Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2011/votes/Beria

< Stewards | elections 2011
Since my vote page became what you can see now (a war zone) I would like to withdraw now. That will - hopefully - make easier and lessen the huge amount of work awaiting the election committee in a few days! Also, I wish to thank all the people that took the time to support my candidature, especially Hoo, who was the first to believe in me and Tanvir, Darkoneko, Nemo, Galio, Dereckeson, Waldir and Alchimista for been so supportive. Also, many of you seemed interested in our bad situation at portuguese wikipédia, so I'll be glad to answer any others questions about it on my talk page. Thanks again! Béria Lima msg 00:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Warning
English: The 2011 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2011 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2011 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2011 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2011 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد. [update needed: en]
Français : Les élections Steward de 2011 sont terminées. Il n'est plus possible de voter.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2011 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2011. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2011 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2011 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה. [update needed: en]
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el. [update needed: en]
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2011 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2011年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2011 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2011 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2011 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2011 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2011 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2011年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（简体）： 2011年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（繁體）: 2011年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢 [update needed: en]
Tiếng Việt: Cuộc bầu cử tiếp viên năm 2011 đã kết thúc. Không có phiếu bầu nào tiếp tục được chấp nhận.
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2011 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι. [update needed: en]
Türkçe: 2011 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2011 stüard seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha səslər qəbul olunmur.

Beria (Béria Lima)

edit

Beria talk · contribs · SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: pt, en-3, es-2 (also can read fr and it, but i can't write in those languages)
  • Personal info: Hello, my name is Béria Lima, and I’m 25 years old. I started editing on Wikimedia projects in 2007 at the Portuguese Wikipedia, where I was elected sysop in April 2008 and crat and CU in November 2008, until my demotion on April, 2009. Currently I’m autoreviewer and rollbacker on pt.wp. I edit in commons since 2007, and by now I have made over 1000 uploads. I have the flags of filemover and license review there. I’m also a OTRS member, and have editor and reviewer privileges in Portuguese Wikisource. My SUL has 50 000 edits in over 100 projects.

    I have two bots: Lucia Bot, which works only in pt.wiki to do general tasks and Ripchip Bot, who is a interwiki bot.

    I’m a volunteer at Wikimedia Brasil, and member of Wikimedia Portugal’s board. Because of that, I have sysop rights in br.wikimedia.org and wikimedia.pt. Some of my current work in WMPT includes the Iberocoop project. My past work includes being the Fundraising 2010 coordinator for WMPT and for the Wikipedia’s 10th anniversary celebration event in Portugal.

    I decided to put my name as a candidate steward for the community because I have experience in the tools involved in stewards’ work, as well as the resolution of problems associated with vandalism. Also, I am often on IRC, in channels such as #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and #wikimedia-commonsconnect, so I can provide prompt assistance during most of the day. Thanks for your time and consideration.
বাংলা:
bosanski:
Deutsch:
español:
suomi:
français:
  • Langues : pt, en-3, es-2 (also can read fr and it, but i can't write in those languages)
  • Renseignements personnels : Bonjour, mon nom est Béria Lima et j'ai 25 ans. J'ai commencé à éditer sur les projets wikimédiens en 2007 sur la Wikipédia lusophone, où j'ai été élue administratrice en avril 2008 et bureaucrate et CU en novembre 2008, jusqu'à ma rétrogradation en avril 2009. Actuellement, je suis autoreviewer et rollbacker sur pt.wp. Je contribue sur Wikimedia Commons depuis 2007, et ai ainsi réalisé plus de 1000 téléversements. J'ai les statuts de renommeur de fichier et de license review sur ce site. Je suis aussi un membre OTRS, et j'ai les droits d'éditeur et de reviewer sur la Wikisource en portugais. Mon SUL a plus de 50 000 éditions sur plus de 100 projets.

    J'ai deux robots: Lucia Bot, qui travaille seulement sur pt.wiki à faire des tâches générales ; et Ripchip Bot, qui est un bot interwiki.

    Je suis bénévole de Wikimedia Brasil, et membre du board de Wikimedia Portugal. Grâce à cela, j'ai les droits d'administration sur br.wikimedia.org et wikimedia.pt. Une partie de mon travail actuel dans WMPT inclue le projet Iberocoop. Ma tâche précédente consistait à être le coordinateur du Fundraising 2010 pour WMPT et pour la célébration du 10ème anniversaire de Wikipédia au Portugal.

    J'ai décidé de placer mon nom pour une candidature au statut de steward pour la communauté parce que j'ai l'expérience des outils utilisés pour le travail des stewards, comme la résolution des problèmes relatifs au vandalisme. Aussi, je suis souvent sur IRC, dans les chans comme #wikimedia-stewardsconnect et #wikimedia-commonsconnect, donc je peux fournir une assistance prompte pendant la plus grande partie de la journée. Merci pour votre temps et votre considération.
עברית:
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: pt, en-3, es-2 (also can read fr and it, but i can't write in those languages)
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
日本語:
  • 言語: pt, en-3, es-2 (also can read fr and it, but i can't write in those languages)
  • 候補者の情報: 所信はこちら
Nederlands:
português:
  • Línguas: pt, en-3, es-2 (also can read fr and it, but i can't write in those languages)
  • Informações pessoais: Olá, meu nome é Béria Lima, e tenho 25 anos. Começei a editar nos projectos da Wikimedia em 2007 na Wikipédia em português, onde fui eleita administradora em Abril de 2008 e burocrata e checkuser em Novembro de 2008, tendo exercido as funções até a minha desnomeação em Abril de 2009. Actualmente detenho os estatutos de reversora e autorevisora nessa wiki. Também sou editora no Commons, onde edito desde 2007 e tenho mais de 1000 ficheiros carregados, e onde detenho os privilégios de deslocadora de ficheiros e revisora de licenças. Também sou membro da equipa OTRS e editora e revisora no Wikisource em português. A minha conta global conta com mais de 50 mil edições em mais de 100 projectos.

    Eu opero dois bots: a Lucia Bot, que funciona unicamente na pt.wiki para fazer tarefas gerais e o Ripchip Bot, um bot para inclusão de interwikis.

    Também participo como voluntária na Wikimedia Brasil e faço parte dos órgãos sociais da Wikimedia Portugal. Neste sentido, sou administradora na br.wikimedia.org e wikimedia.pt. Entre os meus trabalhos na WMPT estão a participação na Iberocoop, a coordenação da participação da WMPT na Fundraising 2010 e a coordenação das comemorações dos 10 anos da Wikipédia em Portugal.

    Decidi colocar o meu nome à comunidade porque tenho experiência nas várias ferramentas envolvidas no trabalho de steward, assim como da resolução dos problemas relacionados com vandalismo. Além disso, estou com frequência no IRC em canais como #wikimedia-stewardsconnect e #wikimedia-commonsconnect, pelo que posso prestar auxílio rapidamente e durante a maior parte do dia. Obrigada pelo seu tempo e consideração.
русский:
  • Языки: pt, en-3, es-2 (also can read fr and it, but i can't write in those languages)
  • Личная информация: Привет, меня зовут Béria Lima, мне 25 лет. Я начала редактирование в проектах Викимедиа в португальской Википедии, где я была администратором с апреля 2008, бюрократом и чекъюзером с ноября 2008 вплоть до отказа от флагов в апреле 2009. Сейчас я являюсь автопатрулируемым и откатывающим в pt.wp. Я участвую в Викискладе с 2007 года и загрузила более 1000 файлов. Сейчас на Викискладе у меня есть флаги filemover и license review. Я также являюсь OTRS-агентом и имею права editor и reviewer в португальской Викитеке. Моя глобальная учётная запись имеет более 50 000 правок в более чем 100 проектах.

    У меня есть 2 бота: Lucia Bot, который занимается общими задачами только в pt.wiki, и Ripchip Bot, который занимается интервики.

    Я волонтёр Wikimedia Brasil и член правления Wikimedia Portugal. Кроме этого, у меня есть права администратора в br.wikimedia.org и wikimedia.pt. Часть моей работы в WMPT связана с проектом Iberocoop. До этого я была координатором сбора пожертвований для WMPT и для празднования 10-летия Википедии в Португалии.

    Я решила выдвинуть свою кандидатуру, потому что у меня есть опыт использования инструментов, связанных с работой стюардов, и опыт решения проблем, связанных с вандализмом. Кроме того, я часто бываю в IRC на таких каналах, как #wikimedia-stewardsconnect и #wikimedia-commonsconnect, поэтому я могу оказать своевременную помощь в течение большей части дня. Спасибо за ваше время и внимание.
shqip:
  • Gjuha: pt, en-3, es-2 (also can read fr and it, but i can't write in those languages)
  • Informacion personale: Çkemi, emrin im është Béria Lima, dhe jam 25 vjeç. Unë kam filluar të redaktoj në projekte Wikipedia te Wikipedia Portugali, ku isha zgjedhur sysop (operator sisteme) në Prill 2008 dhe burokrat dhe Checkuser (Kontroll përdorës) në Nëntor 2008, deri në uljen e pozitës në Prill 2009. Tashti jam autorecensues dhe rikthues në Wikipedia Portugali. Unë kam redaktuar Commons nga 2007, dhe tashmë kam bërë më shumë se 1000 uploada. Kam flamujt e file lëvizje dhe shqyrtim licencës aty. Gjithashtu jam anëtar të OTRS, dhe kam privilega redaktues dhe recensues në Wikisource Portugali. SUL im ka 50,000 redaktime dhe në më shumë se 100 projekte.

    Kam dy bota (robota): Lucia Bot, që punon vetëm në Wikipedia Portugali në punë të përgjithshëm dhe Ripchip Bot, që është një bot interwiki (Në të gjithë wiki).

    Jam vullnetar në Wikimedia Brazil, dhe anëtar të bordit e Wikimedia Portugali. Për shkak të kësaj, kam privilega sysop (operator sistemash) në br.wikimedia.org dhe wikimedia.pt. Një pjesë e punët e mi në Wikipedia Portugali është projekti Iberocoop. Më parë kam qënë koordinues e fondesh 2010 për Wikipedia Portugali dhe përvjetorin numri 10 e Wikipedia ngjarje në Portugali.

    Unë kam zgjedhur të vëjë emrin në listin e kandidatëve për kujdestarë për komunitetin sepse kam eksperiencë me mjetet në punën e një kujdestarë, gjithashtu në zjidhjen e problemeve lidhur me vandalizmi. Gjithashtu, jam në IRC shumë, në kanale si #wikimedia-stewardsconnect dhe #wikimedia-commonsconnect, kështu unë mund të jap ndihmë të shpejtë gjatë ditës. Faleminderit për kohën dhe vëmendjen tuaj.
српски / srpski:

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2011/Questions#Beria

  Yes

edit
  1. --Hoo man (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --თოგო (D) 00:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Saibo (Δ) 00:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC) trusted, friendly, helpful user with sufficient experience with apparently a strange home wiki community[reply]
  4. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC) I just had good interactions with her.[reply]
  5. -- You go Girl. Theo10011 00:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. - @lestaty discuţie 00:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. — Tanvir • 01:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Note: There is an ArbCom case is going on ptwiki for possible CU abuse of Ruy Pugliesi. Also, they are warring against each other pretty tight. It's quite normal they will try to put the impact here. Sadly, good or bad doesn't matter. And where ptwiki community is saying she is not trusted, but Commons community elected her as one of their trusted administrator with 30 support votes against no oppose. That's also a prove that she is suffering of internal war of ptwiki and trusted enough to be a steward.[reply]
  8. Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Please note that there's an internal war at ptwiki, which basically cuts it in two faction (with Ruy Pugliesi leading the other side). Almost all the oppose below comes from there.
    It should be added that either side won't stop at anything try to destroy the other. (As of now, they have no more bureaucrat/CU/OS and only 36 sysop left). Ptwiki's situation is such a pain, seriously. DarkoNeko 02:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. We need someone who knows the Wiki-pt, to prevent cases like this do not happen again. GRS73 03:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Giro720 04:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. GerardM 05:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Beria is involved in translatewiki, she has demonstrated an interest in several meta subjects.. I love to see her develop further.[reply]
  13. pt.wiki is not the entire wiki-universe. It's sad to admit that after some scrutiny through her activity and after reading Beria's interaction in the "Questions" section I've been convinced. - εΔω 07:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  14. Without a doubt. Good candidate! Laaknor 07:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Jan eissfeldt 08:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  16. No doubt about competence; the internal war on pt.wiki may become a poison for many WMF projects, so I ask to all to check personally Beria's pattern of contributions before taking an (independent) decision in this election. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 08:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Знойная женщина, мечта поэта. / Support. --Обывало 08:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Clerk note : Elligible[reply]
  18. She's interested in meta and crosswiki work and experienced enough; I've never seen anything wrong with her here on Meta; we need to make her presence on IRC more useful (:-p); the local conflict is just a local conflict and anyway the opposers don't seem to bring any compelling reason to think there was some abuse.
    With regard to other questions etc.: I agree with her about the stewards requests from pt.wiki and multilingualism; her reply to Ruy was not so terrible given the context; the mentioned message on foundation-l was straightforward but on-topic and correct; I consider her answers to other questions entirely satisfactory. --Nemo 10:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Competent and dedicated. Hot tempered, yes, but always willing to help those in need. GoEThe 10:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support mickit 11:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support abf /talk to me/ 13:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support Ijon 13:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Per Nemo basically. I trust her to do well. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24. The current topic is the Beria election as steward, nor a collection of Portuguese Wikipedia issues. Furthermore, the stewards usage is to not use their tools on their homewiki. The question to examine in a steward election is "How the community will benefit of this new steward?" I know Beria from the IRC channel #wikimedia-commons where she's active and where she handles translation tasks, doing its part for Portugese and then seeking other contributors to translate to others languages. That shows a concrete, real and beneficial action for the community. We also need more non-English active stewards. So I strongly approve the Beria candidacy. --Dereckson 14:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support per Darkoneko and Dereckson. esby 15:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support The best so far. :) Vini 175 15:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Savhñ 16:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support, she is a valuable and trusted user. My strong support to her. Alex Pereira falaê 16:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Support --Jaba1977 16:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  30. On the basis that stewards do not use their tools on their active projects (ptwiki seems to be causing all the controversy here). I trust the opinions of my fellow voters here. 1ForTheMoney 16:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Have had positive interactions with her and I think Beria will make a valuable steward. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 17:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support --Galio 17:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC). Please take your time to check Beria's contributions and compromise with the Wikimedia movement —at all levels— before being misguided by an unfortunate exploitation of ptwiki's internal disputes. Accusing her of not having enough command of the English language is the clearest example that some appear to be more interested in discrediting Béria —to the poing of questioning her in Italian, because Portuguese was not enough— than in electing stewards with both experience and compromise. Many of us, thankfully, happen to know Béria from outside of ptwiki's wars.[reply]
  33. yes--Nick1915 - all you want 18:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Support 18:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC) I agree with the coments above. Beria is competent and dedicated. Ruy Pugliesi and his group (almost everbody who vote against her from ptwiki) are trying to destroy the candidate (as they did with ptwiki), but I sincerely hope they will not be successful! Nice poa 18:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  35.   Support I had problems with the user in the past, but to me it's overcome. Beria is very committed to the various Wikipedia projects and, therefore, decided to give my vote of confidence.Robertogilnei 18:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC) clerk note : eligible[reply]
  36.   Support --WizardOfOz talk 19:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support & Applaude -- We need more people like her, capable of facing small time wikigangsters without fear. Just knowing she's facing an election like this, knowing what would be said about her, makes her deserving standing ovation. Indech 19:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  38. A trusted user, so sure; why not? Trijnstel 20:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Support …from a contributor to pt-wiki. Cherurbino 09:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Benefit of doubt despite below. Carolmooredc 15:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Support - Leandro Martinez msg 18:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Support--Shizhao 00:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support ⇢ ᴊᴏʜᴀɴɴ   01:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible.
  43.   Support I presume she will be more valuable for the WM wiki, and presume the errors done on PT wiki wont be repeated here. Asr 10:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support--Jusjih 10:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Support - --Zivax 13:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC))...J'ai le droit de voter... - --Zivax 08:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  46.   Support Has experience with sysop, CU tools and cross wiki participation. Was elected sysop on commons with 30 supporting votes and no oppose, so provably the homewiki problems are more related to local internal problems. Alchimista 13:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support - Beria appears to be a more upstanding editor than the opposes make her out to be. Neelix 17:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC) no SUL, but: enwp, m, eligible[reply]
  48.   Strong support --B1mbo 17:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Strong support --George M. 17:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  50.   Strong support Aleposta 21:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  51.   Strong support Absolutely. --Isha 23:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Strong support Dornicke 00:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Beria is a valuable contributor. Feliciomendes 11:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  54.   Support Superzerocool 15:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --Ziko 19:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  56.   Strong support a valuable user. --ebraminiotalk 21:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  57.   Support for her contribution to the off-wiki Wikimedia community, which will be helpful in administering cross-wiki steward duties. --Deryck Chan 13:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Support I've been working closely with Béria, first in pt.wikipedia and now in Wikimedia Portugal, for several years now. Her dedication and commitment to the Wikimedia projects and her activity level throughout dozens of fronts (translatewiki, meta, commons, ptwiki, pt and br chapters, otrs, irc, among many others) are impressive and inspiring. Her temper and straightforwardness often give the impression of harshness, but her heart is always aligned with the best interests of our movement. Through my interactions along my years as a wikimedian, I experienced a personal growth in conflict management and collaboration, and I believe this opportunity will allow her to do so as well and become even more valuable to the community. --Waldir 22:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  59.   Support per Tanvir and Darkoneko Comte0 01:00, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  60.   Support --Kyknos 15:00, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Sympatico 15:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC) Sympatico ineligible to vote. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Support Moral support , issues in past but shiny future Mardetanha talk 19:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Support Good user, she'll make a fine job. Belanidia 19:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  63.   Support --Lucas Nunes 00:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Support --Zeljko 02:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Yes, please. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Strong support Mjbmr Talk 15:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Support Jo Lorib 18:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Burmeister 21:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support Angrense 22:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Vituzzu 23:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  71.   Support For me, she is a valuable and trusted user. My strong support to her, here and anywhere. Mwaldeck msg 14:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  72. per Dereckson Elfix 17:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  73.   Support Mezelf14 16:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Support Odacir Blanco 22:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support I regret you fall victim to local strife. Popo le Chien 07:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  76.   Support I think she'll make a fine steward. Mboehn 19:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  77.   Support She is competent, trusted and well-balanced in opinion from my eyes. --Aphaia 21:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Fuxx 10:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible Ruy Pugliesi◥ 22:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  78.   Support HCa 18:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support. AGK 20:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Sergey Semenovtalk 02:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  81.   Support as I think she is very competent an handles herself very well. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  82.   Support Manuel Anastácio 11:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Soenke Rahn 11:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Elvaube 18:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  85.   Support Yes, handles herself well. And per Ruy e outros abaixo. Shenme 04:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  86.   Support --Econt 12:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  87.   Support As per Saibo & Alchimista. She appears as qualified and reliable candidate despite some hardly comprehensible minor issues in local wiki.— MZaplotnik (contribs) 22:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Silent (Contact) 00:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Strongly Oppose. Reasons: 1. Personal attacks: This user has been blocked on Portuguese Wikipedia (her home wiki) with an expiry time of 3 days due to "personal attacks and misconduct" (After a detailed checkuser result, she remained treating a newbie like a sockpuppet and also offended an account verifier, calling him a "blighter" ["corrupto"], what is a clear violation of "no personal attacks" policy). Later (November 2010), she received this warning from an administrator on Meta-Wiki and had your autopatrolled flag temporarily revoked. In this revison (December 2010), an ArbCom case, she offended an arbitrator, calling him a "cheeky / brazen" ("cara-de-pau"); 2. Constant edit warring on home wiki and misuse of edit summaries: This user is always trying to force edit warrings, by reverting others' revisions without previous discussion on their talk pages and leaving mockeries in the edit summaries. See this history page and this sequence of actions: 1, 2, 3 (personal attack), 4; 3. Misuse of edit summaries to mock and to personally attack administrators on request pages: 1, 2; 4. Misuse of edit summaries at village pump: 1, 2. Furthermore, in this revison (October 2010), at village pump, she called a group of users "cheeky / brazen" ("cara-de-pau"), again. 5. No cross-wiki activity: This user doesn't perform any cross-wiki activity, such as countervandalism/spam. If she doens't fill any criteria even for global rollback or global sysop (no experience), how she could become a steward? 6. Disruptive editing at administrators' request pages: 1, 2; '7. Lack of trust on homewiki: After her "demotion", she asked again for administrator rights, at a later time. As a result, her request became unsucceeded. Nowadays, she is not a trusted user in her homewiki anymore and I sincerely don't think she could be trustworthy enough to become a steward. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 00:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Oppose Per Mr. Ruy Pugliesi. MetalBRasil @ # 00:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Oppose: Per Ruy Pugliesi. Capitão Pirata BruxoTalk page 00:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Oppose Mário Henrique 00:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Strongly Oppose. The user had administrative powers suspended per community order, months after, its administrative powers was removed per community decision. The user also been blocked per political disregard for the project. Received during six months private information of mailing list for CheckUser users via e-mail in total disagreement with the privacy policy of the Wikimedia Foundation. There is also a history of conflict with multiple users. I don't trust in this user. Salamat disc 00:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Strongly Oppose. For the same reasons as above, and also for her opinion about multilingualism and my concern on this issue. CasteloBrancomsg 00:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Strongly oppose. Per Ruy Pugliesi and CasteloBranco. ChristianH 00:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Strongly oppose. She demonstrates lack of fluency in the English language and deficient knowledge of Wikimedia policies (for example: she's tried to delete the talk page of a user who asked for the right to vanish). Furthermore, she is bossy (she is used to say on MSN Messenger that she can decide almost everything on Wikimedia Foundation) and overbearing. Being elected to steward position is a great risk. Tradução: Não sabe inglês, desconhece as políticas do projeto (como por exemplo eliminar as páginas de discussão de um usuário que pediu right to vanish), é autoritária (me disse outro dia no MSN que manda em tudo fora da pt.Wiki) e ainda é muito arrogante. Junius 01:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Strongly oppose, because: 1) prone to trollish behaviour (example, example), which includes 2) unfounded accusations (example, example). For trolling and baseless accusing she was already blocked at her homewiki, and flag suspended on Meta. The user, which is a former checkuser at her homewiki, often shows a 3) worrying lack of knowledge about checkuser and WMF privacy policies, demanding in more than one occasion the release of private and protected information (Example: "Espero os motivos, um por um, para cada verificação"). Adding to this, 4) ethical concerns have been raised when she continued receiving user's private information after she was demoted from checkuser (though she says she never looked into the emails, I find it hard to believe that a daily habit - which would be the case while she was a checkuser - would fade like this overnight). Finally, while there is or was an internal war at pt-wiki, and it's situation is indeed "such a pain, seriously", let's not forget that such war started here on meta and not the other way around. We don't need more stewards which treat Wikimedia projects in such a reckless way, let it be pt-wiki or some other project.--Darwinius 05:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Oppose --Berny68 07:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Very unpleasant impressions from communication in foundation-l--Yaroslav Blanter 08:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Oppose A usuária não tem condições nem de ser eleita administrador na wiki-pt, como que pode ser eleita a cargos maiores que isso? Vitor Mazuco Msg 16:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Oppose Because of that. --Flopy 16:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Oppose VR-Land 16:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Per above[reply]
      Oppose Vitorcostadc 16:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Clerk note : not eligible[reply]
  16.   Oppose Terence 17:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Strongly oppose. I cannot vote for a candidate that has repeatly disseminated distrust, violated WP's conduct code so brazenly that she had to be blocked for it, and doesn't seem to have a minimum knowledge of the English language in order to make herself understood by anyone who requires her help. Sorry, but it's a strong NO, in any election she is involved with, despite not having anything personal against her. RafaAzevedo 17:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I accept it is a "local argument" however it takes two parties to have an argument. --Herby talk thyme 17:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Respectfully. Per Ruy Pugliessi Diego Grez return fire 18:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Oppose - Vinicius Lima 19:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Oppose after having read posts above. Udufruduhu 19:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Oppose —MC10 (T•C•EM) 19:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Davecrosby uk 20:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Oppose - Per concerns raised above. Tiptoety talk 20:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Oppose - Jbribeiro1 21:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Thankfully, I became a registered user at Wiki-pt too late to watch any of these and I regret to see that every one there is now supposedly involved in this so called "war"... Well, I'm not. I just think that someone who wishes to become a steward - better yet, one of the few who speaks portuguese after @lestaty stepped down - should have the trust and support of his homewiki community. Surely this is not the case and neither is Mr. Pugliesi's for that matter...[reply]
  26.   Oppose - --Cbyd 22:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Oppose One year ago you requested bot flag on dewiki and you did never respond to question although notified at homewiki. That's why bot flag was rejected after two month. I prefer people answering and not ignoring question. Merlissimo 23:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Lolsimon 23:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC) too much involved in conflicts.[reply]
  29. Marinna 01:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Eddylandzaat 01:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Vhorvat 02:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jafeluv 10:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Rudko 10:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Skydrinker 12:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Neo139 17:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  36. INS Pirat 17:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  37. 我同意魯伊 Higor Douglas Msg Contrib 19:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Oppose there's just too many complicated interactions that have left various users upset. EdwinHJ 22:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  39. 99of9 01:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Blacklake 06:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Oppose--Anto 10:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Oppose Oppose with a capital "O" -- Gean 14:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  43. rubin16 17:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Strongly OpposeRaphael0,0 22:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC) User who has failed as a manager, Steward is a more powerful position for her! Not eligible.[reply]
  44. --Alex Esp 23:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Oppose--Galazan 09:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  46.   Oppose -- too much controversy QU TalkQu 13:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Oppose It seems like she does not get much support from her home wiki.--Tomo suzuki 20:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Yerauy 23:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC) lot of personal issues, too much controversy, too many complicated interactions. Clerk note : not eligible[reply]
  48. --Holder 08:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. riffic 18:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Per Oppose 1 Tofutwitch11 20:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  51.   Oppose --Gamma127 00:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Oppose Too much concerns on whatever this editor would use Steward Badge as an argument in home wiki: "I'm a good guy because i'm steward, the others are evils". --KrebMarkt 18:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Oppose I think a candidate who has received a lot of opposes from her homewiki should not receive the status. Roberto de Lyra 01:11, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --FollowTheMedia 12:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  55. VIGNERON * discut. 14:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  56.   Oppose Ruy Pugliesi'ye katılıyorum.. --Captain Jones 21:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  57.   Strongly Oppose - Lack of trust, mainly on homewiki, for the following reasons: the use of ironic and/or rough words when contradicted or cornered; arrogant and pedantic behavior; very questionable as sysop, bureaucrat and checkuser in the past — never regained the trust of the community again; persecution and conspiracy mania; vindictive; disguised "good samaritanism" and selective friendship to gain trust among important members from the community; and all that's said by the fellas above. In other words: all that I don't like to see in a steward. Guys! Sorry about my poor english! Spoladore 21:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Oppose Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  59.   Oppose Caiaffa 11:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  60.   Oppose Coelhoscoelho olá 23:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  61.   Oppose - as per Ruy Pugliesi. Temperament and some drama in homewiki. --Visik 01:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Oppose Stewards should be above reproach and the above opposes worry me. WormTT 09:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  63.   Oppose --Emaus 02:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Oppose Per Ruy Pugliesi --Slon02 05:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Primarily because of the questions pages, where she was talking around the questions. Either avoiding or misunderstanding. Vik-Thor 16:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible[reply]
  65.   Oppose Rubicon 12:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Oppose So much personal attacks. Onjacktallcuca 13:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Oppose due to issues relating to pt.wiki discussed on the questions page, and per concerns above Chzz 22:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  68.   Oppose she used to be a really nice admin on Wiki-pt. She's smart and knows well all Wikimedia policies. She could be a goos stewart but she succumbed to the power. She tends to flatter and collude to make her way. Also she uses to bennefit her friends even if they are wrong. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 13:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Oppose Too many concerns raised about this candidate to be able to support her -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. I respect this user but the first oppose above is worrying.  fetchcomms☛ 00:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Keep many power important right in some WMF projects. But a criminal bad at home wiki. Neutral vote --minhhuy*= 01:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    The opposes give me pause. I will revisit this later. 1ForTheMoney 01:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Moved to support. 1ForTheMoney 16:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Per above. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. fr33kman 04:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Not too impressed with the exchange on the questions page. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 04:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 05:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Neutral seems lot of personal issues. -- බිඟුවා සාකච්ඡාව 03:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Neutral Aldo samulo 07:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Neutral Even though I do not know the user, I am impressed by the divided opinions she generated... I can't take sides since I won't have enough time to check if she deserves it or not, however I've read CasteloBranco's sensible comments about multilingualism and I totally agree with him: the Wikipedia projects go way beyond English and the other languages, whether big or small, statal or stateless, dominant or minorized and they should be all respected, treated on the same level and allowed the right to be used freely; if the stewards really want to do their job correctly they are free to find solutions (ask fluent speakers for instance) in order to answer the best they can. Capsot 13:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Neutral --Cekli829 12:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Neutral Roberto de Lyra 01:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Neutral Cant say I can fall in either direction. Marauder09   Long live the thrash Marauder09 17:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Neutral Seems like there were a lot of issues on pt.wikipedia surrounding the user's actions as administrator. --Brandon5485 21:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Neutral Not so obvious to have an opinion on this user. Sounds very motivated, but what happened on her home wiki cannot be ignored. --Floflo 21:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Uncertain. Njaelkies Lea 15:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. The charges against the candidate by Ruy Pugliesi are extremely graves but out-dated (almost all charges have more than two years old). For that reason, I vote neutral. --Demonaire Rai 16:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  16. About 40 users from pt.wiki have voted so far. About half are supporting and half opposing. This, in part, reflects a recent clash there, where we could say Beria and Ruy are in different sides. However, is important to say that most of the voters here have not voted "taking sides", but are following their own convictions, regardless the internal problems of pt.wiki. To me, the candidate fills the basic requisits for the job, maybe better than any lusophone user today. But the behavior of the last steward on the pt.wikipedia community was, im my opinion, disastrous. He did what some users still today calls "semi-intervention" there, mixing advices from other stewards with his own advices, bringing more confusion than solutions. He also came to pt.wikipedia to defend the halt of elections of bureaucrats and checkusers, a weird situation where Beria said a few weeks ago: "what they <<stewards>> are doing is pure "boycott" to requests from pt.wiki to not deal with both of you on meta:SRCU", about the excess of denied requests from pt.wiki. That's why pt.wikipedia is the way it is. I'm afraid that Beria would act the same way, on similar new situations. I could support the candidate if she commits to not act as steward on pt.wikipedia like the previous lusophone steward did, but I believe no one in her position could make such statement. That's why i'm neutral. (And sorry for a possible bad english... =P) Kleiner 13:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment The above diff by Kleiner refers to this.--Darwinius 21:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed. Kleiner 05:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Neutral It's sad, but serious people who really want to contribute to the advancement of Wikipedia should forget the Portuguese language as an option. Lusophone Wikipedia has long become a kind of circus, a "social network" (in the worst sense of the term), ruled by cyberbullies. There are even administrators and bureaucrats blocked ad infinitum by the improper use of sockpuppets (and there is no justified reason for the use of sockpuppets - IMHO). - Al Lemos 17:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment Sad indeed, but not a privilege of Wiki-pt. See, for example, [1] and [2]. Jbribeiro1 11:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Neutral Some of the oopositions above are too much worrying. VonTasha 10:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Neutral -- Neozoon 22:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Neutral -- I'd like to see more cross-wiki work. Portuguese language skills (and bot skills!) are certainly needed, and often a strong background from one's home wiki is enough to demonstrate the mediation and communication skills that are valuable for a steward. However in this case there is enough conflict on that homewiki that a history of work elsewhere matters. Global adminship for a year and some small-wiki monitoring might be a good way to get more experience with a variety of local policies. –SJ · talk | translate 00:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2011/votes/Beria&oldid=20486912"