User contributions for Kiefer.Wolfowitz

1 September 2014

• 23:3723:37, 1 September 2014 diff hist 282 User talk:DanielTom →Prudence: new section

21 August 2014

• 13:4613:46, 21 August 2014 diff hist 1,220 User talk:LilaTretikov (WMF) →WikiWand: Better for Wikiwand to have targeted giving that focuses on supports writers and maintainers of quality articles and that focuses on the problems of exploiting child labor and harboring child predators. The WMF still has not released its up

27 June 2014

• 20:1320:13, 27 June 2014 diff hist 6 m Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Suggested heuristic checks on systematic biases
• 20:1220:12, 27 June 2014 diff hist 921 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Suggested heuristic checks on systematic biases: you examined groups for balance with respect to one covariate. Was this the first time you examined the covariates? Have you examined others? ::In the future, studies should check for covariate balanc
• 19:5919:59, 27 June 2014 diff hist 747 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard non-random assignment to VE or Wikitext: Again, Cox discusses a case where deterministic parity alternation introduced a bias into a study, contrary to your "provided no reasoning". (On the same page, Cox notes tha
• 17:2317:23, 27 June 2014 diff hist 52 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard exposure to VE or Wikitext: strike through erroneous statements, already acknowledged, with editor tools now allowing strike through
• 17:1817:18, 27 June 2014 diff hist 347 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard exposure to VE or Wikitext: I retract my statements "observational" and "not under the control of the researchers", the better to focus on the lack of randomization and since the study does seem to have satisfied co
• 16:2016:20, 27 June 2014 diff hist 709 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard exposure to VE or Wikitext: check rather than assume that associating editors with id numbers by parity was not terrible would be to look at covariates, e.g. browser type, etc. Do the distributions of covariates agr
• 16:0916:09, 27 June 2014 diff hist 2,096 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard exposure to VE or Wikitext: For Cox's book like the previous books I mentioned (Kempthorne, Hinkelmann; Freedman), you may consult the appropriate articles on English Wikipedia (and if stumped try the search functio

26 June 2014

• 11:5311:53, 26 June 2014 diff hist 2,470 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard exposure to VE or Wikitext: my and your opinion of the subjective likelihood of a bias due to your failure to randomize is irrelevant. There is no objective basis for your "unbiased" claim. Textbooks on randomized e

25 June 2014

• 22:0522:05, 25 June 2014 diff hist 711 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard exposure to VE or Wikitext

21 June 2014

• 17:4917:49, 21 June 2014 diff hist 655 Research talk:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Observational study with haphazard exposure to VE or Wikitext: new section
• 17:4517:45, 21 June 2014 diff hist 358 Research:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study →Methods: Clarify that editors haphazardly received id-numbers, which determined their exposure to VE or Wikitext. There was no random assignment or experimental control. These are common mistakes of non-statisticians trying to do experiments.

1 June 2014

• 21:3521:35, 1 June 2014 diff hist 474 User talk:Ottava Rima →Re:: Try addressing points rather than just repeating falsehoods
• 21:2321:23, 1 June 2014 diff hist 392 User talk:M7 →Block of DanielTom: M7, until you apologize for your false accusation of "racist" against DanielTom, you are in a state of mortal sin, at least according to my understanding of the 10 Commandments, which prohibit i.a. making false accusations. Would
• 21:1521:15, 1 June 2014 diff hist 906 User talk:DanielTom →being a racist: M7 OR M/ ::Please remove and apologize for your false accusation of racist behavior.Do you really claim that Italians form a race? [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM&feature=kp Hmmm....]

24 May 2014

• 19:2719:27, 24 May 2014 diff hist 685 User talk:DanielTom →Blocked: block is discussed at [http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=95904#p95904 Wikipediocracy].

18 February 2014

• 18:5618:56, 18 February 2014 diff hist 6 N User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz Created page with "hello." current
• 18:3518:35, 18 February 2014 diff hist 426 Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Risker →{{sr-heading|no}}: release of confidential Arbitration Committee emails,releasing confidential (check-user) information about editor's IP and editing times,
• 17:2017:20, 18 February 2014 diff hist 364 Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Rschen7754 Voted no
• 17:1417:14, 18 February 2014 diff hist 385 Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Meno25 Voted no
• 17:0817:08, 18 February 2014 diff hist 457 Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Risker Voted no

24 August 2013

• 18:4118:41, 24 August 2013 diff hist 347 Requests for comment/Global ban for Ottava Rima →Oppose: {{oppose}} per Beeblebrox(!). Ottava Rima has been reasonable in our limited interactions. He has been victimized by a WMF staffperson who vandalized his user page, according to English Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee, so why pile on?

27 July 2013

• 08:0908:09, 27 July 2013 diff hist 920 N User talk:80.177.10.254 WMF "community liason" and English Wikipedia administrator [http://wikimania2012.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google_Reception&diff=prev&oldid=32745 Oliver Keyes has acknowledged using this account]. Keyes uses also the accounts {{user|Ironholds}} and

9 July 2013

• 23:1623:16, 9 July 2013 diff hist 382 IRC/Guidelines/Public logging →Support: *'''Support''' public logging of Wikipedia and administrator channels and ban on private chats, because of concerns about child protection, canvassing, etc. If IRC cleans up its act, it would attract more productive-contributors, who do not

8 July 2013

• 23:0223:02, 8 July 2013 diff hist 1,570 User talk:Sue Gardner →RFAR: Wikipedia's IRC channels: new section

7 July 2013

• 20:2320:23, 7 July 2013 diff hist 15 Editor Survey 2011/Profiles →2.3 Wikipedia editors are older than believed: anchor age

19 September 2012

• 10:3810:38, 19 September 2012 diff hist 1,717 Talk:List of articles every Wikipedia should have →Philosophers and social scientists: C. S. Peirce, J.S. Mill, B. Russell: new section

18 February 2012

• 16:2816:28, 18 February 2012 diff hist 161 m Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Snowolf Voted yes
• 16:2716:27, 18 February 2012 diff hist 161 m Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Tegel Voted yes
• 16:2416:24, 18 February 2012 diff hist 161 m Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Billinghurst Voted yes
• 16:2216:22, 18 February 2012 diff hist 161 m Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Pundit Voted yes
• 16:2216:22, 18 February 2012 diff hist 161 m Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Nihonjoe Voted yes
• 16:2116:21, 18 February 2012 diff hist 161 m Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/MBisanz Voted yes

16 December 2011

• 14:2714:27, 16 December 2011 diff hist 221 User talk:Vituzzu →ACE2011: Maybe release raw vote totals? We are adults and understand that the numbers will probably change.

11 December 2011

• 13:5113:51, 11 December 2011 diff hist 120 N User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz Please write me on English Wikipedia current
• 13:5013:50, 11 December 2011 diff hist 3,098 User talk:GeoffBrigham (WMF) →Quoted from English Wikipedia: new section