Steward requests/Checkuser/2013-04

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in April 2013, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Latest comment: 11 years ago92 comments37 people in discussion

Unypoly@kowiki

Status: Done

List of users: Unypoly (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 레즈큐읭 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 게이큐읭 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 볼라벤 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): It is long-term sockpuppet problem.. At first, please see Steward_requests/Global/2012-09#Global_lock_for_Unypoly and Steward_requests/Global/2012-09#Global_lock_for_Unypoly.27s_more_puppet_accounts. Now, Unypoly insist that someone impersonate him. But same pattern users still appeared and were blocked. I don't know this CU is helpful for revealing anything because He have used proxies and any other computers. Unypoly admit that 레즈큐읭 and 게이큐읭, 광해왕 are his sockpuppets. Final contrib of 광해왕 is stale, therefore I don't put account lists. 볼라벤 is same pattern user who recently blocked. It is past CU information; Steward_requests/Checkuser/2013-01#레즈큐읭@ko.project. Thank you, Sotiale (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

I cannot confirm affinity with Unypoly. However, users 레즈큐읭 and 게이큐읭 seem to be the same. Pundit (talk) 11:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

I already wrote that Unypoly admit 레즈큐읭 and 게이큐읭, 광해왕 are his accounts. As a result, Unypoly is unrelated to other accounts? Also, 볼라벤 is unrelated? Sotiale (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sotiale, I checked again to answer your question.

The following users are

Confirmed to be sockpuppets of Unypoly :

레즈큐읭
게이큐읭
Cycloane

볼라벤 is really

Unlikely to be part of this group. Why is he blocked indefinitely ?

I'll send a message on the CU mailing list very soon to know if this is a crosswiki issue or not. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 13:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Because 볼라벤's editing pattern and behavior(on requests and discussions) is very likely. I'm not sure 볼라벤 is impersonate Unypoly, but it is worth consideration. Thank you for helping! Sotiale (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Saulchristie @ most/if not all/English projects

Status: Not done

List of users: Saulchristie (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: This was over IRC, more below

Reason(s): The deal with this user is that they put code on their JS pages over multiple wikis in English that allows them a button to, basically, become an open proxy for someone who wants to use a proxy. This wouldn't normally be a problem, as most open proxy IPs are in databases eventually, but me and a few others weren't sure on the reliability of those databases on picking up on these private IPs used as flash-proxies as they're called. This isn't a request to release the IP of the user, but just to check the IP, and the dynamicness thereof, and the possibilities (if any are found) that it is in fact being used as an open proxy. I was advised to come here by Mentifisto after a discussion in -stewards. Any questions, feel free to ask (a ping on either IRC or my enwp talkpage would be helpful) here :) Gwickwire (talk) 04:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

All English projects except Wikiversity have local checkusers. Please, ask them. Ruslik (talk) 06:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I was told to ask here because this would possibly result in a lock or some other manner of sanctions/"punishment" for lack of better words for this user in question, across all WMF projects. A steward would be the only one that would have access to the CU data across all English wikis (as far as I'm aware, there aren't any cross wiki checkusers). Thanks, however. Gwickwire (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

HRO'Neill @ en and pt.wiki

Status: Not done

List of users: HRO'Neill (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); G.-M. Cupertino (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): en:User:G.-M._Cupertino is a known sockpuppeteer at english wikipedia, blocked permanently after a long history of block evasion, harassment and editwarring. I have strong reasons to believe he moved to portuguese wikipedia after his ban at en.wiki, and is editing there under the account HRO'Neill and two static IP addresses (193.136.149.253 and 195.245.149.70).

HRO'Neill behaviour at pt.wiki is exactly the same as G.-M._Cupertino and his socks at en.wiki. Constant refusal to comply with editing policy, harassment and uncivility. But the main reason for suspicion is that both Cupertino and HRO'Neill/IP do the exact same pattern of edits. Random examples both at en and pt.wiki from different socos: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Mostly, genealogical data in allegedly "noble" families biografies. Although some of the edits violate the BLP policy, the block reasons are mostly related to constant harassment to those who dare to oppose him or his IP addresses and edit warring.

Both his HRO'Neill account and the IP addresses are constantly being blocked for minor incidents. He claims that IPs and Cupertino are just his "friends". However, it would be extremelly important to be sure that IPs do belong to him and are being used to avoid edit warring sanctions or a more severe sanction. As this is a cross-wiki issue I'm reporting here. Polyethylen (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Polyethylen, thank you for reporting this. As stewards we're not allowed to do checkuser investigations like this at the English and Portuguese Wikipedia's, because these wiki's already have local checkusers, who should be able to take care of your request. I will send an e-mail to the checkuser mailing list, because the data might be useful for stewards since this is possibly a cross-wiki issue, but I'd recommend requesting the checkuser investigations locally anyway. Please let me know if you have any questions. Kind regards, Mathonius (talk) 18:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Ameba [email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Ameba parasit (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Adakah aku UMNO (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dedaun masa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Pakatan Hebat 2013 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sabah pantat pukimak (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Nurulizzah2013 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Anwar Ibrahim2013 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Musimelection001 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Panasaran di hari mengundi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Pancungdayung (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): I suspected they are same people because they always said about politics and attack other people like Aurora and Yosri. Look at their contributions in ms.wiki. I hope you can help me because I, Ranking Update and Irfanshaharuddin suspected they are the same person. You may look there as a prove [7], [8] and [9]--法尔汉 Aplikasi 08:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed Mrsuperb, Ameba parasit, Kukukakiku, Dedaun masa, Coklatbasi, Aku cunla, Anakjebat, Adakah aku UMNO, Panasaran di hari mengundi, Kucingbiru13, Sabah pantat pukimak, Nurulizzah2013 and Pancungdayung. Probable for Pakatan Hebat 2013 and Anwar Ibrahim2013.
Confirmed Dikirbaratpahang, Musimelection001 and Daily update

The two groups seem unconnected to each other QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for helping.--法尔汉 Aplikasi 10:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I request to using global block to block all these account in group 1 because there used another account for politic and attack another people.--法尔汉 Aplikasi 10:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

We won't global lock an account for abuse on a single project. Decisions on which (if any accounts) to block need to be taken locally on mswiki QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, btw thanks for help me to identified these abuse accounts.--法尔汉 Aplikasi 09:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Steward requests/Checkuser/2013-04

Requests

Unypoly@kowiki

Saulchristie @ most/if not all/English projects

HRO'Neill @ en and pt.wiki

Ameba [email protected]

فلورانس@fa.wikipedia

Spambots on MediaWiki.org

Texugo on pt-wy