheriadis, Giorgoseleftheriadis1

Confirmed Ναυτόπαις, ArkofBuhara, ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη, Sayyid al Shuhada, MartinLutherPing, GiannisZois, HBPEMD

Both groups are Possible to each other. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: Mktsgk (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sdecode (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Sockpuppetry

Reason(s): Similarity in editing pattern, same edit summary and exactly same userpage. Tousif.15 (talk) 13:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

So how about asking the hiwiki admins to block them? Did they reject your request or require you to request checkuser? --Sotiale (talk) 04:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined It's pretty obvious that they are connected. No need for CU here. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Renamed user t9KjM2uN7L (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Mosowai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/852hk#2023年4月7日

Reason(s): After Mosowai got banned from editing, the account 852hk (which renamed to Renamed user t9KjM2uN7L after the local SPI case was posted) resumed editing around the same time. Both users have very high similarity in editing topics (Interaction Timeline, quite hard to find users who have the same interested topics this much in the span of 2 years) with similar beliefs/ideologies (see zh:Special:diff/76264134, which correlates with Mosowai's opinion about the title of the page zh:Special:diff/76147974 despite oppositions that were also outlined later). It is possible that the user has other accounts that are not spotted, and, therefore, a check is requested. Thanks in advance.

\int

（☎） 10:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed FamousPatrick, Renamed user Ql4mD3uV9y8pxH, Renamed user t9KjM2uN7L, Mosowai

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Modern [email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: 185.224.0.62 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 178.247.157.163 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 85.98.17.97 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Modern primat (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): There are no check user in the local project. All 3 ip's voted in favor of my application for interface manager. From the spelling I assume that one or more of them is the user named "Modern primat", but I'm not sure which one or which ones. Modern primat is a banned user from the project and has no right to vote, even as an ip. Mustafa MVC (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

No comment with respect to IP address(es).

Declined for the account, as blocked already on local wiki. No steward is going to take several IP votestacking seriously in deciding permissions. -- Amanda (she/her) 01:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

愛喝奶茶@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 愛喝奶茶 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 凜冽的天空 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/愛喝奶茶

Reason(s): New user (凜冽的天空) removing deletion templates following the older user (愛喝奶茶) in a specific page, and has only overlapping edits with said user. Possible undisclosed sockpuppetry. Luciferian Thomas 01:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Sadly, all I can give is a Confirmed, nothing else. -- Amanda (she/her) 01:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Stalin [email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: 雪莉數位 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 莊麒維 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 澤野螳螂 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Stalin_kzj

Reason(s): Very significant overlapping editing patterns with the sockpuppet group Stalin kzj, yet these editing patterns may also be simply unrelated. A check is requested (and compared with past Stalin kzj sock checks) to see if these are sockpuppets. Luciferian Thomas 01:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

It's a school network. I can't block any ranges they are so large, and I can't confirm who is who because of behavior. My best recommendation is just treat them like vandalism-only accounts. -- Amanda (she/her) 02:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

冏@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Issliapi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Chocola Lala (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); pleaasage (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 恩多力良多 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/冏

Reason(s): These users were identified by the zhwiki community as possible sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:冏, with similar attacking behaviour. A check is requested to confirm their relationship and look for sleepers. Last check on the LTA was all the way back here. Luciferian Thomas 01:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed Issliapi, 喬治盧卡絲, Chocola Lala, DENDEND1998, 元桃園桃花源嚮, 药神小厨师, 斯坦買買提, Keoghpeer, 恩多力良多

Confirmed Pleaasage, Cribssited2003, 阿甜師, 布之火舞, 天气小李子, 一番多鄰國

Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) between the two. They are on the same range, with the same very common UA. Sleeper check extremely difficult on this range. 5000 edits goes back 15 days. -- Amanda (she/her) 02:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

沈佳俞@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: 沈佳俞 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 陳羽湘 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 洪恩採的櫻桃 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 洪恩採老婆 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Fff4416 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 火雞大正咩 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Yaoytu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Yuntaiiiiii (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 陳韶芸 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 金智秀的老婆 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/沈佳俞

Reason(s): Large groups of trolls with the same editing pattern. A check is requested to see if these trolls are controlled by the same user. Note that there are also a large group of IPs that have been found with similar editing patterns, so I am not sure if this check would get something meaningful. Luciferian Thomas 01:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Definitely was worth the check, but the first 4 I looked at all come from completely different ranges. CU is useless. An edit filter might be better here. -- Amanda (she/her) 03:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: 2240676michaldamacmeller (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2211477deekshitha (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); MisterBenelux23 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2211182 Vaishnavi Sampath (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Shyam Parthasarathy 2110492 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2211382vaishnavipsivaram (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Discussed at Village pump / ta.wiki has same policy as en.wiki

Reason(s): Recently same pattern of users edit without any wiki guidance. Almost all of their edits are deleted since there are copy & paste, machine translation, POV, etc. Therefore we would like to know that are they socks who makes vandal. Also, could you cross check if there anymore IDs. I have given just 6 IDs out of dozens. Thanks Antan O 11:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

You only linked to your village pump, not the discussion, but that doesn't really matter here.

Likely Deva2110488, 2240565prathipa, 2210186abhivarshini, Roobesh Amirthalingam, 2240676michaldamacmeller, Ebino thommy, 2240677mithun, 2230316Ebino thommy, 2240284amalajothialpart, SWADHARSHINI N, 2211382vaishnavipsivaram

Likely 2211477deekshitha, Shreya Kaundinya, Shasanth MK 2210184, 2211228 Jaishree Palaniappan, 2230781anurathi, 2240124 JV Baarathi, Suji N 2240138, Nivasini.A 2231376, Nivasini.A, 2211182 Vaishnavi Sampath, Keerthinivashini P, Nihantha M, 2231376 Nivasini.A

The above 2 groups are Possible to each other, along with Shyam Parthasarathy 2110492 individually

Likely to each other, Unrelated to the above: SenorSudamerica24, MisterBenelux23, Adamstown50, DidiMaker

-- Amanda (she/her) 14:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: DefenderTienMinh07 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); TARGET6tidiem (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 103.247.55.83 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 42.118.117.251 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 42.118.157.37 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 220.221.0.84 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 112.68.43.198 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 126.125.99.198 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 126.59.249.49 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 59.27.249.33 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): I request this check for three reasons:

I have been blocked on viwiki for being misunderstood as a sockpuppet of Trieu Thuan Son (i.e. 42.118.117.251; 42.118.157.37; TARGET6tidiem) so that I cannot request a check there.
I might have reverted 5 edits by 103.247.55.83 on the article Chiếu hết (cờ vua) but for some reasons (help readers/editors to find these articles easier), I restored all of these edits then created a lot of redirect pages there, lead these editors 220.221.0.84, 59.27.249.33, 112.68.43.198, 126.125.99.198, 70.95.187.121, 126.59.249.49, 103.247.55.83, 59.27.249.33 vandalize. (see more here: Requests for comment/Sysop abuse on Vietnamese Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Tin nhắn cho bảo quản viên#TTS)
And because of this editor 70.95.187.121, everyone thinks that I am dodging the block to vandalize some articles there. (see: Thảo luận:Tàn cuộc hai Mã (cờ vua)#Xin đừng lùi lại and this revision in Thảo luận:Chiếu hết (cờ vua))

☀DefenderTienMinh☽ (discussion) 18:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined I honestly don't understand why someone who is blocked has no chance to appeal on their talkpage or via email...that seems counter the values Wikipedia implores. But, alas, viwiki has two of it's own community checkusers that you can reach out to for this, either through their meta talkpage or meta email. There is nothing stewards can do about this. -- Amanda (she/her) 20:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)