Steward requests/Checkuser/2022-06

Requests

祖祖祖@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Fashionplease (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

祖祖祖 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/祖祖祖

Reason(s): New user Fashionplease has been targeting user CyrussKK1230 almost since starting editing, and is oddly familiar with LTA:愛莎 as seen in local AIV reports, accusing that CyrussKK1230 (with active SPI case on possibly being LTA:愛莎) is in fact LTA:愛莎, which resembles 祖祖祖 and 愛莎's long term rivalry and targeting each other. Please compare with data is retained from previous checks on 祖祖祖 (if any from these two checks). (It is also understood that there might not be any matches due to the previous checks is so long ago, but a check will still help.) Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 01:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

At least I can't conduct this investigation. @علاء: Could you please check it? --Sotiale (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Insufficient data. Sorry, and please count on behavior --Alaa :)..! 10:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Δημήτρης Στεργιούδης@el.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Δημήτρης Στεργιούδης (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Γατόνι Σ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

ZEN PREMIE (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:el:ΒΠ:Μαριονέτα

Reason(s): A long term abuse about anti-left and sports. He has created many puppets (many of them already blocked). There may be sleepers and accounts with a single edit. C messier (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Ουμαν 1, Nekst, Ekiela, Vasiliki Nansi, Γατόνι Σ, ZEN PREMIE, Γκέκας, Ntako, Olerios, ΜΙΝΛ, Δημήτρης Στεργιούδης, Serafim265, KLMNJ, Goutsie, Frakta, Bantola, Αντώνης ΖΚ, ThIOP, Fatirga, Cicharón, Γιώργος Καλφιόπουλος, Redrigo 14, Kampack, Στέφανος Σ, Aeljno, Isan 00, Μαγιατι, Fernando Lo S, Νίκος Φωκίδα, Kingote, Edo76, Καντιρησ, Artist8888, G77777

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

47gkwkdii (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

L9gptJQlz5v (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Amnidjoetahs99586 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/47gkwkdii

Reason(s): Suspected paid-editing connection between these users based on similar questions on IRC for an ad-like draft article, leading to these accounts. I do not feel like this is a duck and more like meatpuppets or simply co-workers, so a check is requested to check for these users' relationships. --LuciferianThomas 05:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Group 1: 47gkwkdii, L9gptJQlz5v
• Likely Amnidjoetahs99586 and Group 1

---

• They used VPN in some cases.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Ttaajq (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Ttaajq

Reason(s): Specific IP range consistently aiding Ttaajq in edit warring in specific articles. A check is requested to check if Ttaajq has used IP socks (he is currently partially blocked in zhwiki). If found, please block the related IP range. --LuciferianThomas 05:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Ttaajq, FEgHF, Within512

Sorry, I guess I don't have to do what you requested for. As you know.. if IP socking is suspected, semi-protect is recommended to prevent new accounts and IPs from editing. --Sotiale (talk) 02:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Mihai4801 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

MihaiPower3 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Here

Reason(s): These are most likely sockpuppets of Blocau (see Steward requests/Checkuser/2022-05#Claudiu [email protected]) or NonBad (see messages like this). Maybe there are sleeper accounts. --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 12:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Mihai3993, Mihai4801, Mihai4800, MihaiQuote, MihaiPower3, MihaiSource

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Bakhshizada (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

AzeWEB (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Erzuman gia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

MrTaghizade (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Azimoffff (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Elnur Neciyev (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: here

Reason(s): These 2 user accounts have been blocked for violating the rules of the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I think the third account I mentioned belongs to the same person. Lavici (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Could you explain the evidence of their similarity in behavior to support your request? --Sotiale (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, hi. The people on the blocked accounts were doing paid editor and PR, and so they insisted that their unsignificant articles not be deleted. Although the user account is 8 years old, however, the other 2 accounts started to contribute after blocking them respectively. The way they talk in the discussions is exactly the same. Can you check? Thanks. Lavici (talk) 02:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

What does it mean to say that a talk in the discussion is exactly the same? Does that mean they make the same claim on the same pages? Please make your explaination a little more specific. --Sotiale (talk) 02:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, so that is, both of them make the same arguments that the pages they created should not be deleted. In particular, he wrote that I am more experienced than you in these matters. The person on the blocked account said the same thing at the time. And can you check in on account 4? The activity on that account consists only of the AFD page. He always supported the articles that he did not want to delete the other two accounts. The account does not function normally. But that's it. Lavici (talk) 02:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, there is currently an open discussion on Az Wikipedia. The last 2 accounts I added commented that only the article that came in was left. The contributions of these 2 users are mostly on this page. Lavici (talk) 03:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Well, account is still being presented. I will review it again when you finish editing. It would be good to organize which pages the added accounts submitted comments on. For reference, the only accounts that can currently be investigated are Erzuman gia, Elnur Neciyev, and Azimoffff. Other accounts have expired data. --Sotiale (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

In other words, please summarize what similarities they have on AFD. It is too broad to be suspected of being the same user simply because they have the same opinion on AFD. --Sotiale (talk) 03:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, first of all, sorry for the bad english. Maybe that's why I can't explain. Mentioned users do not have normal contributions, they are only on this page. And they express their opinion that it should remain a pole without any arguments. Don't you think this is weird? Lavici (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, I'm worried that there are other accounts as well. Can you perform the necessary actions? Lavici (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your explanation is not enough for me, but based on what you said, I proceeded to investigate, looking for evidence of suspicion. --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Group 1: Erzuman gia, Rizvanoghlu
•  Confirmed Group 2: Elnur Neciyev, Gunay M.E.
• Unrelated Azimoffff

---

• Unrelated Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. This is an investigation based solely on logged data, so whether or not they are the same user should be judged based on their similarity in behavior within azwiki. --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

List of users

Samral (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Lavici (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: here

Reason(s): Hi, Samral is permanently blocked on Turkish Wikipedia. He claims that there was a mistake. Samral has been working on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia for a long time, and his activities are completely different from those of a user who claims to be a sockpuppet. Would you please check his account on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia? He does not object to the checking. Turkmen ^talk 23:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Unless you suspect that two users on azwiki are using sockpuppets, this request should be directed to trwiki checkuser or ombuds. The data on azwiki may be different from the trwiki data judged by the trwiki checkuser, and the only thing we can check is the data comparison of the two accounts on azwiki. If you think there is a problem with their decision, contact them directly, and if you have any doubts about their explanation, file a complaint with the ombuds. --Sotiale (talk) 00:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sotiale hi, these users are mainly active in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. If this is the case, it would be good to know about it in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. Because they participate in joint discussions. This check is also needed for use in other discussions. Turkmen ^talk 17:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

If they have already been confirmed on trwiki, your community may accept it or reject it. If your community believes that the trwiki checkuser result is not valid, you can leave them as they are, without blocking them. It seems you already have a decision on this. If this investigation is necessary, please give specific reasons why you should investigate them on azwiki, and give reasons why you think they are socks. --Sotiale (talk) 08:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Please request again if necessary. --Sotiale (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Indiansingers89799 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

ArijitSinghoffcial (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: here

Reason(s): These users all used similar tones to promote Vikash Rajput on this page w:hi:सदस्य:Vikash Rajput, and their contributions have been deleted. Please check the deletion contributions for more information. But given that the wording of the promotion is not exactly the same and the edits were not very duck-able. We suspected that this might be a puppet behavior, so we are requesting a check, and this request has got the approval of a sysop. --PAVLOV 15:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 08:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

 Confirmed ArijitSinghoffcial = Indiansingers89799

--Alaa :)..! 09:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Chiaoyay (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

LUCfest (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/LUCfest

Reason(s): Users suspicious of sockpuppetry in AFD on article LUCfest 貴人散步音樂節, and local sysop feel uncomfortable with directly ducking the two accounts, so a check is requested on these two accounts. Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 16:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed LUCfest and Chiaoyay

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Mimoo and [email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Mimoo and jiowmoo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rft2ghu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Mimoo_and_jiowmoo

Reason(s): Similar prank-style edits on zhwiki, one converting the Morse code page to Morse code, the other replacing article text with translated text. User 2 sent user 1 a Wikilove message, and local sysops would like to know whether the latter is just a copycat or an actual sock of the former. --LuciferianThomas 16:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Group 1: Qwertyuiosdghjk, Rft2ghu, Fttujk83li, 432wedcvg, Fkigtetqax, Kstreov463, W3ertygh
•  Confirmed Group 2: Pipimi and pipijiow, Mimoo and jiowmoo

---

•  Confirmed Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 21:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Lambocomrade (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Villeum (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Villeum

Reason(s): Both users engaged in image interchanging vandalism, and the images the latter used are those that the former just uploaded to Commons. A check is requested by local admins to confirm their relationship, and check for further sleepers if any. Thanks! --LuciferianThomas 16:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Lambocomrade and Villeum

--Sotiale (talk) 21:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Akishima [email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Akishima Yuka (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Shinohara Chihiro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: v:zh:Wikiversity:管理員佈告板#Akishima Yuka

Reason(s): User Akishima Yuka has recently registered in zhwikiversity and only responded in AFDs for keeping some propaganda material on the project, and is currently blocked for being a single-purpose account. The user has revealed themselves as Shinohara Chihiro's legitimate alternate account on zhwiki, and I recalled a previous check where steward AmandaNP reported that this user has been editing logged out (here). With suspicion on their activities, zhwikiversity would request for a further checking on this user. Thank you. --LuciferianThomas 15:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

While there is no abuse occuring on zh.wikiversity, these two are  Confirmed on zhwiki where their edit timelines overlap. -- Amanda (she/her) 09:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Reported back to zh.wiki community as well. $\int$（☎） 14:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Asiadolls (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

28winning (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Asiadolls

Reason(s): Within 24 hours after Asiadolls's local block, 28winning was created and editing like how Asiadolls behave; I suspect there could be additional sleepers. Please perform a check and let the community know if 28winning is indeed Asiadolls and if there are additional sleepers that would require local sysop action. $\int$（☎） 14:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed 28winning, Asiadolls, Feelsoulgood, Writingfast, Tokyohot

--Sotiale (talk) 11:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Pipimi and [email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Pipimi and pipijiow (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rrtu437 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Kcc02 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Pipimi_and_pipijiow#2022年6月8日

Reason(s): A follow-up request regarding a previous check. Local admin suspected these two accounts are socks for the first account; the accounts are created right before the previous check results reported back to the community (6:27 am the next day after the check is completed, local time. The second account was created on 6:07 am, next day after the check completed, local time). Another sock, which later identified, claims that the third account listed is his or her classmate at school; therefore, local admin also requested for sleeper check and possible blocking IP of the school per zh:WP:CUP#1. $\int$（☎） 15:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Group 1: Kcc02, Kcc0101

---

• Likely Rrtu437 and previous confirmed
• Possible Group 1 and previous confirmed

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Dggdfyhf6477 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Fhshhh6774 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Tommy860119

Reason(s): Tommy860119 socks. Please check per w:zh:WP:CUP#1 for underlying IP ranges in use to extend autoblock due to extensive sockpuppetry and vandalism on Hong Kong transport articles. --LuciferianThomas 01:53, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Dggdfyhf6477, Fhshhh6774, Dfhhufr75478, Jfhfoafa 25244, Dfhfhfjj8 43222, Fyddgggd456357

---

• They used VPN.

--Sotiale (talk) 00:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Bahareza@fa, id, it, lv, ru and Wikidata

Status:    Done

List of users

Bahareza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rantemariana (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

NicoloRaul (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

KirjuxaB (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Shpynov (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Steward_requests/Checkuser/2021-07#MARdF@en,_es,_fr,_hu,_id,_it,_pt,_ro,_zh_and_Wikidata

Reason(s): In 2021 a Checkuser investigation found sockpuppetry among single purpose accounts editing articles linked to it:Prix Versailles across 8 wikipedias. In 2022 single purpose accounts have created new articles in fa, lv and ru and updated id and it. The ru account last edited on 12/03/2022 so it may be stale. TSventon (talk) 21:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

The wikis you provided(fawiki, idwiki, itwiki, ruwiki, wikidatawiki) are where local checkusers exist, so we have to cooperate with them and can't do it ourselves. Therefore, it was set as global, and for convenience, the language code was modified to lv. --Sotiale (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

• Likely(MARdF) KirjuxaB, Bahareza
• Possible(MARdF) NicoloRaul, Rantemariana
• Stale Shpynov

But the hidden account could not be found. I lock them because their behavior patterns is exactly the same. --Sotiale (talk) 00:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Frankou (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Agogo555 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Frankou

Reason(s): Agogo555 used an identically styled signature in the discussion of the same AFD that Frankou participated in. Local sysop pointed out that the signature time and the actual editing time is different, therefore we cannot directly duck as sockpuppetry, and thus a check is requested to see if they are unrelated. Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 16:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Possible -- Amanda (she/her) 20:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

折毛@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

折毛 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

好學的菜鳥 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

湖湘夜市 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/折毛

Reason(s): Chinese Wikipedia user 折毛 is recently found to have created over 200 articles on the project that have been found to be completely made-up hoaxes, and is now indefinitely blocked. Local admins blocked five other accounts apart from the main account, being 折毛猫, 炸毛鸡, 雨木枫华 (these three accounts are probably long Stale) and the two other listed accounts for request. However local community also has concerns on the identification of 好學的菜鳥 as a sock of 折毛, with a major difference being 折毛 and the other accounts uses Simplified Chinese, and 好學的菜鳥 uses Traditional Chinese, yet the tones are similar. A check is requested to confirm on the relationship of these user accounts, and a check for further sleepers is requested to help with further identification of hoax content. Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 15:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

• Likely 折毛, 好學的菜鳥, 湖湘夜市

---

• Since these were edited in public facilities, they may be the same user or users with the same purpose.
• Except for IPs assigned to public facilities, most were IPs used as VPN or Tor exits.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 23:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Ttaajq (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Westdollar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

妍萱 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Ttaajq

Reason(s): Westdollar has similar fanpov edits on w:zh:機智校園生活 as blocked user Ttaajq did before the registration of Westdollar, and 妍萱 started editing on an article that Ttaajq created an hour ago, and in that hour Ttaajq was blocked by local sysop for copyright infringements on Commons. These evidence do point towards sockpuppetry, but is insufficient for a definite conclusion, and thus a check is requested on these user accounts. Thank you! (Note: previous check has been made earlier this month by Sotiale, please check with previous records if needed.) --LuciferianThomas 16:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

 On hold --Sotiale (talk) 23:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

• Possible 妍萱
• Unlikely Westdollar

First of all, the data on zhwiki does not confirm their relationship. AtttttttF who posted the file on commonswiki seems to be Ttaajq's account(based on zhwiki data), but the data held by the two accounts above does not strongly imply that they are the same user. --Sotiale (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

MosiaCinevaOfficial6 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

MosiaCinevaOfficial7 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

MosiaCinevaOfficial8 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

MosiaCinevaOfficial9 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Local policy

Reason(s): LTA sockpuppetry. Maybe there are sleeper accounts. --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 16:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed MosiaCinevaOfficial9, MosiaCinevaOfficial8, MosiaCinevaOfficial7, MosiaCinevaOfficial6, MosiaCinevaOfficial4, MosiaCinevaOfficial2, MosiaCinevaOfficial, VictorSugePulaLuiNGCsiAndrei, VictorBlacusPorcNesimtitJavraTampeet, GikuMaSuge

---

•  Confirmed Mihai4801

@NGC 54: Here you are. --Sotiale (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Subhah Shirin@global

Status:    Done

List of users

Subhah Shirin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rusha Datta Syr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

WIKIYRI (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rita Ora Syr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Both created pages on a non-notable so-called encyclopedia named Wikiyri. Please perform a LWCU as there is no mutual wiki where they all have at least one edit. --NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 17:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Rusha Datta Syr, Subhah Shirin, Shakil Raksam (Chief Boy), WIKIYRI, Zack Kilbi, SORIF B. MAHMUD

All locked as cross-wiki spam. And this should be marked as global(including metawiki, wikidatawiki, etc), not loginwiki. If it's loginwiki, you can't use two of the accounts you provided for investigation. --Sotiale (talk) 23:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Noted that. Thanks! NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 23:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

詹姆斯[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Fanxingtuan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

鲸小鱼儿 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

破隐成锋 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

垃圾清 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/詹姆斯008

Reason(s): Similar PAID editing patterns with this confirmed group on a writer named 陈忱. I don't find these accounts clearly duckable, so a check is requested to see if they are related. --LuciferianThomas 05:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

• Possible 詹姆斯008 and Fanxingtuan
• Unlikely 破隐成锋
• Unrelated 鲸小鱼儿
• Stale 垃圾清

---

• They used VPN.

The technical data gave little evidence to support their relationship. For Possible, I recommend that you make a decision by carefully analyzing their behavior patterns and contributions. --Sotiale (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

NewHenry2022 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

HienProWiki (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: is:Wikipedia:Grímuleikir

Reason(s): Suspected block evasion. NewHenry has similar edit pattern to HienProWiki, editing and creating articles on animated movies. In doing so he adds incorrect information (for example incorrect release dates) in small articles, possibly machine translated. HienProWiki was banned on is.wikipedia for one week and globally locked yesterday. Asking for an CU so I can make an informed decision.--Snævar (talk) 22:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed HienProWiki, NewHenry2022

All locked now. --Sotiale (talk) 01:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

Ttaajq (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Chinet1124 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Ttaajq

Reason(s): Chinet1124 was registered the day after Ttaajq was banned, and made similar edits in matching topics (related to a Taiwanese talent show, a another Taiwanese reality show and COVID Omicron), similar edits including editing an inappropriate template created by Ttaajq, a FANPOV page also created by Ttaajq (both of the above now deleted), and the addition of FANPOV content and removing maintenance templates in w:zh:原子少年Atom Boyz. --LuciferianThomas 23:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Chinet1124 and Ttaajq(2022-06)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 14:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

潔西卡情緒@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

潔西卡情緒 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

C-entwikieditor (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Beryl88701985 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/潔西卡情緒

Reason(s): C-entwikieditor and 潔西卡情緒 both consistently removed sourced content in w:zh:龔俊, and seems to have a continuous editing pattern. There is also Beryl88701985 who also made similar suspicious edits in the article. Please check these users and see if they are related. Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 00:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

• Unlikely 潔西卡情緒 and Beryl88701985
• Unrelated C-entwikieditor

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

List of users

MM0968543904 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

BoronBeryllium (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Professor_John_William_B1234 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Aidneif (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Absbjdjdi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Winkylo8189 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/MM0968543904

Reason(s): SPAs at w:zh:陳君健, and the account that created the article has already been blocked. Please check for the relationship between the users and check if there are underlying accounts. Thanks! --LuciferianThomas 00:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

• Likely Absbjdjdi, MM0968543904, Aidneif
• Unlikely Professor John William B1234, BoronBeryllium
• Unrelated Winkylo8189

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! (This is a test edit for the zhwiki SPI clerk bot, please ignore)--LuciferianThomas 14:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)